Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Story of an hour theme analysis
Analysis of the story of an hour by kate chopin
How is symbolism used in the story of an hour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Story of an hour theme analysis
Firstly, I read my father the short story “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin. After he read the story, I asked him what he thought on whether or not she is a sympathetic character. My dad responded with a huge no claiming that she was a very selfish character. He said that although it was a male dominated society back in her time period, no one should be happy with the death of one of their family members; especially her husband. Furthermore, he claimed that any woman would be heartbroken and have a paralyzed fear to accept its significance. Also, he pointed out that she would now have nothing left with her. Society in her day was very male dominated and it was the males that brought home money for the family, not females. She may not be heartbroken to hear the news of her husband’s death, but she should have showed emotion on acknowledging the fact that her life will take a turn for the negative. …show more content…
Next, I read the same story to my mother.
After she read the story, she said that the reader can definitely have some sympathy for Mrs. Mallard. She claimed that Mrs. Mallard was probably very tired of having to take care of her husband all the time and her not being able to do anything else. My mother said that now that her husband was dead, she will be able to continue on with her life freely without having to worry about anything else. She said that it is often the case back home in India, where she is from. In India, women often do not hold jobs and are instead housewives tending to their husbands. However, she did point out that Mrs. Mallard would have likely gotten remarried as she cannot earn money because of her status as a
woman. A case could be made for either argument as they are both supported very well with evidence. The gender of a reader plays a massive role in the feelings of sympathy they may have for Mrs. Mallard. Females, especially feminists, are likely to have some sympathy for Mrs. Mallard. Also, the society and culture in which they live in today is likely to factor in the decision to feel sympathy for Mrs. Mallard. For example, women living in male dominated Muslim countries are likely to feel sympathy for Mrs. Mallard as they know how much a husband can control them in a society like theirs. Age likely does not affect largely affect a reader’s perception other than if really small children read the story as society and culture impact an individual’s decisions more than age. Religion and race also play a huge role in the reader feeling sympathetic as they are both related to society and culture in the part of the world they live in so yes it does matter.
The Story of an Hour is a short story of Ms. Mallard, a woman with a heart condition who receives short term good news. Chopin uses contrast between independence, marriage, and gender to show how hidden emotions can effect a woman’s actions in the time period where women did not have much power or right to speak what came to their mind.
Similarly, Kate Chopin uses her writings to voice her dissatisfaction of current principles of the time. In Chopin’s time, women were not considered equal to men. In her short story, “The Story of the Hour”, Chopin writes about the impact of marriage on women. In her view, women are dominated by men and are restricted to play subservient roles in which society expects of them. Kate Chopin’s writings were scandalous in her time when women writers were not prominent. Kate Chopin was considered one of the first feminists. Her stories often dealt with women making their own decisions and standing up for themselves. In her stories, Chopin explored specific problems that woman faced. Because she portrayed women as keen and able to exist without the complete support of men, many men dismissed her writing.
In the short story, “The Story of an Hour,” author Kate Chopin presents the character of Mrs. Louis Mallard. She is an unhappy woman trapped in her discontented marriage. Unable to assert herself or extricate herself from the relationship, she endures it. The news of the presumed death of her husband comes as a great relief to her, and for a brief moment she experiences the joys of a liberated life from the repressed relationship with her husband. The relief, however, is short lived. The shock of seeing him alive is too much for her bear and she dies. The meaning of life and death take on opposite meaning for Mrs. Mallard in her marriage because she lacked the courage to stand up for herself.
Kate Chopin’s story, "The Story of an Hour," may seem to be about Mrs. Mallard’s unexpected and ironic reactions to the news of her husband’s untimely death due to a railroad disaster. At least that’s what I thought when I read the story. It seemed to me that she led a normal life with a normal marriage. She had a stable home life with a kind, loving husband who cared for her. She seemed to love him, sometimes. She had some kind of "heart trouble" (Chopin 25) that didn’t really affect her physically, until the very end. I thought Mrs. Mallard would have been saddened and filled with grief for an adequate period of time after her spouse died, but her grief passed quickly, and she embraced a new life that she seemed to be content with. Therefore I believe there is good evidence that Mrs. Mallard was an ungrateful woman who did not appreciate her husband or his love for her. That evidence is found in her selfish behavior after the death of her husband, Brently Mallard.
Kate Chopin wrote a short piece called “The Story of an Hour” about a woman’s dynamic emotional shift who believes she has just learned her husband has died. The theme of Chopin’s piece is essentially a longing for more freedom for women.
She would not have grieved over someone she did not love. Even in the heat of her passion, she thinks about her lost love. She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked safe with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. Her love may not have been the greatest love of all time, but it was still love. Marriage was not kind to Mrs. Mallard, her life was dull and not worth living, her face showed the years of repression.
Kate Chopin’s story “The Story of an Hour” focuses on a married woman who does not find happiness in her marriage. When she hears of her husband’s death, the woman does not grieve for long before relishing the idea of freedom. Chopin’s story is an example of realism because it describes a life that is not controlled by extreme forces. Her story is about a married nineteenth-century woman with no “startling accomplishments or immense abilities” (1271). Chopin stays true to reality and depicts a life that seems as though it could happen to any person.
Written in 1894, “The Story of an Hour” is a story of a woman who, through the erroneously reported death of her husband, experienced true freedom. Both tragic and ironic, the story deals with the boundaries imposed on women by society in the nineteenth century. The author Kate Chopin, like the character in her story, had first-hand experience with the male-dominated society of that time and had experienced the death of her husband at a young age (Internet). The similarity between Kate Chopin and her heroine can only leave us to wonder how much of this story is fiction and how much is personal experience.
In "The Story of an Hour" Kate Chopin tells the story of a woman, Mrs. Mallard whose husband is thought to be dead. Throughout the story Chopin describes the emotions Mrs. Mallard felt about the news of her husband's death. However, the strong emotions she felt were not despair or sadness, they were something else. In a way she was relieved more than she was upset, and almost rejoiced in the thought of her husband no longer living. In using different literary elements throughout the story, Chopin conveys this to us on more than one occasion.
“I can control my destiny but not my fate. Destiny means there are opportunities to turn right or left, but fate is a one way street. I believe that we all have the choice as to whether we fulfill our destiny, but our fate is sealed.” (Paulo Coelho). Choice is when you can decide the things that are going to happen in your life. It is something everyone should have. In The Giver by Lois Lowry and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, choice or no choice is very important and none of the people had much choice about their destiny and what their life would be like. In The Giver, a twelve year old sets out to change his society where everything is controlled and you have to do things a certain way or else you will be released. In Fahrenheit 451 a destroyer of books sets out to change what people think about them. Everyone is a conformist because they simply have no other choice. “Do you ever read the books you burn?” Clarisse asked Montag this and he obviously said no in ridicule because of the big role conformity plays. In the
Kate Chopin provides her reader with an enormous amount of information in just a few short pages through her short story, “The Story of an Hour.” The protagonist, Louise Mallard, realizes the many faults in romantic relationships and marriages in her epiphany. “Great care [is] taken to break to her as gently as possible the news of her husband’s death” (Chopin 168). Little do Josephine and Richards know, the news will have a profoundly positive effect on Louise, rather than a negative one. “When she abandoned herself,” Mrs. Mallard opened her mind to a new way of life.
Mrs. Mallard was at first overjoyed with freedom because her husband was supposedly “dead,” yet at the end of the story, Mrs. Mallard comes face to face with Mr. Mallard. A whole new wave of emotions overcame Mrs. Mallard as she laid eyes on her husband instantly killing her from “a heart disease-of joy that kills.” It is ironic how Mrs. Mallard is overjoyed about her husband’s death, and she ended up dying because she found out he was alive instead. Her joy literally was killed, killing her on the inside as
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
In “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, the main character of the story, Mrs. Louise Mallard, is oppressed by her husband. Chopin’s works focus mainly on feminism, the relationships between classes, and the relationships between men and women, specifically between husband and wife in “The Story of an Hour” (“The Story of an Hour” 264). Mrs. Louise Mallard lives under her husband for her whole marriage. Mrs. Mallard gets news through her two best friends that Mr. Mallard was in a railroad accident and did not survive. Mrs. Mallard was hit with waves of guilt, agony, sorrow, fear, and grief. Mr. Mallard later comes back home, as he was mistakenly not involved in the accident. Throughout “The Story of an Hour,” Chopin demonstrates how the repression
In “The Story of an Hour,” Kate Chopin describes to her readers a young woman’s response to her husband’s death, or at least his presumed death. The opinions readers will draw from this story will vary from person to person due to personal experiences. The experience and wisdom that I have gained through the trails and tribulations of my life help me to understand, relate, and even despise Mrs. Mallard’s character. On one hand, I feel pity for Mrs. Mallard. I think she felt trapped in a situation that she found to be inescapable. She felt lonely, restless, and did not know how to help herself. Yet, on the other hand, I do not feel sorry for her character. Almost immediately after finding out that her husband is dead, she rejoices at her newfound freedom. I think that her actions portray in her a selfish and cowardly nature.