Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis of Plato and Aristotle
Comparative analysis of Plato and Aristotle
Plato's impact on human nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative analysis of Plato and Aristotle
The way the government structure is organized has been changing ever since humans began to live in a polis. The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle believed that humans were political animals, thus the reason for organizing ourselves into a political state. However the way governments are organized, and which political system works best has been the centrepiece for many violent conflicts in the past, and will continue to challenge the world into the future. Yet a new form of organization is taking place in the 21st century and has been given the term “globalization.” With the onset of globalization many of those in government have had to change their governing style in order to keep up with the pace of a shifting world that is becoming more integrated. However the foundations of the modern western societies can be traced back to ancient Greece, arguably the first democratic society. Since the western world prides itself as being a democracy, would it not still value the teachings of great philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle? The answer is ambiguous, and modern society may be able to relate better with Aristotle than with Plato. This is because both philosophers differed in many areas when they described their ideas of an efficient state. Aristotle’s writings in his work Politics give more freedom to the polis and the structure of government is not as ridged as what Plato believed. Furthermore Aristotle was a firm believer in the laws of nature since everything in nature has a purpose. In contrast, Plato believed in a ridged class structure to form the organization of the state, among other things. Differences in opinion of the two philosophers include the family household, organization of the state, who is a citizen, and how ...
... middle of paper ...
...because they know their rights are protects by a system of laws.
All in all, modern western democracies would most identify with Aristotle’s concept of government. This is because of his ideals for family, how he organizes the state, and his terms for justice. As stated numerous times, modern western democracies pride themselves for upholding the values of freedom. Aristotle’s writings in Politics allow for more freedom for individuals than Plato’s class based system of government. It seems as though the world has already progressed though Plato’s principles for his ideal state when Europe was divided into a system of aristocracies, with the few ruling the many. Society and governments have progressed in such a way that they represent the majority, yet most people are still able to live a full and meaningful life, to develop themselves to their highest standards.
In comparing the Ancient Athenian system of government, and the Modern Day American political system, there are many similarities. In Ancient Athens, democracy was developed in response to a long history of oppressive rulers who used their position of power for their own benefit. Ancient Athenians sought a government where all citizens were considered equal under the eyes of the law, and all had a fair say in the running of their country. Following a series
Greece and Rome’s governments included many democratic aspects that continue to be used in modern
Socrates and I grew up alongside the Athenian democracy, and experienced her vicissitudes in the past seventy years. We have both heard and experienced cycle of five types of governments that Socrates had mentioned. (Plato, Republic 8.547e) Our democracy was established hundreds years ago under Cleisthenes and turned to tyranny under Isagoras. In our childhood, Athens was a timarchy, and then Pericles ruled Athens with the
A longstanding debate in human history is what to do with power and what is the best way to rule. Who should have power, how should one rule, and what its purpose should government serve have always been questions at the fore in civilization, and more than once have sparked controversy and conflict. The essential elements of rule have placed the human need for order and structure against the human desire for freedom, and compromising between the two has never been easy. It is a question that is still considered and argued to this day. However, the argument has not rested solely with military powers or politicians, but philosophers as well. Two prominent voices in this debate are Plato and Machiavelli, both of whom had very different ideas of government's role in the lives of its people. For Plato, the essential service of government is to allow its citizens to live in their proper places and to do the things that they are best at. In short, Plato's government reinforces the need for order while giving the illusion of freedom. On the other hand, Machiavelli proposes that government's primary concern is to remain intact, thereby preserving stability for the people who live under it. The feature that both philosophers share is that they attempt to compromise between stability and freedom, and in the process admit that neither can be totally had.
Philosophy can be defined as the highest level of clarity and understanding human thought can aspire to. In some ways, Plato’s Republic can be compared to George Orwell’s book 1984. It may seem strange to compare the two, however they are quite similar. Plato writes from the Western philosophy, while Orwell tells of a totalitarian society where all free thought is banned. However, the two versions of government, one being a utopian government, and the other being horrific, contain certain connections that will be made clear over the course of this paper.
During the age of Pericles, the ideal form of government was believed to be a government formed by all of the citizens regardless of wealth or social standing. This was known as democracy, literally meaning “ government of the people” [Document 3.] This government favored the many instead of the few. Athens was a direct democracy, meaning every citizen participated in debates. Western civilization used this philosophy of government by many, and created an indirect democracy where citizens elect officials to make and enforce laws.
The Romans called their political system not democracy but republic. Republic is something that belongs to the people. In Rome the right to take part in the governing belonged only to the men and those who had the statute of being citizens. The differences of republic and democracy are because of the origin of the two terms Greek and Latin language. The ancient Greeks discarded the tyranny as well as the disorder. Plato as well as Aristotle stabilized the complete democracy which was not based on the laws, with the power of the crowd and considered it as a form of ruling based on the jealousy and sweet talk of demagogues. Both of them considered the democracy to be wrong kind of state governing. Plato considers the democracy as nice and various public orders but without the necessary governing. The main good of democracy is freedom.
In The Republic by Plato, Plato constructed an ideal city where Philosophers would rule. Governed by an aristocratic form of government, it took away some of the most basic rights a normal citizen should deserve, freedom of choice, worship, and assembly were distressed. Though the idea of philosopher kings is good on paper, fundamental flaws of the human kind even described by Plato himself prevent it from being truly successful. The idea of an ideal democratic government like what our founding fathers had envisioned is the most successful and best political form which will ensure individual freedom and keep power struggle to a minimum.
The understanding of Plato's regime is one that involves both the self and the regime. Aristotle on the other hand shows that development of state can be achieved without being the most wise. He also looks upon the regime with a positive regard rather that the pessimistic view of Plato, that things will always get worse. Aristotle understands that the coming together of people with common interest will always yield a city, and then onto a regime. Plato takes the planned out way, making sure that everything is in order before the regime or city can be formed. Both ideals of a regime are ones that would yield strong frivolous and successful places of habitation, yet we have never had a chance to see them in today's world. If only now we could see how virtuous they could be?
In the U.S., people elected to the U.S. congress vote on issues. In Athens, ballots were decided by a system of lottery, but the U.S. chooses between certain individuals to regulate the country. In the U.S., people have special legal training, where as in the Athens people do not have the guidance to fulfill positions. The connection that the Athenian government and the U.S. government have in common is that it is their plan is to serve the people. In both democracies, not all individuals were given the authority to participate in decisions that were assembled. In our democracy, we have what is called a Democratic Republic. Our leader produces the laws that impacts us. Athenian democracy was a undeviating democracy. If there was an issue, people voted immediately on the issue. The legal system challenged the ancient Athens without lawyers and or other official representatives. Today, we normally vote for representatives who will form laws for the people. What both democracy’s have in common is the amount of patriotism and nationalism seen in the
One important contribution of Ancient Greek to the Western Culture is Democracy. The very term itself is of Greek derivation, meaning "People’s Rule". Unlike modern states which call themselves "Democratic". For example, Pericles Funeral Oration gave the greatest contribution to our today’s society. In .(Doc. 2) Pericles stated "Our plan of government favors the many instead of the few". Because of this quote it has contributed the society tremendously due to the fact that the democratic society is a direct democracy. Yet in a way, people have the power to overthrow other powerful representatives; Pericles Funeral Oration, gave us the idea of keeping the civilization as a democracy rather than Oligarchy, Monarchy, and many more. Moreover, Solon an Athenian tyrant discussed his thought about democracy. In .(doc. 4) Solon stated, "I drew up laws for bad and good alike, and set straight justice over each". Solon reveals that he has created laws for the good of others. He wanted every individual having the ...
The readings and information in our textbook in regards to Plato and the Greek government were very similar to today’s ideas of government with the examples of citizens choosing other citizens to represent them, which is the same as voting in Governors or Councilmen/Councilwomen. The fact that there were term limits held by some is similar to the way we do things in our government.
The democratic system developed by the Ancient Greeks influenced the western democratic systems seen today, mainly in Europe and North America. The Ancient Greeks introduced our concepts of citizens' rights, rule by the people, and right to fair trial.
Plato believed that everything had an ideal form, but Aristotle looked into the real world and studied that. Instead of inventing a system of government, Aristotle explored more of practical things that you can realistically put into effect. Aristotle’s main aim was to “consider, not only what form of government is best, but also what is possible and what is easily attainable”. Meaning that he wanted everyone to be able to relate and adapt to his form of power. He wanted people to be servant to his laws because if the law were an order, it would make a good society. He ended up maintaining a government somewhat like a democracy, where the middle class is strong. Aristotle produced natural domination as one of his biggest theories. Aristotle believed that people were born into being a ruler or in slavery. He wanted people to accept what they are and do what they were born to do. It was the only way that he thought the world would be able to work and not come out with a lot of problems. This is way he believes that everyone is born with a color that tells you your placement in the world. Your placement is not genetic and can’t run in the
Societies began to establish thousands of years ago, and this was due to the fact that we as humans are inclined to live in societies. “State comes into existence because no individual is self-sufficient” (Cohen). Humans are in need to live in societies but the question, that all of humanity has had since the beginning of the establishment of society is what type of government should be applied. Philosophers from all time have argued for or against various theories, and many have come up with their own theories. An answer may be found by looking at which theories are more plausible and with less problems. A good theory must be measured by a scale, and the scale that has been chosen is based off of three important characteristics. The characteristics that promote the common good of the people and state, stability and justice. An ideal political system has to have these three essential characteristics,