Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media and immigration
Describe immigration reform
Describe immigration reform
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media and immigration
The Real Problem with Immigration
“Immigration Problem Is About Us, Not Them” is written by Jo-Ann Pilard, she is professor emerita of philosophy and women’s studies at Towson University in Maryland. The reading provided focuses on what she seems to believe is the problem, how the immigration debates seem to only focus on those immigrants that cross the border in the Southwestern states meanwhile the media appear to forget or discard the presence of the “illegal native employers”. The author of this reading seems to believe that the problem with immigrants is that the media focuses only on those who cross the border in the southwestern states, yet there are more illegal immigrants but they seem to go unnoticed by the media.
As stated at the beginning of the paper by the author, “The migration debated always focus on small brown bodies jumping fences and scooting through the brush of Southwestern states…” the use of this quote provides the audience to acknowledge the allegation
…show more content…
Pilardi states “We need to create a fair immigration program for those who want to stay…” this provides evidence to support her purpose on wanting more people to acknowledge what is going on and what should be done about immigration. Throughout her essay the allegation in constant, focusing on letting the reader know how the media and its audience seem to ignore the fact that there are more illegal immigrants than just those “brown bodies”. The author’s tone is best described as determine. As the audience reads the essay it is noticeable how the author wants to get her point across. In her essay she writes, “we should stop thinking the problem is just about ‘securing our borders’ – from them.” The quote supports her tone by expressing what she seems to believe we as one should
In the article “Se Habla Entitlement”, Star Parker responds to the sensitive essay written by Roberto Rodriguez on the subject of illegal immigration in Mexico. Parker is a well-educated woman with republican political ties and libertarian values. “Star Parker’s argument that illegal immigration is convincing through her use of these rhetorical strategies such as logos, ethos, and pathos balances her article. By carefully examining the text and context in this article it will establish a better understanding on Parker’s argument.
Ngai, Mae M. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, N.J. [u.a.: Princeton Univ. Press, 2004. Print.
Recently illegal immigration has become a very pressing issue among people. Many people around the borders are being greatly affected by the issue and think immediate action needs to be taken to put a stop to the issue. The Documentary Border War: Battle Over Illegal Immigration takes a stand on the issue using many examples of pathos, ethos, and logos to try and persuade people that illegal immigration is a very serious issue and we need to put a stop to it. This documentary follows the lives of people who have been affected by illegal immigration, and explains how they feel about the issue. Another way that people can look at the issue of illegal immigration is through the eyes of the immigrants, and the reasons why they might be trying migrate to another country. The documentary Wetback: The Undocumented Documentary focuses on the issue from this point of view. This documentary uses pathos and logos to show the lives and hardships of those people who are trying to migrate to a new country. Although Wetback used many examples of pathos and logos to show the struggles of the migrants, Border War did a better job showing pathos by following the lives of people who were affected by the illegal immigrants they were also very persuasive with ethos by following credible people.
Illegal immigration has been an issue in this country since its founding. However, in recent years, more and more people are deciding that the conditions in their native countries are too dangerous and impossible to overcome, so they decide to take on the journey to try and enter the United States, “the land of opportunity”, without the proper documentation. In the novel Enrique’s Journey, by Sonia Nazario, we see first hand the expedition many of these people take in order to fulfill their dreams of helping the families they leave behind. Many of these people, like Lourdes and Enrique, come thinking that the “American Dream” will be easily obtained through hard work. Unfortunately, times have changed, and this promise of riches is no longer the norm. Those undocumented immigrants that are lucky enough to make it to the United States are faced with a harsh hit of reality when they realize that the perception they had build of America, with an abundance of jobs, is actually flooded by poverty and an unsteady job market.
Mexico: Mexico’s immigration policy is strict with clear and distinct laws with what a foreigner can and can’t do in the country. For starters, immigrants are barred from interfering with the country’s internal political affairs. Furthermore, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico; those who come to the country under false pretenses could be deported or incarcerated. They also only accept foreigners who will be beneficial to the country’s society and economy.
Considering the ideas that both authors have brought to the table, I have concluded that in order to make progress in solving the problem of undocumented immigrants, we as a country must decide what’s best for our country. We either look at undocumented immigrants as an asset or a parasite. America is the ‘land of opportunity’ where millions of people want to live there and pursue the ‘American Dream’. We should not let people stop from achieving their dreams. But on the other hand, a quantity of immigrants leave their country because it does not have “stable democracies and free markets” that “ensure economic growth, rising standards of living and thus, lots of jobs”, because the countries of these immigrants “birth rates and native populations fall”.
a passage from the letter she is writing to add a personal feel to the
The United States has been known as the “Melting Pot ”and “The Land of Opportunity” for decades, but the title is slowly diminishing as scrutiny has been bombarding immigrants for wanting a better life. As questions arise of what is needed to protect the borders from possible terrorist other factors come into play such as what immigrants have to contribute to the country. Immigration is actually vital to our country since it provides the government more income, it brings the country a positive image, and DACA helps the community come together.
In conclusion, although Colin Powels’ plea for immigrant is based on Americans common moral and historical values; and although it provides an effectual argument through a formal and practical style to convince Americans who already support his idea, he fails to persuade Anti-immigrants idealist who are not on his side. This is because he fails to provide a realistic measure to solve the threat posed by illegal immigrants, he is being bias and he provides weak support for his argument that immigration should be encouraged.
The author, Jo-Ann Pilardi accurately writes about immigration in her article “Immigration Problem Is about Us, Not Them.” All Immigrants, whether they are legal or illegal know that having the chance to live in America, is a dream come true or in other words, “a chance in paradise.” America is known for its opportunities. Immigrants came to the United States for a very significant purpose. Their purpose and goal is to take advantage of the opportunities in the land known as, “the land of opportunity.” Immigrants did not come here to damage the country or to over burden its inhabitants. That author states, “Many of our political leaders talk hard line about immigration reform even though they know our country is mired in its demand for the
Ngai even focuses on the humanity of legalization of the undocumented in her main claim. In her seventh paragraph she approves of the current laws slightly because of the vast improvement over the blatantly discriminatory national-origins quota. When Ngai offered her solution she made sure to incorporate the interests of immigrants in hopes that it will support family unification and existing ties in immigrant countries in the United States. When Ngai concludes her article she hopes for principle that are both “flexible and
“I do not believe that many American citizens . . . really wanted to create such immense human suffering . . . in the name of battling illegal immigration” (Carr 70). For hundreds of years, there has been illegal immigration starting from slavery, voluntary taking others from different countries to work in different parts of the world, to one of the most popular- Mexican immigration to the United States. Mexican immigration has been said to be one of the most common immigration acts in the world. Although the high demand to keep immigrants away from crossing the border, Mexicans that have immigrated to the U.S have made an impact on the American culture because of their self sacrifices on the aspiration to cross over. Then conditions
Star Parkers essay, “Se Habla Entitlement” was published in 2006 on the website WorldNetDaily.com. In the essay, Parker attempts to convince the reader that the United States should not have an open border policy. She uses the techniques of Ethos, Pathos, and logos to present a compelling argument to the reader, which in the end falls a bit short.
Ngai, Mae M. 2004 “Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America” Publisher: Princeton University Press.
Obama Administration proposed what is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform. It is composed of six sections aimed at fixing the current immigration system. It includes enhanced border enforcement, interior enforcement and the most controversial section; an amnesty program to legalize undocumented immigrants. In other words, it creates a pathway to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants that is fair and feasible. Many argue that even though Comprehensive Immigration Reform is good for America because it addresses important issues like creating a committee to adopt the number of visas available to changing economic times, preventing people from working without permits and creating programs aimed at helping immigrants adjust to life in America. Yet it rewards violators of current U.S. laws who entered the country illegally, and those who entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. Opponents of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform proposal claim that immigrants have a negative impact on the economy; overwhelming social services of many states, and posing a threat to American workers as a result of big corporations exploiting immigrants with low wages and poor working conditions. With the recent economic downturn and the severe recession that hit the U.S, many individuals blame immigrants for their economic misfortune and lack of employment. For both the opponents and proponents of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Proposal, for the millions of the undocumented immigrants and their families, and lawmakers; immigration has become an emotional political issue. Despite the resistance of many, America should embrace comprehensive immigration reform.