Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of science to the society
Nuclear theory of the atom
Nuclear theory of the atom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of science to the society
How has nuclear medicine innovated science and society itself? Within the last century, science faced several discoveries that changed society and the scientific enterprise. However, the definitive scientific discovery of the twentieth century was the sustainable nuclear chain reaction by Enrico Fermi, which led to a revolution in nuclear physics. However, the foundations for the study of nuclear medicine formed at the end of the nineteenth century with the discovery of X-Rays. As research progressed in nuclear science with the use of radioisotopes to treat tumors, a transformation in society took place. Following the Second World War, the world suddenly was plunged into the Atomic Age. Understanding the potential that radiation and nuclear physics had in the medical field, society’s acceptance of the Atomic Age influenced the study of nuclear medicine. The influence of social factors on the study of nuclear medicine led to a transformation in the scientific enterprise. Influencing the study of medicine, several social aspects such as ethics, …show more content…
research, and what enterprise that funds the advancement of nuclear medicine. Although nuclear medicine altered the way that the scientific community understands the medical field, it is debatable that the social aspects that surround atomic studies in medicine influenced a transformation in the scientific enterprise. The comprehension of the influence of how a particular field in science has benefited society is vital to understanding the concept that science is a social process.
The advancements throughout the study of nuclear medicine provide an illustration to how science has transformed society. Defining social process in science, the researcher must understand that the term that describes the changes of how science has altered society. However, the social process in science also provides an explanation for society’s ability to change the scientific enterprise. Since the discovery of radioactivity, scientists and physicists grappled with the idea of the benefits for society that emerging field of science presented. Evolving in the early studies of nuclear medicine, the social factor involving the benefits that the study offered to society influenced the way that science and society view the use of nuclear elements in medical
care. Progressing medical treatments, the early studies in nuclear medicine provided a new outlook to scientists on ways for treating fatal illnesses such as cancer or thyroid disease. Wilhelm Roentgen acknowledged, during his experiments with cathode tubes, that he had stumbled upon discovery, which would influence medical practices that benefited society across the world. Roentgen’s experiments at the end of the nineteenth century laid the foundations for nuclear medicine. While working with electricity and its effects that it had on certain gasses in cathode tubes in 1895, Roentgen began to notice several anomalies that his experiments produced. Roentgen noticed that while charging the container with electricity that it presented a new type of ray. Darkening the room, that he conducted his experiments in, Roentgen decided to use a piece of barium platinocyanide covered cardboard and a photographic screen to illuminate his newly found rays. Perplexed by his discovery, the physicist used the screen to find that the rays would pass through many objects with the exceptions of lead and bones. This invention deemed as X-Rays by Roentgen influenced the study of nuclear science in great ways. His discovery drastically changed the scientific community as the X-Ray offered new techniques on observing broken bones and other medical phenomena in the early twentieth century.
Atwood takes many of today’s potential scientific developments and illustrates the worst possible outcome of what may happen if we continue the unregulated pursuit of knowledge. In reality, the scientific advances of today will yield a higher standard of living for the majority of the world tomorrow. We will continue to push for the best in everything including science, medicine, and technology; we will not allow any single person to make the sole decision to develop an idea. Scientific progression will save many lives; therefore, it should and will always be there for us.
In her essay "Science, Facts, and Feminism" Ruth Hubbard makes many claims in relating her opinions about the relationship between men and women in society as well as the role science plays in this relationship and the balance of power in the world. One of her claims states that "the pretense that science is objective, apolitical and value-neutral is profoundly political because it obscures the political role that science and technology play in underwriting the existing distribution of power in society." In essence, she is saying that it is ridiculous to claim that science is an objective look at the world around us because science is constantly affected by society and the political establishment. I agree that it is impossible to claim that science is in every way separate from politics and power because those types of people who created the political world also created the scientific world to supplement and support it. For example, the government, a political and power establishment, created the Manhattan Project and put a huge amount of funding into a scientific project that produced the atomic bomb.
A nobel prize winning, architect of the atomic bomb, and well-known theoretical physicist, Professor Richard P. Feynman, at the 1955 autumn meeting of the National Academy of science, addresses the importance of science and its impact on society. Feynman contends, although some people may think that scientists don't take social problems into their consideration, every now and then they think about them. However he concedes that, because social problems are more difficult than the scientific ones, scientist don’t spend too much time resolving them (1). Furthermore he states that scientist must be held responsible for the decisions they make today to protect the future generation; also they have to do their best, to learn as much as possible,
...tion therapy, which corrects the defects in growth, differentiation, and death that are characteristics of cancer cells. This therapy has already been successful in curing acute promyelocytic leukemia (Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation). Housing such an event proves the concern for society in the present and future. The continuation of technology positively correlates with the advancement of society and culture.
Oppenheimer's early studies were devoted mainly to energy processes of subatomic particles, including electrons,positrons, and cosmic rays. He also did innovative work on not only neutron stars but also black holes. His university provided him with an excellent opportunity to research the quantum theory, along with exploration and development of its full significance. This helped him train an entire generation of U.S. physicists. Furthermore, the most important impact was the invention of the atomic bomb.
According to Helibron and Seidel (2011) nuclear medicine began as a simple experiment in the early twentieth century by George de Hevesy. De Hevesy started the experiment by deciding to test the effects of radiation on living things, beginning with bean plants, then onto furred animals, and then continued onto finding the effects of radiation on the human body, when he did this he became the first person to ever use radiation on a human being. He along with his partner E. Hofer, in 1931, consumed Deuterium which they had diluted with tea and found that traces of radioactivity stayed within their bodies for between eight to eighteen days. This was the first known use of radiation on humans (p. 1). This was just the beginning though, as time moved on the use of nuclear energy advanced and as it advanced it began to bleed into more subjects than those that it had been used in before, such as, nuclear medicine. Although it has its drawbacks, such as nuclear waste, there are many different benefits to nuclear medicine. Examples of such would be advances in therapy and treatment of disease...
Dr. Michael Shermer is a Professor, Founder of skeptic magazine, and a distinguished and brilliant American science writer to say the least. In His book The Moral Arc: How Science Makes Us Better People he sets out to embark on the daunting task of convincing and informing the reader on sciences’ ability to drives the expansion of humanity and the growth of the moral sphere. Although such a broad and general topic could be hard to explain, Shermer does so in a way that is concise, easy to understand, and refreshing for the reader. This novel is riddled with scientific facts, data, and pictures to back up shermers claims about the history of science, humanity and how the two interact with one another.
Wang, Jessica. American science in an age of anxiety scientists, anticommunism, and the cold war. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1999. Print.
Weinberg, A. M. 1994. The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer. New York: Springer.
Marie Curie opened the world up to the science of radioactivity. She discovered polonium and radium, two radioactive elements, and was the first person to ever win two Nobel prizes and in two different subject areas. To the modern world, her discovery of radium was significantly and forever changed our understanding of how matter (atoms) and energy (radiation) are related. Her efforts influenced and expanded theories dealing with fundamental science and brought in a new era of medical research and treatment.
After the United States developed the atomic at the end of World War II, interest in nuclear technology increased exponentially. People soon realized that nuclear technology could be used for electricity, as another alternative to fossil fuels. Today, nuclear power has its place in the world, but there is still a lot of controversy over the use of nuclear energy. Things such as the containment of radiation and few nuclear power plant accidents have given nuclear power a bad image. However, nuclear power is a reliable source of energy because it has no carbon emissions, energy is available at any time, little fuel is needed for a lot of energy, and as time goes on, it is becoming safer and safer.
Nuclear Medicine is the use of radioisotopes for diagnosis, treatment, and research. Radioactive chemical tracers emit gamma rays which provides diagnostic information about a person's anatomy and the functioning of specific organs. Radioisotopes are also utilizes in treatments of diseases such as cancer. It is estimated that approximately one in two people in Western countries are likely to experience the benefits of nuclear medicine in their lifetime.
The Fear of Science To live in the today's world is to be surrounded by the products of science. For it is science that gave our society color television, the bottle of aspirin, and the polyester shirt. Thus, science has greatly enhanced our society; yet, our society is still afraid of the effects of science. This fear of science can be traced back to the nineteenth century, where scientists had to be secretive in experimenting with science. Although science did wonders in the nineteenth century, many people feared science and its effects because of the uncertainty of the results of science.
Medicines and medical technology always have two separate sections that describe itself. It is divided in advantages and disadvantages. As time goes by, scientists research to improve medicine and medical technology to increase the advantages section. However, no matter how advanced it becomes, medicine and medical technology still has both positive and negative impacts. Mostly, there is a case where something new can also have another type of negative impact too. One example of a medical technology that has both positive and negative effects to patients from history are X-rays. Before X-rays was invented, doctors had to be extra cautious. To check for anything abnormal in the body, they needed to gash the body and look inside. Nowadays, there are X-rays. Doctors have less need to cut into the body. On the other hand, there is a new negative impact: radiation. It may cause cancer and many other diseases and damages. What never changes is the fact that new technology often has both positive and negative impacts.
One of the greatest events of twentieth century was the use of radioisotope as a source of energy and as medical and industrial tools. Using radioactivity has been a global issue owing to its very nature. When it is used for peaceful purposes, it is a triumph of science because it can solve energy problems in the form of nuclear energy but the side effects in the form of harmful radiation and harmful radioactive waste is the real limitations of science. This essay will attempt to analyze the application of science in the use of radioactivity and radioactive isotopes and how science is not so effective in dealing with the side effects.