Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of setting in literature
Importance of setting in literature
How selfishness is viewed in this world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of setting in literature
A singular label for the previous and present generation is selfish. Homo sapiens have forgotten how to care for others and now follow a path of selflessness. Bartleby the Scrivener, A Tale of Wall Street written by Herman Melville, takes readers on a journey back in time. Throughout this journey, the author describes his brief encounter with the main character {Bartleby}. As the story progresses, the author describes the actions of Bartleby and the selfless ones by committed upon him by the people around him. The author uses setting, characterization, and imagery to convey that mankind has lost its humanity. To fully understand the turn of events, the reader must understand the setting. the author describes the setting in the beginning of …show more content…
the story to give the reader an understanding of how bad the need to care for one’s self as gotten. The office extended all the way to “The state of New York” ( Melville 1), where it was “upstairs at No. Wall street” (Melville 2). Wall street in New York is known as a place with the goal of making money. With money as the main focus, no one was worried about the needs of the people around them. This is another sign that mankind has lost its humanity, because if everyone is only focused on getting money then there is no happiness in life. Following the same schedule without any inter action with other people makes us not human, but machines. In the office, “ground glass folding doors divided”(Melville 3) the work space into two separate areas. Also to worsen the problem, Melville “procured a high green folding screen, which might entirely isolate Bartley”( Melville 4) from his sight. The office was divided into multiple sections so that there was nothing distracting the workers from making money. Separating the office was the biggest mistake the author could have done. Not only did this setting block all interactions with people it also was the reason that Bartleby gave up on life to begin with. To make matters worse, the only other view for Bartleby was a window that had “an unobstructed view of a lofty brick walls” (Melville 5). Giving him a view of 4 walls was proof that there’s no hope for human kind due to the loss of humanity. Separating the office into sections is like putting the employees into a cadge. The authors use of characterization also shows the loss of humanity.
Throughout the story Bartleby character changes dramatically. In the beginning Bartleby is full of life, the author describes him as “respectable”(Melville 6), and is glad to have him in the office. As the story progresses Bartlebys character changes dramatically over time. Being in a confined area, without any friendly human interaction caused bartleby to enter a rebellious stage. He did his work “silently, palely”(Melville 7) and “mechanically” ( Melville 8). This should have been the first sign to the author that something was wrong with him. Therefor ignoring him shows the loss of humanity, because he did not try to help him when he first started seeing flaws in this character. When Melville first asks Bartleby to examine documents, he replies with “I would prefer not to”(Melville 9). The author noted the verbal refusal coming from bartleby as strange, yet decided to forget the matter. The rebellious character did not eat, and eventually “for long periods”(Melville 10) “would stand looking out, at his pale window”(Melville 11). Bartleby had given up working, because the author was oblivious to his efforts, which lead bartleby to give up on life. Although he showed many signs, no one in the story attempted to show the slightest sign of …show more content…
humanity. Melville also use imagery to further imply the loss of humanity.
One morning the author returned to his office on main street to find the door locked. When bartleby eventually opened the door the author described him and his clothes “strangely tattered”(Melville 12) and “dish ample” ( Melville 13). After further inspecting the office the author discovered “a blanket”(Melville 14) rolled away under his desk, and an old sofa head the “faint impress of a lean reclining form”(Melville 15). the use of imagery concluded that bartleby was indeed living in the office, yet he still didn’t receive any help. Instead of lending a hand, the author decided to just move offices and leave bartleby all alone, knowing he needs help. the vivid imagery given to readers by the author proves that there is a dramatic loss of humanity, because even though he visibly saw that bartleby was struggling he still didn’t care about bartleby sickness, and moved for business
(money). Bartleby had a different way of viewing things, unlike the people around him, he prefers human interaction over living to just make money. The writer didn’t realize his mistake until after bartleby died. The use of imagery, description of setting, and characterization shows the loss of humanity through the bibliography by actin with selflessness and not caring for others.
Bartleby- The Scrivener In Herman Melville’s “Bartleby the Scrivener”, the author uses several themes to convey his ideas. The three most important themes are alienation, man’s desire to have a free conscience, and man’s desire to avoid conflict. Melville uses the actions of an eccentric scrivener named Bartleby, and the responses of his cohorts, to show these underlying themes to the reader. The first theme, alienation, is displayed best by Bartleby’s actions. He has a divider put up so that the other scriveners cannot see him, while all of them have desks out in the open so they are full view of each other, as well as the narrator. This caused discourse with all of the others in the office. This is proven when Turkey exclaims, “ I think I’ll just step behind his screen and black his eyes for him.”(p.2411) The other scriveners also felt alienated by the actions of the narrator. His lack of resolve when dealing with Bartleby angered them because they knew that if they would have taken the same actions, they would have been dismissed much more rapidly. The narrator admits to this when he said, “ With any other man I should have flown outright into a dreadful passion, scorned all further words, and thrust him ignominiously from my presence.” (2409) The next theme is man’s desire to avoid conflict. The narrator avoids conflict on several occasions. The first time Bartleby refused to proofread a paper, the narrator simply had someone else do it instead of confronting him and re...
McCall focuses his argument within the way in which Melville has written Bartleby, The Scrivener, he goes into detail about the comical aspects within the story and uses Melville’s description of Bartleby’s saying “I prefer not to,’ he respectfully and slowly said, and mildly disappeared.” (272). McCall suggests that the adverbs Melville uses, “respectfully” , “slowly” and “mildly” , “create[s] a leisurely little excursion into the uncanny” (279). I agree that the lawyer must have had some wit and good intentions in making the claim about Bartleby up to a point, I cannot accept this fully because many people still believe that the lawyer is unreliable. Most critics within the majority, as McCall reinstates, “believe, “the lawyer is “self-satisfied”, “pompous”…”a smug fool” who is ‘terribly unkind to a very sick man’ “(2660. I disagree with the idea that the lawyer was unkind and Bartleby was sick. The lawyer was fascinated by Bartleby’s responses to the job, and Bartleby, I feel knew exactly what he was doing in stating his responses. McCall acknowledges that “these cure two central problems in the story: the nature of Bartleby’s illness and the lawyer’s capacity to understand it,”
People one can never really tell how person is feeling or what their situation is behind closed doors or behind the façade of the life they lead. Two masterly crafted literary works present readers with characters that have two similar but very different stories that end in the same result. In Herman Melville’s story “Bartleby the Scrivener” readers are presented with Bartleby, an interesting and minimally deep character. In comparison to Gail Godwin’s work, “A Sorrowful Woman” we are presented with a nameless woman with a similar physiological state as Bartleby whom expresses her feelings of dissatisfaction of her life. Here, a deeper examination of these characters their situations and their ultimate fate will be pursued and delved into for a deeper understanding of the choice death for these characters.
The author of the story presents the questions of what is valuable in society and how those that resist these values are dealt with and answers them through Bartleby's actions from his life to his death. Society values things such as money and working to make money where human things such as sentimentalities and emotions are not worth holding onto and when one refuses to work he is left with choices of imprisonment in a cell or imprisonment in a job where Bartleby instead chose to die, to be free of such a world that does not value freedoms and humanity.
In Melville’s, “Bartleby the Scrivener,” a lawyer’s idea of relationships is tested. As a bachelor, his disconnection with people is an obstacle he has to overcome. The relationships between his coworkers and himself are simple and detached until Bartleby is introduced. The lawyer is befuddled at the unique behavior that this character displays and cannot help but take particular interest in him. When Bartleby is asked to work, he simply says, “I would prefer not to,” and when he quits working, he begins to stare at the wall (1112). This wall may symbolize the wall that the lawyer has built up in an attempt to ward off relationships, or it may simple symbolize Wall Street. When the lawyer finds out that Bartleby is l...
Bartleby demonstrates behaviours indicative of depression, the symptoms he has in accordance with the DSM-IV are a loss of interest in activities accompanied by a change in appetite, sleep, and feelings of guilt (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, 320). Very shortly after Bartleby begins his work as a Scrivener he is described by the narrator as having done “nothing but stand at his window in his dead-wall revery”. (Melville, 126) In contrast, Bartleby had previously been described as a very hard worker and this process of doing increasingly less shows how his a diminishing sense of interest both in his work but also of the perception others have of him. It is also noted that included in this lack of interest is a social withdrawal (DSM—IV, 321) which corresponds well to Bartleby in that his workspace becomes known as his “hermitage”. During small talk which included Bartleby he says that he “would prefer to be left alone”. (Melville, 120) Bartleby only emerges from his hermitage when called upon and quickly returns when faced with confrontation.
Parker, who wrote the script with Catherine di Napoli, has transported Melville’s story into a surreal contemporary nowhere world,” (Scott, 2001). The last resource being used in this research paper is an article wrote by Damon smith called “Poorly conceived “Bartleby” fails to bring characters to life”, this article discusses the drastic changes in the 2001 film “Bartleby”, compared to Melville’s original writings. Smith feels that these changes does not give Melville’s short story the justice that it deserves. These three sources are credible scholar articles that will provide comparative information to help support my thesis as well as primary points with this research. There are more differences in the movie and book that effect the way that the short story may have been perceive in its time. Parker takes a 18th century story and modernizes it to fit a culture that the viewers are in to help them to understand what Melville was trying to interpret in his writings. To some those drastic changes dampened the story and to others it made it more understandable and exciting. This research will show those differences as well as the similarities and show that the symbolism in both kinds of literature is the
In Herman Melville's short story, Bartleby, the Scrivener, the narrator's attitude towards Bartleby is constantly changing, the narrator's attitude is conveyed through the author's use of literary elements such as; diction-descriptive and comical, point of view-first person, and tone-confusion and sadness.
In the short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” which was written by Herman Melville, the character named Bartleby is a very odd, yet interesting individual. In the story, Bartleby is introduced when he responds to a job opening at the narrator’s office. Although there is no background information given about him, it becomes very apparent that he will be the antagonist in this story. Unlike the usual image put on the antagonist, Bartleby causes conflict with a very quiet and calm temperament. This character’s attitude, along with the fact that he is a flat and static character, makes him a very unique antagonist, and this fact is shown through the way other characters approach and deal with his conflict.
He starts to disconnect himself by refusing to do work given to him by his boss, this comes from his desire to be complacent, which we find out when he says “I like to be stationary,” when talking to the lawyer (127). Bartleby continues to change throughout the story, as he goes from being an employee who won’t do his work, to never leaving the office and essentially making it his home. According to Todd Giles, “Bartleby's silence establishes distance,” meaning that he becomes so out of place that people stop expecting of him (Giles, 2007). What this causes is the need for Bartleby to be removed from the Wall Street Office. The lawyer tries in many different ways to do so, and even offers him more money than he is owed if he will quit. Bartleby refuses and continues to stay in the building, doing nothing, detached from the world around him. Eventually the lawyer changes offices due to Bartleby and leaves him there for the next buyer. Bartleby is forced out by the new owner, and in time it is told the police he is a vagrant and he is thrown into jail. Bartleby’s story ends
Melville, Herman. “Bartleby, the Scrivener A Story of Wall Street.” “The Norton Anthology American Literature.” 8th Ed. Nina Baym. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 1979 1102-1128. Print.
“Bartleby, the Scrivener” is one of The Piazza Tales written by Herman Melville which was one of his greatest works that express the author’s groundbreaking beliefs through a relationship between a narrator and his coworkers. The narrator is a successful lawyer who hires Bartleby. Shortly after, Bartleby manages to drive the narrator crazy by doing absolutely nothing. Doing this, Melville introduces several important prompts for the reader to ponder over. These prompts are introduced to us and justified through Melville’s symbolism. Melville’s great uses of symbolism strongly address three major contentions to his audience: his critique against capitalism, his philosophical stance on the value of life, and his reaction towards his audience’s feedback.
Melville, Herman. “Bartleby, the Scrivener.” The Norton Anthology of American Literature. 8th ed. Nina Baym and Robert S. Levine. Vol. B. New York: Norton, 2012. 1483-1509. Print.
Now, reading about humanity as a dismal ruin may seem a bit dramatic and depressing, but it is unfortunately true. Melville was using the character of Bartleby as a symbol for the inevitable fall of humankind in 1853. Today, the same message can be passed through the mysterious character of Bartleby. Times have not changed and the moral values of humans are still showing signs of utter disappointment. “Ah, Bartleby! Ah, humanity!” (Melville 34).
His efforts though are fruitless because he was not able to get to Bartleby and never truly understood him, even in prison as the man eventually dies of starvation. Although after his death the lawyer does learn of Bartleby’s previous and listless job at a ‘Dead Letter Office’ which made the lawyer sympathize for him and wonder if that job is what made Bartleby so distant. Bartleby was a loner who distanced himself from everyone, even in death, he was aloof and never interacted with anyone which is not considered normal human behavior because humans are supposed to be social. This story went a little deeper and gave the idea of humanity as a whole being apathetic towards each other, because only the lawyer showed any sort of humane concern for Bartleby while the others cared less. Bartleby himself displayed apathetic behavior as he showed little to no care for how his behavior affected others or even himself. Outside in the world, many people who are stressed out and constantly working tend to only focus on themselves and have little to no care for other people most of the time. It’s another negative view on humanity, but at the same time it’s not that wrong, as society made by humans also makes others so busy and stuck in tedious schedules that they gradually become more jaded and some even become distant and