Guns blaze across the battlefield, hammers bang against the new factories, and steam engines roar across uncharted waters. Imperialism in European countries was a turning point in the world and its future. “Imperialism is the domination by one country of the political, economic, or cultural life of another country or region. Often imperialism occurs when a stronger country supports or takes over a weaker country.” (1) Imperialism affected many different parts of the world and people in many different ways. Under ‘New Imperialism’ European countries decided they would use aggressive tactic to pursue their customs to other countries. However, each country that imperialized had three specific reasons that would benefit their country.
Economic interests, political and military interests, and humanitarian and religious goals were all reasons for New Imperialism. The economic result of imperialism would grant manufacturer’s access to natural resources allowing them to expand their markets across the globe. Colonies helped expand Europe’s population, which helped support the economy. New steam ships and naval vessels needed places worldwide to pick up and exchange supplies. Some land and knowledge was used only for prestige of having more than another country. Many people, such as missionaries, doctors, and colonial officials believed it was their job to spread Western ideas including medicine, law, and Christian religion. They showed their compassion in distributing their ideas beyond the sea to their “little brothers” in distant countries. European countries often used Social Darwinism as a reason to improve weaker countries and peoples. Industrialization was successful because diverse lands were unable to unite which ...
... middle of paper ...
...alistic tools and use them in modern scenes. From the Industrial Revolution to today, we can observe the differences and similarities in lifestyles of the past to make the best decisions for our country for today and in the future.
Works Cited
1) Bisbee: Imperialism Notes: Building Overseas Empires & the Partition of Africa- pg 1. (The New Imperialism)
2) Bisbee: Imperialism Notes: Building Overseas Empires & the Partition of Africa- pg. 2 (Forms of Imperial Control)
3) Bisbee: Imperialism Notes: Building Overseas Empires & the Partition of Africa- pg. 2 (Forms of Imperial Control)
4) Bisbee: Japan Modernizes Notes- pg.3 (The Meiji Transformation: Changes in Society)
5) Bisbee: European Claims in Muslim Regions pg. 1 (Problems for the Ottoman Empire: Nationalist Revolution Breaks Out)
6) Bisbee: China and the New Imperialism pg. (The Boxer Uprising)
The "DBQ Project" What Is the Driving Force Behind European Imperialism in Africa? (2012): 257. pp. 177-177. Print.
Africa is a land of riches like no other, so as expected, European countries would have some sort of desire to conquer properties in whatever way they did. As stated in African Colonies and their Exports Chart, countless of natural resources are found in different areas in Africa. Not only does the data show plenty of resources, but also a variety (Doc D). This confirms that Africa is a wealthy land that Europeans grew fond of and hoped to take over. Specified in Imports and Exports Graph, following the 1900’s, after the conference to divide up Africa was held, Britain decided to use Africa’s natural resources and specialize in many industries. The imports doubled from 4 million pounds, while the exports boosted from 2.5 million all the way to 21 million pounds (Doc. E). With this lucrative increase in trading and selling, it is fair to conclude that not only were resources a factor of beginning imperialism in Africa, but also a successful result.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
Introduction: The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as a proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans are aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on.
A. Adu Boahen's African Perspectives on Colonialism neatly classifies African responses to European colonialism during both phases of invasion and occupation during the 19th century with precise labels according to their nature or time period. However, the reactions can also be loosely grouped into two diametric characterizations: peaceful and violent. Although creating this dichotomy seems a gross generalization and oversimplification of the colonial African experience, it more importantly allows for a different perspective- one that exposes the overwhelming success of the typically peaceful or pacifist reaction in contrast to the little gain and large losses of the violent response.
This paper examines Chasteen’s “Colonial Crucible”, Khapoya’s “Colonialism and the African Experience”, Steinberg’s “Introduction”, “Siam, 1767-1868” and “The Malay Peninsula to 1874.” These chapters are interrelated in that they all examine the role of European colonial rule of a specific region. First, Chasteen’s chapter examines the differences and similarities between the areas under Spanish and Portuguese rule. The author argues that these different European rulers impacted the religious, cultural, and political identity of these regions from past to present. Additionally, Khapoya’s chapter examines British, French, Belgian, and Portuguese rule in Africa and the source of interest for European powers in Africa. Lastly, Steinberg’s chapters
During Imperialistic times South Africa was a region of great resources that was greatly disputed over (Ellis). Europe’s main goal during these times was to compete against each other and played a “game” of which country can imperialize more African countries than the other. Imperialism was a curse to South Africa, because many wars, laws, and deaths were not necessary and would not have happened if South Africa were not imperialized.
As many people know, Imperialism has shaped the culture and customs all over the world. Imperialism is the dominance of one country over another politically, economically or socially. Western culture can be seen in all parts of the world; from Asia to Africa, to the Indies and the Americans. The downside of having the bits of western culture all over the world, is how it got there. Western influence was forced upon places in Asia, specifically India, Indonesia with a hellacious price; lives and poverty.
The foundation for new imperialism rested on the ideas and products of the enlightenment. Advancements in technology, medicine and cartography led to the success of new imperialism (Genova, 2/15). For example, European voyages would have been for naught, if it were not for the enlightenment discover...
Beginning in the 1800s, Europeans colonized many different parts of the world in order to gain more power and influence. Imperialism, which is defined as a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through colonization, military force, or other means, flooded through Europe. Quickly, different European countries, like Britain, France, Belgium, Germany, and Russia, conquered the lands and people of nations around the world. They were able to do so because the Industrial Revolution had given them the advanced technology, such as weapons, needed to conquer the lands. Many reasons why the Europeans colonized lands, like India, Africa, and southeast Asia, included the fact that colonies benefited the state.
A popular analysis of the late 19th and early 20th century “scramble for Africa” attributes it to a ramping up of European powers’ imperialist goals, often providing it as supporting evidence in the characterization of the late Victorian period as one of increased imperialist action. However, in analyzing the motives behind the actions of European imperialist powers, continuity emerges. Robinson and Gallagher describe the history of 19th and 20th century Europe as “the history of and expanding society”. This idea of characterizing the entire period as a single “history” is revolutionary in that it points to some sort of continuity in the actions and motives of European powers throughout the period of imperialism that the idea of the mid and late Victorian periods being anti and pro-imperialist periods respectively fails to address. As evidence counter to the idea of a dichotomy existing between the policies of the middle and late Victorian periods, Robinson and Gallagher point out the fact that during the same time period, mercantilist formal empire was being used in India while more informal free trade policies were being used in Latin America by the same imperialist power: Britain. It is in regard to this point that one of the signature ideas of
Africa’s struggle to maintain their sovereignty amidst the encroaching Europeans is as much a psychological battle as it is an economic and political one. The spillover effects the system of racial superiority had on the African continent fractured ...
The concept of imperialism is one that has pervaded nearly every major society or empire throughout human history. It seems to be a natural consequence of societies growing in size, power, and knowledge. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries vast changes occurred in Western Europe (and soon spread elsewhere) that spurred a new round of imperialism the likes of which had not been seen before. The changes were the industrial revolution that was taking place. Countries were rapidly advancing to industrial societies producing much greater quantities of goods at much lower costs. The goods produced ranged everywhere from cotton textiles to military machinery, all of which would play important roles in rounds of imperialistic expansion that would follow. The imperialistic displays by Western European nations also brought about several other industrial revolutions in other regions including the Ottoman Empire, Russia, and Japan. I will take a look at how the industrial revolution encouraged imperialistic expansion, as well as some of the results of that expansion in other regions.
The New Imperialism and the Scramble for Africa 1880-1914. Jeff Taylor, n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2014.