Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is Virgil’s Aeneid about
The conflicts in the aeneid
What is Virgil’s Aeneid about
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is Virgil’s Aeneid about
Leaves of Grass. Kebra Nagast. Popol Vuh. Daredevils of Sassoun. These titles represent some of the most respected works of their cultures. On a quest to compose a story that would become the great epic of Rome, writer Virgil created The Aeneid, a poem following the journey of Aeneas, an epic hero. In “Book II” of The Aeneid, Virgil portrays the Trojan War in such a way that makes the Trojans appear less foolish than what The Odyssey, its Greek predecessor, depicted. Virgil emphasizes the Trojans’ good character, love, and sympathy while exposing the Greeks deceitful and untrustworthy ways. “Book IV” describes Queen Dido’s inability to find love after the loss of her beloved husband. After escaping the Greek’s attack on Troy, Aeneas …show more content…
arrives in her kingdom, and Dido instantly falls in love with the great warrior who washed up on her shores. Faced with a decision, he must choose to stay with his love, Dido, or fulfill his duty of returning to Italy. Withstanding plights that seem impossible to overcome can force one to make difficult decisions by balancing the need for personal happiness and upholding obligations. Through Aeneas’s constantly changing behavior, Virgil shows how emotions can be powerful, but, ultimately, duty prevails. To start, Aeneas shows great sympathy towards an abandoned Greek warrior when confronted with his stories.
When it begins to seem as if the Trojan War will never end, a large wooden horse appears outside the walls of Troy, and the people of the city become skeptical of the mysterious statue. The Trojans have little trust for the Greeks because of their cunning attacks and deceiving war tactics, however, they place a great deal of pride in the fact that they do not cheat their war opponents and place their moral values before everything else. In “Book II”, Virgil opens with Sinon, a Greek warrior, announcing his abandonment by the Greeks to the people of Troy saying the rest of his men retreated back to Greece; “Unblamed may I break the oath of Greek allegiance, unblamed hate them and bring all to light that they conceal; nor am I bound by any laws of country” (Virgil, Aeneid: Book II 168-169). Aeneas begins to feel pity for the poor man pleading for acceptance as one of their own and starts to contemplate letting him into the city. Sinon continues to elaborate that the wooden horse was a gift to the goddess Minerva, who had turned away from the Greeks due to the desecration of one of her temples. Denying the statue’s entrance to the city and leaving it to the power of the weather would consequently infuriate her. Considering showing their values of kindness, trustworthiness, and respect for the gods, Aeneas allows the horse to enter Troy and accepts Sinon’s plea for …show more content…
acceptance despite the fact many of the city’s inhabitants do not agree with the idea. One of the men of the city declares, “...hurl this deceit of the Greeks, this suspect gift, into the sea, or set fire to it from beneath” (Virgil, The Aeneid: Book II 36-37). Although a majority of the citizens saw the statue as a danger and wanted to rid of the suspicious wooden horse, the sympathetic emotions and values Aeneas possess temporarily interfere with his duty to protect the city. Aeneas soon realizes the grave error he made in allowing his heart to dictate his emotions and attempts to turn the situation back around by reassuming his obligations as a leader. Once Aeneas realizes the mistake he has made, his sense of duty kicks in to protect the people of Troy. Virgil highlights the Greeks’ duplicitous approach to war when the reader realizes the massive wooden horse contains all the Greek troops Sinon claimed had deserted him. ”Sinon stealthily lets loose the imprisoned Grecians from their barriers of pine” (Virgil, Aeneid: Book II 272-274). Armed and ready for battle against the unknowing Trojans, the Greeks quickly cause Troy to fall to ruin. Hector, a slain leader of the Trojan army, startles Aeneas in his dream when he comes to alert him of the bloodbath happening outside his home. “They invade the city that’s drowned in sleep and wine, kill the watchmen, welcome their comrades at the open gates, and link their clandestine ranks” (Virgil, Aeneid: Book II 284-286). Aeneas’s emotions quickly evolve from sympathy for Sinon into outrage towards the phony man he chose to believe. When feeling as if he has lost all control of something he assumed he had total command of, a sense of urgency to redeem himself appears. Aeneas and his men rush to the scene of the battle and attempt to disprove their ignorance towards the purpose of the horse. As a form of damage control, Aeneas counteracts his sympathetic actions by completing his duty to protect Troy and leading the battle against the Greeks to show his loyalty to his city. When faced with adversity, duty prevails and triumphs over emotional decisions. Much like his duty to protect Troy, Aeneas feels obligated to return to his city as ordered by the gods while in Carthage. Many suitable men have come forward, pleading for Queen Dido's hand in marriage, however, Aeneas is the first man she has been able to feel any affection for since the death of her husband. Soon after, the goddesses Venus and Juno coerced the couple into a cave to informally wed them. From Dido’s point of view, the ceremony is as official as any other wedding while Aeneas feels that it does not mean anything. Their conflicting perspectives proceeded to cause an issue in their relationship. When Apollo confronts Aeneas and advises him to journey to Italy, he forces Aeneas to choose between leaving the woman he loves or to risk angering the gods and disappointing his people. “I never held the torches of a bridegroom, never entered upon the pact of marriage” (Virgil, Aeneid: Book IV 467-468). Aeneas attempts to make his sudden leaving seem more reasonable to Dido while also seeking to anger her, causing her to want for him to leave. While he fails in his pursuit to reason with Dido, he does an excellent job in infuriating her. Aeneas revealed his final decision to her stating, “I should look after Troy and the loved relics left me of my people” (Virgil, Aeneid: Book IV 984-985). Putting his duty before the emotions of Dido proves that obligations trump feelings in most situations. Aeneas prioritizes his loyalty to his city before his feelings towards Dido, even though he loves her just as much as she loves him. With love obstructing his decisions, it takes divine intervention to remind Aeneas of the task he must complete. Though written in 19 BC and revolving around the life of a man unlike many in modern times, The Aeneid causes readers to ponder the morals of people in ancient times and how these morals appear in today’s society.
In “The Prioritization of Moral Duties”, physician and philosopher Alex Scott explores the ways in which morals differ. Scott states that moral duties or obligations “...are requirements to perform actions in order to comply with given principles of morality.” It is a necessity to appease these duties so one may fulfill moral standards of society. Executing “...actions that are advised or recommended but not necessarily required or obligatory” (Scott) are known as moral prescriptions. Virgil shows Aeneas making both moral duty and prescription choices in The Aeneid. Once he recognizes that his moral prescription choice to let Sinon in hindered his job as a leader, Aeneas switches gears to accomplishing his moral obligation of defending Troy instead. In short, he lets his emotions get in the way of completing his job even while realizing that his responsibility is to help protect Troy. Scott explains, “the amount of blame that may be properly placed on persons for noncompliance with moral duty may also be determined by whether they actually recognized their moral duty.” Aeneas’s dilemma is not that he does not know his duty is to protect Troy, but more along the lines of his ignorance as to what could possibly happen by letting Sinon enter. Disregarding
known tasks and disastrously applying emotions to decisions leads to catastrophic results in the case of Aeneas. The realization that he has a job to do causes Aeneas to ultimately accept the fact that obligations hold precedence over the emotions he experiences. As for people today, achieving moral duties and prescriptions come easily to those who have grown up with them. A relative or other member of society must plant moral obligations in the minds of those around them. The values a person acquires over time cause one to form moral prescriptions of their own. Through losses, struggles, and experiences, one develops their own judgement as to when it is necessary to apply emotions to a situation, but accomplishing their moral duty will preponderate. Virgil plainly illustrates how emotions can often be compelling, but, sooner or later, obligations rise to supremacy. The Greeks’ cunning plot to get into Troy, the unexpected battle, and Queen Dido’s infatuation for Aeneas cause him to contemplate his choices carefully. Whether ending terribly or pleasantly, the choices Aeneas makes are a balance of his values, beliefs, and morals, depending on what the situation entails. Accomplishing a set job can be a seemingly difficult task for some when emotions and stress levels are at a high. In ancient times and even today, encountering emotional actions and decisions is not uncommon, however, the need for acting upon assigned duties rapidly emerges to become a priority.
The idea that one’s destiny is already determined is both comforting yet brings dismay because it leaves a feeling of powerlessness which is fine for the lazy but painful for the proactive. This idea is surely a failure among principles but even so the role of fate is not completely limited to these terms and ideas. Fate in the book was seen more as a mission that Aeneas had in life, and it would only happen on his obedience to his tasks. This type of belief that “actions determine fate” is actually quite healthy for a society to follow. During Aeneas’ journey there were several times that he faced difficult temptations that tested his obedience
A twenty-first century reading of the Iliad and the Odyssey will highlight a seeming lack of justice: hundreds of men die because of an adulteress, the most honorable characters are killed, the cowards survive, and everyone eventually goes to hell. Due to the difference in the time period, culture, prominent religions and values, the modern idea of justice is much different than that of Greece around 750 B.C. The idea of justice in Virgil’s the Aeneid is easier for us to recognize. As in our own culture, “justice” in the epic is based on a system of punishment for wrongs and rewards for honorable acts. Time and time again, Virgil provides his readers with examples of justice in the lives of his characters. Interestingly, the meaning of justice in the Aeneid transforms when applied to Fate and the actions of the gods. Unlike our modern (American) idea of blind, immutable Justice, the meanings and effects of justice shift, depending on whether its subject is mortal or immortal.
Aristotle argues that friendship is a vital part of life. It serves not only as a means to bond individuals together, but also a necessity in achieving overall happiness. Aristotle comments on the various types of friendships that exist, and the role they each play in society. He explains three overarching types; utility, pleasure, and complete friendship. Yet, with family, friendship is different than it is with companionship. As Aristotle states in his piece, Nicomachean Ethics on friendship in families, “they all seem to depend on paternal friendship” (Aristotle, 1161b18). In The Aeneid, Aeneas and Anchises’ relationship, perfectly embodies this. The father son bond does not distinctly resemble one of the three types, rather it is a friendship in of itself; a paternal friendship.
Virgil. “The Aeneid, Book IV”. The Norton Anthology of Western Literature. 8th ed. Vol. 1. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. 974-95. Print.
... prominent source of his weighty troubles. They are helpless to withstand the gods, restrain Aeneas from advancing towards Italy, and burn at women’s torches. Yet, his ships are invaluable to the overall success of his journey and the expression of his character. Aeneas is a ship, chugging toward western shores and providing refuge for his people. However, this extended analogy has greater importance to Virgil and the rest of human society. After the destruction of Troy, Aeneas has no country to protect or call his home. The cargo and soldiers aboard his ships are the remnants of his past civilization, but they are also the seeds for a new empire. Aeneas, just as his ships, is the invaluable carrier and protector of one of the greatest empires in all of human history – Rome.
Publius Vergilis Maro, known to us as Virgil, was born Oct 15, 70 BC in Northern Italy. Octavius, who had always been a friend of Virgil, became Emperor in 27 BC, adopting the name of Augustus. He made Virgil in a sense, a court poet, "although [Virgil] always retained his independence of thought and expression" (Milch 7). However it was the Emperor's initial idea, and not Virgil's own, for him to write the Aeneid. Virgil accepted the project although he later wrote that "he thought he must have been just about mad to attempt the task" (Quinn 73).
Many people seem to be under the impression that the Aeneid is a celebration of Roman glory, led by the hero of fate Aeneas. I find these preconceived ideas hard to reconcile with my actual reading of the text. For starters, I have a hard time viewing Aeneas as a hero at all. Almost any other main characters in the epic, from Dido to Camilla to Turnus, have more heroic qualities than Aeneas. This is especially noteworthy because many of these characters are his enemies. In addition, Aeneas is presented as a man with no free will. He is not so much bound to duty as he is shielded by it. It offers a convenient way for hum to dodge crucial moral questions. Although this doesn’t necessarily make him a bad person, it certainly makes him a weak one. Of course some will argue that it takes greater moral conviction to ignore personal temptation and act for the good of the people. These analysts are dodging the issue just like Aeneas does. The fact is that Aeneas doesn’t just sacrifice his own personal happiness for the common good; he also sacrifices the past of the Trojan people, most notably when he dishonors the memory of his fallen city by becoming the men he hated most, the Greek invaders. The picture of Aeneas as seen in the end of the Aeneid bears some sticking resemblances to his own depiction of the savage and treacherous Greeks in the early books.
"My lord who rule The lives of men and gods now and forever, And bring them all to heel with your bright bolt, What in the world could my Aeneas do, What could the Trojans do, to so offend you?
Rome was experiencing a great deal of internal turmoil during the period when Virgil wrote the Aeneid. There was somewhat of an identity crisis in Rome as it had no definitive leader, or history. With the ascension of Augustus to the throne, Rome was unified again. Still, it had no great book. The Greeks had their Odyssey, giving them a sense of history and of continuity through time. A commonly held view is that the Aeneid attempts to provide the Romans with this sense of continuity or roots. There is a great deal of textual evidence to support this interpretation. Virgil makes numerous references to the greatness of Rome through "ancient" prophecies. Clearly, the entire poem is an account of the founders of Rome. In some sense, this does make the Aeneid seem as a piece of propaganda. However, upon closer examination, there is another idea that Virgil presents. War is painted as a vicious and bloody, not some glorious event. The image of war condemns the concept of Rome as the all-powerful conqueror of other nations. Not only that, but the strong emphasis on duty is frequently mocked. These underlying ideas would seem to run contrary to the theory that Virgil was simply producing a synthesized history of ancient Romans. In order to determine the true intent of the Aeneid, it is important that both ideas presented be examined.
In Virgil’s The Aeneid, there are many parallels found in Homer’s The Odyssey. In each epic, the heroes, Aeneas and Odysseus, are on a journey “home.” Aeneas is on the search of a new home for he and his companions to settle since Troy has been destroyed, Odysseus on the other hand is attempting to return to his home he left years earlier to fight the Trojan War. They both have Gods against them and helping them, both Aeneas and Odysseus are both held back by women, both voluntary and involuntarily, and they both have experiences visiting the Underworld. Despite these similarities, there are differences between the two characters and it reflects their values and the society they live in. Aeneas relies on his strength as a warrior, where as Odysseus uses his deception to survive which reflects how Aeneas is truly Roman is versus Greek.
Virgil's heroes bear a strong resemblance to the heroes of the earlier works of Homer, however there are some differences that are not merely the result of differences in character. Virgil is depicting his ideals through the traits of his heroes and villains, and some of these traits are different from the Greek traits from The Iliad and The Odyssey. The best way to identify the specific traits that Virgil is trying to plant in the mind of his readers is to look at the main hero, Aeneas. Through Aeneas we see a slightly different variation on the Greek hero. Aeneas is strong and deadly in battle, but fa...
In addition, the overall theme of the poem highlighted morality, which was a definitive tenet of Greco Roman civilization. In many ways, Virgil wrote the poem as a means of lauding the moral virtues of Roman society and as a personal challenge to outdo Homer’s epic compositions, The Illiad and The Odyssey. Virgil was successful because he had incorporated many of the same tales shared in the works of Homer into one epic poem which presented a linear storyline in the books that detailed the life and times of Aeneas and the Trojans. That being said, Virgil did not stray far from the approach that many writers had used before him; his primary focus throughout the Aeneid was placed squarely upon the back of idealized Greek and Roman moral principles, which were the dedication to ones’ honor, family, and country. By no means is there anything wrong with this approach, but in many ways, the entire poem could be viewed as a “propaganda” piece; while it might have served to enlighten, educate, and create a cohesive and uplifting story for the Roman populace, the poem lacked depth and a more profound exploration of human intricacies. While Virgil’s epic poem has stood the test of time and remains one of the greatest pieces
Pyrrhus who plays a deeper and personal meaning into the story has his fathered killed by Paris and seeks to avenge him by slaying someone just as dear to Paris, his own father Priam. However with the great walls of Troy blocking his advance there is little he could do, but madness drives him and they build a great “Trojan” horse as a transport to fool the superstitious Trojans. To make it believable they even stage like they abandoned the siege by having all of their ships sail away from the island off on the far end to avoid attention, and leaving the horse there as if it were a gift from the gods. The Trojans seeing this as a great victory happily took the horse into Troy and threw a great feast, and drunk themselves to sleep. Then in th...
It is the underlying theme in works of Greek literature. Mortals became tools of the gods when convenient. The affairs of men were not always at the will of the gods however, in certain instances, the agenda of the gods permitted involvement in the human domain. By mating with mortals, the Olympian gods could produce children who be loyal to themselves and would be stronger and better than ordinary mortals. Hemitheoi, or demi-gods, were the fourth generation of humankind; the heroes of myth, the ones who fought at Troy or killed immortal beasts in order to save another (Zaidman 25). Homer’s epic the Iliad describes the last two weeks of the ten-year battle between the Trojans and the Greeks that has become known historically as the Trojan War. While the poem primarily focuses on the conflict between Achilles and Agamemnon, the use of several Greek gods displaced the purity of the war involvements change the pace of the battle. The story of the Trojan War begins with the story of the apple of discord, the Golden Apple. Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite each believed that they deserved this apple, by virtue of being the most beautiful. Since the goddess could not decide among themselves and Zeus was not willing to suffer the wrath of the females in his family, the goddess appealed to Paris, Prince of Troy. When asked to judge
... attempts they do just the opposite. With Venus’ many interventions, Aeneas is prevented from making mistakes and is guided to his fate, from not killing Helen [book 2] to leaving behind the old and the weak for Italy [book 4] . He is shown enough times to be the puppet of their play: from obeying the will of the gods while enduring the wrath of other gods, all this in order to set the wheels in motion for the far off future Roman race. However, there are also times when he is also shown to be exerting his won free will. For example, in book 12, killing Turnus when he is begging for mercy, something not heroic and which Susanna Braund debates the positive and negative aspect of in her essay on Virgil and the Meaning of the Aeneid [1.17-18]. nonetheless, this act demonstrates that even the gods and the fates require his cooperation to fulfil his destiny.