Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of telling the truth
Immanuel kant's philosophy on lying
Importance of telling the truth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of telling the truth
A lie is a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive. Some people believe lying is never justified, like Immanuel Kant a german philosopher from the 18 century . Others believe that lying is always justified, or believe that lying is only justified in certain situation. In my opinion, lying is not ever justified no matter the situation.
In an excerpt by Sissela Bok, Rejecting All Lies : Immanuel Kant, Bok explains Kant’s argument that lying is a given right to another person. In the excerpt it argues that ,“Truthfulness in statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage.” Many people lie to avoid a disadvantage for themselves but Kant has a different view. Basically what Immanuel Kant is saying the truth should always be told no matter what situation or how big the conscience. This is because it is our duty to proved the truth to
…show more content…
Mary put in, “ Jayson’s mom told him that the doctors had just diagnosed her with cancer. She asks Jayson not to tell his dad because the stress could cause a deadly heart attack. He agreed to say nothing and pretended everything was fine.” In this situation I am fully against it and believe it is fully unjustified. This is unjustified because the mother should have not told her son that to lie to his father by not tell him the truth and by acting like nothing happened. The mother and son should have told the father because this is a life-altering event that the whole family should know about and spend what ever time she may have left together. This real life situation ties in with the idea that lying is never acceptable by show an example when lying should not be done and better way to solve a problems in real life without
Is it possible for certain lies to be considered justifiable? Everyone has told a lie at one point or another in their life. While growing up, society is taught that honesty is the best policy but it is hard to know at what point a lie crosses over from justifiable, to an evil action.
With different views on when it is OK to lie, the people continue to debate. But personally, I respect Kant’s views on the idea that lying is bad. Lying weakens the purpose to serve justice, destroys the liars’s dignity, and messes up the records. But I think that rare situations justify lies. I believe lies to save someone's life or just to protect someone from a big danger is the only type of lie that is justified. Those situations are the only times I think it is OK to lie. It might seem that lying to get yourself out of trouble is a situation that makes the lie justified. But I think that is a selfish reason for your own good and that people are thinking less about the society and more about their own good. Lying to get out of trouble is one of those many lies that are not justified.
According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, lying means to tell an account of an untrue event or give false information.
Firstly, by looking at the first patient, whether she gets a kidney from her father or a “cadaver kidney” , there will be no difference because she needs a kidney nonetheless. The second patient however, cannot agree to give his kidney away because one of the main reasons is that he’s scared and lacks “the courage to make this donation”9. So right at this point, it can be seen that it would be better if the father didn’t give his kidney away because it wouldn’t cause him any happiness, whereas the daughter has two options to gIn everyday life, whether on a personal base or on a professional base, difficult scenarios, or also known as moral dilemmas, are present. Depending on whom the person is or what their belief and value systems are, the issue can be ‘resolved’. In this particular case, questions arise about whether it is morally right to lie to family members when something can be done, ignoring the fact of its after effects. The case will be explained in details later on including the patient’s state, but to answer this ethical question, two theorists will be presented for the con and pro side. For the con side, the deontologist Immanuel Kant will be presented with his theory that lying is prohibited under all circumstances, as for the pro side, John Stuart Mill will be presented for the utilitarian theory stating that whichever decision brings out the most happiness is the right decision. After discussing the case, my personal view of what is right will be stated with my own reasons, which is that lying is the right decision to be taken.
Kant proves this by coupling it with the universal law, as one “can indeed will the lie but can not at all will a universal law to lie” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). He reasons this in an intellectual way, which leans heavily on the law of universalizability, as “by such a law there would really be no promises at all” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). He therefore reasons that this maxim “would necessarily destroy itself just as soon as it was made a universal law” (Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, 15). Kant has therefore proved conclusively that lying is always wrong, but has only done so if his opinions on universal law remain
...t woman that falls downstairs and she loses her baby; in the hospital when she wake up she sees the doctor and told him “my baby is ok? Please tell me that he is fine”! Here she doesn’t want to know the truth; rather, she wants to escape from it since she’s afraid. Whether the doctor tells her “your baby died” or “I’m so sorry to tell you that your baby died, but don’t be sad you can have another one you still young”, the woman is going to cry in both situations because the truth won’t change and it actually do harm. From these examples we can conclude that people are afraid from knowing the truth, and because what is scary leads to harm and pain. Thus truth leads to harm and not the way it’s told.
Lying is being deceitful. It is construed in more cases than not, as the opposite of being truthful. Yet, there’s more to it than that. A person can lie without actually saying anything false. There’s such a thing as ‘lying by omission’ and little ‘white lies’ to keep people baffled as to what dishonesty is. In reality, mendaciousness is a sickness that haunts its nurturers without letting go. Then, after a while, a person can get so good at this ‘skill’ that they even begin to lie to themselves.
Lying involves asserting a claim that one knows as false to the other with the intention to mislead the listener. There is generally a widely accepted constraint against lying. Constraint against lying should not be mistaken with a requirement to tell the truth since no such requirement exists. One has a negative duty against telling a lie whereas there is no positive duty requiring one to tell the truth.
In society, some people are looked at as liars or “bullshitters,” as stated in the article, “Is Lying Bad for Us?” Honesty is not always the best policy, and in certain situations, liars are best not to tell the truth when protecting the innocent, or protecting oneself. Because of this, lying should be looked at as a standard in society and something that people recognize in every day life.
A false statement or a statement intended to deceive someone is known as a lie. Of course, there are many different types of lies. There are those blatant lies that have no truth in them whatsoever, lies of omission, and half-truths.
What are lies? A lie is defined as follows: To make a statement that one knows to be false, especially with the intent to deceive. There are several ways that lies are told for instance, there are white lies, lies of omission, bold faced lies, and lies of exaggeration. No matter what type of lie that one chooses to tell many people believe that lies do more harm than good.
Lying is when you purposely tell someone something you believe or know is false. If you told someone something you thought was true, but then it ended up being a lie, you simply have just given false information. Lying is obviously not an ideal thing to do, but sometimes it may be necessary. Here are the four types of lies.
Using Kantian philosophy a lie is always immoral and wrong, no matter what the situation is. Kantian ethics establishes the idea that good will be based on the action itself rather than outcome or any inclination one may have to perform an act could be good will.
Did the father do the right thing by lying to his daughter about killing someone? I believe that he did do the right thing because his daughter is only nine and there is only so much stuff she needs to know and that isn’t one of them. Him telling her that he killed somebody might change the way she thinks about her dad. She isn’t mature enough to know about something like that because she will just think it’s a game and tell everyone and then everybody will look down on him for what he did.
He states that in no case should you lie (Bennett 2). What Kant focuses on is deontology, this focuses on duty-based ethics. What duty-based ethics consists of is, doing what you should do for the right reasons, your moral obligations (Bennett 2). Sometimes people will do something they know is right to do but, for the wrong reasons. Someone may save someone’s life because they know they will get money out of it while they should be doing it to save that person with or without a reward. Kant believes that lying is wrong and immoral for anyone in any case, no excuses. Kant believes in a good will (Bennett 5). He believes that happiness cannot be achieved through a bad will. A good will must consist of truthfulness, doing the right thing and doing it because you care to help. Kant believes that along with having a good will, you should be morally good. Being “morally good” has to do with following the moral law. Under any circumstance, a person should never corrupt the moral law (Bennett 2). Everyone should live their life knowing and living by this moral law, never making mistakes and always making the right decisions for the right reasons. With the scenario given, telling a small lie to a friend, Kant believes that lying is against the moral law. Bentham wanted to optimize happiness, in that case lying was the answer. Whereas, Kant says that people deserve more than that, each person deserves to know the truth and should