Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Functional role of literary criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Functional role of literary criticism
How to Mark a Book
missing works cited
You know you have to read "between the lines" to get the most out of anything. I want to persuade you to do something equally important in the course of your reading. I want to persuade you to "write between the lines." Unless you do, you are not likely to do the most efficient kind of reading.
I contend, quite bluntly, that marking up a book is not an act of mutilation but of love.
You shouldn't mark up a book which isn't yours. Librarians (or your friends) who lend you books expect you to keep them clean, and you should. If you decide that I am right about the usefulness of marking books, you will have to buy them. Most of the world's great books are available today, in reprint editions. There are two ways in which one can own a book. The first is the property right you establish by paving for it, just as you pay for clothes and furniture. But this act of purchase is only the prelude to possession. Full ownership comes only when you have made it a part of yourself, and the best way to make yourself a part of it is by writing in it. An illustration may make the point clear. You buy a beefsteak and transfer it from the butcher's icebox to your own. But you do not own the beefsteak in the most important sense until you consume it and get it into your bloodstream. I am arguing that books, too, must be absorbed in your bloodstream to do you any good.
Confusion about what it means to own a book leads people to a false reverence for paper, binding, and type - a respect for the physical thing - the craft of the printer rather than the genius of the author. They forget that it is possible for a man to acquire the idea, to possess the beauty, which a great book contain...
... middle of paper ...
...em you can get through, but rather how many can get through you - how many you can make your own. A few friends are better than a thousand acquaintances. If this be your aim, as it should be, you will not be impatient if it takes more time and effort to read a great book than it does a newspaper.
You may have one final objection to marking books. You can't lend them to your friends because nobody else can read them without being distracted by your notes. Furthermore, you won't want to lend them because a marked copy is a kind of intellectual diary, and lending it is almost like giving your mind away.
If your friend wishes to read your "Plutarch's Lives," "Shakespeare," or "The Federalist Papers," tell him gently but firmly, to buy a copy. You will lend him your car or your coat - but your books are as much a part of you as your head or your heart.
One of the things Aristotle discusses is the need to limit the number of friends we have. He states: “So the right course is perhaps not to seek to
As selfish as it might sound, the decision of ending your life to avoid suffering is more about ending the suffering of your loved ones. It is way more painful to watch your family being sad, crying, getting frustrated and tired because there is nothing else they could do. As much as family tries to hide their distress, or as much as they try to avoid thinking about the inevitable, sometimes the feelings can't be avoid. I wouldn't want my family to go through this, and I wouldn't want to watch them being miserable. It is just not fair for them. Why wait longer for something that will eventually happen, especially when the patient is bed bound and has to depend on others for the most basic needs. I couldn't and wouldn't want to do that to my loved ones and to myself.
Bradbury attacks loss of literature in the society of Fahrenheit 451 to warn our current society about how literature is disappearing and the effects on the people are negative. While Montag is at Faber’s house, Faber explains why books are so important by saying, “Do you know why books such as this are so important? Because they have quality. And what does the word quality mean? To me it means texture. This book has pores” (79). Faber is trying to display the importance of books and how without them people lack quality information. In Electronics and the Decline of Books by Eli Noam it is predicted that “books will become secondary tools in academia, usurped by electronic media” and the only reason books will be purchased will be for leisure, but even that will diminish due to electronic readers. Books are significant because they are able to be passed down through generation. While online things are not concrete, you can not physically hold the words. Reading boost creativity and imagination and that could be lost by shifting to qui...
In “The Lonely, Good Company of Books,” by Richard Rodriguez, you learn that Rodriguez had read hundreds of books before he was a teenager, but never truly understood what he was reading. His parents never encouraged him to read and thought the only time you needed to read, was for work. Since his parents never encouraged Rodriguez to read it effected how he perceived books.
deceive you, or in other words don’t judge a book buy its cover or its
Naturally, human beings are social beings and cannot live without friends. Friendship is an essential part of the structure of human existence. Today’s people are seeking and participating in relationships because they believe that it is good to have friends so as to experience pleasure, to be honored, to be healthy, and to prosper in life. Even in the inferior kind of friendships, people cooperate for the common advantage or pleasure. Irrespective of qualifications, career, personal perspectives, cultural differences, and interests, all people seek for love and acknowledgement from others (Curzer, 2012). This means that at a particular time, every individual will seek for a friendship, whether based on utility, pleasure, or even virtuous
From my past experiences, I have grown to prefer reading over writing. When I am reading, I can visualize the text in any way that I see fit. It is almost as if I am rewriting the novel using the illusions that I feel express the words in a passage. For example, in the current independent novel I am reading, it portrays a woman of high stature who is able to lure ...
Anyone caught with a volume anywhere would not be set on fire; that fate was reserved for their scholarly possessions. But Montag did not seem to care if he received humiliation from his colleagues. When Montag’s confidant, former literature professor Faber, sighted the stolen book in Montag’s arm, “(h)is gaze returned unsteadily to Montag, who was now seated with the book in his lap. ‘The book─where did you─?’ ‘I stole it.’ Faber, for the first time, raised his eyes and looked directly into Montag’s face. ‘You’re brave’” (81). Montag may not have been hailed a hometown hero for his efforts, but he would certainly become noteworthy in the city. No one had ever before dared to complete what he
Fadiman thinks that carnal readers are superior than courtly readers. She states numerus times that courtly readers miss-out on life experiences that are only associated with findings in writing on books, notes, and meaningful experiences for some. Carnal readers create lifelong memories by taking the liberty to utilize them in any way. She uses the example of her daughter at age 22 months, spilling egg yolk onto her cooking book. That egg yolk stain will remind Fadiman of her baby girl every time she opens that cooking book and sees the stain. Courtly doesn’t work with younger children either.
Fadiman Introduces her opinion of various styles of the physical interaction with books in her autobiography Never Do That to a Book. During a family trip to Copenhagen, Fadiman's older brother left an open book face down on his night stand. When the family returned to the hotel from an outing, they found the book sitting on his bed. The book was closed and held a chastising note from the chambermaid on how to handle a book. Fadiman uses that memory as an opening example to how people treat their beloved books so differently. Fadiman recalls on how her family treated books in her home growing up. Describing how each altercation done to the book marks the special event that particular book was involved in. Fadiman recalls another memory of
UW School of Social Work. “Facts About Mental Illness and Suicide.” Facts About Mental Illness and Suicide. University of Washington, 2014. Web 27. 2014.
Before my shift started, I did my research about my new client for week three clinical. I thought I was well prepared for the clinical, I knew the client’s mental and medical conditions but I was more focused on the client’s mental health issues and not the medical illnesses. When the nurse informed me that client W was experiencing shortness of breath due to his COPD, I was a bit shock because I was not expecting that to happen.
She was battling with serious guilt throughout the movie and didn't know whether to blame herself for all that has happened to their son. Truly, she shouldn't be the one to take all the blame because it wasn't Michaela’s fault that she had the disease in the first places. It was really just an unlucky genetic roll that happened to be within her genes and get passed onto her son. Just imagine if you were put into a situation were it was because of the genes you carried your child was going to die, how would you feel in that situation. In my opinion if I was a carrier for this disease and was given the choice to have a child that could have a 50% chance of being born with the disease i probably would still have the child. No matter how the child comes out i would make it my duty to love and protect that child for as long as I can and give that child the best life they could ever even wish for. Some people believe that you shouldn't be allowed to have children if you have this disease but i believe that is just nonsense. Modern medicine is bound to figure out a way to let your child have a perfectly normal, happy, and healthy life, so dont put any laws on who can and can't have
Mark Antony follows Caesar’s word religiously, and states that “when Caesar says, ‘do this’, it is perform’d” (10). Having this mindset shows Antony begins as a convergent thinker, listening and following Caesar without much individual thought at all. While Antony’s actions are mostly fueled by his loyalty, other characters believe he is simply not capable of thinking for himself. As the conspirators are plotting Caesar’s murder, Cassius suggests killing Antony as well, because of his close relationship with Caesar. Brutus immediately rejects this idea, and explains to the conspirators they don’t need to kill Mark Antony because he is “but a limb of Caesar” (165). They believe that when Caesar is murdered, Antony will not be capable taking any significant action-- he will simply disappear into the citizens of
Who or what is the main culprit when it comes to the bulk percentage of distracted driving incidents? Do technical and automobile manufacturers, along with drivers and government officials, all share an inherent responsibility to combat the current epidemic of distracted driving? As hard as it is...