More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and movie comparison of the hunger game
The distinction between the movie and novel called The Hunger Games and the effect
The hunger games book vs movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and movie comparison of the hunger game
Konstantin Ryabokon ESL -262 08.06.2014 Hunger Games Movie/Book Differences Surprisingly movie showed many elements, which were not included in the first book or were include briefly, such as appearance of Seneca Crane and President Snow. The story of the mockingjay, as well as some fragments in the Hunger Games itself. Similarly there were changes of delivering Katniss thoughts to the audience (that is to say us). First noticeable change that appeared include mockingjay pin, which in the book have a major foundation and a bit story behind it. However in the movie scene was shorted and altered. Symbol of the district is important piece of story, but it is not necessary to cover its background in movie. In the book Katniss got the pin from
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
Science fiction writers create a particular setting not only to entertain readers but to give clues on lessons they believe human beings are struggling to understand. In both books, The Hunger Games and Catching Fire, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark are introduced as the main characters to project the criticisms made by the author. Susan Collins creates a Dystopian society ruled by the Capital. Different areas of their country, named Panem, are separated into different districts. Two kids from each of the twelve districts are chosen at random to fight in an arena until 1 tribute is left, this is called The Hunger Games Both Peeta and Katniss fight together during the hunger games as a team from District 12. Between the two books, Collins portrays the idea that humans tend to be disrespectful and insulting, depending on another's wealth and/or authority and power. Both The Hunger Games and Catching Fire connect with readers but also indicated the problem with certain human behaviors that most people don't notice or fail to
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
There were countless small differences in the film as compared to the book, things such as shuffling the order in which chapters appeared in the film. For example, the beginning of the film took a different path than the beginning of the book. In the book the first chapter set the tone for the rest of the book, describing the firefight and all that had gone wrong, Burning into your mind the thought of Ron Kovic lying on the ground bleeding, paralyzed, screaming for help and hearing people get shot all around him. The beginning of the film is a different story all together. It gives you hope, it lulls you into believing that this is a happy story, the kind where everything always works out in the end. It is not until after the entire buildup of the character, after you feel as if you know him, that you see this scene. The accidental killing of the civilians, the baby, the killing of the corporal, all these things happen before you find out that this soldier, this Marine, will come home paralyzed.
Neither the novel nor film version of To Kill A Mockingbird is superior to the other, just different. In the book you delve more into the separate characters while in the film you see the relationships in action. The book gives you a broader view of everything, but at the same time the movie points out everything that seems important. Lastly, the novel shows Scout as a girl caught in the middle, when the movie seems to paint Scout as a girl without a inkling of what is going on.
...ter their survival chances. The story was adapted to film by Gary Ross and altered to his desires. The adaptation is a complement to the original story and most alterations were to compress the film to comply with time restrictions. The focuses on strategy had to be altered as the perception on the story has changed and cannot follow all of Katniss’ thoughts. As such, Ross could not include details like Collins as the novel was told from Katniss’ point of view. The limiting details force Ross to focus more on visual representations of strategy than that of Collins, who had the ability to describe and use emotional character ties in her strategies. In short, the similarities between text and film uphold the strength and value of the work, while the differences in the cinema adaption cause minor lapses in detail that do not effect the overall significance of the work.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
The serious difference between movie and book is a portrayal of Haymitch. In the book he was described as punchy, middle-age man, who won the Hunger Games, and who always handle a bottle of alcohol with him (Collins, 28). Being drunk on the Reaping, he falls off from the stage and declaring himself as a buffoon person. While in the movie he was shown as grumpy and taciturn person, who doesn’t care about anybody around, and scene from the Reaping was cut. It is a total misconception, because being described as an alcoholic in the book, Haymitch impugns his help as a mentor for Katniss and Peeta, which means they will need to decide everything by their own. Even Haymitch’s advice to Katniss and Peeta had shown different between book and movie. In the book, Haymitch said, “Here’s some advice. Stay...
In the film they left out lots of important scenes. The movie seemed rushed. They should’ve made the movie with each and every scene, even if it would’ve been five hours long. There are people who are big fans of the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, and then seeing how the film didn’t use every scene makes it disappointing to watch. An example of some differences were in the courtroom scene. Most of the scene was the same except for a couple parts. The difference that caught my eye was Tom Robinson’s arm. It was completely different comparing the novel from the movie. In the book it said that he had caught his arm in a grinder. His arm was described as a small shriveled hand that was fully twelve inches shorter than his right, and hung dead at his side. In the movie his left hand looked exactly the same as his right hand. Another difference was during the courtroom scene as well. This scene wasn’t even included in the film; it’s important to the theme. It was when Dill started crying and couldn’t stop. Scout had to take Dill because people started to hear him in the balcony. Scout had thought he was crying because he hadn’t fully recovered from running away. Dill wasn’t crying over that he was crying because of how Mr. Gilmer was treating Tom. Dill and Scout being kids, they still have their innocence. They're starting to see how cruel the world is; they’re not accepting, but upset of how the world truly is.
Imagine being in a game where everyone dies except for one victor, and you have to risk your life to save your little sister’s life. Also imagine not being able to speak freely in your own home. These are some examples of how dystopian governments take control of the people in the societies in dystopian novels. The governments of 1984 and The Hunger Games share the dystopian goal of dehumanizing their citizens in order to maintain and win control over the citizens. The Party and the Capitol are after power, and whoever has control of the people in a society has has all the power.
Divergent and The Hunger Games are two of the most successful movies released in 2014. The movies attracted a large number of viewers who were able to connect with the characters and the story being told. Many people found themselves getting emotionally involved in the characters lives. In both movies, it is easy to find yourself rooting for the underdog and hoping that only the best happens in the end. Both movies are remarkably similar because they feature similar strong female leads, display omnipotent authority, practice dystopian societies, and have a clear distinction between good versus evil.