Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy in healthcare
Philosophy of healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy in healthcare
Healthcare is the maintenance and improvement of physical and mental health, especially through the provision of medical services and is also the topic I chose for this paper. A familiar and well known argument heard in health care and health care policies reform debate is that the government should have nothing to do and stay out of health care. That they should let the market allocate resources efficiently. It is further argued that government rules and regulations applied in health care markets interfere with proper resource allocation resulting in inefficiency. The argument further states that without government interference, the “invisible hand” of the market would allocate resources optimally leading to economic efficiency in health care. Although interesting, this argument is based on the assumption that health care meets all necessary conditions for an ideal perfect/free market. Unfortunately, this assumption is never articulated …show more content…
explicitly therefore the argument is not fully explored, understood or challenged. It is important to explore fully the argument, the assumptions made about the free market, and the conditions necessary for the “invisible hand” to allocate resources efficiently. A market that meets all necessary conditions for efficient resource allocation is an ideal in economic theory, but a rarity in the real world.
Markets do fail because necessary conditions for perfect/free markets are rarely met in any industry and least of all in health care. When the necessary conditions of the ideal free market are not met, there can be market failures some of which are not easily corrected by the market and therefore require interventions from outside the market. Another important issue that is also rarely articulated is whether free markets are a desirable feature of a health care system. This issue cannot be easily addressed through economic theory. It is an issue that requires a closer examination of the philosophy behind the foundation of the health care system in any country. It requires an examination of the culture and beliefs of the country about health and health care. Is health care a commodity to be bought and sold for profit, or is it a basic human right that should be accessible to all
citizens? Health care has several interdependent markets such as: education, manpower, institutional, pharmaceutical and others. The education market determines how many doctors, nurses and other professionals are trained every year and therefore how many such professionals are available to provide services. In this market, prices can be viewed in terms of tuition and other costs to the individual seeking training to be a physician, a nurse or other professional. Manpower markets determine labour prices (salaries and wages) paid to professionals. Institutional markets determine prices for hospital stays, or stays in nursing homes. In the pharmaceutical markets, prices of medications are determined. One can identify many other markets in health care. Because of the nature of the product for sale and the structure of health care markets most of these markets do not meet the ideal perfect market conditions that facilitate efficient resource allocation.
An issue that is widely discussed and debated concerning the United States’ economy is our health care system. The health care system in the United States is not public, meaning that the states does not offer free or affordable health care service. In Canada, France and Great Britain, for example, the government funds health care through taxes. The United States, on the other hand, opted for another direction and passed the burden of health care spending on individual consumers as well as employers and insurers. In July 2006, the issue was transparency: should the American people know the price of the health care service they use and the results doctors and hospitals achieve? The Wall Street Journal article revealed that “U.S. hospitals, most of them nonprofit, charged un-insured patients prices that vastly exceeded those they charged their insured patients. Driving their un-insured patients into bankruptcy." (p. B1) The most expensive health care system in the world is that of America. I will talk about the health insurance in U.S., the health care in other countries, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, and my solution to this problem.
Does every citizen have the right to have access to basic health care in the wealthiest country of the world? The current healthcare system in America has many inequalities in the access, quality, and cost of healthcare among different economic groups of people. In addition, it would be more beneficial to give citizens access to preventative care that could avoid health issues by addressing them early on, while they are still manageable. Siegfried Karsten (1995), professor of economics at West Georgia College, brings up a valid argument in the American Journal of Economics and Sociology when he questions whether “society really can afford not to cover all people…..is it economically and politically rational to continue to have millions of people develop serious health problems, at great costs to society……because they are financially unable to obtain the necessary medical care when it does them the most good?” (p.138). The cost of healthcare in America is a deterrent to lower income groups who cannot afford insurance, or even if they have insurance, hesitate to seek treatment due to deductibles and copays.
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
In a universal health care system, the quality of care does not match that of a managed care system because because patients do not have as much say in their health care, wait times are longer versus a managed care, the actual care maybe viewed as less optimal, and doctors may not able to handle the stress of such a system. A universal health care system adds a political side to any type of medical decision because th...
A health care system that provides free health care services to its entire citizen can be termed as universal health care. This is a situation where all citizens are protected from financial costs in health care. It is recognized around the globe as it provides a specific package of benefits to all citizens in the entire nation. For instance, free health care can result to improved health outcomes. In addition, it provides financial risk protection and an improved access to health services. There is an increasing debate on how citizen should be provided with free medical services. Although United State does not permit free health care services it should have free health care for all citizens. This is due to the fact that healthcare is the largest industry in United State. Due to the fact that United State is a rich country, it should have a healthcare system that provides free services such as treatment for its entire citizen. This will play a significant role, as it will stop medical bankruptcies in...
People argue about the constitutionalism of the healthcare reforms. The same people tend to wonder of the congress can require each and every person to be purchasing health instance from the private companies. They hold that the congress has managed to use its taxing power to facilitate funding for the Social Security and Medicare but never before has it ever considered using its commerce power to make it mandatory that each individual have to engage in economic transactions with the private
In today’s society, there is growing sentiment that our government should provide a “socialized” type of universal medicine for the masses; that the onus to provide healthcare should no longer be on the individual or business. I posit that entrusting our healthcare to a government that can barely manage itself is misguided; that even if The United States could successfully implement a system of socialized medicine the economic and medical hardships this would cause to so many would far outweigh the benefits to a relative few. Although socialized medicine appears to provide adequate healthcare for each person, regardless of economic status, in reality this flawed and expensive system penalizes everyone associated with it. It will cause wide spread economic distress, a marked increase in taxes, and will severely limit access to care.
6. The special characteristics of the U.S. health care market are Ethical and equity considerations, asymmetric information, spillover benefits, and third-party payments: insurance. Each one of these characteristics affects health care in some way. For example, ethical and equity considerations affect health care in the way that society does not consider unjust for people to be denied to health care access. Society believes that it is the same thing as not owning a car or a computer. Asymmetric information also gives health care a boost in prices. People who buy health care have no information on what procedures and diagnostics are involved, but on the other hand sellers do. This creates an unusual situation in which the doctor (seller) tells the patient(buyer) what services he or she should consume. It seems like the patient has to buy what the doctor tells him. The topic of spillover benefits also cause a rise in prices. This meaning that immunizations for diseases benefit not only the person who buys it but the whole community as well. It reduces the risk of the whole population getting infected. And the last characteristic is third-party insurance. Which involves all the insurance money people have to pay. This causes a distortion which results in excess consumption of health care services.
“After World War II, it was straightforward for other countries to move from minimal coverage to universal programs because they had few private interests to contend with. Americans, on the other hand, had a vested interest in their private system. Employers and employees wanted to keep insurance as a tax-free job perk, while healthcare providers wanted to protect their income.”
A country’s health care system refers to all the institutions, programs, personnel, procedures, and the resources that are used to meet the health needs of its population. Health care systems vary from one country to another, depending on government policies and the health needs of the population. Besides, health care programs are flexible in the sense that they are tailored to meet health needs as they arise. Among the stakeholders in the formulation of a country’s health care system are governments, religious groups, non-governmental organizations, charity organizations, trade/labor unions, and interested individuals (Duckett, 2008). These entities formulate, implement, evaluate, and reform health services according to the needs of the sections of the population they target.
According to Roy, 2013 the issues of providing the affordable care act will unite both the supporters and offenders of the public policy, but in this current situation where the input costs are rising, it will become impossible for government in managing the public policy related to affordable health care. In order to provide affordable health care, majority of the US government has tried out different policies time to time, but unable to get success in realizing the actual policy goals. By providing the affordable health care to majority of the people who requires more amount as controlling the input cost is not possible (AAMC, 2013). Lack of doctors is one of the primary issue in providing high quality health care to the citizens especially those who are financially poor. The Supreme Court of the country passed an Act related to Health insurance as all should have Health Insurance to all the country people by the year 2014, but the at the same time government is concerned about constitutionality of these act (NYTimes, 2013).
Certain individuals possess insurance while others are helped by the government. On the other hand there are people who need work in a rigorous way so that they can get access to health care but this is in vain as the costs are too high (McNutt 14). The author further instigates the argument that if there were not so many lawsuits within the nation, then so much cost wouldn’t have been charged by the doctors and more people would have managed to go visit the doctor when they require the same. The stance of the author in the article was in favour of the argument that yes free universal health care is a key necessity. The recommendation offered by the author was to make health care free as well as not free in the sense that people should not pay for something that is threatening and they should pay for something that is not threatening their
What makes a health care system good .What would such a system look like if applied to the United States? To answer these questions, we analyzed the health care delivery and financing systems of several countries and individual states. Not one, we concluded, has a perfect system; however, many operate significantly better than ours.
This is a basic economic rule and unless it is followed to begin with it will never work. There is no such thing as “free” health care. This was and still is a common misconception among many Americans. For a long time everyone believed we would be receiving free health care, but this was not true we would only be getting affordable health care. But what if our health care is already affordable and we don’t want to change? If you like your health care you can keep your health care along with the extra money piled on your deductibles and premiums.
The cost of US health care has been steadily increasing for many years causing many Americans to face difficult choices between health care and other priorities in their lives. Health economists are bringing to light the tradeoffs which must be considered in every healthcare decision (Getzen, 2013, p. 427). Therefore, efforts must be made to incite change which constrains the cost of health care without creating adverse health consequences. As the medical field becomes more business oriented, there will be more of a shift in focus toward the costs and benefits, which will make medicine more like the rest of the economy (Getzen, 2013, p. 439).