Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of religion as social agent
Effect of religion on human society
The role of religion in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of religion as social agent
When humans perform an act of kindness, what is really their intention in doing so? Is it perhaps to help someone, to fit in, or feel accepted or is it just a step in achieving their goal of receiving their homework, their money or maybe something valuable that they found to be jealous of? From the past to the present, human nature has always been corrupted. In our everyday life we see people getting murdered, assaulted, and cheated. In the past, Kings were dominant figures, they ruled worth power so they can maintain their position. As time passes from period to period we are still facing the same corruption in our society because people only serve to their benefit and their own status. Human being were never born good, but innocent through lack of knowledge and experience and the world. But corruption can overwhelm the child as it grows up because of the negative influence it would have among society. In discussion to human nature, one controversial issue has even whether humans are naturally inclined towards good or evil. On one hand …show more content…
Mencius, the author of the essay titled “A Man’s Nature is Good” from the compiled book Reading The World Ideas That Matter argues that human nature is good. On the other hand, Hsun writes in his essay “Man’s Nature is Evil” from the same book that human nature is evil. Others like Master Kao, who is mentioned in Mencius’s essay, believes human nature is neutral. My own view is that human nature is bad because in reality human nature is corrupt through the lack of respect towards each other, countless violent acts, dishonesty, and racial discrimination. Debates surrounding human nature have been going on for a while on whether human nature is evil or good. According to the philosopher Thomas Hobbes, he believes in the evil nature of humans mentions his opinion in Leviathan. He states that laws were “devised” for the purpose of keeping our evil nature in check. (95). By him making this statement Hobbes was in favor of authoritarian governments trying to keep society under control. In other words, Hobbes believes we should be protected from the evil. For example, he explains how in war countries, people kill and steal from each other in order to survive. That's why people are so dishonest and selfish because most of human nature will do anything to survive. Hobbes makes an important question in his novel, to be the people who believe human nature is good. He asks that if human are so” benevolent in nature, then why do we lock our doors at night”?(97). By him asking this, he is basically saying the evil of humans nature. Hobbes viewed human nature as the state of nature where men have a tendency to be selfish and will step over any obstacle in order to be successful. That is why many people around the world live in everyday fear that they are at risk of being attacked, robbed or murdered. Hsun Tzu also mentions that man’s nature is evil. He believed that humans are born evil and that it is a teacher's responsibility to educate them and guide them away from those evil instincts. Hsun Tzu believed that man's nature is always selfish. He said that every man is born with evil in them "The gentleman is by birth no different from any other man; it is lust that he is good at making use of things”(6). I agree with Hsun because he makes a good point by mentioning that if humans indulge their nature their lives will be difficult and any who do so will inevitably become a criminals. Even though many people may oppose to what Hobbes and Hsun have to say about humans being naturally good, they both pose strong ideas to counter the argument and state humans are naturally evil. The philosopher Meniscus states that “humans are naturally good and that one's circumstances influences their nature”(79). I disagree with Meniscus because people just try to make the person feel bad for their bad behavior we are all born evil . A person may say that people born into less situations that are bad, are most likely to overcome them. Some people may become careless by the situation but no matter we are all born evil but Meniscus agrees that we are born with a naturally good intention in life. But I disagree with his actions because we don't grow up to be good we might be taught to be good but many kids may be curious and something bad and that just how they might be turned into a evil person. Naturally human nature is evil because another author Jimmy Santiago Baca also implies human nature is evil. In his novel “ A Place to Stand” he says “ After what seemed a long silence he said, I run this place. I own your ass. You understand that? You fuck with me” he stuck his pissed off face in mine again “ and you don't know what I can put you through”(158). Baca is saying how corrupt the jail system is, this is another way that shows how evil and violent the world is. Baca’s point is that by the security yelling at baca he thinks he can get more power. In other words in this world people want more and more power, and baca is also saying how the security can get a away from everything this quote relates back to hobbies how he talks about the government All throughout life we are educated on what it is to be good and derailed from how to be evil.
Through this, it shows that from birth we act without knowledge and awareness because many will agree that we are born with original sin which was inherited from the ancient times of Adam and Eve, according to The Bible. The book of Genesis states “You will not certainly die, the serpent said to the woman. For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” therefore this original sin is derived from the moment they fell into temptation and thus life continued to grow from that moment on. According Christian based practices, humans are all sinners who develop and grow from these sins to become aware of what it is to be good. From there they are able to choose whether they want to live a life of good practice or follow in the path of the wrongdoings of evil
practice. A number of philosophers have shown that human nature is good Eliza Veretilo wrote in her artilce for thephiosophytakeaway.com “Human Nature Is Good” she states “Fear has become conditioning and we have not yet learnt to drop it. Underneath it all, the human spirit is good, it’s undeniable that we strive for goodness as a whole. That’s why things like universal peace are so appealing, because we are creatures that thrive in peace. We have created war out of fear, but that doesn’t make us bad.” I think Veretilo is mistaken because she overlooks human nature as essentially being good. I disagree with her because we just don't create war out of fear we do it because we are protecting ourselves from all those evil which is a trait of human nature. We don't all strive for goodness as a whole and we certainly don't thrive for peace in this world because everything in this world is chaotic; all these violence in the world shootings and on a regular base. From early history it is noted that historic representations of evil such as Hitler, Stalin… etc are personifications of Lucifer as the superior force of evil of their time. A Psychologist from Stanford University, Philip Zimbardo ,writes in his piece titled “The Psychology of Evil” “My modest task is to outline some of the psychological processes that I believe are involved in human evil, more specifically, to share with you some ideas I have about the social psychological strategies and tactics that can facilitate the transformation of good,or at least ordinary, people into monsters, who are perpetrators of evil.” The essence of Philip Zimbardo argument is that human nature is evil as he states that even though those evil men are dead evil still continues in today's world. There is still evil out there and a lot of violence,killing, stealing. Also in education many people may be corrupted and be mindless and turn evil, because the states controls what students and teachers have to say about human nature . Ultimately as a result of history, previous christian beliefs, and personal believes humans are naturally evil. we are born with nature rights and how we choose to act upon them is a result of the way we were born. human being were never born good, but innocent through lack of knowledge and experience and the world. But corruption would overwhelm the child as it grows up because of the negative influence it would have among society. That's why my own view is that human nature is bad because in reality human nature is corrupt through the lack of respect towards each other, countless violent acts, dishonesty, and racial discrimination.
Through the progression of William Golding's Lord of the Flies and the article, “Are Humans Good or Evil” by Clancy Martin and Alan Strudler, a multitude of undeniable evidence is provided to prove that humans are in fact inherently wicked. In Lord of the Flies, a human being’s savage nature and primal instincts are effectively portrayed through the development of Jack, the lead hunter in a group that gets meat for the boys. Little Jack Merridew, who seems to be nothing but a naive and obnoxious chorister, becomes one of the most malicious and violent boys on the island. Jack's wilder side shows itself the most when he goes hunting. Making one his first kills brought such exhilaration, satisfaction, and pure bloodlust, that it drove him to insane limits,
The idea that a person can be purely good and altruistic does not exist due to society’s acceptance and embrace of the selfishness and greed of human beings. People these days are some of the most selfish beings to ever exist but they are not ashamed of their actions because of how the world around them welcomes their self-centered nature with open arms. Selfishness comes is many ways, shapes, and forms. Many businesses need to utilize the greed of mankind in order to make money and prosper; “Greed-for lack of a better word-is good. Greed is right. Greed works” (Wall Street). Even politicians use their greed to run campaigns for themselves in order to win the hearts of Americans. As well as fulfill their ultimate selfish goal to be the man
Human beings show kindness from the outside but they are thinking mean thoughts from the inside. People can easily delude others when not much attention is paid towards them. Not everyone is as nice as they seem, there are many bad people out there. Today’s generation is full of people who get offended on almost anything someone does or says and starts to behave differently, hating every single thing the person does. Orwell and Geddes demonstrate that a man is inhumane to another through their texts Animal farm and “Growing up Native”. Those texts are referable to the real world today, because small misunderstandings can lead to crimes against others. People are more likely to have grudges towards others in society, such as fights, misunderstandings, and jealousy which can make people do cruel things. People of other religion and beliefs are treated differently; betrayal is a common occurrence among humans. No matter how nice Therefore one can see that “man’s inhumanity to man” is everywhere.
Whether or not humans are instinctively good or evil has been a much talked about debate for many years and is known as an unanswerable question. Determinists, such as Thomas Hobbs, have come to the conclusion that humans are naturally evil and it is within our basic instincts to be greedy, selfish and otherwise drawn to chaos. Hobbs states that “our true nature arises in times of strife and it is within us, when threatened, to self preserve.” I on the other hand disagree with this famous philosophers take on human nature. In this short essay, I will argue that human beings are born with the instinct to be good and to love one another, as well as to be loved.
Are humans naturally good or evil? This age-old question dates back to as early as the Chinese Dynasty and is still being argued to this day. Thomas Hobbes believed that all humans were born cruel, that they began cheating others to benefit themselves. Whereas, John Locke believes that humans are born good and pure, but become evil based on experiences and obstacles in life. In my opinion, all humans are born good and become cruel based on their experiences. I feel this way because when you look at a new born baby, they are seeing the world for the first time, and although they are screaming and crying, they are pure. They do not want to do anyone any harm, and you do not wish to cause them any harm. The same goes for young, growing children
How exactly does the human brain work? Are humans evil by nature or are they good samaritans most, if not all, the time? As studies throughout history have shown, this is not the case. Humans are inherently evil because they are always seeking as much power as they can, revert to challenging authority and selfishness in times of peril, and become intimidated easily by “authority” figures egging them on, which is reflected in The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, as well as The Zimbardo Experiment conducted by Psychologist Phillip Zimbardo.
Because of a few notable people who exhibit strong negative behaviors such as greed, you discount the entirety of the human population are bearing these traits. However, not everyone has these characteristics. There are many people who donate money to charities such as Doctors without Borders or to the Red Cross or donate their time through volunteer work. Even I have done both of these at one point or another. There are definitely people out there who donate their time or money simply because they expect and want attention and respect in return. However, not everyone
The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, shows human nature to be greedy, self-involved and vengeful. Claudius is driven by his greed to commit murder. Polonius is always looking out for himself, currying favor at the expense of anyone in his way. Hamlet thinks only of vengeance from the moment he finds out about Claudius murdering his father. Human nature has been all of these things, but it has also evolved through the ages. We can be base and cruel, but we can also show great compassion and kindness.
Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a novel about a man named Henry Jekyll who
The virtue of kindness is not meek it is not niceness. Kindness holds firm to its foundation and values, but it does it in a way that is gentle. Kindness is not naïve, it is wise and discerning (Corey, 211). People confuse being nice as kindness because on the outside both are soft. The inside is what shows the difference. Niceness has no substance, it will go wherever society takes it. Kindness is different, it has a firm, solid center (Corey xv). The components of soft edges and firm centers make kindness warm and inviting and yet it remains deeply rooted to its core beliefs.
Before a case can be made for the causes of altruism, altruism itself must first be defined. Most leading psychologists agree that the definition of altruism is “a motivational state with the ultimate goal of increasing another’s welfare.” (Batson, 1981). The only way for a person to be truly altruistic is if their intent is to help the community before themselves. However, the only thing humans can see is the actions themselves, and so, selfish intent may seem the same as altruistic intent. Alas, the only way that altruism can be judged is if the intent is obvious. Through that, we must conclude that only certain intents can be defined as altruistic, and as intent stemming from nature benefits the group while other intent benefits yourself, only actions caused by nature are truly altruistic.
Sin can be defined in many ways, but it creates a separation from God. There is a war that occurs inside people. That war is between one’s flesh and the Holy Spirit. Satan was the originator of sin because pride caused him to sin against God. Adam and Eve were the doors that allowed sin to enter the world. Sin causes death and without a savior, it is impossible to cleanse oneself. Once sin is conceived, it takes an atonement to wipe away one’s sin. Jesus became the atonement for all believers and He gives everyone a chance to have a relationship with God. As Christians, one must be aware of sin because it can affect a person’s destiny and cause delays with God’s blessing.
Are human beings born to be good? Or are we naturally born to be evil? A person’s nature or essence is a trait that is inherent and lasting in an individual. To be a good person is someone who thinks of others before themselves, shows kindness to one another, and makes good choices in life that can lead to a path of becoming a good moral person. To be a bad person rebels against something or someone thinking only of them and not caring about the consequences of their actions. Rousseau assumed, “that man is good by nature (as it is bequeathed to him), but good in a negative way: that is, he is not evil of his own accord and on purpose, but only in danger of being contaminated and corrupted by evil or inept guides and examples (Immanuel Kant 123).” In other words, the human is exposed to the depraved society by incompetent guardians or influences that is not of one’s free will in the view of the fact that it is passed on. My position is humans are not by nature evil. Instead, they are good but influenced by the environment and societies to act in evil ways to either harm others or themself.
The creation of man is told to be one of God’s greatest creation. A creation so great and precious that he made it in His own image- one without sin (Genesis 1:26-27). The occurrence of evil and suffering is greatly due to the Fall of Man. The idea of temptation is closely associated with evil because “sin is conceived in the internal stages of temptation and manifests itself in the external aspects” (Towns, 2012, p. 2). In other words, temptation is the root cause of man acting upon sin. A constructive approach on the theological definition, biblical foundation, and a practical application will be discussed throughout the paper to further elaborate and examine the Fall of Man and temptation.
The first man created on earth was Adam and since he sinned, it was passed down to his descendants. Psalms 51:5 states, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.” It is natural to sin because we are sinners by nature. If we are willing to participate in sin all of our lives and choose not to give it up, we will push ourselves further away from God. Since we are born is sin we ask ourselves, “What would Jesus do?” to avoid taking action of sin. Willard claims that “it is not sufficient to see us boldly and confidently through a crisis, and can find ourselves driven to despair over powerless tension it will put us through (Willard 9). Our actions are what makes us further or closer to the lord and many of us choose “to withhold our bodies from religion and that can exclude religion from our lives” (Willard 31). God is a forgiving God when we ask for forgiveness of things that we do wrong in sin. People want to transform their life over to God, will be considered to be a different kind of person in which 2 Corinthians 5:17 states, “Old things that have passed away and, behold all things have become new” (Willard 20). God loves us no matter what we do but it is best to give ourselves to