Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature to movie adaptation proces
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Grace Kuenzli
Ms. Jeurgens
AP English Literature Composition
26 October 2016
Dracula Paper
Nosferatu (1922) is a notorious horror-film directed by F.W. Murnau, and is credited for being the first film adaptation of the novel Dracula by Bram Stoker. Although Nosferatu and Dracula share obvious similarities, the two works are also in stark contrast of one another in terms of characterization, particularly concerning the character of Dracula. Ultimately, this variation between the novel and its film adaptation highlights the theme of vampirism being associated with sexuality versus disease and the plague.
To begin with, the vampire in the film, known as Nosferatu (hence, the title of the work), is characterized as a rather ghoulish figure
…show more content…
with animalistic qualities (Nosferatu). Leavy claims that rather than being fascinating and romantic like the image of Dracula in the novel, Nosferatu is instead cadaverous and time-worn in appearance, an immediate contrast with the initial characterization of Stoker’s Dracula. To elaborate, in Nosferatu, the vampire is presented with bat-like, pointy ears and long, sharp claws for hands, emphasizing his monstrous form and lack of human qualities. Because the film is a German expressionist film, Nosferatu’s costume is evidently of an expressionistic design; its aim is to convey a startling, uncomfortable emotion from the audience. Nosferatu’s costume inevitably characterizes him as strangely gaunt and abnormally tall, as it consists of nothing but a long, black-clad coat, most notable in the scene in which Nosferatu stands under a door frame, about to enter Hutter’s bedroom (Leavy). Also, the agonizingly slow, unnatural movement of his walking provides a rather suspenseful effect on the audience, as he/she is constantly dreading Nosferatu’s next move. In one notorious shot, which occurs inside the ship’s hold, Nosferatu gradually rises before a sailorman to stand fully erect, without a bend in his body (Leavy). With this scene, Murnau conveys to the audience the extent of Nosferatu’s overwhelmingly eerie powers and supernatural existence. According to Leavy, another manifestation of Nosferatu’s malicious powers is the ensuing “plague epidemic,” which accompanies his travel to the village.
In the film, Nosferatu is a plague of humanity, a disease. He is the embodiment of Death, rather than simply a monstrous ghoul. To elaborate, in one notable scene, Murnau presents vampirism in light of the devastation and desolation of Wisbourg, the mysterious yet deadly plague (Leavy). The high-angle shot looking down onto the village depicts an evident procession of men in black clothing carrying the coffins of the “plague’s” victims along the streets (Nosferatu). Each are portrayed to be a victim of Nosferatu’s horrors. Overall, it is implied throughout the film that, when bitten by Nosferatu, death is …show more content…
inevitable. On the other hand, rather than depicting Dracula as an eerie, deformed monster with sharp fangs and bat-like ears such as Nosferatu, the Dracula character in Stoker’s Dracula is characterized as a “tall old man, clean shaven” (Stoker 13). This is most noteworthy in the first chapter, where Jonathan Harker comments to the reader of Count Dracula’s physical appearance—a “strong” face that “showed vitality in a man of his years”—and thus, emphasizing his extraordinary ability to embody the appearance of a human disguise (Stoker 15). In Nosferatu, the vampire is a ghastly figure similar to that of an animal, whereas the novel’s descriptions aim to characterize Dracula as young and rather attractive in appearance, with normal physical characteristics. Count Dracula’s ability to transform into a debonair, suave version of himself is also evident in the scene where Jonathan and Mina Harker spot him in the streets while traveling to Exeter in chapter 13.
Count Dracula in this scene is depicted as a “tall, thin man” with a “black moustache,” which implies his youthful appearance (Stoker 147). He then proceeds to act courteous to a young lady passing by along the streets. He is “observ[ing]” her, eventually following after she drives away, indicating that the woman may become his next victim (Stoker 148). Another instance is the scene in which Count Dracula attacks Mina Harker, drinks her blood, and claims that “you, their best beloved one, are now to me… blood of my blood” (Stoker 247). In the novel, Count Dracula is the essence of sensuality, as there is constantly a focus on fascination with his character by the women in the novel. On the other hand, in the film adaptation, vampirism represents death by the plague, as noted previously. Another variation between the two works is the fact that the Vampire in Dracula is fertile (as he is what may be considered a young vampire) and thus, “can produce” (Stoker 242). In other words, Count Dracula has the ability to make new vampires from humans who, if bitten, will become controlled under his maleficent powers. This is evident in Lucy Westenra’s alleged attack. Meanwhile, Nosferatu is implied to be both infertile and incapable of creating new vampires, for if bitten by
Nosferatu, it is death that will result, not transformation. To conclude, although the two works, Nosferatu and Dracula, both share a variety of similarities, distinctions remain evident concerning the characterization of Dracula. Whereas Nosferatu possesses monstrous and animalistic qualities throughout the film (ultimately contributing to the central theme of death by the plague), Stoker’s Count Dracula differs significantly, as he is seen solely in his human form as an embodiment of romanticism and sexuality. Word Count: 940 Works Cited Leavy, William. “NOSFERATU: Murnau’s use of Expressionism in his film.” Academia, www.academia.edu/2205991/NOSFERATU_Murnaus_Use_of_Expressionism_in_his_Fi lm. Accessed 26 October 2016. Nosferatu a Symphony of Horror. Directed by F.W. Murnau, performances by Max Schreck, Gustav von Wangenheim, and Greta Schröder, Jofa-Atelier Berlin-Johannisthal, 1922. Stoker, Bram. Dracula. Mineola, NY, Dover Publications, Inc., 2000.
Nosferatu a Symphony of Horror and Sunrise: A song of two humans, are silent films directed by F.W. Murnau made in the 1920's. Sunrise tells the story of two young lovers that rekindle their romance, and Nosferatu is a horror adaptation of Bram Stoker’s, Dracula. While they differ in genre, both are similar in that they consist of a young couple that encounter a threatening situation. The element of space becomes an interesting aspect relevant to both films as it is used to foresee the events of what is to come in the plot. In Noseferatu, enclosed spaces evoke the feelings of uneasiness and no escape.
Bram Stoker’s Dracula is not only a classic story of men and monsters, but a dramatic reactionary work to the perceived threats to Victorian society in nineteenth century England. In modern times there have been many film adaptations of the novel, each developing a unique analysis or criticism of the literary text within the framework of the society and time period in which it was created. The 1972 film Blacula is one of the most culturally specific variations on the story of Dracula, and highlights many of the themes and messages found in Stoker’s original text. Among the primary similarities between the novel and the film is the portrayal of race, sexuality, nationality, and culture, and the characterization in each work speaks to the fears and ideals of their respective dominant societies.
It is precisely the point that Hollywood distorts and corrupts serious literature for the entertainment pleasures of a mass audience. In the task of comparing and contrasting the novel of "Dracula" to film extracts of "Bram Stoker’s Dracula", values, meaning and context discovered lie between discrepancy and similarity. The change from differing mediums, novel and film, reveal characteristics and possibilities of narratives. Through the advancement of technology, modern writers have gained a cinematic approach to their writing. However Dracula, written in 1987 by Abraham Stoker, where the introduction of technology was gradual, forging inventions such as the typewriter and phonograph, made reference to in the novel, had no anticipation of what technology would have an effect on such writings. With society’s fascination with the supernatural, and love of technology, Dracula’s many adaptations, film, stage, have ensured its survival through the passage of time.
Comparing the 1931 version of Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi, with Frances Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula 1993 version yields some similarities. Both films are of the same genre: Horror. Both films are set around the same time period. Also, both deal with a vampire coming to England and causing disruptions in people's lives. Beyond these few similarities are numerous contrasts.
The late nineteenth century Irish novelist, Bram Stoker is most famous for creating Dracula, one of the most popular and well-known vampire stories ever written. Dracula is a gothic, “horror novel about a vampire named Count Dracula who is looking to move from his native country of Transylvania to England” (Shmoop Editorial Team). Unbeknownst of Dracula’s plans, Jonathan Harker, a young English lawyer, traveled to Castle Dracula to help the count with his plans and talk to him about all his options. At first Jonathan was surprised by the Count’s knowledge, politeness, and overall hospitality. However, the longer Jonathan remained in the castle the more uneasy and suspicious he became as he began to realize just how strange and different Dracula was. As the story unfolded, Jonathan realized he is not just a guest, but a prisoner as well. The horror in the novel not only focuses on the “vampiric nature” (Soyokaze), but also on the fear and threat of female sexual expression and aggression in such a conservative Victorian society.
to Bram Stokers story as myself to a chimp. If it was named 'Parody Of
The vampire, or monster, could be seen as the unfavorable downturn in social status. The trust that the family put into Dracula only to be betrayed by him could be looked at as fraud. The hypothetical of what Dracula stands for, being the lower class, tricks the high class family into believing he is higher class than he really is. This makes him the villain. It also means that he needs to be outed for what is really is. This being shown when Van Helsing figures out that Dracula is a vampire. This would mean that the overt is a monster killing people, and the covert is secretly being lower class.
Stoker has rendered the reader to see the Count as physically strong and powerful, through Jonathan Harker and his confinement and Lucy Westenra and her failing health. Although the reader does not understand all the omniscient powers and control that Count Dracula possesses over people, they are brought to light through Dr Steward’s accounts of his patient R.M. Renfield. The ‘strange and sudden change’ (Stoker, 86), that has happened in Renfield evokes the reader to contemplate the Count’s influence over people. Dr Steward suggests it is as though a ‘religious mania has seized’ Renfield (Stoker, 87), and is controlling him. The reader is aware that Renfield can feel the Counts presence and that there is a connection between them. This eventually leads Van Helsing to recognize the bond between Mina Harker and the Count, which helps them to find Dracula and finally kill him. Dracula’s invasion over Renfield also reveals a weakness in the Counts power. Renfield, an obedient servant of Dracula, claims he is ‘here to do Your bidding, Master. I am Your slave’ (Stoker, 88). Renfield’s devotion is quickly reversed when he sees that the Count is taking life from Mina. It is his care for her that causes him to turn against Dracula and try to fight for her. Again Renfield’s actions mimic that of the other men as it becomes their goal to save Mina from the invasion running through her body. The key to this invasion is the blood.
‘Dracula’ is a novel that probes deeply into people’s superstitions, fears and beliefs of the supernatural. The creature Dracula is an evil being with no concern for others, he kills for his own ends and cannot be stopped, and this is what makes ‘Dracula’ truly frightening.
When the vampire came about the thought of the monsters themselves were terrifying, and to view one they were ghostly pale with dark sunken eyes, large nose similar to that of the stereotypical witch, pointed ears like an elf and dark hair usually dark brown if not black. The original folklore on vampires showed a terrifying creature that you would know if you would see it out and about during the night. Today’s films and novels want to present you with an attractive vampire, like dying and becoming an immortal being is something a human would want to do because they would become more attractive. But also in today’s depiction of the vampire they have no obvious tells that a person is a vampire until they get angry and the fangs elongate. The idea of the vampire has shifted so drastically over the course of time, from fear to an admiration of a creature that could kill you in seconds. In the popular culture of today, the vampire is something attractive that girls pine after and want to be since there are a multitude of romance novels printed today with the male leads being portrayed as a
From Transylvania to Hollywood, vampires have transformed from unfamiliar, mysterious personalities to one of the most dominant monsters in the horror genre today. Vampires are one of the oldest and most noted creatures in mythology, with many variations of them around the world. Although the most famous version is Bram Stoker’s Dracula, many variants have come before and after telling of the same legend with their own added ideas and modifications to relate to their cultures. Today, there is a multitude of literary and film works that convey and resurface peoples’ fear of vampires. As gothic works like Dracula, by Bram Stoker and Scooby-Doo! and the Legend of the Vampire directed by Scott Jeralds share certain traits reflective of the genre;
F. W. Murnau’s Nosferatu was a powerful commentary on disease and lust for its time. The character of Count Orlok himself was a metaphor for most evils such as disease, lust, and death. Towards the end of the film, people began to get sick from a disease that originated from Transylvania. What also causes widespread epidemics is that people unknowingly carry them into their home countries. Paranoia of the disease is also a crucial element of the film. The film’s innovative use of shadows and lighting also add more depth and suspense to the film and adds on to the commentary and social themes of the film. The iconic scene where Orlok went up the staircase and you saw nothing but his shadow stuck out to audiences all around for good reason.
It is said that this book is considered as one of the most famous horror novels, if not the most famous one. The Gothic descriptions in the novel are very prominent at the beginning. The portrayal of the countryside of Transylvania, of the ruined Dracula Castle, etc, all provide the effect of horror in the sense of spooky and gloomy atmosphere, which you can obtain close at hand. Everything is so obvious. The originally beautiful scenes are changed by the writer¡¯s magnification of some specific details which provide certain effect on the readers. All of the above reminds how one¡¯s personal feelings can alter their attitudes towards what they see or what they experience. Sometimes when you are sad, everything look so depressing. It is like the whole world is against you. The sunset could be a fantastic scene when you are filled with joy but an extra source of sorrow when you are not in the mood. Harker is separated from her lovely fianc¨¦e to meet some foreign count in the exotic and unknown eastern world.
Dracula, by Bram Stoker, is a classic tale of Gothicism. Traditionally, gothic tales only carried single theme of horror. Through Dracula, Stoker breaks this single theme barrier. The theme throughout Dracula is clearly displayed through the characters as they step from ignorance to realization in this tale of horror.
In Bram Stoker's "Dracula", Dracula is portrayed as a monster made evident by his gruesome actions. An analysis of Dracula shows that: shows his evil nature in his planning, brutally killing Lucy Westrenstra causing a violent response from Dr. Seward and others, and how his evil ways lead to his downfall. To characterize Dracula in one way, he is a ruthless, cunning monster who uses tricks, torture, and wits to manipulate people to his will. However when he trifled with some courageous people, he had no knowledge that it would be his undoing.