Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do we remember the Holocaust through films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How do we remember the Holocaust through films
Humor and war are two words that typically do not belong together in the same sentence, or even in the same text, but the concept of humor during (and following) war is addressed in the documentary, The Last Laugh (Pearlstein, 2016). The documentary was directed by Ferne Pearlstein and produced by Ferne Pearlstein, Robert Edwards, Amy Hobby, Anne Hubbell, and Jan Warner. The Last Laugh focuses on the Holocaust as a topic of humor, and there is great insight on the topic from filmmakers, comedians, and Holocaust survivors. Near the beginning of The Last Laugh, Sarah Silverman mentions “comedy puts light on to darkness and darkness cannot live where there is light. They (Holocaust memories) stay in this dark and in a taboo place if they are not …show more content…
I also thought that this documentary may help me, and possibly those who share beliefs similar to mine, to be more open to jokes regarding sensitive and taboo topics and in understanding why people choose to make these types of jokes. The documentary, as well as other significant texts have helped me realize that humor played a crucial role during the time of the Holocaust and continues to still play this role for many. Clementi (2013) states “producing art — and laughter — during the war was a way for the victims to array creativity, civilization, and pacifism against the brutality of genocide” (p. 258). This statement gives a bit of insight into why humor was used during the war and why it is still used today in regards to the saddening events that took place over the span of several years. Along with these questions, it will be crucial for both sides to understand where the line should be drawn on these types of jokes and who should ultimately be able to find humor in the Holocaust. The ultimate questions are whether jokes need to be made in order for the event to be remembered by generations to come and is there a better way to tell these jokes while also showing empathy towards those who who have survived one of the most horrific genocides in the history of the
Beautiful the producer treats the Holocaust more like more of a joke, the producer makes it
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
In Art Spiegelman’s Maus, the audience is led through a very emotional story of a Holocaust survivor’s life and the present day consequences that the event has placed on his relationship with the author, who is his son, and his wife. Throughout this novel, the audience constantly is reminded of how horrific the Holocaust was to the Jewish people. Nevertheless, the novel finds very effective ways to insert forms of humor in the inner story and outer story of Maus. Although the Holocaust has a heart wrenching effect on the novel as a whole, the effective use of humor allows for the story to become slightly less severe and a more tolerable read.
As inappropriate as it sounds, humor was used in an attempt to cheer up the soldiers. Humor is a way to temporarily relieve the pain or stress of an ongoing issue. Laughter, or even just smiling can have positive effects on the body. O’Brien explains in an interview with Patrick Hicks on why he used humor in his story as part of a coping mechanism. He stated, “It 's very important to me when I 'm writing tragedy to have humor in it, and vice-versa. The world is not uni-dimensional. It 's not all sad or all happy. I remember reading Man 's Search for Meaning, Viktor Frankl 's book, and Primo Levi on the concentration camps, and even their humor was a way of coping and dealing with the world--it 's called gallows humor. It was rampant in Vietnam (Hicks, 2005).” Being in Vietnam and fighting this whole war was unpleasant, so he used humor in hopes of making things somewhat
Humor is more than just amusing entertainment to pass the time. Though jokes and witty banter can be shallow, humor can go deeper than surface level to convey messages to audiences who would otherwise be close-minded about certain ideas. Humor is a great tool to get audiences to change the way they think, feel, and act. In “Saying Goodbye to Yang,” Alexander Weinstein uses humor to criticize some of society’s faults such as the way it has become heavily reliant on technology, racially insensitive, and judgmental.
In Alain de Botton’s book, Status Anxiety, he argues that the aim of humorists is not solely entertainment, but also to convey a message that isn’t always okay to state directly. There are many places where his argument can apply. Even with humor, some topics are still too controversial to joke about; However, in most cases, humor can lighten things up and make it easier to discuss topics that otherwise would not be as easy to talk about without heavy arguments. There are many cases that would make his argument true. There are many examples that support his argument, and that help to show the importance of humor in arguing, including cartoons, comics, works of literature, and also when thinking of hosts of television programs.
...r family members. Lastly, the Jews often use humor as strategies to communicate with others, or they may use it as one of their coping mechanisms however, mentions of concentration camps and the Holocaust is inappropriate and should be avoided in conversations (Schub T et al., 2013).
When one laughs, a public expression of feelings is being made. One’s guard is let down, and the act of laughing and the emotion that catalyzed it often appears to leave the immediate control of the laugher. Ironically, the more inappropriate the situation, the more full bodied and unstoppable one’s laughter can become. Both Minnie of “Dry September” and Nancy of “That Evening Sun” laugh at seemingly ill-timed occasions.
James Conroy argues that laughter in serious topics has been regarded through the ages as dangerous, deviant, and subversive; yet equally as refreshing, challenging, and constructive. Political humor is extensively used in almost all countries, but political satire is perceived differently from one country to another. The research question is as follows: what factors make political satire an effective tool that affects politics and policy? I argue that humor is more influential when blended with serious topics, such as international relations or politics. Laughter is a great means to put serious topics under the lenses of critical thinking. The use of humor, and political satire specifically can bring about serious political change. Humor can play all sorts of roles in the political process through being informative, educational and influential while keeping its captive entertaining
Without the contextual background to interpret a rape as a punishment or avenge, a view cannot feel comfortable to laugh at a rape joke. Moreover, Louis addresses the justification of rape jokes by using bad guy’s name such as Hitler. Louis continued that “No, I’m gonna take a shower. I don’t feel good…I’m not condoning rape, obviously. You should never, er, rape anyone” (2007).
Humor can make evil people feel inferior or see how ridiculous his or her actions are. Charlie Chaplin’s film, The Great Dictator, mocks Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Throughout the film, he mocks the German lifestyle and language and the actions of the dictator. The speech Chaplin delivers at the end of the film is very encouraging to spread love and peace and not the hatred that was stirred up by Hitler. Chaplin, starring as a Jewish
They are funny. At times also sad. But jokes have to get credit for the benefit, and insight they can provide. We cannot overlook them. But on the other hand, don’t take it too seriously.
F.W Murnau was one of the greatest directors of all time. His style of storytelling and technical innovations changed the cinema forever. The first film that I would like to focus on with Murnau is The Last Laugh. Lotte H. Eisner described The Last Laugh as a “German tragedy that can only be understood in a country where uniform is King” (Eisner). Murnau’s attention to detail is remarkable in this movie when it comes to the symbols that he uses to signify the doorman’s despair. The first symbol of importance is the revolving door. The most important symbol in this movie is the uniform. The shooting of the film took place during the time of the Weimar Republic; a period in German history when the Nazi’s rose to power; the Nazi’s used uniforms as a symbol of status and
You can find wide varieties of these crude pieces on the internet, and it is not uncommon to hear them in the hallways of schools, or whispered among students and followed by unjustified giggles. Attempting to lighten the seriousness of things such as sexual assault or terrorism is not comedy, no matter what people may say. Comedy is about laughing with the people being mocked, not lessening the seriousness of their situations. When we try to make ‘jokes’, we must keep one thing in mind: comedy is about laughter and joy. A joke is only funny when it is not blinding us to the reality of cruel
Humor can be used like a sniper's gun, picking people off when they least expect it. When we use humor to hurt, we abuse the fundamental essence of this wonderful gift. We must teach our children the difference between what is funny and what is cruel. A joke is never humorous if it is at the expense of another.