Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology and literature essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Humbert Humbert is a pediphile plane and simple. It has been argued that's Humberts unnatural love for what he calls “nymphets” originated from his childhood love Annabel. They sent one summer together when they were teens and he instantly fell for her. That summer ended in tragedy when Annabel died and Humbert was emotionally lost. Due to the fact that Humbert never had any closer in his relationship with Annable, his emotional maturity was eternally set at that of a teen. As he progressed through life his only sexual desires were directed towards children of smile characteristics of Annable. These were his nymphets; “between the age limits of nine and fourteen there occur maidens who, to certain bewitched travelers, twice or many times older …show more content…
than they, reveal their true nature which is not human”(16). These were the children that Humbert fantasised about all the time and when he met Lolital all of his fanticys were brought to fruition. Lolita was the perfect embodiment of everything Humbert had lusted over his whole life. Through a series of events Humbert became Loitas legal gurdean and he proceaded to drag her across the country as his personal concubine, systematicly rapeing her from hotel to hotel all the while keeping her passive by giving her whatever she wanted except her freedom. Throughout the novel Lolita can be seen as a passive victim in this whole situation, but this might not be entirely true. Humbert’s monstrous personality can only surpassed by Lolitas skills of manipulation and faked innocence she uses on Humbert. In the end it is apparent that Humbert is not the monster that he was once perceived as because of his redeeming qualities like his true and deep love for Lolita. Humberts monstrous ways can not be disputed. Without a doubt he is a vile creature who does deserve to rot in prison for his crimes against Lolita. Throughout their cross country travels Humbert endlessly seems to take advantage of both Lolitas emotional instability and her sexual imuchurety. When Lolitas mother dies she was at summer camp and had no idea it had happened. Humbert decided on his way to go and get Lolita that he would not tell her about her mother's demise. Instead he would lie to her as long as he needed to while he dragged the drugged Lolita from hotel to motel across the country. After the first time Lolita and Humbert has sexual relation at the Enchanted Hunters hotel Lolita demanded to speak to her mother for she feared that she might be in over her head with this man she hardly knew and wanted to seek her mother's help. Humbert told her she could not because her mother was dead. That night it became apparent how much control Humber really had over Lolita; “At the hotel we had separate rooms, but in the middle of the night she came sobbing into mine, and we made it up very gently. You see, she had absolutely nowhere else to go”(142). Lolita was backed into a corner. Her mother was dead and she had no other family or friends except for Humbert who could only fouce on his sexul disers for Lolita. She was alone with this monster of a man. Humbert continued to display his power over Lolita every day. Humbert boosted, “How sweet it was to bring that coffee to her, and then deny it until she had done her morning duty”(165). By retaining simple human need like food and water Humbert was dehumanizing Lolita from a happy young girl into his sexual object that he could do as he pleased with. This though could have been a way for Humbert to separate himself from what he was doing. Though Humbert's actions against the victim of Lolita could be seen as monstrous their would be a deeper reasoning for his actions possibly leading to a redeemable attribute in him. Throughout the story Humberts monstrous personality plays a big part in who he is, but as the book comes to a close the reader can see a transformation in the character of Humbert and how he sees Lolita.
His first redeeming attribute is his real and true love for Lolita. Humbert infact confesses that, “I loved her. It was love at first sight, at last sight and ever sight”(270). If the reader thinks back to the beginning of the novel Humbert refers to Lolita as someone who only brought him lust. Humbert also makes it a point to tell the audience that he only like girls who fall into his nymphetic criteria and anyone who is too old does not appeal to him. When Humbert sees Lolita though after three years of being apart he says that “I insist the world know how much I loved my Lolita, this Lolita, pale and polluted, and big with another’s child, but still gray-eyed, still sooty-lashed, still auburn and almond, still Carmencita, still mine”(278). No matter how she has age and move past her nymphetic stage of life Humbert still loves her. Humbert even goes on to say that, “No matter, even if those eyes of hers world fade to myopic fish, and her nipples swell and crack, and her lovely young velvety delicate delta be tainted and torn-even then I world go mad with tenderness at the mere sight of your dear wan face, at the mere sound of your raucous young voice, my Lolita”(278). This is true love that he is feeling. No matter what happens to her he will still love her. Humbert has …show more content…
never experienced anything like this before. In the past after a small amount of time he becomes fed up with the person he's with and he loses interest in being with them, but not with Lolita. With her he wants to be with her no matter what. Also he does not want to be with her in order to have sex, but to be with her so they can grow old together. The second reason that Humbert could be redeemed for his actions is because he actually feels bad for what he did to Lolita. Not only does Humbert come to realise that he was not a fitting father for Loita but he also realizes that “during our singular and bestial cohabitation that even the most miserable of family lives was better than the parody of incest, which, in the long run, was the best I could offer the waif”(287). Humbert realizes that he was not capable of giving Lolita that life that she deserved to have. It is also apparent to Humbert that Lolita has not grown up like every other child in the world. He has been the cause of so much misery and torture in her life and he feels bad about that. He came to this realization when he was sitting in his car watching a playground full of happy children: “I stood listening to that musical vibration from my lofty slope, to those flashes of separate cries with a kind of demure murmur from background, and then I knew that the hopelessly poignant thing was not Lolita’s absence from my side, but the absence of her voice from that concord”(308). Humbert realizes that not only did he steal Lolitas sexual innocence but he also stole her childhood. That is something she will never get back and Humbert regrets it. Humbert's actions were unforgivable, but the reasoning behind why he did what he did and the fact that he feels remorse when he looks back helps to redeem his character. Lolitas victimization throughout the novel helps to paint the picture of Humbert as a horrible monster who does not care about his actions, but as discussed prior, this is not true.
Therefore, it only seems fair to entertain the idea that Lolita might not be as much of a victim as believed. Throughout the story on many occasions Lolitas perceived innocence can be called into question. Firstly the fact that Lolita has had sex prior to her relations with Humbert speaks to her lack of innocence. This little twelve-year old girl tell Humbert that “I am thrifty and I am absolutely filthy in thought, word and deed”(114) which is something that no normal twelve-year old world tell man. She is also experienced in ways that even HUmbert himself did not expect. This shows a lot of maturity on the part of Lolita that world not otherwise be their if she was as innocent as she is perceived to be. In addition to her sexual maturity with Humbert she also has many other partners throughout their cross country road trip. Lolita confesses to Humbert that “I’m so sorry I cheated so much, but that's the way things are”(279). Considering she is still only twelve she seems to know a lot about how “things are” in life. Lolita does have a strong understanding of how Humbert works though. While she was with him she started using what he wanted against him. Lolita started charging Humbert in order for her to perform sexual acts for him. She world then keep that money hidden from Humbert and
accumulated quite a bit. Lolita was also the mastermind behind her own escape. She plotted with Claire Quilty, another pediphile that Lolita had known earlyer inlife and was in love with, to take her away from Humbert. The plan worked and she escaped. In the eyes of Lolita Humbert never really meant much to her. Quilty on the other hand, “he was the only man she had ever really been crazy about. What about Dick? Oh, Dick was a lamb, they were quite happy together, but she meant something different. And I had never counted, of course”(272). Humbert was but a phase in Lolitas life. Humber recounts that “In her washed out grey eyes, strangely spectacled, our poor romance was for a moment reflected, pondered upon, and dismissed like a dull party, like a humdrum exercise, like a bit of dry mud caking her childhood”(272). Lolita does not hate Humbert for he did to her, she does not like him because she was not in love. She was perfectly happy running away to have sex with another older man. She was just not happy with Humbert. Lolitas power over Humbert is one that in many ways is stronger that his own. It is vital to note that “while Lolita can be seen as a victim, she must also be seen as a powerful agent, in whom erotic desire and creativity are as closely intertwined as they are for Humbert himself”(Herbold 8). HUmberts true love for Lolita redeem him of only some of his monstrous attributes, but Lolitas skills of manipulation show that she is as much a threat as a victim in Humbert's life.
Riva was truly a “smart owl” she found different ways to keep her and her brothers alive, and out of harm’s way. For instance, she managed to get herself off the Nazi deportation record that was made every week. Riva did this by making friends with the work manager who was forced to make the deportation list. Riva realized that if she kept on worrying about what is going to happen in the future it would be depressing; instead she thought about when she was going to be reunited with her family. *******FINISH***********
The book Blind, written by Rachel DeWoskin, is about a highschool sophomore named Emma, who went blind after being struck in the face with a firework. When she first lost her sight, Emma was placed in a hospital for over 2 months, and once she was released, she could finally go home again. DeWoskin uses the characterization of Emma throughout the beginning of the text to help the reader understand the character’s struggle more. Especially in the first few chapters, it was difficult for Emma to adapt to a world without sight. For instance, DeWoskin writes, “And sat down, numb, on our gold couch. And tried to open my eyes, rocked, counted my legs and arms and fingers. I didn’t cry. Or talk” (DeWoskin 44). As a result of losing a very important scent, she’s started to act differently from a person with sight.
Cal is a character who has to deal with other peoples' problems while having to deal with his own problems. Cal has to deal with his father losing his job and his father doesn't support Cal when it comes to sports. Wanting his dad to go to some of his games, Cal discusses with his mom about his dad coming to the games. "Do you think you and Dad might come?" "No... not tonight, you know your is going through a lot right now." I zipped my gym bag shut. "Yeah, I know, but I wish he'd see me play sometime" (West 16). Helping out Cal, Peggy brings up Cal's last football game at the dinner table, trying to gain her fathers' attention on the subject. "I didn't say anything about the game at dinner that night! like I'd be begging my dad to come, I mean a lot of kids
Maria Teresa Mirabal, also known as Mate was born on October 15, 1935. She is the youngest out of all the Mirabal sisters and we mostly get to know her from her journal entries. Mate received her diary from Minerva on the day of her first communion. At school, people would make fun of her for having the diary and would steal it from her. Mate used to think differently about Trujillo as a little girl, she thought he was someone that everyone loved and should be respected. On Benefactor’s Day, she wanted to give Trujillo her best wishes, "I am taking these few minutes to wish El Jefe Happy Benefactor's Day with all my heart. I feel so lucky that we have him for a president." (37) Mate’s sister Minerva starts to get in trouble at school for leaving
As portrayed by her thoughts after sex in this passage, the girl is overly casual about the act of sex and years ahead of her time in her awareness of her actions. Minot's unique way of revealing to the reader the wild excursions done by this young promiscuous adolescent proves that she devalues the sacred act of sex. Furthermore, the manner in which the author illustrates to the reader these acts symbolizes the likeness of a list. Whether it's a list of things to do on the weekend or perhaps items of groceries which need to be picked up, her lust for each one of the boys in the story is about as well thought out and meaningful as each item which has carelessly and spontaneously been thrown on to a sheet of paper as is done in making a list. This symbolistic writing style is used to show how meaningless these relationships were, but the deeper meaning of why she acted the way she did is revealed throughout the story.
In the dystopian novel of The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil, the theme is Loss of love. Loss of love is both demonstrated inside the novel and as well it is presented in the real world life where real humans live in. Who knew that in a fiction novel it can seem so real as these situations that are happening in the novel were not made up and were real things happening to the Characters. Just like these situations happening in the novel they are actually happening in the real world today. Loss of love occurs in the novel of The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil through three influential characters; Inner Horinters, Phil, and Carol. The fictional representation of loss is similar to real life situations such as Undocumented Immigrants
Clarisse McClellan a beautiful young girl with a free spirt exposes Guy Montag in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 to the allure the world has outside of his lifeless home. Disinterested with his mediocre home life and job Guy Montag goes looking for an escape. Montag, a fireman by day whom in a twisted society starts fires with books oppose to putting them out begins reading the books one day. Although extremely prideful of his work he becomes curious in the books he burns because of one single soul. One night after another satisfying work night he meets the beautiful young Clarisse whom has expressed to Montag her knowledge about fireman in which she had learned from a book. However, reading is not Clarisse’s only difference from the others. She is a “crazy” outcast yet gentle and innocent all traits that are seemingly polar opposite from Montag’s cold and bitter wife. Science teaches us that opposites attract, maybe this is why although fearful or Clarisse’s differences Montag is also fiercely intrigued. Clarisse’s short time as a
Lolita, by Vladamir Nabokov is a controversial book that elaborately represents and forces the reader to deal with a pedophiles obsession with his 12-year-old stepdaughter. As the reader finishes reading Lolita, he must establish a meaning for the novel which hinges heavily upon whether or not he should forgive Humbert for his rape of Lolita and for stealing her childhood away from her. This rape is legally referred to as a statutory rape because Humbert is having sex with Lolita who is under the age of consent. Humbert also figuratively rapes Lolita of her childhood and a normal teenage life. This decision to forgive Humbert will rely upon Humbert's words as he realizes what he has done to Lolita. In order for the reader to be able to forgive Humbert he must determine if Humbert is truly sorry for his actions.
In one of the most elaborately vivid scenes in the novel, Humbert excites himself to a sexual climax while Lolita sits, unaware, on his lap. Rejoicing in the unexpected and unnoticed fulfillment, he asserts that, "Lolita ha[s] been safely solipsized" (60)...
...s of Lolita and Humbert to show the isolation and loneliness they feel, and to show just how different and immoral the situation is. By stressing the dissonance between one persona to the next, he portrays a view of his characters that is sad and shocking, for the public seen is also the reader; the unaware, innocent, “moral” group. By letting us into the different faces of Lolita and Humbert, Nabokov reveals the tragedy in the novel, and allows the reader to vividly feel what is morally right and wrong with Humbert, Lolita, and ourselves.
In Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, the overruling drive of the narrator, Humbert Humbert, is his want to attest himself master of all, whether man or woman, his prime cravings, all-powerful destiny, or even something as broad as language. Through the novel the reader begins to see Humbert’s most extreme engagements and feelings, from his marriage to his imprisonment, not as a consequence of his sensual, raw desires but rather his mental want to triumph, to own, and to control. To Humbert, human interaction becomes, or is, very unassuming for him: his reality is that females are to be possessed, and men ought to contest for the ownership of them. They, the women, become the very definition of superiority and dominance. But it isn’t so barbaric of Humbert, for he designates his sexuality as of exceptionally polished taste, a penchant loftier than the typical man’s. His relationship with Valerie and Charlotte; his infatuation with Lolita; and his murdering of Quilty are all definite examples of his yearning for power. It is so that throughout the novel, and especially by its conclusion, the reader sees that Humbert’s desire for superiority subjugates the odd particularities of his wants and is the actual reason of his anguish.
With his 1955 novel Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov invents a narrator by the name of Humbert Humbert who is both an exquisite wordsmith and an obsessive pedophile. The novel serves as the canvas upon which Humbert Humbert will paint a story of love, lust, and death for the reader. His confession is beautiful and worthy of artistic appreciation, so the fact that it centers on the subject of pedophilia leaves the reader conflicted by the close of the novel. Humbert Humbert frequently identifies himself as an artist and with his confession he hopes “to fix once for all the perilous magic of nymphets” (Nabokov, Lolita 134). Immortalizing the fleeting beauty and enchanting qualities of these preteen girls is Humbert Humbert’s artistic mission
Character Analysis of Mrs. Mallard in Kate Chopin’s The Story of an Hour Mrs. Mallard Chopn’s main character in “The Story of an Hour”, has under gone the loss of her husband Mr. Mallard. The story depicts that she has been contemplating through different feeling about the situation. Mrs. Mallard may start off as a timed wife, however through the death of her husband sorrow and sadness turns to freedom and respite.
In Daisy Miller, Henry James slowly reveals the nature of Daisy"s character through her interactions with other characters, especially Winterbourne, the main character." The author uses third person narration; however, Winterbourne"s thoughts and point of view dominate." Thus, the audience knows no more about Daisy than Winterbourne." This technique helps maintain the ambiguity of Daisy"s character and draws the audience into the story.
He describes beauty as delicate and rare, unable to be established. He focuses on the lightheartedness of young girls, how they are caught up in beauty, and he warns them to be conscientious of the fact that their beauty will fade and that they cannot put all their hope on their beauty. At the same time, he encourages them to "practice" their beauty until it is gone, and he promises to celebrate that beauty as best he can, with all its value and frailty.