Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of international law
Importance of international law for human rights
Importance of human rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of international law
The Netflix documentary, E-Team, lets us follow members of the Emergencies Team as they travel around the world, investigating and reporting human rights abuses. The job is often dangerous and difficult but the documentary gives a firsthand account of what these people are doing to make the world a better place for many people. The human rights violations that are taking place in Syria are atrocious. Everyday citizens are being murdered and having their bodies burned by the militia for no reason at all, as two groups try to take control of the country. Anna Neistat and her husband Ole Solvang are E-Team members who traveled to Syria to report on these horrific crimes in an attempt for the world to view these crimes as international human rights violations. The couple talked to many villagers about the crimes they had witnessed and compared testimonies to ensure the accounts were accurate. Anna then went back and reported to Russian media via interviews on the events she witnessed and the data she had gathered. She was met with some opposition as some in Russia believed the data and accounts were fake and manufactured. Russian leadership rejects western ideology and the western influence as well as their Arab allies. However, Russia does not want to see a rise in fundamental extremists Muslim group that would lead to further …show more content…
Our book states that “the liberal belief in the role played by institutions in reducing, if not altogether elimination, the incidence of violent international conflict” (Lawson 43). The group record and publish reports on various media outlets to let the world know of these human rights violations. The thought is that these human rights violations are going against international law which is a liberalism concept. Laws that protect us all across the world is lined up with the idea that through institutions you can achieve greater human rights for
Belbin's Team Role Theory Based on research with over 200 teams conducting management business games at the Administrative Staff College, Henley, in the UK, Belbin identified nine team types: · Co-ordinator · Resource Investigator · Team Worker · Shaper · Company Worker/ Implementer · Completer finisher · Plant · Monitor/Evaluator · Specialist Co-ordinator ------------ The co-ordinator is a person-oriented leader. This person is trusting, accepting, dominant and is committed to team goals and objectives.
In this essay, after defining some crucial concepts, such as peace, liberal and democratic governments, I’ll present arguments that support the idea that liberal democratic states are not inherently more peaceful then other states, but that they are, in fact, more likely to create conflicts between nations and different political systems. The focus will be attributed to U.S.’s policies and historical events that corroborate the idea expressed above.
...against underdevelopment and marginalisation in Darfur, neither Turabi’s name not the Islamist involvement has been featured much in the media coverage of the conflict. How the media handles crises can be descriptive; “..the crisis will become front-page, top-of-the-news story. Print and television reporters, photographers and camera people flood the area.” Victims, villains and heroes are created and “the crisis dominates coverage of international news, and for a while even domestic events.” It becomes the focus of debate in congress moral guide to the nation. “The success of that morality play story line rests on the fact that it is easy to understand and appreciate.. The set piece is ideal material for television and superficial print coverage” The superficial and exaggerated press coverage is clear, many news reports have accepted propaganda and are uninspiring.
The current century has witnessed immense improvement and re-conceptualization of standards and sovereignty of human rights in Latin America. With the endemic repression and violations of human rights throughout Latin American in the mid to late 20th century, the International human rights regime, an amalgam of international and intergovernmental organizations and bodies, expanded exponentially. By conducting investigations within certain countries, or simply monitoring overt violations of human rights, the international human rights regime stimulated global awareness of violations of human rights in different countries; soon to follow was change in domestic policy in response to international policy. This also led to increased opposition by domestic NGOs against repressive governments or dictatorships largely responsible for human rights violations. Just as well, a number of organizations and groups aided domestic non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their growing efforts to establish judicial practices that better protected human rights. Declarations, conventions, and charters, established a number of values that served as the credo for the organizations that constituted the international human rights regime. Over time, more and more countries were pressured and held accountable for these values, which developed into universal standards for human rights practices. Thus the International Human right regime and the pressure they imposed upon governments ultimately resulted in widespread positive changes in human rights.
The thesis of Scott Burchill’s article, Liberalism, is that “the prospects for the elimination of war lay with the preference for democracy over aristocracy and free trade over autarky.” He adds that liberalism is contingent upon the state to uphold the rule of law and respect for human rights. The key ideas in the article support his thesis by explaining that democracies promote peace by sharing mutual democratic principles and institutions, that free trade breaks down barriers between individuals and states – uniting them into one community, and the promotion of human rights by states decreases the chance of inter-state conflict and international insecurity.
As violence heightened the lack of assistance from the United Nations, Non-governmental organizations, and humanitarian groups caused severe shortages of food, water and healthcare within Syria. Opponents of the Assad regime began to surface creating several opposition groups such as the Syrian National Council and the Free Syrian Army. The Syrian National Council was composed of exiled Syrians while the Free Syrian Army was a militarized group largely made up of armed rebels. As government imposed media blackouts emerged in March 2011 external confirmation of the conflicts occurring in Syria have surfaced and become increasingly difficult. The United Nations Human Rights Council established an independent International Commission of Inquiry in September of that year to investigate the alleged human rights violations. The...
There are a lot of women’s human rights violations in Syria. According to the SNHR, the percentage of women deaths has dramatically increased in 2013, reaching nearly 9% of the total number of victims on April 30, 2013, and at this date, at least 7543 women including 2454 girls and 257 female infants under the age of 3 have been killed, including 155 women who remain unidentified at this date. The SNHR documented the killing of 55 foreign women. In 2013, the SNHR estimates that the number of rapes of women approximately reaches 6000, resulting in numerous cases in forced pregnancy. (Sema Nasar) This shows that some families will lose their mother and some husbands will have difficulty with their wives, and maybe there is population imbalanced. Also a young Syrian girl was stoned to death by Islamic extremists in 2014. Cause of it was a facebook account. Fatoum Al-Jassem, aged 14 or 15, was taken to a Sharia court in the city of Al-Reqqah after the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants caught her ...
In conclusion realist and liberalist theories provide contrasting views on goals and instruments of international affairs. Each theory offers reasons why state and people behave the way they do when confronted with questions such as power, anarchy, state interests and the cause of war. Realists have a pessimistic view about human nature and they see international relations as driven by a states self preservation and suggest that the primary objective of every state is to promote its national interest and that power is gained through war or the threat of military action. Liberalism on the other hand has an optimistic view about human nature and focuses on democracy and individual rights and that economic independence is achieved through cooperation among states and power is gained through lasting alliances and state interdependence.
To define any perspective in International Relations, one must understand its’ origin and primary authors, including the context in which they were writing in. Liberalism is one of the more loosely defined perspectives as it has had a number of authors throughout history. Primarily, liberalism relies on the positive aspects of human nature. One of the most prominent liberal authors was Kant- who often wrote of the anarchical nature of international relations- referring to it as “the lawless state of savagery.” He also wrote of three primary routes to obtaining peace within this system, namely treating all aspects of human life with humanity, allowing for a federation of states and most importantly republican constitutionalism.
Nation States only care about human rights if it is profitable to do so.Thankfully, after end of World War II and the emergence of several super powers, human rights now have a logistical backing. There are now more severe consequences for a nation state which decides to violate basic human rights. This is a recent phenomena, one which did not arise until this past century.
Liberalism and democracy are closely tied together in international politics. They have a central bond which brings out the notion of democratic peace. Today much of Latin America and the European Union practices democracy. The chances of these nations getting into an armed conflict are very scarce in today’s standards. Liberalism promotes the idea of human security and equality and democracy reinforces that idea into the political framework of governing bodies and their higher authorities. Liberalism leads to democracy which promotes democratic peace preventing conflict between nations. This article will look at how liberalism leads to democratic peace through the process of creating democracy.
Magno, A., (2001) Human Rights in Times of Conflict: Humanitarian Intervention. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 2 (5). [online] Available from: http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/publications/dialogue/2_05/articles/883.html> [Accessed 2 March 2011] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report (2000) Human Rights and Human Development (New York) p.19
Liberalism assumes that the war and can be policed by the institutional reforms that empower the international organizations and law.
Since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the discourse of international human rights and its importance has increasingly become indoctrinated in the international community. In the context of political and economic development, there have been debates on how and which rights should be ordered and protected throughout different cultures and communities. Though there is a general acceptance of international human rights around the globe, there is an approach that divides them into civil and political rights and social and economic rights, which puts emphasis where it need not be.
The role that globalization plays in spreading and promoting human rights and democracy is a subject that is capable spurring great debate. Human rights are to be seen as the standards that gives any human walking the earth regardless of any differences equal privileges. The United Nations goes a step further and defines human rights as,