Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canterbury tales character analysis
Canterbury tales character analysis
Canterbury tales character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canterbury tales character analysis
The “Monk” The Canterbury Tales by Jeffrey Chaucer tells the story of a pilgrims’ journey while travelling to Canterbury. In means of entertainment, their host proposes that each one of them tells two stories on the way to and back from their destination. He also claims himself as a judge of these stories and proclaims that the announced winner will earn a free diner. As the storyteller Chaucer tells each story and gives a detailed portray of its main character. This essay demonstrates that in The Monk’s tale, Chaucer describes the monk’s personality, his characteristics, and his physical appearance. To begin with, the monk’s physical appearances are described. He is described as bald with bulged eyes. Not to mention that he was fat, and “[a] fat swan loved he best of any roast” (Canterbury Tales, 42). Assuming that monks spend their days in prayer and feast, …show more content…
In fact, he has abandoned these rules because they are “old and somewhat strict” (Canterbury Tales, 10). Instead, he has “followed new-world manners” (Canterbury Tales, 12). Hence, the monk goes against the typical type his character is ought to be, for he is “one made for mastery” (Canterbury Tales, 1). In Addition, “[h]e cared not for that text a clean-plucked hen /Which holds that hunters are not holy men” (Canterbury Tales, 13-14). Actually, hunting is his greatest pleasure and his roars where loud. Is not a monk supposed to care less for this world’s materials? However, this monk lives in luxury, follows the pleasures that his heart pursuits, and acts recklessly. “What? Should he study as a madman would/ Upon a book in cloister cell? Or yet/ Go labour with his hands and swink and sweat,/As Austin bids? How shall the world be served?” (Canterbury Tales, 20-23). Chaucer thinks otherwise. This monk is a “manly man” (Canterbury Tales, 3) who is meant to be an “abbot able” (Canterbury Tales,
In Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, Chaucer the author and Chaucer the pilgrim are both quick to make distinctions between characters and point out shortcomings. Though Chaucer the pilgrim is meeting the group for the first time, his characterizations go beyond simple physical descriptions. Using just twenty-one lines in the General Prologue, the author presents the character of the Miller and offers descriptions that foreshadow the sardonic tone of his tale and the mischievous nature of his protagonist.
Why Henry VIII Closed the Monasteries There were 800 monks and nuns in 1500s they had strict rules, The rule of St. Benedict for monks of the Benedictine order was prayer should take place eight times a day, all monks should sleep in separate beds, all monks must rise quickly when signal is given to attend the services and all monks must not grumble about the colour or rough material of their clothes. The rule of St. Augustine for the monks of the Augustine order was love god and your neighbour and monks should spend their time when not praying, coping books, looking after the poor and old, nursing the sick and crippled, teaching children and looking after travellers. Between 1536 and 1539 Henry V111 and Cromwell decided to close the monasteries because the monks are not flowing rules and take all the wealth to defend the country. In order to complete this essay I am going to explain below in detail why the monasteries were closed by Henry V111 between 1536 and 1539
In his Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer assembles a band of pilgrims who, at the behest of their host, engage in a story-telling contest along their route. The stories told along the way serve a number of purposes, among them to entertain, to instruct, and to enlighten. In addition to the intrinsic value of the tales taken individually, the tales in their telling reveal much about the tellers. The pitting of tales one against another provides a third level of complexity, revealing the interpersonal dynamics of the societal microcosm comprising the diverse group of pilgrims.
In The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, the stereotypes and roles in society are reexamined and made new through the characters in the book. Chaucer discusses different stereotypes and separates his characters from the social norm by giving them highly ironic and/or unusual characteristics. Specifically, in the stories of The Wife of Bath and The Miller’s Tale, Chaucer examines stereotypes of women and men and attempts to define their basic wants and needs.
The monk receives some scathing sarcasm in Chaucer’s judgment of his new world ways and the garments he wears “With fur of grey, the finest in the land; Also, to fasten hood beneath his chin, He had of good wrought gold a curious pin: A love-knot in the larger end there was.” (194-197, Chaucer). The Friar is described as being full of gossip and willing to accept money to absolve sins, quite the opposite of what a servant of God should be like. Chaucer further describes the friar as being a frequenter of bars and intimate in his knowledge of bar maids and nobles alike. The friar seems to be the character that Chaucer dislikes the most, he describes him as everything he should not be based on his profession. The Pardoner as well seems to draw special attention from Chaucer who describes him as a man selling falsities in the hopes of turning a profit “But with these relics, when he came upon Some simple parson, then this paragon In that one day more money stood to gain Than the poor dupe in two months could attain.” (703-706, Chaucer). Chaucer’s description of the pardoner paints the image of a somewhat “sleazy” individual “This pardoner had hair as yellow as wax, But lank it hung as does a strike of flax; In wisps hung down such locks as he 'd on head, And with them he his shoulders overspread; But thin they dropped, and stringy, one by one.” (677-681,
as brown as is a berry." (P 120 line 211) This shows that the Monk spends
In the general prologue to The Canterbury Tales were seen the hierarchical barriers being broken by joining representatives of various strata on a pilgrimage. For this reason The Cook, The Squire and The Manciple were chosen. The first character is The Cook, where whose description begins with a rather daily language, but never quite approaching this informality. The physical experience of the cook is represented by grotesque details; he suffered from a sore in his shin that was visible to everyone even when he cooked. It also had the reputation of being dirty. And despite of having decent repertoire of dishes and cooking techniques, he was not very reliable with his job, as dirt and flies flying around his kitchen made a lot of their guests become intoxicated with th...
The differences between the laity and monastic worshippers within Buddhist tradition are distinguished by the extent to which these two groups are willing to follow the middle-way as taught by Buddha. Typically, in order to have a functional Buddhist society, there must be the devout, and those who support the devout, giving aid in the form of food, monies, shelter, transportation, etc. The devout who sacrifice the purity of a true monastic lifestyle in order to support the community (who in turn are the recipients of merit or punya; a bank of ‘good’ actions tied to ‘good’ karma) (Gethin 101), from the monastic worshippers, are called the laity; upasakas (men laity) and upasikas (women laity). The monastics, or Bhikkhus (monks) and Bhikkhunis (nuns) are responsible for accepting the devotion shown by the laity, reciprocally, the laity are obliged to maintain devotion for “in order to be free from guilt […] the bases of a clear conscience [is] generosity and good conduct” (Ibid 83) . Good conduct is the realization and active partaking of the “eight significant dimensions [the Noble Eight-fold Path] of one’s behavior” (Ibid 82), which constitute right (in all actions of) understanding, thought, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and concentration (although not limited to, rather expanded upon realization). The importance of a laities duty within society is to support, through their livelihood, the only traditional Buddhist teaching available to them (Ibid 92). In order to adapt a Buddhist ideology, some conducts were left out of lay worship to support a less strenuous spiritual life (putting the emphasis on merit earned) in pursuit of maintaining a functional community. The purpose, to establish the five lay percepts ...
Chaucer uses the Prioress, the Monk and the Friar to represent his views on the Church. He makes the three model members of the Church appear to have no problems with self-indulgence, greed, and being unfaithful to their vows. He displays his anti skeptical thoughts of the faults of the medieval church by making fun of its teachings and the people of the church, who use it for personal gain. Chaucer see’s the church as corrupt, hypocritical and greedy.
The Canterbury Tales is more than an amusing assortment of stories; it is an illustration of the society in which Geoffrey Chaucer lived. It portrays the culture and class system of the medieval ages in microcosm. Every strata of human life at the time were represented by the many characters whose tales are told. Each character’s basic human nature also plays a role in their stories, and each one has within them the strengths and weaknesses that make up all of humanity. Each character exemplifies their life and reputation through the stories they tell. The Pardoner uses his tale as a ploy to garner money. His tale embodies each deadly sin, and every reader can relate to his story and feel the guilt of his characters. The Wife of Bath’s tale expresses her own ideals in the way her character is given a second chance after committing a crime. The Franklin’s tale, because of its straightforwardness and honesty is a direct representation of the Franklin’s simple and joyful life. Each character tells a tale that is a suitable match to their personality. These characters’ tales represent prevalent themes of the middle ages, including greed, corruption of religious clergymen, violence, revenge, and social status. In Chaucer’s society, the traditional feudal system was losing its importance and the middle class began to emerge. The middle class characters within the Canterbury Tales, with their personal lives and interactions with members of differing social classes, gave an understanding of the growth of society, especially the rising middle class, during medieval times.
The Canterbury Tales is an in-depth narrative analysis of twenty-nine unique characters and their Host on a collective pilgrimage to Thomas Becket’s shrine in Canterbury. Chaucer paints vivid pictures of each pilgrim through his description of their physical appearance, inner nature, and outward behavior towards others. The individuals are not given names but the reader can identify them by their titles. One of the clearest cut characters in this work is the Parson. Chaucer presents the Parson in The Canterbury Tales to create a stark contrast for the other religious figures by his description of the Parson’s inner constitution, outward actions, and shepherd like qualities.
An interesting aspect of the famous literary work, "The Canterbury Tales," is the contrast of realistic and exaggerated qualities that Chaucer entitles to each of his characters. When viewed more closely, one can determine whether each of the characters is convincing or questionable based on their personalities. This essay will analyze the characteristics and personalities of the Knight, Squire, Monk, Plowman, Miller, and Parson of Chaucer's tale.
(Chaucer, 6) Taken from the Order of Saint Benedict's website are some of the Rules of Saint Benedict to which The Monk should be abiding by, including, though not limited to: little to no material property, working with hands six hours a day, spending leisure time on prayer, fasting, and service of neighbour. Certainly, it is worth mentioning that the subject of prayer was not even mentioned once throughout The Monk's entire introduction. Even more evident are his many personal belongings (considerably flashy, valuable ones at that), denial of work, and eating habits. Christianity having had a rather strong hold on the status of late 14th century England, hypocrisy in religion (this one specifically) holds potential to become a dangerous influence on its surroundings (people, specifically).
It is a sad commentary on the clergy that, in the Middle Ages, this class that was responsible for morality was often the class most marked by corruption. Few works of the times satirically highlight this phenomenon as well as The Canterbury Tales, by Geoffrey Chaucer. Chaucer’s "General Prologue" introduces us to a cast of clergy, or "Second Estate" folk, who range in nature from pious to corrupt. The Friar seems to be an excellent example of the corrupt nature of many low-level clergymen of the times- while his activities were not heretical or heinous, his behavior is certainly not in accord with the selfless moral teachings he is supposed to espouse. According to the Narrator’s account, he is a snob, corrupted by greed, and acts in very un-Christian ways. It is clear that he is a man of low moral standards.
The Monk partook in and greatly enjoyed hunting, contradicting the common belief that monks devote their lives to peaceful prayer, study, and work. The Monk devoted himself to a hobby he loved, appeared healthy and happy, and was never said to have hurt or otherwise acted against anybody else as a result (or at all). The Monk did not live as was common among and expected of most monks, but he appeared to be virtuous nonetheless and lived a fulfilling life, so one could say he was justified in deviating from the norm. Others, however, lived differently to what one would expect not to lead a better life, but for personal gains. The Friar, the Summoner, and the Pardoner all used the powers of their occupations corruptly in order to satisfy their own greed, accepting bribes from and pardoning sinners who didn't truly repent, removing the wealthy from the consequences of their actions.