Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do strategies to reduce crime help
Strategies gang prevention efforts
Ways police reduce gang activity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How do strategies to reduce crime help
I can remember coming home one night to gun shots, just like every other night but this night was different; it struck a nerve with me, I began to look around and noticed the state of my neighborhood. I was thinking to myself, there has to be something that can be done, there has to be some way to take care of our neighborhood. Thinking of different ideas and doing research of different communities, I came with some ideas of how this can be done. Most neighborhoods stick together during terrible situations, have community meetings, and volunteer to clean up the neighborhood. The term “don’t snitch” is the reason violence in my neighborhood is the way it is; letting go of not being a “snitch” and standing up to the people who are committing …show more content…
horrific acts will help the people stand together and not be afraid to leave their homes. That feeling of peace and not having anything we are afraid of will motivate people to not be afraid to attend meetings and give their ideas of how the neighborhood will improve, information I found on communitytoolbox.com shows most people in neighborhoods have very affective ideas on improving their neighborhoods. Volunteer work will be needed to get everything working effectively, the ideas of the community can’t all be done by the government or can be waited for the city to take action, that action has to come from the community itself. Volunteer work is what will make everything come together, the people of the community have to be the ones to go out and make the changes happen. Once all of this can be put together we will have a cleaner neighborhood and an effective system to take care of it. Sticking together during though situations is what really makes a neighborhood strong and keeps the people together.
In the neighborhood I grew up in everyone is afraid of coming out and telling authorities what they saw was happening in the community, this is known as "snitching". People are usually afraid of being labeled a "snitch" because once word gets around of whom was the person to go forth to the authority’s that person now has to be afraid of retaliation on his/her life and the safety of his/her family. That would not be a problem once everyone in the neighborhood gets the courage to stick together and work with authorities; getting rid of the idea that speaking up is not the way to be safe in your own neighborhood. The fear of talking to authorities also has to do with what’s been going on all over the news and social media; all the images and videos of police brutality and police abusing power to get away with anything including murder; getting to know that not all police officers are the same and will not try to hurt them will be a critical step in getting people from our neighborhoods not only to speak up when seeing something wrong but also not being afraid of the authority figure they are speaking to. Tackling this small step, I believe will be a great start in cleaning up our community and taking care of …show more content…
it. Having community meetings would be the second effective step to make when trying to take care of our neighborhood.
My neighborhood and many other neighborhoods do not offer a neighborhood meeting. Having an effective meeting can help neighbors know what to look out for, what is a bad trend that is affecting the integrity of the neighborhood, and what area need the most eyes and hands to keep that area and the neighborhood clean. For my neighborhood, going back to my earlier thought in stocking together; it would work hand in hand with neighborhood meetings, once again the mind-set of protecting yourself by not saying a word is an obstacle that is stopping my neighborhood from having these meeting. I believe once it is taken care of the people from the neighborhood will not be afraid to attend these meetings and not only listen to what needs to be improved but also offer insights on what needs to be done and what area they feel need the most help. Neighborhood meeting are vital in taking care of the neighborhood but also creating bonds between neighbors that will make for a far more comfortable and safe
neighborhood.
Policing is a very difficult, complex and dynamic field of endeavor that is always evolves as hard lessons teach us what we need to know about what works and what don’t work. There are three different Era’s in America’s policing: The Political Era, The Reform Era, and The Community Problem Solving Era. A lot has changed in the way that policing works over the years in the United States.
When help presented itself, many of the people at least made an effort to change and realize that violence was not the answer. The amount of people that are shot and killed in Chicago is a surprising number. Many of the violence does not come from someone necessarily being a bad person, but someone who is unwilling to back down from any situation (Kotlowitz, 2012). In Chicago many believe that “death before dishonor” is a good motto to live life by (Kotlowitz, 2012). The funerals that people attend are just a reminder to them, that one day the way they live their lives on the street will catch up to them (Kotlowitz, 2012). The violence interrupters are working hard in Chicago to help the people in the society, but if people do not want to change it is hard to make a difference (Kotlowitz, 2012). The people in Chicago also have to put in the work to make the community a better place, so that they feel safe leaving their houses instead of feeling like “every time [they] go outside somebody is going to get killed” (Kotlowitz,
Looking back at the number of homicides in the city of San Jose, CA for the year 2000 it was 20, then there was an average increase of 8 murders per year for the next 8 years. Then in 2010, despite a population increase of over one hundred thousand people, there were only 20 murders in the city of San Jose. Now in 2011, up to the month of July, there have been 26 homicides, which means based upon the current rate San Jose is on track to have more than 50 homicides in 2011, which would theoretically be over a two decade maximum. Now despite having lived in a small town, I consider San Jose as a home away from home because I go there often. I have had a job there and my dad has worked in San Jose for 28 years. In 2009 the San Jose area was rated as the seventh safest area in the country and when that happened it made me feel thankful that my family and I have lived in such a safe area. Yet nowadays it seems like I have been reading about a different murder every week, which has caused me to ask many questions about the possible causes of this rise in murders. From the research I have done, the cause seems to be a rise in gang violence and rival gang murders. In San Jose, the two rival gangs, Norteños and Sureños, have begun to be bolder with their killings as shown with the already high and rising murder rate of 2011. Solutions must be determined in conjunction with the San Jose Police Department and governmental gang task forces to establish the best course of action to stop the continuing rise in violence (Associated Press).
In order for the police to successfully prevent crimes, public cooperation is needed. Various community policing programs have been implemented and it is important to discuss the benefits and limitations of these programs. Community policing allows the community to be actively involved and become a partner in promoting safety. This partnership increases trust of police officers and helps citizens understand that the police are on their side and want to improve their quality of life (Ferreira, 1996). The role of the police officers goes beyond that of a “crime fighter” and expands to multiple roles including that of a victim-centered
The authors analyzed data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN), dividing the communities into neighborhood clusters (NCs) based on census indicators and geographical continuity. The residents were interviewed in their homes as part of the community survey and their responses were categorized into indicators and measures such as concentrated disadvantage, immigrant concentration, residential stability, social cohesion and trust, and informal social control (the latter two combined to form ‘collective efficacy’). Multilevel statistical models were then created with these and several other predictor variables. The primary results found here were that collective efficacy, defined as “social cohesion among neighbors combined with their willingness to intervene on behalf of the common good”, was negatively associated with violence and acted as a mediator between the association of concentrated disadvantage and residential instability, with violence. Even with the stated limitations that the analysis was cross-sectional and no causal relationship was proven, the simple message that comes forth from this study is that there is less likelihood of violence and crime in neighborhoods where the residents have better social ...
The dramatic increase of gun violence in Chicago has many questioning the effectiveness of state policies and police tactics. For many Chicagoans, gun violence is a common occurrence and this would not be the first time in which a big spike has been observed. In fact, Chicago was doing well overall in each crime category until recently in 2016, when they ended the year with 762 homicides victims that were gun related. Towards the end of 2016, Rahm Emanuel, mayor of Chicago, had a press conference with the communities at the Malcom X College. He goes into detail of how he hopes to see a sharp decline on the heavy issue of gun violence surrounding their city. It’s an issue in which the mayor says will only work through a combined effort of its
Snitching, does it really work for Americans? Some people believe that snitching can work to improve the quality of life in some communities. While others believe that snitching will tear families apart. Bill Maxwell writer of “Start Snitching” has a view that low-income neighborhoods can benefit if more people started snitching. On the other hand Alexandra Natapoff writer of “Bait and Snitch: The High Cost Of Snitching For Law Enforcement,” opinion is that law enforcement needs to change the way they handle snitches. Both Maxwell and Natapoff have views that can change the way we look at snitching.
We must take actions to reform police behavior! The problem is not the police nor the people of the United States, but the Federal Government system in which we all have to abide by. In order for a police reform to be implemented, the system has to be fixed and reconstructed. The people of the United States want to feel protected by the police, but on the other hand, they receive limited training on how to effectively interact with the people in the community they serve. Police officers are ordained by the power of the government. Police reform should start by giving proper training to new recruits and veterans, enforcing community policing and police accountability.
In the article "snitch culture comes to Canada," written by George Jonas, explains how snitches were and currently are praised and criticized through the years. Meanwhile, the Canada revenue agency had started an open telephone line so neighbours can tattle on others for wrong doings they have assumed. In fact, many states in the past heavily relied on snitches to be there eyes and ears, for example being a snitch for the Ussr was something to be proud of. Opposite of the Ussr, individuals like Falcone killed his son for snitching, this always leaves a dark stain on families honour. Although, with our snitch culture we praise people who risk their lives to bring in criminals but when they do the same for political stances they are in the
It may be impossible to determine what the one incident was that caused the police officers to fear for their lives, especially when in minority areas. The one way to solve the problem, however, is to ensure that future generations will not inherit the same animosities and fears from their forebears. How then can this be made possible? The majority of everyone's preconceptions are firmed at a young age. Children are very impressionable, and will imitate most of the adult behaviors that they see around them. Currently, with all of the news stories and protests being broadcast that show blatant attacks on police officers, a child will no doubt pick up on the hate and spitefulness that is being thrown from the citizens to the police. There is no doubt this is teaching them to hate.
Growing up in Brooklyn, NY I keenly became aware that in my own neighborhood there were educational disparities, street violence, and police brutality. Due to the widespread presence of these issues while walking home from school or going grocery shopping with my mother, I also learned there was internal conflict between the people that lived in the community and those who were appointed to represent them- the congressional representative of my district. My premature awareness of these issues caused me to question who had the ability to solve the problems of my community? I discovered that the television show “Law and Order” offered a possible answer. As the youngest child of my household, my older siblings affinity for the show naturally steered
Many communities have been the victim of many gangs moving into their once safe neighborhood, causing major downfalls and preventing the citizens from living their daily lives in peace. Guarino elaborates how Chicago still outpaces other big American cities in crime rates due to gang violence (Guarino1). There’s a lot of given reasons to why there is much gang violence in the city but the solutions are not as prominent. In the article, “Chicago Tactics Put Major Dent in Killing Trend” written by Monica Davey, she goes on to explain, “that more than 500 people were killed in Chicago in one year, many of them young men shot to death amid the hundreds of gangs that flourish in Chicago neighborhoods” (Davey). Davey continues on to say that in recent months, police officers have been working overtime and dispatched to 20 small zones that are considered the most dangerous in Chicago (Davey). Due to the high activity of police activity, Chicago homicides and gang violence have declined.
There are many different ways of policing in the 21st century and all address and apply different theories and ideas to try and control the crime this day in age. One of these methods is called community policing and many law enforcement agencies around our country and the world use it as a model for policing and interacting with communities. Community policing is based on the belief that policing agencies should partner with communities with the goals to prevent or reduce the amount of crime in those areas (Pollock, 2012 p. 99). There are 3 main aspects of community policing that I will talk about in this paper and they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. After hearing about the
To conclude, Community policing represents a major development in the history of American law enforcement, but the extent to which this approach is a success and dominates contemporary policing remains a source of debate. In my point of view, community policing is good for communities. It has challenged the traditional concept of the police as crime-fighters by drawing attention to the complexities of the police role and function. In addition to the police officer hard work; citizens can also make a difference and contribute to make neighborhoods a better place to live. For instance, citizens can hold community meetings to talk about concerns and agree on solutions help organize healthy activities for children in your neighborhood, join or starting a neighborhood crime watch program, and talk to your community police officers and share information and concerns.
You can’t turn on the television, or read the paper without hearing about violence in our cities and world. In a report from “Stand Up for Kids” in Chicago, they analyze the relationship between low wages, income inequality, and the epidemic of violence in Chicago’s low income neighborhoods. This report found that in 2012 there were nearly 7,700 gun-related crimes reported in the city. The city of Chicago has the third highest overall metropolitan poverty rate in the nation. Nearly one quarter of all Chicago residents live below the federal poverty threshold according to this report. ("Chicago Not Only Leads the Nation in Gun Violence Rates, but Also in Measures of Urban Poverty." Stand Up Chicago, 1 Feb. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.) Decades of research have demonstrated that there is a statistically significant link between low wages, income inequality and crime. The analysis presented in this report shows that when a city’s economic conditions improve, the violent crime rates go down.( "Chicago Not Only Leads the Nation in Gun Violence Rates, but Also in Measures of Urban Poverty." Stand Up Chicago, 1 Feb. 2013. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.) Parents and children are turning to violent acts to provide for their family needs. Policy makers and the government need to address the issues of persistent poverty and income inequality such as raising the minimum wage to a living wage and create satisfying jobs for the