Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The human nature of lord of the flies
How does the protagonists character change in the Lord of the Flies
The human nature of lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The human nature of lord of the flies
In Lord of the Flies, a 20th century novel written by William Golding, countless issues are portrayed; however the essential nature of humankind is, perhaps, the most recurring. From the moment we meet the boys after they land on the island, it is obvious that this fundamental issue will play out through the entire length of the novel, and, as it progresses, the deeper Golding will delve into mankind’s true nature. Shown through the loss of innocence, social skills, and order, the nature of humankind is showcased in this novel.
The novel begins when a plane, containing seemingly innocent schoolboys, crashes onto an island. The plane was vacating the boys from their country, where a war is currently happening. The fact that there is a war taking place already shows the barbaric nature of people, and this seems to rub off on the boys, too. When the boys first come into the novel, it is clear that their personalities and morals differ. There is Simon, who we see as a wholly good-natured boy; Piggy, who we see as a source of wisdom; and Ralph, who we see as the every-man, someone that, generally, symbolizes humanity as a whole, all of whom, basically, represent the amiable side of humanity. Then there is Jack, who we immediately see as corrupt; and Roger, who we see as amoral and wicked. These two represent the essentially evil side of humanity. As the novel progresses, we see that the characters’ morals will change, and their societal conditioning will diminish, eventually showing their true nature. When the boys first meet, their societal condition makes them try to create their own civilization and democracy, and they decide to vote one of themselves as chief. The boys choose Ralph, because he has the conch, but also because of hi...
... middle of paper ...
... evil and savage side by killing Simon. With Simon and Piggy gone, Ralph struggles more than ever with choosing between his morals and savage instincts, and he gives up all hope of being rescued and, presumably, in the other boys. When true nature of the boys is completely revealed, they are finally rescued. Golding suggests that when there is no order and we have complete free will, there will be chaos and that, generally, our true nature will be one of evil and savagery.
Through the loss of innocence, lack of order, and regression of societal conditioning, William Golding shows us what he thinks the true nature of mankind is in the 20th century novel, Lord of the Flies. The essential nature of humanity is an issue that recurs throughout the entire novel. Golding is suggesting that, when we have no civilization or rules, our true instincts will not be good-natured.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
Societies were constructed by both parties. With no authoritative figures to control what is decided, it enabled them to create whatever laws to their liking. The characters become more savage-like every day as the upkeep of their laws starts to become more lenient. As the intelligent Newt explained, “‘That’s one of the reasons we run this place all nice and busylike. You get lazy, you get sad. Start givin’ up. Plain and simple” (Dashner 77). Explaining that a societal type of order had to be established in order to keep their spirits up, the quote retaliates that believing what they have contributed to their small society will grant them into finding a way out soon. However, even this type or societal order came crashing down when... After Piggy was killed, tragically and the conch shattered, Jack had tried to kill Ralph. Consequently, after running away from Jack’s chaotic takeover, Ralph, “. . . argued unconvincingly that they would let him alone, perhaps even make an outlaw of him”, but then becoming aware (to his own knowledge) that, “These painted savages would go further and further” (Golding 184). Ralph realizes that Jack and the rest of the boys have become barbaric. Without the conch’s overwhelming reigns holding the boys back from becoming savage, all order is forgotten. With prior knowledge that the conch was what held the boys together, it can be seen that once it was destroyed, humanity was lost. Proving that once order is lost, humanity is then
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes.
Throughout the novel several different characters are introduced to the reader, such as Ralph, Jack, Simon and Piggy. With all these characters presented to the reader, one can get to see into their minds-eye, which allows the reader to analyze their character. In this case one could examine their basic morals and distinguish between the person’s natural instinct to rely on civilization or savagery to solve their problems. The author of the novel, William Golding, had a “first-hand experience of battle line action during World War II” which caused him to realize, “[that] The war alone was not what appalled him, but what he had learnt of the natural - and original- sinfulness of mankind did. It was the evil seen daily as commonplace and repeated by events it was possible to read in any newspaper which, he asserted, were the matter of Lord of the Flies” (Foster, 7-10). This being said by Golding leads one to the central problem in the novel the Lord of the Flies, which can be regarded as the distinction between civility and savagery. This can be seen through the characters that are presented in the novel, and how these boys go from a disciplined lifestyle, to now having to adapt to an unstructured and barbaric one in the jungle.
Over millions of years, man has transformed from a savage, simple creature to a highly developed, complex, and civil being. In Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding shows how under certain circumstances, man can become savage. During nuclear war, a group of British schoolboys crash land on an uninhabited island to escape. Ralph the elected leader, along with Piggy and Simon, tries to maintain civilization, while Jack and his group of choir boys turned hunters slowly become savages obsessed with killing. Through characters’ action and dialogue, Golding illustrates the transformation of civil schoolboys into bloodthirsty savages.
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
Katherine Paterson once said, “To fear is one thing. To let fear grab you by the tail and swing you around is another.” William Golding, who is a Nobel Prize winner for literature, writes Lord of the Flies, originally published in 1954. Golding’s novel is about a group of boys who crash land on an island. All of the adults are dead and they are abandoned on an island. The boys try to set rules and create a fire in efforts of being rescued. The group of boys chooses Ralph to be their leader. This choosing makes a literary character named Jack, who doesn’t show his anger until half way through the plot. The novel shows the nature of humans and how fear can control them. The novel also shows the difference between good and evil. Golding experienced this when he was in World War II. There were many times fear controlled the boys in the island in Lord of the Flies.
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding expresses the idea that humans are naturally immoral, and that people are moral only because of the pressures of civilization. He does this by writing about a group of boys, and their story of survival on an island. The civilized society they form quickly deteriorates into a savage tribe, showing that away from civilization and adults, the boys quickly deteriorate into the state man was millions of years ago. This tendency is shown most in Jack, who has an animalistic love of power, and Roger, who loves to kill for pleasure. Even the most civilized boys, Ralph and Piggy, show that they have a savage side too as they watch Simon get murdered without trying to save him. Simon, the only one who seems to have a truly good spirit, is killed, symbolizing how rare truly good people are, and how quickly those personalities become corrupted.
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.
In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young boys from England are evacuated out of their country due to a war. The plane is then shot down and results into a plane crash on a deserted island. The boys are left all alone with no adults, no supplies, and no one to come and rescue them. They are all on their own and have to establish a new “society”. The boys have to choose someone to govern them and that person ends up being Ralph, who had an internal struggle between what is right and wrong closer to the end of the novel. The boys turn into savages, killing each other, and showing their evil inside each of them. According to, William Golding man is inherently evil, evil is in all of us, but it is oppressed by society, and comes out when there is not anything to hold us back, civilization is what holds back evil from coming out, or it is what triggers evil inside of man.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies shows man’s inhumanity to man. This novel shows readers good vs. evil through children. It uses their way of coping with being stranded on an island to show us how corrupt humans really are.
By analyzing my very own personal investment in the idea that heterosexuality is normal, I have realized that I am currently and that I used to deliberately present myself in a heterosexual persona to the world at large. Personally, when I was young, I used to be uncomfortable with women who broke the social norms of heteronormativity in public. I remember feeling anxious, and believing that one day soon society would perceive me as a divergent towards the norms because I hang out with women who didn’t present a heterosexual persona. I feared unspeakable things that would happen to me once I lost my privileges of being perceived as the ‘good’ heterosexual female. The lost of my social standing in society scared me; I was already a minority,
William Golding explores human psychology in Lord of the Flies through his characters. His experience in World War II influenced him to write about the human nature, and the struggle of good and evil. Along with Sigmund Freud’s theory on the human personalities and mob mentality, the book displays the extremes of human nature. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses psychological allegory to illustrate the concept of id, ego, the superego as well as mob mentality through the characters Ralph, Jack, Piggy, and Simon.