Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of media censorship
Censorship vs freedom of expression
Negative effects of censorship in media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of media censorship
Chapter 1: Introduction
Context 1.1
Real news feeds the globalized world like no other modern industry. It is a source of information that citizens cannot help but adopt as the “truth”. The truth in the media is sometimes altered to become less offence to its audience. This relates to the ethics of taste and decency.
“The whole topic of taste and decency is fraught with controversy. This is an area of free expression which, in a free society sends up warning signals quicker than anything else.”(Chris Frost, 2009. 166).
In this quote Frost alludes the meaning of taste and decency which is what is known as a limit on freedom of expression for journalists. It’s an area that covers issues such as sex, nudity and violence explicit pictorial or video images and is a particular concern on broadcasters, newspapers and magazines.
However the topic has become questionable, whether or not the media are using taste and decency concerns as an escape route to censorship. It has become a debate and discussion on how journalists uphold standards of taste and decency that then probably become a case of censorship.
With on-going issues around the world that are being portrayed in images and video on war and suffering and other raised issues of taste and decency like violence and sex; protecting the audience is what is debated. Is it right to portray explicit or graphic images in the media?
In the literature review I will attempt to present concrete insight into whether or not the media are protecting the public and maintaining taste and decency standards or using censorship to hide information. This is where I will look at a selection of news stories that illustrate the concern of taste and decency it will explore how the and why the media...
... middle of paper ...
...derstanding of the crisis Moller (1999).
However the price of censorship should come with a question of whether it hinders freedom of speech. Former London bureau chief for Reuters Jodie Ginsburg stated,
"Defending freedom of expression is not an easy task but it is a vital one. If we want to live in a world where everyone is free to speak, write, publish or perform without fear of persecution then we need to champion those rights every day. (Social Media And It’s War on Censorship; 2012).
Chapter 3: Methodology
As mentioned in my introduction the aim of this paper is to In this chapter I will review and evaluate the different methods and studies I have conducted and researched in. I will investigate examples of how common censorship is presented in the media. So I far I have tended to focus on the reporting of death and violence and how it can cause offence.
The mass media has an essential role in today’s society as a channel of valuable information. Lots of people rely on media as the epicenter of information and as the yardstick on which they form their decisions and opinions (Agner, 1999). Any selection of messages in the mass media would have a profound impact on the entire society, this is according to Cultural selection theory. In the short story “Gray Noise”, Rojo uses this story to express his annoyance toward technology, but more specifically his most effective critic is on how society has overpowered valuable news with “dramaturgically crafted news” (Vettehen) and competition while desensitizing their viewers. Since competition has also stiffened up in are of mass media as the attention of readers, TV-viewers and listeners are fought for by every journalist. For this reason, every news media has turned to other strategies such as scandal-mongering and entertainment as tools of making a profit since a large audience is assured of such news even if they are not correct. Rojo’s views on critics of technology are widely shared among many people including the authors of the following studies, “Research Note: Sensationalism in Dutch Current Affairs Programmes by Paul Hendriks Vettehen
In “Reporting the News” by George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Robert L. Lineberry, the main idea is how the media determines what to air, where to get said stories that will air, how the media presents the news, and the medias effect on the general public. “Reporting The News” is a very strong and detailed article. The authors’ purpose is to inform the readers of what goes on in the news media. This can be inferred by the authors’ tone. The authors’ overall tone is critical of the topics that are covered. The tone can be determined by the authors’ strong use of transitions, specific examples, and phrases or words that indicate analysis. To summarize, first, the authors’ indicate that the media chooses its stories that will air
Creating a safe space is more important for some rather than others. In “The Hell You Say” by Kelefa Sanneh for The New Yorker, he provides an interesting look at the views of Americans who support censorship of speech and those who are completely against it. Another issue I gathered from his article was that people use their right to free speech in wrong ways and end up harassing people. Providing two sides of a controversial debate, his article makes us think of which side we are on. So, whether or not censorship should be enforced; and how the argument for free speech is not always for the right reason, Sanneh explores this with us.
The case, R. v. Keegstra, constructs a framework concerning whether the freedom of expression should be upheld in a democratic society, even wh...
Peter, Sagal. “Should There Be Limits on Freedom of Speech?” 25 March. 2013. PSB. PBS.com 14 Nov.
Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”. Although this amendment gave people the right express thier opinions, it still rests in one’s own hands as how far they will go to exercise that right of freedom of speech.
Showing various different images on media forms like television is prevalent. However, it is seldom that a picture showing violence is openly displayed on screens. Such an idea is justified by saying that graphic images are sensitive and horrifying to see, but it is often not mentioned that not presenting such images itself is unfair. It is unjust for the public to remain in the dark, from the truth of life. Images only show what the truth is and hiding that would be wrong for every individual. "Death happens to be one of life's main events. And it is irresponsible and more than that, inaccurate for news papers to fail to show it..." (Source A). This suggests how no matter how many pictures or images are censored, the horrifying and 'sensitive' conditions will continue to exist, so what is the point of hiding it? In fact, by openly displaying such photographs, the viewers only learn more. They will get to fully understand the processes of life and what
The term "censorship" originates from the Latin censere, "to give as one's opinion, to assess" (Culture Shock: Who Decides? How and Why?: Definitions of Censorship). In contrast to this seemingly simple definition, contemporary usage offers no agreed-upon definition of the term or its' appropriate usage, most specifically concerning the highly conteste...
Freedom of speech is the right of civilians to openly express their opinions without constant interference by the government. For the last few years, the limitations and regulations on freedom of speech have constantly increased. This right is limited by use of expression to provoke violence or illegal activities, libel and slander, obscene material, and proper setting. These limitations may appear to be justified, however who decides what is obscene and inappropriate or when it is the wrong time or place? To have so many limits and regulations on freedom of speech is somewhat unnecessary. It is understood that some things are not meant to be said in public due to terrorist attacks and other violent acts against our government, but everything should not be seen as a threat. Some people prefer to express themselves angrily or profanely, and as long as it causes no har...
Taylor, Charles. "Censorship is Not an Effective Way to Protect Children." n.d. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 8 April 2012.
In a world in which acts of heinous violence, murder or crude and shocking behavior seem to be a normal occurrence, it may lead one to wonder what has put society onto this slippery slope. How did this type of behavior come to be so acceptable and in some cases glorifiable? A careful study of society may lead to multi media as being the main cause in this changing of ideals. The modern world has become desensitized to the acts shown on television, movies, video games or printed in newspapers and magazines. Censorship must be employed if morals and decency are to be preserved.
Exercising the freedom of speech has two sides: the speaker and the listener. Censorship is unfair to both sides. When it takes away the speaker’s Constitutional freedom of expression, it simultaneously revokes the listener’s right to develop an informed opinion based on unobstructed truth. This opinion has been supported by the courts. In 1982, an informal agreement between several broadcasters from major media outlets known as the Code of Broadcaster Conduct, which banned “depictions of sexual encounters, violence and drug use, as well as excessive advertising,” was nullified because it was a violation of First Amendment rights (“Broadcast Decency”). Excessive censorship is viewed as unnecessary by both the American public and by the government that endorses it.
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
"Censorship and Freedom of Information." Issues and Controversies. Facts on File, n.d. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
It is the year 2014. The growth and advancement in technology and innovation lead to the birth of new channels of media. Back tracking to the 1950s, the primary source of media would have been printed such as newspapers, articles and magazines. The introduction of the televisions and cinemas in the late 20th century resulted in the production of masterpieces such as movies and dramas alike. Currently, the internet is the unified source for all kinds of media which gives allows us to freely express and exhibit our perspectives and ideas. On the other hand, this revolution in the media industry saw the production of certain media that are unsuitable for certain audiences. Thus, government bodies such as Malaysia’s Multimedia and Communication Commission are set up to selectively evaluate and censor contents to ensure that media would not be harmful to the public. Therefore, this essay strives to prove that censorship is sometimes justified.