Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of religion in politics
Women underrepresented in politics
Women in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of religion in politics
When evaluating a presidential candidate I would consider the predominant attributes such as the candidate’s race, ethnicity, religion, gender, and background. I would also consider the candidate's personality traits. Although I do consider these characteristics, my vote mainly rests on the political party associated with the
majority of the states, and those that were on the ballot in a majority of
" Character is the way the President orients himself toward life - not for the moment, but enduringly. Character is a person's stance as he confronts experience. And at the core of character, a man confronts himself (Barber 8). " Barber's book is also useful to see how prepared a candidate is to be president. Judging a person's personality, especially a person who is constantly in the spot light, helps you to understand what kind of person they are, what they are passionate about, how they handle themselves in stressful situations, and really anything if you put enough research into it.
... by Robert Finch, “He wasn’t nearly as attractive, physically, as some of the other candidates, but he was so intense; he was a strong personality. You regarded him as a comer, someone who would be effective and successful in political activity. I was impressed by his obvious political skills, his intelligence, and his drive (Strober 31).” This definitely sounds like some qualities that would make a good president and the public agreed by electing him President.
In the wake of the 2016 general election, Michael Lind published a piece on The Smart Set entitled: Can Electoral Reform Save America? This piece centered around a single question on the ballot of a single state, question 5 in Maine, and the impact on electoral reform it could have for the country according to Lind. Using deconstruction, Lind analyzes the idea of a Ranked Choice polling system, rather than the first-past-the-post system that is currently in place in the United States. His allusions to the past as well as separate government entities globally, as well as a deconstruction of both polling systems and the impact they have (or could have) allows the reader to absorb information and produce their own personal opinion.
A fantastic president would always be trying to come up with new ideas that won't affect people in a bad way. They would need to be great public speakers, honest, powerful, persuasive, and respectful. Most importantly though, they need to be able to lead their country through the specific problems facing them
Should someone else be elected? To what standard should they be judged? For starters, the characteristics of a leader must be the paramount standard of verdict; although Sarah Palin has been offensively troubled by the media on the simplest of matters, her personality and character are equivalent, if not more tolerable than President Obama’s. Once entirely understood, maybe the United States will alter its criteria. Despite recent failures on a variety of political aspects, Obama has managed to maintain his “cool.”
Abortion, health care, same sex marriage, immigration, and ISIS- Ben Carson has some fixed plans to execute these topics that he is basing his presidential run on. Ben Carson, from what I could see, has extremely powerful biblical morals and a level head about most everything. From what I have learned about Carson’s views on the five topics I have chosen, I think he would be a very good choice for President. He is willing to learn and get help in areas that he has insufficient knowledge. I think he approaches problems with caution and he has more than one idea for different plans that he has shared with our country, but again he is willing to get help where he is not strong. I believe Ben Carson could do a great job as president.
Although John Kerry's race to the White House is a definite challenge that will be hard to tackle, it is one filled with fruitful returns if achieved. John Kerry will need to be an individual that sets him apart from the other running candidates by addressing key issues that are pertinent to the highest percentage of voters in the United States by learning from the past. On the other hand, as a democratic candidate, John Kerry should uphold the new democratic view of being a moderate while using the media and other mediums of communication to his full advantage to achieve support for his political platform.
Because Donald Trump wanted to become a Presidential Candidate to shake up America and our way of choosing a Commander in Chief he has taken the focus off of other candidates. To me, he has done just that. In turn, he has also showcased a lot of his ignorant behavior and poor attitudes towards others. Eventually, this will affect how America votes; against Donald Trump. Furthermore, Donald Trump lacks a Presidential form of social interaction. This candidate appears to be impatient when others challenge his position on facts versus his opinions. When he dislikes someone politically or personally, Trump uses his popular attack-mode tactics to make his point. Repeatedly Donald Trump fails to be intellectually stimulating as a Presidential Candidate. Often he has a habit of stating his offensive
on their beliefs, not based upon if they are rich or poor. I understand that the candidates that run
In the midst of one of the most controversial presidential elections in history, both political parties are struggling to prove that their candidate is the best choice. Clinton and Trump’s disapproval ratings are very low, but one has to ask, is there really a lesser evil to choose from? While Clinton has had her own fair share of past discrepancies, Trump’s track record proves much more troublesome. Donald Trump has proven to be an untrustworthy presidential candidate because of his misogynistic actions, his racial bias, and his corrupt business history.
Something that differs Carson from other candidates in the 2016 election is that he is honest. He
Presidential campaigns are a crucial time in a democratic country—a time to carefully consider what it is that matters to us, the populace, and who we feel is most fit to represent us. We choose a leader that we hope will address the issues we deem important as well as serve the best interests of the country. We have to try to look above the partisan lines and look at the candidate’s character to choose someone that is truly up to the task. It is critically important that our elected president possess certain attributes in order to lead effectively. Some of those attributes, in my opinion, are humility, confidence, and honesty.
Nowadays, more so than ever before, religion plays a significant role in American presidential elections. As citizens, our job is to examine that role and decide how it will affect our vote. The Bush/Gore campaign has been very much influenced by religion. Joseph Lieberman, Gore’s running mate and the first Orthodox Jew to run for vice president on a major party ticket, has been extremely vocal about his faith. Both George W. Bush and Al Gore, a Methodist and Baptist, respectively, have also referred to their religious beliefs during this presidential campaign ("Anti-Defamation League Criticizes"), raising several questions about the part religious faith plays in presidential elections.
There are many different qualities people believe a president should contain. For centuries the United States has gone through their fair share of good presidents, and bad ones. Presidential qualities make up whether a president was considered a good leader, or a not so good leader. The three presidential qualities I believe every president should contain are, a strong vision, strong leadership, and has to be a public servant. Many presidents in the past did not have a strong vision and this is why I believe they failed at their presidency.