Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

572 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Kant's categorical imperative summary

Immanuel Kant was one of history’s greatest influential deontological philosophers that developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Deontology is viewed that some actions are morally permitted or forbidden regardless of the consequences. Believing the only thing intrinsic moral worth is the goodwill of others as well as self. Kant also believed that goodwill is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes nor because of its adequacy to achieve something in the proposed end (McKnight, 2016). This is not the “Golden Rule.”
Maxim is the general rule that is characterized by the motives of a person’s actions. Therefore, when pertaining to Kant’s thoughts, it was a will that is good and doing it because it was the right thing to do. The respect of moral law or Categorical Imperative is determined through the moral worth of one’s action (Stanford Encyclodepia of Philosophy, 2017). Good moral actions motivated by maxims are to be like a universal law. Actors may interpret one’s actions to another by comparing them with accepted role performances (Zuckerman, 1999).
Therefore, this is a very appropriate way …show more content…

(1972). Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives. The Philosophical Review, 81(3), 305-316. doi:10.2307/2184328
Potter, N. T. Jr., (1998). The principle of punishment is a categorical imperative. Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy. 22. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=philosfacpub
McKnight, L., (2016). Immanuel Kant and "The Categorical Imperative" for Dummies Retrieved from: https://owlcation.com/humanities/Immanuel-Kant-and-The-Categorical-Imperative
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2004). Kant's moral philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/ Zuckerman, E. (1999). The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438.

Show More
Related

  • Mill’s Objection to Kant’s Moral Theory

    1356 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant argued that the Categorical Imperative (CI) was the test for morally permissible actions. The CI states: I must act in such a way that I can will that my maxim should become a universal law. Maxims which fail to pass the CI do so because they lead to a contradiction or impossibility. Kant believes this imperative stems from the rationality of the will itself, and thus it is necessary regardless of the particular ends of an individual; the CI is an innate constituent of being a rational individual. As a result, failure ...

    Read More

  • Kant's Necessary To Posit The Noumenal World

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    For Kant, a maxim refers to law, a law personally embraced (my law, for me…) and universal law. A maxim is moral when it comes from an individual with a Good Will. One should only act according to a maxim that can be universally applied. Such a maxim is moral.

    Read More

  • Deontology and Utilitarianism: Ethical Theories for Nurses

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    German philosopher Immanuel Kant popularized the philosophy of deontology, which is described as actions that are based on obligation rather than personal gain or happiness (Rich & Butts, 2014). While developing his theory, Kant deemed two qualities that are essential for an action to be deemed an ethical. First, he believed it was never acceptable to sacrifice freedom of others to achieve a desired goal. In other words, he believed in equal respect for all humans. Each human has a right for freedom and justice, and if an action takes away the freedom of another, it is no longer ethical or morally correct. Secondly, he held that good will is most important, and that what is good is not determined by the outcome of the situation but by the action made (Johnson, 2008). In short, he simply meant that the consequences of a situation do not matter, only the intention of an action. Kant also declared that for an act to be considered morally correct, the act must be driven by duty alone. By extension, there could be no other motivation such as lo...

    Read More

  • The Amoralist's Challenge

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    At its core, Kantian philosophy is a more complex version of the golden rule, a principle traditionally associated with religious ethics. The premise is to “do unto others as you would have others do unto you”; the rule’s maxim advises reciprocity of actions amongst individuals. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), a German philosopher, believed this rule was flawed; it required a more comprehensive structure and logical means of justification in order to avoid a perverse interpretation. For the rule to become universal law one must individually act for the universal good, rather than self-serving motivations, and expect nothing in return. Kant’s moral requirements, “Categorical imperative”, stipulates that rational individuals perform acts that are

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

    1353 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's deonotological ethical theory assesses if actions are moral based on the person's will or intention of acting. Kant's theory can be categorized as a deonotological because "actions are not assessed to be morally permissible on the basis of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agent's will in acting," (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are based on duty and not consequential. Kantianism is based on three principles: maxims, willing, and the categorical imperative. Kant states that a maxim is a "general rule or principle which will explain what a person takes himself to be doing and the circumstances in which he takes himself to be doing it" (Feldman, 1999, 201). It is important that this principle be universalisable and that the maxim can be applied consistently to everyone that encounters similar situations, therefore willed as a universal law. The second aspect of Kant's theory is willing. This involves the agent consistently committing oneself to make an action occur. He states that, "In general, we can say that a person wills inconsistently if he wills that p be the case and he wills that q be the case and its impossible for p and q to be the case together" (Feldman, 1999, 203). T...

    Read More

  • The Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Section One and Section Two of his work. Kant explores his position on his fundamental principle of morality, or his “categorical imperative”, or his idea that all actions are moral and “good” if they are performed as a duty. Such an idea is exemplified when he says, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14). The philosopher uses examples such as suicide and helping others in distress to apply his principal to possible real life situation. Kant is successful in regards to both issues. As a result, it means that categorical imperative can plausibly be understood as the fundamental principle of all morality. Kant’s reasoning for his categorical imperative is written in a way that makes the theory out to be very plausible.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    If we desire X, we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations: the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morality, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viability of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.

    Read More

  • Kantian Imperatives

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    In our discussion I focused upon applying the concepts of choice, imperatives, human worth, and external human conditions to an analysis of twenty first century societies: Tibet and China. We began by listing indicators of freedom of choice in the movie that were distinctly Kantian or Utilitarian. For instance, the captains initial strategy for keeping the lifeboat moving towards land was to save everyone, not even considering the hardships of having ill and injured people aboard. However, there was a socialite on the boat who repeatedly placed her worth above others and entertained the idea of killing off or throwing off other people. She displayed expediency, the quality of being practical despite immorality. We then compared this to the

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative Analysis

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    While there are four formulations of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, two of them are relevant today. The first formulation is the Formula of Universal Law, which says, “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (McCormick). This means that you are not allowed to do anything that you would not be willing to let everyone else do (McCormick). Also, that you are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. That meaning that you cannot say it is okay for you to do something, but not okay for others to do it.

    Read More

  • Kantian Deontology: The Categorical Imperative

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kantian Deontology is a diverse and widely-accepted theory of ethics in which consequences of human actions do not matter. Instead, the theory focuses on intentions, acting from a sense to fulfill duty and how we treat one another. The core of Kantian Deontology is the Categorical Imperative, which is Immanuel Kant’s conclusive principle of morality. The Categorical Imperative has two forms, both of which are cited by Rachels & Rachels from Kant’s Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. The second form of the Categorical Imperative is best supported by the evidence observed by Rachels & Rachels, which mandates that people treat one another only as an end, and never as a means.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1682 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant’s categorical imperative has two components in it namely good will and acting in such a way that the action has an ability to become a universal law. So, first, we analyze his notion of good will and then we will move towards the action

    Read More

  • Categorical Imperative Kant

    519 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kant is a giant of the philosophy world. The three statements of the categorical imperative were some of Kant’s most important words. btannica.com says a categorical imperative is, “a moral law that is unconditional or absolute for all agents, the validity or claim of which does not depend on any ulterior motive or end” (britannica.com Categorical imperative par. 1). In other words, a categorical imperative is a moral “you ought to do this” no matter the circumstances. Let’s examine the 3 versions of the categorical imperative.

    Read More

  • Kantian Theory: The Categorical Imperative

    566 Words  | 2 Pages

    From a Kantian perspective, we look at the act in itself. In Kantian theory, the categorical imperative is a logical test that encompasses three formulations, but I will only discuss one. The consequence of using a person to benefit another is that we cause non-malfeasance to a healthy person to benefit an ill person (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 363). This act violates the principle respect for persons of the second means as an end formulation of the categorical imperative. In this formulation, we are to act by treating humans as an end, and not as a means for our purposes only, because each rational being has equal moral worth and dignity (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 20). Justice, a kantian value claims we do not sacrifice some to benefit

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    267 Words  | 1 Pages

    Keith should be concerned about the payment because it’s against the law which makes it illegal rather than a major ethical issue. In future, if such payments are discovered during the audit process, the trust of the stakeholders will be breached and it might result in huge penalty.

    Read More

  • Good Will By Immanuel Kant

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who made great contributions with his work on the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Kant’s interest with metaphysics left him in the company of Aristotle, who had the original work on metaphysics. Kant’s goal in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals was to find and make the supreme principal of morality. Kant covers several concepts in his work on metaphysics, some of the key concepts in his work are good will, moral worth, and imperatives. When it comes to good will Kant believes that “Nothing in the world—indeed nothing even beyond the world—can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will” 1. In the next key concept, moral worth, Kant believes that actions are only morally right depending on their motives, “an action done not from inclination but from duty” 2 is morally right according to Kant. Kant’s imperatives are broken down into two types, those being hypothetical and categorical. A hypothetical imperative is an “action that is good to some purpose, possible or actual” 3. A categorical imperative “directly commands a certain conduct without making its condition some purpose to be reached by it” 4. From these concepts you can tell that Kant is a perfect world philosopher who thinks that all humans are rational beings, who have preeminent good in them, and should always strive to be their best selves.

    Read More

More about Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

Open Document