Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kafka a hunger artist analysis
Kafka a hunger artist analysis
Kafka a hunger artist analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kafka a hunger artist analysis
When we think of someone obsessed with gaining more, we think of money or physical objects, but this is not always the case. All some people want and crave is glory and attention. Such was the case of “The Hunger Artist” by Franz Kafka. The Hunger Artist was into professional fasting and he traveled to different towns to put on shows. His shows would consist of him depriving himself of food for 40 days which was the limit set by his boss. As professional fasting loses popularity he sells himself off to a circus where he hopes that he will once again find that recognition and praise he is seeking but ends up dying from his deprivation of food. From the beginning the Hunger Artist shows arrogance and annoyance at what he has endure from the people. …show more content…
He drew crowds of all ages. However, not even at this point is he content or satisfied. People stayed and watched him over night and he would tell jokes or let them touch him, but not even that was enough for him. He just had to prove to them that they could never do what he was doing “But his happiest moment was when the morning came and an enormous breakfast was brought them, at his expense, on which they flung themselves with the keen appetite of healthy men after a weary night of wakefulness” (Kafka 320). So not only does he enjoy their company and staying up all night to reassure them that he has not eaten anything, but he then thinks it’s a good idea to treat his spectators to a breakfast paid by him. This shows just how arrogant and conceited the artist is. One of course could argue that he did it out of kindness, however, there were many other ways in which he could have thanked them such as by giving the spectators free tickets or a photograph. Instead what he did was throw it in their face that he had the ability to do what they could not. Other watchers who did not pay attention to him at night irritated him, “Nothing annoyed the artist more than such watchers; they made him miserable; they made his fast seem unendurable” (Kafka 319). Had he purely been doing his job to entertain others then he wouldn’t have been annoyed by the watchers who were not as interested in what he was doing. Yet his …show more content…
However, he can never attain the recognition and glory he wants, for he knows that fasting is too easy for him, “For he alone knew, what no other initiate knew, how easy it was to fast. It was the easiest thing in the world.” (Kafka 320). In that moment we know not why it is easy for him but this lets us in on the fact that the Hunger Artist is not trying. He is just simply doing what comes natural to him and thus this is why he is unhappy. The Hunger Artist knows that he has not achieved anything and as such when he is unable to draw a crowd sells himself off to the circus in order to try to prove himself once more, only to
In the poem Juggler, Richard Wilbur conveys the routine of a talented entertainer through figurative and imagery, which reveals how the speaker is completely delighted by the act. This poem, while portraying the juggler in colorful hues and the performance to be one full of action, allows the reader to view the captivation the speaker gains from observing the avid
In society, most people have an obsession to some extent, these may include such things as a hobby – collecting antiques; or even as simple as having to have things a certain way. For others though, obsession has a different meaning, they might become obsessed with one special object, or possibly attaining a certain goal. They might go about achieving this goal no matter what the consequences to others might be. Mordecai Richler’s book the Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz, illustrates one such case of obsession, the title character, Duddy Kravitz becomes obsessed with his grandfather’s saying, “ ‘ A man without land, is nothing.’”, thus starting Duddy on his quest to attain a piece of land. Throughout his quest, Duddy has no regard for the feelings or the relationships he destroys in the process, weather it in his family relations, business relations, or even his personal relations to those that are closest to him.
“By working dying people into his act, Jones is putting himself beyond the reach of criticism. The dying people are viewed on videotape. He thinks that victimhood in and of itself is sufficient to the creation of an art spectacle. The cultivation of victimhood by institutions devoted to the care of art is a menace to all art forms.”
...t that many of these situations are fading. Increasingly, we resort to eating as a kind of automatic action, indulging in "fast food" or even eating while walking. One thing I believe Kass failed to realize was that the human body is very important. It urges us daily for the different pleasures in life. See Kass believes that we are stuck in a sense of informality of much that is current today. He writes, on the last page, "Recovering the deeper meaning of eating could help cure our spiritual anorexia. From it we can learn the essential unity of body and soul, and we can relearn the true relations to the formed world that the hungering soul makes possible” (Kass 231). My only question is, will we ever understand what it means to eat?
created maintain an overly pleasurable relation with food. This passion for food proves how if one accepts their hidden desires, their psychological self may soon be tinted. The lustful relationships presented to us shows how beloved characters may soon be damaged by their obsessive corporeal traits. This theme enormously important to the play, for it proves Wilde’s intention that if people begin to accept animalism instead of appeasing it, their cerebral persona will soon be tinted.
Psychoanalyst and social philosopher, Erich Fromm, once said “Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction.” However, in comparison to other groups of people, such as Europeans, greed is not necessarily a “natural right”. The accounts of Bartolome de Las Casas, Olaudah Equiano, Mary Prince, and the New York Conspiracy of 1741 conveys the conquest of slavery in the Americas, the Atlantic Slave Trade, and the establishment of white identity. All in all, greed was the propulsion behind these vital historic events, thus birthing systematic oppression, psychological colonization, classism and racism in the creation of the modern world.
gluttony are of mythic proportions. He is able to live out his fantasy with the social support of Face, Subtle ...
...and ridiculed, especially for entertainment purposes. Nonetheless, the Artist shows a hunger for fame, even if the fame and attention comes from a sick and wild point of view. The Hunger Artist dies a man of sorrow and failure, but is reborn as his opposite, a hungry, strong panther eating everything that comes its way. Maybe in some way the Artist represents a lost tradition of fasting which seemed to come and go, as well as maybe representing the desire that our generation today tends to eat too much and require too much. In the end, the Hunger Artist will be remembered as an outcast of society, and after all his years of fasting, his accomplishments are forgotten, easily replaced as if he never existed.
"For some, Life is rich and creamy ... while Art is a pallid commercial confection ... For others, Art is the truer thing, full, bustling and emotionally satisfying, while Life is worse than the poorest novel: devoid of narrative, peopled by bores and rogues, short on wit ... and leading to a painfully predictable denouement."1
Fra Lippo Lippi grew up on the streets minus his deceased parents, with no home or food. His occupation became “Watching folk’s faces to know who will fling The bit of half-stripped grape-bunch he desires, And who will curse or kick him for his pains--” (lines114-116). At the ripe age of eight he finds himself in the good company of the church as monks take him in as a brother. Fra Lippo Lippi fails at learning the language of the church but shows off his young talent of art. Instead of dismissing this as the graffiti of a child, the Prior sees fame.
...circus connotes images of color and imagination, paralleling the vitality and benevolence only Sissy’s character possesses. Through influencing Tom to take refuge at the circus, the auditor observes the heroic and commiserative qualities that highlight Sissy’s character apart from all the others.
However, as long as someone is able to be happy without falling to the feet of their pleasures they can still be functioning properly, seemingly, according to Aristotle’s definition. With many pleasures, moderation is imperative. Otherwise, someone would not be functioning properly by allowing these pleasures to overtake their mind- leaving no room for rational thought/contemplation. Aristotle rejects the notion that pleasures can lead to happiness for this very reason, but an exception can be made with bring up limits. Limitations that someone may abide by shows self-control and an ability to rationalize well. Many people have a tendency to overindulge in eating food. The more food they consume may lead to each bite being less pleasurable due to such a large quantity. Each bite someone takes, they become closer to being full or satisfied with the amount they have eaten. However, if someone does not stop eating, extending the limits that their stomach can handle, this not only has physiological repercussions but psychological ones as well. A person will become sick with the food they have just engulfed as well as having a somewhat negative association with the awful physical feeling they experienced after stuffing themselves. When someone places mental or physical limitations to their actions they produce a healthier mind and body. This not only shows stability but a rational mind. In this example, someone who only ate what was served on their plate and did not go back for more, even after feeling satisfied, will continue to enjoy the food in the future by having a fond memory/association from the experience. Even though someone did engage in the pleasure of eating food and then equating this to their happiness, they did go through the process of contemplating their limits. This shows that humans that can function this way are doing so