Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Into the wild by jon krakauer literary elements
Realism and romanticism
Into the wild by jon krakauer literary elements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Into the wild by jon krakauer literary elements
1.
The difference between romanticism and realism is the different focuses within the book. Romanticism focuses more on the emotion and the fantasy aspects of the story. “Into the Wild” made Chris seem to almost have a superman complex, I had suspicions about this throughout the book but I wasn't not completely convinced until Carine said, “Chris didn’t think twice about risking his own life.”(128) This is where I drew the conclusion that Chris seemed to believe he was invincible to the harm of the real world.
In a book of realism the author focuses on the authenticity of the characters and tries to simulate normalcy within the character's lives. Realism is the contrast of idealism, and realism the author attempts to unveil things as they
…show more content…
truly are, not masking them in the quintessential coating we would generally see in a book that portrays romanticism. I can see why Chris became so obsessed with going to Alaska. It seemed like such a pure way to live. Although, between his jaded views from the constant so called “reassurance” from all of the books he read, convincing him to believe this was almost a fantasy land. The book as a whole bounces back between Chris and his weary view of the world and for Chris Alaska was the holy grail, almost as if this “Great Escape” would separate him from the the grueling world that he loathed. 2. Chris describes this odyssey as “Ultimate Freedom” (179), his final escape, All of Chris’ life it seemed he had no real authority and maybe this was the final test to see how far his freedom really went and how far he could get on his own. Chris goes to extreme measures of isolation to obtain this constant need for freedom. That being said, I can not speak on the behalf of all “young people” but personally I don't think this a venture only sought out by the Post- adolescence of the world but yearned for by a variety of people.
The woman who is stuck in an empty marriage, the mother who drinks too much because she made a few too many wrong turns in her day, the guy stuck in his dead end job, or the man who is simply bored with his bland life, they are all craving freedom in one way or another but have no idea how to approach their goals. In that sense i admire Chris for attempting to live the life he sought out for, even if it got him …show more content…
killed. Many may have Viewed Chris as a rebel to society, a crusader to the unknown, an excellent example of counterculture. Chris himself was cut from a different cloth, in a sense that he did not mind what society said about him and had no intentions of changing to fit the mold that is cast out for us. Because Chris refused to fit the mold and conform to the mainstream culture he was cast out, but I suspect that anyone that thought of him as an outsider is almost envious of Chris and his strength as an individual. Since he was a boy, Chris had the ability to stand out from the crowd and decide his own path, many who were envious of him are more or less unhappy with themselves for going with the grain. 3. Chris and Walt’s relationship was second-rate at best, Chris seemed to have a constant resentment towards his father, even as a child he seemed to be angry or bitter. Chris described their relationship as “so irrational, so oppressive, disrespectful and insulting” and claimed that he had “finally passed my breaking point.(Krakauer 64).” The relationship grew more strenuous as Chris began to look deeper into his father's past, unveiling his secret life and uncovering a chilling past filled with lies and deceit, “Walt’s split from his first wife, Marcia, was not a clean or amicable parting. Long after falling in love with Billie, long after she gave birth to Chris, Walt continued his relationship with Marcia in secret, dividing his time between two households, two families. Lies were told and then exposed, begetting more lies to explain away the initial deceptions.(Krakauer 121). Chris’ relationship with his had a large affect on his life later down the road, Chris always seemed to be searching for a father figure, attempting to fill the void his father left with “conditional love (Krakauer 64)” since he was boy. Chris and his mother seemed to have a genuine relationship with an attempt of affection towards one another but the constant misconnections and unspoken words between the two made it hard for them to make a real connection. After becoming so enraged with his parents and their suburban slavery lifestyle, filled with frustration he decides to shut them out completely from his life. Chris seemed to gravitate towards women that come into his life aside from men. Chris found that Carine may be the only person who could truly understand what he was going through. Although, Chris and Carine had very different outlooks on life, Carine was more passive while Chris had more of an aggressive approach towards his parents. Carine tended to keep her head down and keep her feelings and anger to herself. This being said she didn't fully understand how Chris felt. 5.
“To write is to exist” you say, I took this with a grain of salt, because my personal “writing” has been lack lately but this metaphor should not be take so strictly. My “writing” may be seen on the green grass with a ball between my feet, and picasso “wrote” with his paintbrush and a canvas. To express yourself is to exist, to leave your mark on the world is to exist, to be someone who people will remember, with passions and dreams is to exist. To write is to exist, merely skims the surface of what is means to truly exist.
I don't believe the story was entirely about Krakauer, although, some underlying bias that krakauer portrayed throughout the novel may lead one to believe so. I would find it hard fro an author not to leave a little piece of themselves leaving small anecdotes from their personal lives with their piece of work. Maybe krakauer was just trying to exist. Maybe this was his defining moment, he was no longer just a columnist, he was writing about something that mattered to him, putting pen to paper and writing down the soul of a lost man, how could he not has poured a little bit of himself onto the page as well?
6. Chris did not neglect the research aspect of his journey out of negligence or ignorance, i believe that Chris did this on purpose. Throughout the book i was never led to believe that Chris was the type of person to follow someone else's path or to trail behind the people that had come before him. Although, Chris did however rely on the literature and the authors he admired throughout his journey, but not necessarily in the sense of his livelihood but he relied on the books more to keep him sane. The books and the literature that he read grasped him to what he was yearning for. The Books aloud him to keep hold of what he was doing this all for, what he was risking his life for as a whole, searching for solitude. Chris was told multiple times throughout his journey that he was ill prepared for the journey he was about to face, told that he didn't have the right equipment for survival and that he did not have the correcting clothing to live in the wilderness. This as a whole intrigued me, he knew he was was ill equipped and yet he continued, this tells me that he wasn't interested in doing this the easy way and doing this the hard way although it may have cost him his life, allowed him to find clarity within himself. 7. Krakauer had a strong personal connection with Chris, connecting his experience of going into the mountains as a young man with the journey Chris had experienced, although Chris seemed to be more of a risk taker than Jon, he still felt a kinship with the boy. I found a sense of resolution when John wrote, “if he pitied himself in those last difficult hours -- because he was so young, because he was alone, because his body had betrayed him and his will had let him down” CHAPTER 12 I feel as if Jon felt that This could have been him up on that mountain as a young man, searching for his freedom just like Chris was. By using Chris’ journals he was able to continue this near friendship by connecting with him on a nearly day to day basis through his journal entries. When Krakauer realizes that Chris was killed by poison he felt sorrow for Chris and yet an eerie feeling of serene and calm overcame me as i read the last few chapters. The ties between author and subject had been broken by death. I almost felt bad for Jon, almost as if he had lost a friend he had known for years.
characters. This is most likely since Krakauer was living Everest first hand, as opposed to Capote who put himself into the environment years later, picking up details here and there instead of relying solely on memory and friends.
In the first chapter of Into the Wild, Krakauer is able to establish the tone by using certain words and techniques to further punctuate it. By the way he writes, it is clear that the tone is objective. He shows this by not inputting any of his own opinion or beliefs in the first chapter. Instead, he just went with the facts. In addition, his word choices show that the tone can also be classified as serious. “He persuaded the young hitchhiker to take the food as well” (7). Instead of “persuaded”, he could have simply used the word “offered” but he wanted to get it across clearly that Gallien really wanted him to accept the food and other equipment because he knew with the stuff Alex had that he would not make it out in the wilderness. This shows the seriousness of the situation. With careful word choices and techniques, Krakauer was able to set up the tone of the first chapter.
Bret Harte's "The Outcasts of Poker Flat" is an excellent example of realism. Harte uses realistic characters that use everyday language with a hint of local color from California, which is where the story is set. The characters are put through real situations and faced with troubles that we go through day to day. Bret Harte lived through the California gold rush and was able to create a very realistic setting and characters. Since he actually experienced the culture and people of this time the words create a very detailed picture, and the characters come to life in your
Krakauer observes that it is not “unusual for a young man to be drawn to a pursuit considered reckless by his elders.” Identify two details from this chapter where McCandless exemplifies this observation. Explain whether or not McCandless would agree with Krakauer. Finally compare McCandless’ view with that of one of the following men mentioned in this chapter: Andy Horowitz, Gordon Samel, Roman Dial, Sir John
Jon Krakauer is a very unique author which his story creates many emotional and valuable lesson throughout the story.
Through his use of special organization, factual accounts and complex syntax, he is able to display McCandless as a person who was living the life that he wanted to live. He was kind and respectful to the people he met along the way, even helping them through their own hardships at times. This is the type person that Krakauer wanted to paint a picture of. He wanted to make sure that people did not see McCandless as the “nut” who did himself in. To make sure that the McCandless family could be proud of their son for being brave and doing what many would be too scared to attempt even if they wanted to. By writing this novel with the impressive rhetoric that he did, Krakauer was able to defend the actions of the late Chris McCandless and paint him as the bright young man that he
First, Realism is a definite movement away from the Romantic period. Romantics wrote regarding the unique and the unusual, whereas in Realism, literature was written about the average and ordinary. The town where the novel takes place is Starkfield, an average farming community. There is not much in the town that is of interest or anything extravagant to be known for. In addition, literature from Romanticism focused on hopes, while Realistic literature illustrated skepticism and doubt. The narrator describes the scene where Zeena declares to Ethan that her sickness is getting serious, saying, "She continued to gaze at him ...
The most important part in writing a novel is to enable the audience to understand what is being communicated. Krakauer did so by clearly communicating his message to his audience. He wanted to share the story of McCandless, a young man who dreamt of conquering the wilderness alone. This conquest ultimately ended in failure and cast a feeling of sorrow upon his family and friends. With the exception of a slight difficulty to understand the story during certain chapters, Krakauer’s novel was full of thrill of emotion and life-lessons.
Realism, in philosophical terms, refers to the concept that there is a reality beyond our perception. This means that how we see things and what we believe about them has no impact on the nature of said things. For example an individual may see an object as blue and another see the same object to be red, this is merely a disagreement between both parties about how they should label the colour. This wouldn’t mean that both parties are discussing different objects, this shows that no matter what individual’s beliefs or thoughts on the real world are only ever approximations and do not accurately capture reality. (O’Brien, M and Yar, M, 2008)
Realism started in France in the 1830s. It was very popular there for a long time. A man named Friedrich Schiller came up with the word “realism.” Realism is based on contemporary life. There is a very accurate and honest representation of characters in this style of art. Realism tries to combine romanticism and the enlightenment. Life isn’t just about mind and not just about feelings either, it’s about both feelings and reason together. As said in the na...
Realism occurs everyday, one may not know but its the reason why know not everyone gets to live their lives to a happy ending, its the reason why sometimes you can't get everything you want in your life. Realism is the attitude or practice of accepting a situation as it is and being prepared to deal with it accordingly. Realism is a trend which takes place in the nineteenth century during which literature depicted life "as is," and focuses on real life. This literary movement frequently depicted everyday life; it follows the rule of a phenomenal world and that nothing is added to your life. It is the reverse job of what a filter would do to all the troubles that one may encounter later in life. Realism is represented in Kate Chopin's short stories The Story of an Hour and A Pair of Silk Stockings. In both the short stories, the main characters get to face a dream/fantasy that they’ve always wanted to encounter; something rare that lasted only for a short amount of time. The freedom that each character got was some sort of new freedom that they never experienced before. For example in The Story of an Hour, the main character Louise Mallards is feels oppressed because she can't live for herself. She realizes at the end that her husband was alive the whole time and that her short fantasy came to an end. She thought that it would last forever until the death of her but she was wrong. Another example of realism is A Pair of Silk Stockings, the main character of this story was Little Mrs Sommers. She finds fifteen dollars on the floor and this feeling of having this much money eventually controls her until its all gone. Her lack of being able to control herself and curiosity controls her and the money. W...
Krakauer’s purpose is to show individuals should not allow outside forces to control the direction of their lives but instead, individuals should be free to live the way that see fit. In order to achieve this freedom, Krakauer advocates for his audience to emulate McCandless and sever ties with anything and everything that hinders personal freedom.
Stories about romanticism is way different from realism. Like in “masque of the red death” it obiously represents more romanticism than realism. “Masque of the red death” adds a lot of details that can not actually happen, more like a fantasy. While in “to build a fire” it is realistics and the details focus more on real life events than can happen.
In conclusion I think that one of the reasons Krakauer decided to write about Chris McCandless is the fact that he found so many disturbing coincidences about his own life that he felt obligated to tell Chris’s story. I think it is quite possible Jon feels guilty about having survived when Chris died. Either way, I think both men were success full even though they both had very different goals and outcomes.
Realism is a literary style in which the author describes people, their actions, their emotions and surroundings as close to the reality as possible. The characters are not perfectly good or completely evil; they exhibit strengths and weaknesses, just as real people. The characters often commit crimes or do immoral things, and are not always just good or just evil. In a realistic novel, aspects of the time period or location are also taken into consideration. Characters dress in clothes that befit them, and speak with local dialects. Most importantly, characters are not sugar coated or exaggerated. The characters do things as they would normally do them, and are not worse or better then their real life counterparts.