Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Addressing bias in intelligence testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to the website, I have an IQ of 113. I feel as though a site like www.iqtest.com could produce a “g” score because they make you pay too see an analysis of your results, which indicates to me that they put some effort into producing fairly accurate scores. General intelligence, also known as “g”, describes an individual’s specific mental ability, which is measured by tasks on an IQ test (Myers p. 405). The site breaks down your overall IQ results into different categories of intelligence and gives you an IQ score for how well you tested in a given area. For example, there is a category for “spatial intelligence” which is ones ability to predict what actions will happen based on varied conditions (Website). By looking at the broken …show more content…
However, I do feel like they can be used in a positive way because they can help identify a persons strengths and weakness. Using the results of an IQ a teacher can help build on a child’s strengths or help a child be brought up to a certain level by using various teaching methods that the test helps identify (Myers p. 471). Therefore because of this an IQ test is a poor indictor of future achievement because a child can work to improve what they struggle in and can grow up to be just as successful as everyone else. Another reasons I feel as though an IQ test in unreliable is through the way it is scored, especially for adults. A simply IQ test is calculated by dividing a persons mental age by their chronological age that is then multiplied by 100 (Myers p. 417). The problem with this is that a person who is 40 years old, if given a test that tests the mental ability of a 20 year old, can score an IQ of 50 (Myers p. 471). This is a big problem because the person taking this test could have a much higher IQ and be very successful, but the test does not show this. Also in regards with aptitude and achievement, I feel as though an IQ test fails in this regard as well. A third reason as to why I feel an IQ test is a poor predictor of success is its failure to recognize how achievement and aptitude go hand in hand. An IQ test is an aptitude test, which is constructed to predict an …show more content…
This is because of the bias that is caused by the values of the writer of the IQ test program. There are two meanings of bias. The first meaning of bias looks at innate differences in intelligence and cultural expectations (Myers p. 438). This can be a problem because results of an IQ test may be waited a different way just because of a persons cultural background. With this view it measures a persons education and experiences (Myers p. 438). This also creates a problem because if questions are formed around the assumption that a person has experienced certain events then their true intelligence might not be shown because they might not have experienced the event the question is about and would thus get it wrong, which is no fault of their own. The second meaning, the scientific meaning, involves predicting the future of behavior for some groups (Myers p. 439). This would mean that a test could have a bias to what gender would have a better future. With this it could inaccurately portray a particular gender party and not give them the accurate intelligence score they actually
The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition, also referred to as KBIT-2, is a test designed to measure verbal and nonverbal intelligence in people ages 4 to 90 years of age (Harris, 2013). The KBIT-2 has three subtests: two Verbal subtests and one Nonverbal subtests. The KBIT-2 Manuel typically takes between 15 to 30 depending on the age of the participant (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1990). This is shown in Table 1, with the distribution of times and how they change depending on age.
Currently I am on the U-High varsity soccer team with many of my other classmates. I am currently taking a hand full of very hard, challenging courses this year and by taking these hard classes I am learning tons of new subjects, therefore raising my IQ. According to Kendra Cherry, a professional psychologist, the average IQ ranges anywhere from 85 to 120. While reading about IQ I was inquisitive to know what my own score would be so I took an online IQ test. I know that this test was probably not the most accurate test in the world but it gives a baseline, which for me was 138. This shows that my IQ is on the high range compared to the average scores. Also I am a junior this year, while there are players from every other grades on the team as well. I am on the varsity team, but I do not start and I very rarely have the chance to enter the game. On the other hand a teammate of mine, who is a freshman, starts in every game. Since I am a junior and he is a freshman, I have had more education because I have been in school for that much longer than him. Also my IQ is above average while his is probably a little bit lower than mine. Even though I have a higher IQ than him, he is a more successful soccer player than I am. Knowing this you could make the assumption that a higher IQ does not necessarily lead to being more successful in soccer.
Before answering the questions let find out what intelligence test is. It is a test consisting of a series of tasks requiring people to use various verbal and non verbal skills to measure the individual’s intellectual ability. Now that we know what an intelligence test is we can now answer the question better. Three important short comings of intelligence test that have nothing to do with intelligence are: having low motivation or high anxiety which can greatly influence the performance on the test, also IQ test may contain cultural biases in their language and or tasks that may place people of one background above people of another back ground, and members of minority groups may have little experience with this kind of test or may be uncomfortable with examiners of a different ethnic back ground than them (Comer, 2013, pp.107).
The g factor, or "general factor", is a construct developed in psychometrics to determine cognitive abilities. It is a variable that summarizes positive correlations among various cognitive tasks, which demonstrate an individual's performance at one type of cognitive task tends to be comparable to his or her performance at other kinds of cognitive tasks. The g factor typically accounts for 40 to 50 percent of the variance in IQ test performance, and IQ scores are frequently regarded as estimates of an individual's g factor rating (Kamphaus et al. 2005). The terms IQ, general intelligence, general cognitive ability, general mental ability, or simply intelligence, are often used interchangeably to refer to the common core shared by cognitive tests (Deary et al, 2012).
In order for a test to have appeal is must have validity (Cohen, 2012). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales has been praised for its validity, and it utilizes the CHC model with is a composite model of intelligence (Cohen, 2012). The Wechsler model also shows strong validity and it also uses the CHC model (Cohen,
In the popular “Darwin’s Theory” survival of the fittest was the key role in evolution, but does that include intelligence? Robert Ehrlich discusses the evolution of intelligence in his article “Are People Getting Smarter or Dumber?” Through several standardized testing, it is easy to see the rapid incline of passing students in the past few years. IQ scores have also been on the incline. The rapid inclination of IQ score has become known as the Flynn Effect. The Flynn Effect seems like solid supporting evidence for evolution, but the Flynn Effect has flaws. It is impossible to narrow down why humans are achieving high IQ scores. Many factors could play into the high IQ scores such as test taking skills. The high IQ scores correlate with the amount of standardized testing. Since students are taking several standardized tests a semester, they are becoming test savoy. In actuality, scientists are believing humankind is becoming
It is hard to say whether these tests are efficient in assessing a student’s knowledge. There have been studies done that shows how students perform contributes to a number of factors. Students are individuals just as adults and can easily slip up on a test, just as many adults have done because of numerous reasons. They suffer from stress, lack of sleep, how they are feeling, whether they ate, and many other reasons. “These influences most dramatically affect low-income students and students of color” (French, 2003). From the rise of immigration there have been tests (IQ and Stanford-Binet) that were used to sort and track students based on race and income. According to a study it has been concluded that these tests will continue to hinder the ability of Black and Latino students to graduate from high school (Orfield and Wald, 2000; Haney, 1999; McNeil, 2000).
Intelligence tests have been developed by scientists as a tool to categorize army recruits or analyze school children. But still discussing what intelligence is, academics have a difficult time defining what intelligence tests should measure. According to the American researcher Thorndike, intelligence is only that what intelligence tests claim it is (Comer, Gould, & Furnham, 2013). Thus, depending on what is being researched in the test and depending on the scientist’s definition of intelligence the meaning of the word intelligence may vary a lot. This essay will discuss what intelligence is in order to be able to understand the intelligence theories and aims of intelligence tests.
Students do not get to express their understanding of the world or to even form their own opinions. Instead they are given a limited amount of time to dance the steps that are deemed important. In these tests there is only one right answer and no room to question or to think critically about them. The “whys” students have always wanted to ask are never answered on the test. If intelligence includes abstract thought, questioning, and creativity, then Standardized tests are in no way measuring students intelligence.
In project 1, my review outlines my personal personality type, as completed on the website for the Jung Typology Test. According to the Myers-Briggs Personality Test online, my type was indicated to show that I am Introvert, Sensing, Feeling and Judging (ISFJ) according to review within the humanmetrics.com =Criterion needs work website. In this case review and upon my own personality review, the framework of my meaning as outlined in the Myers-Briggs personality type description can lead me to truly understand each one of my own personal attributes and can lead others in this course in truly understanding the reasons we are who we are and convictions for loving, fighting, arguing, and even the passionate behaviors and other personal responses we show to ourselves and especially others. In personality assessments, such as in this week’s agenda, we are not out to simply label ourselves or most importantly others, but overall should be thinking of how we may obtain a distinctive understanding of our foundational
Taking the Briggs test it seems I am one of the rare types, INFJ type personality. This makes me somewhat of a complex person with a complex personality that is often misunderstood. When reading the results I could relate to each and every category results. While shaking my head yes as I read on, it was surprising to me that a simple test can out line me as a person.
Can intelligence be measured? Does an IQ test actually measure a person’s intelligence? The answers all depend on who you ask.
The test that I took that day over 13 years ago was an IQ test, a test to determine my "Intelligence Quotient." IQ tests have long been used as placement tests, and are used even today by many school systems to determine the levels of the students in their schools. However, a current trend in education is to try to move away from these types of tests. J. S. Renzulli has been widely recognized as an authority on gifted and talented education for a long time. In a 1996 article, Renzulli and J. H. Purcell talk about some of the new trends in the ...
Even the DSM-5 ensures that the IQ tests are not “overemphasized as the defining factor of a person’s overall ability without adequately considering function levels.” Moore, over the course of 18 years, took seven IQ tests, averaging at 70.66. Five of the seven IQ tests he took were administered before the age of 18; however, the CCA only considered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children test which he made a 78 on and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale test which he scored 74. The CCA held, “Moore’s IQ scores placed him above the intellectually disabled range,” and therefore, “failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence that he has significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning.” The AAIDD recognize that an individual with an intellectual disability has the potential of having an IQ score of as high as 75. Unfortunately, we have reason to believe that the CCA did not take into consider mitigating factors that would further prove the significant subaverage general intellectual functioning (i.e. his head injury in when he was ten, dropping out of school in ninth grade, failing second grade twice). DSM-V explains that when assessing IQ test scores, clinicians must include a margin for measurement of plus or minus five points (65-75) — a standard recognized in Hall. Using
that test was my personality type which is (ISTJ) Introvert, Sensing, Thinking and Judging. I