Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on toxicology
Essay on toxicology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on toxicology
Everyday scientists perform different tests on cells (known as in vitro testing) to assess numerous concepts, such as drug efficiency and nanoparticle toxicity. Unfortunately, these tests do not always provide the best or most accurate results since the human body is composed of several different cell types, all of which interact and cause robust responses that cannot accurately be mimicked or studied with single cells. Thus, current techniques are being employed to imitate the complexity of the human body by using more than two cell lines combined together.
Previous techniques used single cell types, or what is commonly known as a monoculture system to study cellular responses. This is often used for simplicity and for studying single cellular responses rather than cellular interactions. It is useful for studying the general response cells may have under experimental conditions, such as testing toxic materials. It is also useful for studying the mechanisms by which the toxic material exerts their effects. Unfortunately, it is not useful for measuring cellular responses following cell signaling mechanisms. For example, one cell type may not be damaged by a toxic particle whereas a different cell type may be damaged or even killed following exposure. This response is due to the different responsibilities of different cells. Some cell types are capable of controlling for toxicity, while others are not designed to handle toxicity and typically rely on other cells to protect them. This has resulted in inaccurate measurements of nanoparticle toxicity when compared to toxic exposures in animals or humans. This is due to the complex cellular system in living creatures compared to the simplistic monoculture model. For example if scientis...
... middle of paper ...
...signal to each other to change the response. This model provides a more accurate representation of how the human body would respond to a toxic nanoparticle since it is more complex and allows for cellular interactions and robust responses. This model is also useful if scientists are interested in studying animal responses to the nanoparticle, since the measured results are more accurate compared to monoculture models.
Monocultures have long been used for toxicity testing. While they provide many benefits, their ability to represent what may occur in humans or animals is not sufficient. Co-cultures are able to better represent complex systems because bodies have more than one cell type that would respond following exposure. This complexity allows for cellular interactions which can more closely represent human and animal responses.
Amanda Ellis: I guess you would call it ‘Bio-mimicry’. As you are at a very small scale ‘nano-scale’ which is beyond white blood cells and red blood cells, nanotechnology fools the body that it is a normal material. A lot of studies go looking at biocompatible polymers, which are polymers that are bio compatible in the sense that the body does not find it toxic. There are a lot of people that are working with DNA nanotechnology. An example of Prof. Ellis’s research is delivering cancer drugs through a DNA strand with the use of a nano-scale box. Humans have DNA, which is about 50% different than a banana. As DNA is
She points out that many harder drugs first started out with the use of drugs and alcohol. Her conclusion to this paragraph and to the article was, “On top of all of this, as mentioned above, nearly half the country has already tried pot which is more than how many Americans know who Jennifer Lawrence is and much much more than the percentage of Americans who are left-handed,” (10). Jacques is implying that since it is a common theme among many Americans to smoke marijuana, it should be legalized. Her analogy does not have any reputable numbers to back it up, therefore, a reader will have a hard time believing this bit of information. This is a logical fallacy within her argument. There are plenty of things that are common within this country that cannot be legalized. There are a great number of people who run stop signs everyday, but it does not mean a law should be passed saying it is okay to speed right through them without hesitation. This is a weak ending to Jacques’s argument and does not leave the reader confidently on her
In the article “Pinpointing Cancer Fight,” Liz Szabo states the uses of nanotechnology and how researchers are attempting to use this advancement to fight cancer. She defines that nanotechnology is a type of technology that creates devices on an atomic level; this equipment can allow people such as researchers to use its ability to detect cancerous cells as well as treat them. Szabo remains a neutral tone as she states that while some are against the idea of using nanotechnology since there are many risks, others are optimistic that it may lead to transformational results. She presents a list of some products developed through nanotechnology and explains its usage in addition to mentioning the failure of those nanotech products. Szabo provides
Late one night a woman is driving home on the freeway, she’s hit head on by a drunk driver and killed. The man is charged with two accounts of murder; the woman, and her four-week-old embryo inside her. By law, everyone human being is guaranteed rights of life; born or unborn they are equal. The same law should be enforced concerning human embryonic stem cell research. Dr. James A. Thomson discovered stem cells in 1998 and they’ve intrigued scientist ever since. The stem cells themselves are derived from a three to four day old cluster of cells called a blastocyst and they are so coveted because they are pluripotent, meaning they can differentiate into any type of cell in the human body. Although embryonic stem cells show amazing potential to cure various disease such as cancer, congestive heart failure, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, muscular dystrophies, and more. The methods by which they are obtained is controversial. Research on embryonic stem cells is unethical, unnecessary, and purely homicide.
Giving good reason for what legalizing marijuana can do for the United States and how we can gain a lot from legalizing marijuana, but she is able to pull back her reader on why you should not be tamped by what good marijuana can do. The author of the article view that the negative effects of marijuana are a huge deal, since marijuana tempers with the human brain and that even though it has its pros, the cons win since it’s more harmful if not use properly or the drug is used to much or use often. As well that we still don’t know that much about marijuana and that there should be more studies on marijuana, since we can still learn more about
Imagine if your pet was getting experimented on for a product you might buy in the future. Would anyone really want that product, your pet was in pain because of it? Animals are getting experimented on for products to get released to the public. Some companies are using vitro researching to test their products but not enough companies are using vitro as their form of testing products. Synthetic skin could reduce the amount of animals getting tested on everyday for companies to release new products to the public. Animals are getting experimented on everyday.
Wang, K., Wu, X., & Huang, J. (2013, February 28). Cancer stem cell theory: therapeutic implications for nanomedicine. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589204/
... believes this to be very true. But the smokers do not want to be associated with the “pothead” stereotype. They want very much to destroy the connection of marijuana with the tie-dyed, hippy era. Society just assumes smokers are useless, lazy, uneducated bums; which is very inaccurate. There are many hard working people out there that smoke marijuana recreationally to relieve stress. First, this cannot be true because there are an inestimable amount of marijuana smokers that successfully keep their habit a secret. These people are able to blend with society, allowing them to make friends/acquaintances that don’t agree with smoking marijuana. People who use marijuana do not look negatively upon the rest of society. They relate and form bonds with the whole culture as normal people would.
This author uses many informative points and facts. She also shares her statistics and marijuana effects research with us. She states marijuana puts many people at risk. The most at risk, though are the adolescents. The earlier you start using marijuana, the more the negative impact on you. Cannabis use in literally lowering people’s IQs. Regular marijuana users have shown to drop in their IQs about 8 - 10 points. It’s said the earlier you begin using Cannabis the more drastic the effects are. Using marijuana at a young age also causes attention deficit and that worsens over the years of using. Also this attention impairment cannot be repaired with
...ary solution to serious problems. The individual's use of the drug as means of pleasure is clearly evident. I asked why he or she continued and it was like I programmed the individual to say the right thing, "…it makes everything more enjoyable"(anonymous, Nov. 19,p.5). In conclusion to my research I feel I satisfied my thesis that marijuana does create a physical dependency among people who abuse it. And like any other drug abuse it leads to addiction.
The effect of Marijuana on American Society has been a highly popularized point of concern and discussion for many years. This topic has become more frequent in the past months as two states voters have allowed its widespread recreational and medicinal use. This research paper will focus on some of the history of marijuana, details of this drug, and conclude with my findings of why this drug has become increasingly popular which may surprise the reader.
There is a wealth of evidence showing that animal “models” are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research. Scientists and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.
Gabe went on to point out that marijuana that is used medically would have to be higher in CBD than THC so that benefits such as shrinking tumors, lowering anxiety, and so on, can be obtained. I also found it interesting that use of marijuana for just 5 or more days in a month could affect cognitive ability in terms of academics, as Gabe pointed out in one of the studies she spoke of. Another study, which was longitudinal and followed boys from middle school until age 35 found that continual marijuana use resulted in a decrease in IQ as well as no gain of those extra IQ points that others gain as they get older. In terms of the marijuana itself, I had no idea that the potency has increased dramatically since the 1960s, which was 1-2%, to an average of 15% today; that, coupled with the fact that the potency has a significant effect on the brain, is especially troubling. As a college student who knows individuals who smoke marijuana, I now have a heightened awareness of the dangers of marijuana, which are much more expansive than I would have ever originally
In 2004 another experiment was created in Rochester Minnesota at the Mayo Clinic. The clinic was the first to create pigs that used human blood in place of their own. In 2005, two more hybrids are created the first being a mouse with human brain cells and the second is a feline-human protein hybrid. These hybrids are being created to fight and cure cancers and diseases including Parkinson and Alzheimer’s disease. 2007 and 2008, sheep ...
My purpose for writing paper three was to persuade my reader of the importance of my side of an issue which was “the legalization of marijuana.” I had to composed for Dr. Asya specifically for this paper.