Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of fair compensation
Fair And Equitable Compensation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of fair compensation
Fair and equitable compensation is an important concern for all employers. To attract and retain employees, organizations must have an adequate compensation and benefits program in place. Employers go to great lengths in developing a compensation program so employees feel appreciated in the work they are performing. Job analysis and market studies are conducted regularly to compare competitor’s compensation and benefits programs. These studies ensure equivalency in pay by the job being performed, as well as paying skilled employees adequately. The number one reason why employees leave companies is because they think they are underpaid. When employees know without a shadow of doubt that they are being paid fairly, they are more …show more content…
Employees must believe that all jobs are paid what they are worth. And that the employee must be confident that the company pay rates reflect the overall importance of each person’s job to the success of the organization. Some jobs afford a greater opportunity than others to contribute, those holding such jobs should receive greater pay. A job’s worth is typically assessed through a systematic process known as job evaluation. Job evaluations ratings focus on the requirements of the job rather than on the performance of the individual jobholder. The most common approach is the point-factor method to evaluate on compensable factors that represent the most important determinants of job’s worth. Job descriptions are used to rate each job, one factor at a time until all jobs have been evaluated on all factors. ((Reference for
Compensation is made of a base salary (paid by the hour, work or the year; excluding overtime or bonuses), variable pay (bonuses, profit sharing/stock options which work hand and hand with the performance of the company), and benefits (to include health insurance/savings plans – 401(k), or tuition reimbursement). The traditional way of determining base pay for jobs was to compare jobs in the same industry. Now industry and market, no long work by themselves, the current thinking is more person-based that considers knowledge, skills, and competencies of the work. This, however, is best suited for high-performing environments that remain flexible in their deployment of human capital.
Verizon Wireless may be losing at least one competitive advantage as a result of lack of knowledge about how employee benefits packages in the wireless industry compare. Studies have shown that valuable employees and top talent candidates are highly influenced by employee benefits packages considered to be good (Paterson, 2013). The leadership team’s determination and call for organizational growth, translates to both retaining current employees and enticing new candidates to join, an area in which a top employee benefits package is a major contributor. With this consideration, and factoring in the problem of a lack of updated information, it was determined that there was a critical need for a current benefits package comparison. The investigative steps necessary for this analysis for this Capstone Project were found in Section III, and this subsequent chapter, Section IV, submits those findings.
The result of this process is a job description “that includes the job title, a summary of the job tasks, a list of the essential tasks and responsibilities, and a description of the work context “(Burke, 2008). A job description consists of the knowledge, skills, and aptitudes necessary to do the job. A job evaluation is the process of adjudicating the comparative value of a job within a company (Burke, 2008).
Deciding which pay form to use when compensating employees is extremely important to a company. Many things are taken into consideration: labor costs, the correlation between performance and pay, customer service, and the ability to attract and retain employees which is extremely important to FastCat’s need for innovation. We believe a single pay structure coincides with our single based plan for the organization. We want to keep things simple and understandable to all areas of the organization. This strategy will allow employees to understand how their performance and the performance of others relate to the success of the company through specific measures. It is also important that the strategies align with the objectives of FastCat. We beli...
In April 2010, KK BB, the CEO of Marshall & Gordon, a leading public relations firm met with the firm’s leadership committee off-site in Miami. This off-site brought together Marshall & Gordon’s executive committee, practice and regional heads, and senior HR officers to discuss on redesigning the firm’s compensation system. A global advisory taskforce, under the direction of an external consulting firm, had spent three months collecting and analyzing data. Marshall & Gordon hired external specialists to design the new performance management program. The specialists proposed that the senior managers and human resource form a global advisory unit together with Marshall & Gordon partner to represent the firm’s five regions of the firm and lead the design process. The advisory unit surveyed all consultants in February in order to understand their way of thinking about the fairness, worth, and effect of the current performance management system. Majority of the interviewees responded to the corporate surveys implying that the subject was topic was especially exciting to them. Interviews gave insights on present and prospective business plans and direction. The survey also showed that specific focus across certain employee populations should be given. Six current hires from key competitors were also interviewed to comprehend competitor pay practices and compensation program structures. Further focus groups discussions and key information interviews enabled the taskforce’s to understand the needs of certain groups within Marshall & Gordon’s worker population. The survey culminated with the taskforce conducting interviews of 20 partners and principals togeth...
Although Susan’s plan to “just do what her competitors are doing” (Nelson Education, 2013) may have not been the best approach to follow, it is in The Fit Stop’s best interest to match their compensation policy to those business’s similar to them. There is no need for The Fit Stop to lead with the best compensation options around, but lagging with the compensation could repel employees and could push them towards working for a competitor.
Job analysis helps determined selection criterion that is both legal and practical for the selection process. This process also aids in identifying and detailing competencies needed to perform the job as well as any gaps that exist between those competencies and incumbent performance, this is crucial information for training and development. The identifying of concrete standards and cataloging evaluation criteria is another use for job analysis, this can potentially aid with employee appraisals. Lastly, job analysis is critical in making reasonable accommodations for those individuals who are disabled and in the redesigning jobs
Because of this, many employees tend to leave when they have found a job with higher pay. This increases the training costs for their employees, as they tend to not stay for too long.
Technology and the Internet has made many business functions easier, faster, and expanded the reach of many processes. e-Compensation is one of those processes that has benefited from technology; it has made knowing what similar job salaries and compensation easier to access and for management to determine what it should take to retain vital talent within an organization. This paper will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of web-based compensation tools, how it supports the job evaluation process, the advantages and disadvantages to centralized approach to merit pay programs, discuss integrated analytic features needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems, assess barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools and propose approaches to overcome those barriers, recommend strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data that they receive from outside sources.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
Employee compensation and reward systems have undergone a couple of paradigm shifts since inception. Reward systems were traditionally compensation based and focused on the individual or the position (Beam 1995). After a recession in the early 1980's, employers turned to performance based models in an attempt to save money while still rewarding top performers (Applebaum & Shapiro, 1992). Today, the most successful organizations are using a total reward model, a hybrid of the performance based model combined with strategic human resource management planning to create reward systems that both benefit the employee and help organizations realize their operational goals (Chen & Hsieh, 2006).
Another reason may also come from an employee getting a good, decent salary. This not only improves the job satisfaction, but gives the member of staff an understanding of the fact that they get fair payment for their labors. “[But] if an employee does not get satisfaction in their work, they may seek satisfaction in other work unrelated areas. He or she may also be content with work as it relates to those work-related areas. Job dissatisfaction may also cause an employee to quit” (Robbins).
Johnson, Sam T. "Plan your organization’s reward strategy through pay for performance dynamics: Compensation & Benefits Review 30, Number 3: (May/June 1998): 67-72
According to Chaneta (2014), job evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the relative worth of various jobs in an organization for the purpose of comparison and pay grading, and based on qualifications and skills required for a range of jobs. In other words, it forms the basis for pay and benefits negotiation. It helps to compensate employees accurately based on their job grades or values, and hence avoid issues of inequity and indifference at the workplace. To ensure effective job evaluation process, market-driven and job worth systems are largely used. While market-driven system is determined by the existing pay grade or structure in the opened market based on workforce demand and availability for particular positions, job-worth system depends on the value of the job or position to the organization. Both systems can be influenced by the external labor market and there become difficult for managers to apply as they would be torn between fulfilling internal and external demands. Another significant resemblance between market-driven and job worth systems is that they both require the same qualifications and other characteristics from the job performer as the basis for occupying a specific position. For instance, before HR practitioners decide on which system to use to determine Quality Specialist 's pay, they must make sure the potential worker has the job requirements and competencies to execute the job. One of the criteria for rewarding an employee is his or her ability to complete tasks in a proficient, productive, and effective way (Kaifi, Khanfar, Nafei, & Kaifi,
Organizations are working hard in today’s world of business, not only to remain competitive, but also to focus on stability and structure. Employees are the backbone of an organization. It is becoming more important to offer quality HRM programs to staff, in order to support the retention of trained and experienced staff. Employees have always been concerned with salary however, there is a new focus emerging that looks at compensation as a whole entity. Monetary wages are now just as important as other benefits such as paid time off, medical and dental offerings and retirement. This paper will discuss the importance of the total compensation program which includes many aspects, not just salary. Attention must be paid to equal pay, pay