Imperialism In Nigeria

1050 Words3 Pages

On October 1st 1960 , British rule over Nigeria as a colony ended, as well as most of its official structure. Nigerian leaders were left with the task of taking up the leadership of the Nigerian people from the British with a promise of democratic rule; however within fifteen years after independence various institutions experienced great changes and bringing great instability and uncertainty in the newly founded government. Northern and southern regions of Nigeria both felt the impacts in education, politics, religion and ethnically. This causes one to wonder what the British Imperialistic government did differently, and why the difference between the southern and northern regions became evident in the following fifteen years after independence. …show more content…

In Northern Nigeria lord Lugard introduced the technique called the` indirect rule system´ after the defeat of the Sultan of Sokoto and the emir of Kano through numerous slave raiding expeditions; thereafter placing new rulers that are willing to cooperate and further the empires interest on every throne and gives them considerable power. However in southern Nigeria a one’s self-governing region was ruled through imposed and self-proclaimed chiefs in the south. Leaving the future very uncertain for Nigeria which at the time when the British rule ended as Richard Dowden puts it “the new presidents inherited total power from the colonial rulers, but the states they ruled were made of old African societies, once self-governing and still held together by their own networks of power and influence” . Nigerian leaders inherited a nation totally diverse in politics held together only by the authority and fear of …show more content…

Ten main groups were recorded during the 1931 census as follows: (1) Hausa, (2) lbo, (3) Yoruba, (4) Fulani, (5) Kanuri, (6) Ibibio, (7) Munshi or Tiv, (8) Edo, (9) Nupe, and (10) ljaw. According to Nigeria Handbook, eleventh edition, 'there are also a great number of other small tribes too numerous to enumerate separately [...]'. It is a mistake to designate them 'tribes'. Each of them is a nation by itself with many tribes and clans. There is as much difference between them as there is between Germans, English, Russians and Turks for instance. The fact that they have a common overlord does not destroy this fundamental difference.” in these diversity lies great insight as to the reason for the rapid changes in Nigeria post colonialism, when the fear of Britain as well as its institutions were no longer in

Open Document