Imagination In Maxine Hong Kingston's No Name Woman

1464 Words3 Pages

Imagination is a quality that everyone has, but only some are capable of using. Maxine Hong Kingston wrote “No Name Woman” using a great deal of her imagination. She uses this imagination to give a story to a person whose name has been forgotten. A person whose entire life was erased from the family’s history. Her story was not written to amuse or entertain, but rather to share her aunts’ story, a story that no one else would ever share. The use of imagination in Kingston’s creative nonfiction is the foundation of the story. It fills the gaps of reality while creating a perfect path to show respect to Kingston’s aunt, and simultaneously explains her disagreement with the women in her culture. Without imagination in “No Name Woman” there …show more content…

Men are more likely to be respected than women. That’s how it is in Kingston’s story. The man who impregnated the aunt was never sought out. The townspeople did not fight to figure out who he is, they automatically blamed the woman. Even if they did find out who the man was, there is a very small chance that the village people would have done to the man what they did to the aunt. The author stands by this when she wrote about the baby saying that “it was probably a girl; there is some hope of forgiveness with boys” (Kingston 800). Perhaps if the baby was a boy the mother would have let it live, knowing that it would be treated fairly. Instead the aunt killed both herself and the child to rid themselves of the harsh criticism they were shown and going to be shown for the rest of their lives. The judgment from the townspeople and the harsh criticism women are shown is what led to a young mother to commit suicide and murder her newborn …show more content…

Instead of using the aunt as a way to warn her daughter of the consequences of having sex they may have warned her of men and the situations that girls may be in if they do not know some men’s intentions. The mother tells Kingston “Now that you have started to menstruate, what happened to her could happen to you. Don’t humiliate us” (Kingston 794). This statement leads us to believe that since the daughter is now considered a woman she has the possibility to shame her family, instead of a warning to protect her virtue it’s a warning to not disgrace the family. The man in the story may very likely have raped her and left her to deal with the consequences. The culture does not warn the daughter to be wary of men, but that she will most likely be the cause of her own

Open Document