Idealism and Realism in International Relations

1314 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Idealism and realism in international relations

In regards to the recent events in Ukraine, international relations (IR) have become a popular topic among people again. However, not many truly understand what the term ‘international relations’ entails. Unlike what we usually see in TV dramas, it is more than just people sending representatives to different countries to visit or negotiation about debatable agreements. International relation, sometimes known as ‘world politics’, began after the First World War. This field of academic study concentrates on the, as its name suggests, the politics on the global level with states as the units, relations between states, and maintaining peace in the international system. Areas of international relations include diplomacy, international law, international finance, etc. Within this field of study, idealism and realism are two main theories. The two rivaling theories have been on a great debate, or discussion, since the emergence of international relations. From interpretation to decision-making, they are on distinctive stand from each other. On one hand, idealism focus on what ‘should’ be rather than the reality, while realism focus on what ‘is’ rather than the ideal outcome. In this essay, I will discuss about the characteristics of the two theories and compare the proponents each theory is trying to achieve. After the rise of total war in War World I, the president of United States, led the US in1917, despite the long fight he had put up to maintain United States’ status as a neutral party, into the war in hopes for peace by defeating those that are responsible for the conflicts. This is the beginning of idealism in international relations. Also known as liberal theory or liberalism in IR, idealism is a positive view of human nature c... ... middle of paper ... ...s. Retrieved from: http://ire.sagepub.com/content/16/1/33.full.pdf Buchanan, P. J., (2003). Why the League of Nations Failed. Retrieved from: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-the-league-of-nations-failed/ Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., Lawson, S., & MacDonald, D. B. (2013). Introduction to Politics: Canadian Edition. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press The Columbia Electronic Encyclopaedia, 6th ed. (2012). International Relations. Retrieved from: http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/history/international-relations.html Strohmer. C., (n. d.). Realism & Idealism. Retrieved from: http://www.charlesstrohmer.com/international-relations/international-relations-101/realism-idealism/all/1/ Wilson, P. (2011). Idealism in international relations. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/41929/1/Idealism%20in%20international%20relations%20(LSERO).pdf

Show More
Related

  • Russia, Ukraine & the World: Current Events

    1452 Words  | 3 Pages

    International politics as one may imagine includes foreign affairs. This is why the topic and focus of this paper revolves around the current event within Eastern Europe. It will focus on both Russia, Ukraine, and the world, and from it, it will be analyzed by using the resources provided within class. After all it is a International Politics course, and one of the best ways to effectively put the skills and knowledge to use is to focus on an event or current event. The paper will attempt to go over in a chronological order of the events that has happened, and what is happening currently over in Ukraine. Afterwards, an analyzed input will be implemented providing reasoning behind Russia's actions, and actions of the world, and potentially some solutions.

    Read More

  • Treaty-Making in Canada

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leeson, H. A., & University of Regina (2009). Saskatchewan politics: Crowding the centre. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina.

    Read More

  • Why The Discovery of Insulin is a Defining Moment in Canadian History

    2048 Words  | 5 Pages

    Wilson, J. Bradely Cruxton and W. Douglas. Spotlight Canada Fourth Edition. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Read More

  • Canadian Technological Advancement in the 20th Century

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    Newman, Garfield et al. Canada A Nation Unfolding. Toronto: Mc Graw – Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000.

    Read More

  • Quebec Separatism

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    (2011, May 2). Retrieved May 15, 2014, from Elections Canada website: http://www.elections.ca/scripts/ovr2011/default.html. Patriquin, M. (2014, April 11). The epic collapse of Quebec separatism. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from Maclean’s website: http://www.macleans.ca/politics/the-epic-collapse-of-separatism/. Quebec Separatism.

    Read More

  • Democratic Deficit in Canada

    1721 Words  | 4 Pages

    Heath, Joseph. "The democracy deficit in Canada." University of Toronto. homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~jheath/democracy.pdf (accessed October 17, 2013)

    Read More

  • William Lyon Mackenzie King

    607 Words  | 2 Pages

    Quinlan, Don, Doug Baldwin, Rick Mahoney, and Kevin Reed. The Canadian Challenge. N.p.: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Read More

  • Regionalism in Canada

    1815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gibbins, R A New Senate for a More Democratic Canada. Calgary: The Canada West Foundation, 1981

    Read More

  • Plurality Voting System in Canada

    2538 Words  | 6 Pages

    Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., & Lawson, S. (2009). Introduction to politics. Oxford, England: Oxford UP.

    Read More

  • Canada's Electoral System

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    May, E. (2009). Losing Confidence: Power, politics, and the crisis in Canadian democracy. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.

    Read More

  • Does a Minority Government Hinder a Governing Party?

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cody, Howard. "Minority Government in Canada: The Stephen Harper Experience." In American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 38, Issue 1. 27-42. Routledge, 2008.

    Read More

  • Understanding International Relations

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.

    Read More

  • Realism And Liberalism Research Paper

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    In International Relations it is commonly accepted that there is a wide range of different theoretical approaches which attempt to provide an explanation for the different dynamics of the global political system. Realism and Liberalism are well known theories which are considered to be two of the most important theories in international relations. They are two contrasting ideas when it comes to explaining how two states relate to each other in the absence of a world government. Both theories agree that the world is in anarchy and therefore it is helpful to start with a definition of anarchy and what it implies. This essay aims to discuss the contrasts between Liberalism and Realism as well as how these two theories agree that the world is anarchy.

    Read More

  • Structural Realism after the Cold War

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prominent scholar of Political Science, Kenneth N. Waltz, founder of neorealism, has proposed controversial realist theories in his work. Publications such as "Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis", "Theory of International Politics” and “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate,” demonstrate how Waltz's approach was motivated by the American military power. In acquaintance of this fact, the purpose of this paper is to critically analyze Waltz theoretical argument from the journal "Structural Realism after the Cold War". Firstly, this paper will indicate the author's thesis and the arguments supporting it. Secondly, limitations found in theoretical arguments will be illustrated and thirdly, synergies between the author's thesis and this analysis will be exposed.

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    People’s ideas and assumptions about world politics shape and construct the theories that help explain world conflicts and events. These assumptions can be classified into various known theoretical perspectives; the most dominant is political realism. Political realism is the most common theoretical approach when it is in means of foreign policy and international issues. It is known as “realpolitik” and emphasis that the most important actor in global politics is the state, which pursues self-interests, security, and growing power (Ray and Kaarbo 3). Realists generally suggest that interstate cooperation is severely limited by each state’s need to guarantee its own security in a global condition of anarchy. Political realist view international politics as a struggle for power dominated by organized violence, “All history shows that nations active in international politics are continuously preparing for, actively involved in, or recovering from organized violence in the form of war” (Kegley 94). The downside of the political realist perspective is that their emphasis on power and self-interest is their skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states.

    Read More

More about Idealism and Realism in International Relations

Open Document