Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impacts of imperialism
The impacts of imperialism
The impacts of imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Susan Harris’s book God’s Arbiters explores the religious rhetoric when discussing expansion of the United States. She focuses solely on the time period of 1898 through 1902. In this book, Harris calls on the works of numerous poets, authors, and political figures to show the perception of the United States imperialist motives from outside the borders. Harris uses Mark Twain as an epigraph at the beginning of the book with the quotation “I am an anti-imperialist.” Drawing upon authors such as Rudyard Kipling and his pro-annexation story The White Man’s Burden, Harris shows both sides of the debate through authors and poets alike. This use of writers offers an interesting perspective to the argument for and against imperialism, furthermore offering a look into the minds of intellectuals of the period. The main issue addressed by Harris is …show more content…
The first chapter of the book uses Rudyard Kipling’s ”The White Man’s Burden”, a poem published in the London Times in 1899. Kipling’s subtitle for the poem, “An Address to the United States”, suggests the author’s intentions with the piece. In the poem, Kipling urged America to “take up the white man’s burden” and to annex the country to help the native people. Despite the conflict between Kipling’s belief towards imperialism and Mark Twain’s opposition of the movement, the two writers remained friends. Twain, who was not one to hold back comment, never publicly commented on Kipling’s poem or his belief in imperialism. Harris does mention a private comment from Twain late in his life in regard to Kipling. He said that Kipling “loves power and authority and Kingship” (130), but Twain never once criticized the author. This example is a good illustration of the two sides of the argument and their mutual respect held for each other and for their conflicting
The late1890s signaled an imperial expansion of the United States. After the victory of the Spanish American War and the Annexation of Hawaii, the U.S. had successfully expanded its borders overseas. Through the Treaty of Paris 1898, the United States acquired territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific. For example, the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba were all obtained from the Treaty of Paris. That same year the U.S. also Annexed Hawaii into the Union. This massive expansion into the Caribbean and especially the Pacific created a political clash between Imperialist and Anti-Imperialist. During this time Anti-Imperialist and Hawaiian political leaders argued that the mistreatment of indigenous people was unethical. On the other hand, Imperialist like Albert Beveridge supported Imperialism. In Beveridge’s speech “The March of the Flag” (1898) he expressed imperialism was the Anglo-Saxon way, because it improved the prosperity of these islands and expanded American borders. Also, he stated that it’s America’s
America’s Manifest Destiny first surfaced around the 1840’s, when John O’Sullivan first titled the ideals that America had recently gained on claiming the West as their ‘Manifest Destiny.’ Americans wanted to settle in the West for multiple reasons, from the idea that God wanted them to settle all the way to the West co...
Langston Hughes is a writer that has written many beautiful poems that impact people differently. In the poem I, Too by Langston Hughes, he discusses the racial treatment of the african americans, the dream of equality, and how racism treats society. In his writing he uses ethos, repetition, allusion to persuade the audience of his idea of racism in the poem. In both Hughes’ and Twain's writings, they use allusion as their technique, but they also differ in some other techniques. In Hughes’ poem he describes from the point of view of the african american. The African American is treated unequally based on his race when he says “I, too, sing America” (Hughes). The allusion that Hughes makes in his poem is a reference to the poem I Hear America Singing by Walt Whitman. This reference to Whitman's poem is about all white Americans living a happy life, but it does not show the african americans perspectives. Hughes’ technique of using allusion in his poem demonstrates the racism through unequal representation. In all of Mark Twain’s different uses of techniques he incorporates the use of allusion in his novel. When Huck and Jim are on the raft they discuss about topics that would pass the time, although Twain uses the technique of allusion to show racism. When the two strike up conversation about King Solomon, Jim argues with Huck that the king was not intelligent because he says “I doan k’yer what de widder say, he warn’t no wise man...he had some er de dad-fetchedes’ ways...does you know ‘bout dat chile dat he ‘uz gwyne chop in two?’(73). Twain’s reference to King Solomon shows Jim’s stubbornness to admit that he could be wrong about the king, it also represents racial stereotypes about african americans being ignorant and stubborn. Though in the conversation between Huck and Jim, Twain strays away from the racial stereotypes by giving Jim an intelligence that most slaves do not have and shows that
However, it is relevant that we understand the ripple effect that Turner’s thesis had on the world. Soon to be President had already written three of the fourteen four volumes of Winning the West, prior to reading the pamphlet. The concern I see that effects our society is that Turner was able through a speech able to not on influence but encourage Roosevelt to continue to write more in regards to Winning the Race in the West. The impact of Turner’s ideas and Roosevelt’s rise to presidency are a great indication of how significant the thesis was through the “frontiers” which included the Chinese Boxer Rebellion and the Philippine-American War. During both of these engagements, American soldiers were accused and found guilty of brutally beating, killing and even raping women and men in both regions. The tolerance of “manifest destiny” was still alive and well as Roosevelt then Governor of the Philippines would soon take over as President of the United States in 1904. Although this was a negative impact, this is still significant to our history even
In a lively account filled that is with personal accounts and the voices of people that were in the past left out of the historical armament, Ronald Takaki proffers us a new perspective of America’s envisioned past. Mr. Takaki confronts and disputes the Anglo-centric historical point of view. This dispute and confrontation is started in the within the seventeenth-century arrival of the colonists from England as witnessed by the Powhatan Indians of Virginia and the Wamapanoag Indians from the Massachusetts area. From there, Mr. Takaki turns our attention to several different cultures and how they had been affected by North America. The English colonists had brought the African people with force to the Atlantic coasts of America. The Irish women that sought to facilitate their need to work in factory settings and maids for our towns. The Chinese who migrated with ideas of a golden mountain and the Japanese who came and labored in the cane fields of Hawaii and on the farms of California. The Jewish people that fled from shtetls of Russia and created new urban communities here. The Latinos who crossed the border had come in search of the mythic and fabulous life El Norte.
Mark Twain’s use of humor in the story mocks and shines light on the issues of our society’s political system from back then that continue
The parallelism that is introduced in the two long sentences that make up paragraph 14 emphasize Twain’s belief in people. He shows that people believe that they are putting time and effort into thinking about politics and deciding what party they belong to when in all actuality they are influenced by those around them. This can be seen when twain states “they read its literature, but not that of the other side” (720). This shows that many people are actually clueless of the whole picture. They only receive information about a single part and make their decision based off of that, without taking the time out to view both sides.
In Chapter 8 of Major Problems in American Immigration History, the topic of focus shifts from the United States proper to the expansion and creation of the so called American Empire of the late Nineteenth Century. Unlike other contemporary colonial powers, such as Britain and France, expansion beyond the coast to foreign lands was met with mixed responses. While some argued it to be a mere continuation of Manifest Destiny, others saw it as hypocritical of the democratic spirit which had come to the United States. Whatever their reasons, as United States foreign policy shifted in the direction of direct control and acquisition, it brought forth the issue of the native inhabitants of the lands which they owned and their place in American society. Despite its long history of creating states from acquired territory, the United States had no such plans for its colonies, effectively barring its native subjects from citizenship. Chapter 8’s discussion of Colonialism and Migration reveals that this new class of American, the native, was never to be the equal of its ruler, nor would they, in neither physical nor ideological terms, join in the union of states.
This piece is a primary source written directly to the American leader to effectively question social authority over people and physical land. Tecumseh is a Shawnee Native leader who strives to get attention of the newly appointed governor of the former Indian territory to appeal to him that the land does not belong to anyone. He appeals to Governor Harrison by using Christianity as basis for his argument. He claims that the beliefs of the Americans promotes terror and destruction arguing that Christianity is the wrong argument for taking over what once was shared by the Native American community. Since the revolution, the United States yearned to establish a strong military presence to claim power and territory for itself. We see in the Monroe doctrine that removing European influence from Latin America enables the U.S. to claim all the resources that are essential for development. These were the same resources that were abundant in the West, which encouraged Jefferson to design a team to identify more about it to later seize control. Tecumseh makes a logical argument for the future of the native tribes by proposing his own plans.He does not tolerate the violent and bloody way that the whites of the country employ to take control of false identified property. It is Tecumseh’s best decision to write this speech because the destruction and collapse to the native people is an inevitable future, that Tecumseh sees
From western expansion to foreign imperialism the United States has always been an expansionist country. Early America’s focus was to conquer the natives and obtain western land within North America, but in the latter of America’s history, specifically in the nineteenth and twentieth century, foreign imperialism became the new focus. America’s activity in foreign imperialism was a continuation and departure of the United States’ early expansionism. It was a continuation in terms of manifest destiny, the spread of Christianity, and by the concept of “the city on a hill” and a departure in terms of foreign involvement.
While the US may have prided themselves in the fact that we didn’t practice imperialism or colonialism, and we weren’t an Empire country, the actions conquering land in our own country may seem to rebuff that claim. In the 19th century, the West was a synonym for the frontier, or edge of current settlement. Early on this was anything west of just about Mississippi, but beyond that is where the Indian tribes had been pushed to live, and promised land in Oklahoma after policies like Indian removal, and events like the Trail of Tears. Indian’s brief feeling of security and this promise were shattered when American’s believed it was their god given right, their Manifest Destiny, to conquer the West; they began to settle the land, and relatively quickly. And with this move, cam...
Monroe wrote that Spain and Portugal’s efforts "to improve the condition of the people of [colonized countries in the Americas]” yielded disappointing results, and suggests that the United States was better positioned to take on the role of colonial overseer given the nation’s unique geographical, social, and political connection to the Americas. Monroe justified this right to benevolent imperialism largely around the idea that America’s government, “has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, [which has produced] unexampled felicity [throughout America].” Yet contained within this utopian treatment of the American political system is the inherent suggestion that the American definition of “unexampled felicity” was universally applicable throughout the Americas. Here, the issue of textuality is raised; while politically, the protection of American countries by the United States suggests a benevolent intention, the idea that America had indirect authority over its neighbors indicates an impe...
The Siren Song of Imperialism: McKinley Prays for Guidance. Report from an interview, January 22, 1903. C.S. Olcott, The Life of William McKinley, v.2 (1916), pp.110-111.
After the civil war, United States took a turn that led them to solidify as the world power. From the late 1800s, as the US began to collect power through Cuba, Hawaii, and the Philippines, debate arose among historians about American imperialism and its behavior. Historians such as William A. Williams, Arthur Schlesinger, and Stephen Kinzer provides their own vision and how America ought to be through ideas centered around economics, power, and racial superiority.
As shown, America’s rapid change as the 19th century came to a close was supported by a variety of imperialistic beliefs, motives, and incidents that almost jumpstarted the U.S. onto the world stage. Many of these incidents, such as the public’s thirst for expansion, the annexation of several faraway lands, and the build-up of U.S. military forces, would not have been possible without the Spanish American War. Moreover, the Spanish American war would not have been possible without the American people. Imperialism was a consequence of the American Democratic experiment, giving the people what they want. . Works Cited http://www.course-notes.org/us_history/notes/the_american_pageant_14th_edition_textbook_notes/chapter_27_empire_and_expansion_18