Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American literature after World War 2
The impact of World War II on the literature movement
Robert Frost and his influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American literature after World War 2
The poem, “Fire and Ice” by Robert Frost is a short verse that discusses one of the most controversial and debated topics since the beginning of civilization, the end of the world. This poem represents mankind’s question of what will happen in the future. Incredibly dark and nonchalant about destruction, Frost’s poem captures the attention of the audience despite being only nine lines. Frost’s ability to capture so completely his emotions in so short a poem is part of the reason that he is such a popular and influential poet. Robert Frost’s background greatly contributed to his depiction of the end of the world, which was also strengthened by his use of short lines full of symbolism, and his detached mood.
Robert Frost was born in San Francisco
…show more content…
Published in 1923, “Fire and Ice” came to the public only five years after the end of the Great War, otherwise known as World War One. Frost was living in England during the first year of the war, 1914, but moved back to America in 1915 (Robert Frost”). Being so near the conflict inevitably ingrained in Frost’s mind the idea of the world ending. The hate, violence, and suffering he witnessed no doubt influenced his concept of the two universal elements, fire and ice. Separating them into two terrible and different yet equal forces of destruction. Despite the war being over and reconstruction taking place, the end of the world crisis averted, the thought was surely still on people’s minds. Frost harnessed his own perception of these two seemingly unstoppable forces to compel the public ask themselves what they would choose.
The poem itself tells us that Frost’s experiences influenced his understanding when it says, “From what I’ve tasted of desire” and, “I think I know enough of hate” (Frost). The destructive force of fire represents desire while the ice represents hate. Clearly, Frost has experienced fire, or desire and passion. Perhaps the strongest desire of all being the love he gave his wife Elinor. Frost also says that he knows enough of hate, indicating his experiences with icy hatred during World War One, or perhaps the hatred and loneliness he felt after the death
…show more content…
They are short. This alludes to the fact that the destruction of the world, whether it be by fire or ice, as described in the poem will be swift, not long and drawn out. The next symbol shown is the aforementioned conspicuous use of fire and ice. The line, “From what I’ve tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire” indicates that fire, while being the literal force that would destroy the world, is also a symbol for desire or love. The antithesis of love is the hate symbolized by ice in the line, “I know enough of hate to say that for destruction ice is also great” (Frost). Fire and ice are more than just symbols for emotions, they are characterized by them. A flame is bright and powerful like love, while ice is cold and numbing like hate. The debate over how the world will end is overshadowed by the ultimate debate deciding which emotion is greater and stronger, love or hate. Continuing the symbolism of fire and ice representing love and hate, the title, “Fire and Ice” expresses that love and hate go together, they cannot be
...ice of words and focus on the idea of fire add to the story portrayed through the sestina, which allows for us (as the readers) to not forget how horrendous this time in history was. This poem in the end does demonstrate the need for emotional attachment when referring to the past in history, making it a theme to the piece.
...ire, some say in ice”. One thing is we don’t know when the world will end but it will be by one or the other scientists say. The world truly doesn’t know how long it will end it is no time soon. The author is talking about the end of the world so freely without emotion, like it’s inevitable. The symbolic fire and ice meaning varies between different types of people whom remind the author of these elements. The fire we know and think about is a bringer of Light and heat but as well as pain and burning. Ice is ignorance and cold hate sort of feel to it. Fire and Ice have such deep meanings because it’s like the type of people you will encounter every day in life. The poem makes you relive all the times the world was going to allegedly end. What a symbol Fire and Ice is being used to represent is the end of times. This symbolic poem was like a vague prediction of sort.
As characters in the poem are literally snow bound, they find that the natural occurrence actually serves a relaxing and warming purpose, one that brings together family. This effect is further achieved through the use of meter throughout the work as a whole. In its simplistic yet conversational tone, the author uses meter to depict the result that nature has forced upon these humans, who are but a small sample size that actually is representative of society that that time. Due to nature, the characters can talk, represented by the conversational meter, and thus, they can bond within the family. A larger representation of this more specific example can be applied to a more general perspective of human’s relationship with the natural world. Although “Snowbound” captures what humans do as a result of nature, it can also represent a larger picture, where nature appears at the most opportune times to enhance relationships from human to human. In “snowbound,” this is symbolized by the fire, “Our warm hearth seemed blazing free” (Whittier 135). This image relays a spirited, warm, mood full of security, which is expertly used by the author to show how fire, a natural phenomena, can provide such beneficial effects on humans. This very occurrence exemplifies how such a miniscule aspect of nature can have such a profound effect on a family, leaving the reader wondering what nature and its entirety could accomplish if used as a
In these two poems, Frost does a wonderful job of making it seem, at first glance, like wonderfully simple poems, but after taking a deeper look, one can see the deeper and darker meanings of the poems. Although these poems both deal with the gloomy, unhappy theme of suicide, Frost always leaves the character with hope and life. Neither of the characters in the poem actually commits suicide and both realize that it is not their time yet to leave the world. In one, the man realizes that time will decide when he will die and the other knows he has responsibilities in the world to attend to and take care of before he can go. So, although both people are hoping for death, Frost redeems them by having them take the higher road and leaving thoughts of death for another time.
Frost uses the first four lines of the poem to give us a mental image of how powerful the ocean water is:
Frost establishes at the outset his speaker's discursive indirection. He combines the indefinite pronoun "something" with the loose expletive construction "there is" to evoke a ruminative vagueness even before raising the central subject of walls. A more straightforward character (like the Yankee farmer) might condense this opening line to three direct words: "Something dislikes walls." But Frost employs informal, indulgently convoluted language to provide a linguistic texture for the dramatic conflict that develops later in the poem. By using syntactical inversion ("something there is . . .") to introduce a rambling, undisciplined series of relative clauses and compound verb phrases ("that doesn't love . . . that sends . . . and spills . . . and makes . . ."), he evinces his persona's unorthodox, unrestrained imagination. Not only does this speaker believe in a strange force, a seemingly intelligent, natural or supernatural "something" that "sends the frozen-ground-swell" to ravage the wall, but his speech is also charged with a deep sensitivity to it. The three active verbs ("sends," "spills," "makes") that impel the second, third, and fourth lines forward are completed by direct objects that suggest his close observation of the destructive process.
Although this poem also is connected with nature, the theme is more universal in that it could be related to Armageddon, or the end of the world. Even though this theme may seem simple, it is really complex because we do not know how Frost could possibly relate to the events leading to the end of the world. It is an "uncertain" and sometimes controversial topic, and even if everyone was certain it was coming, we do not know exactly how it will occur and when. Therefore, how did Frost envision this event? Is he portraying it in a religious context, a naturalistic one, or both? The last line (14) speaks of God putting out the light, which brings out a religious reference, but the bulk of the poem deals with nature entirely. Physical images of water, clouds, continents, and cliffs present a much more complex setting than the simple setting in "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" or the yellow wood in "The Road Not Taken."
...ed by many scholars as his best work. It is through his awareness of the merit, the definitive disconnectedness, of nature and man that is most viewable in this poem. Throughout this essay, Frosts messages of innocence, evil, and design by deific intrusion reverberate true to his own personal standpoint of man and nature. It is in this, that Frost expresses the ideology of a benign deity.
...fall of snow and the unremitting “sweep” of “easy wind” appear tragically indifferent to life, in turn stressing the value of Poirier’s assessment of the poem. Frost uses metaphor in a way that gives meaning to simple actions, perhaps exploring his own insecurities before nature by setting the poem amongst a tempest of “dark” sentiments. Like a metaphor for the workings of the human mind, the pull between the “promises” the traveller should keep and the lure of death remains palpably relevant to modern life. The multitudes of readings opened up through the ambiguity of metaphor allows for a setting of pronounced liminality; between life and death, “night and day, storm and heath, nature and culture, individual and group, freedom and responsibility,” Frost challenges his readers to delve deep into the subtlety of tone and come to a very personal conclusion.
“Fire and Ice” is a poem that paints a bleak picture of the future in which there are two paths, fire and ice, that both lead to the end of the world. Frost uses language throughout the poem that appears to be simple, but is actually very effective at communicating deeper, insightful meanings. He connects fire and ice to desire and hate and creates multiple levels of complexity. For example, the simple passage “Some say the world will end in fire, / Some say in ice.” (“Fire and Ice” 1-2) introduces the two main symbols in the poem, but, at the same time, pulls the reader in because desire and hate are so personal and such a significant part of human nature. After the symbols are presented, the narrator involves himself or herself in the poem by saying “From what I’ve tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire.” (“Fire and Ice” 3-4). A clear decision is made here in favor of fire, implying that the narrator favors desire. Frost believes that the world will eventually be destroyed by destructive and negative human traits: desire, greed, and jealousy. Yet in Frost’s mind, these traits are still preferable to hate. This opinion is demonstrated by the narrator’s choice of fire. Frost prefers the heat of passion and fire to the ...
strengthens his viewpoint and regards Frost as ―one of the most intuitive poets [. . . h]e sees
The vivid imagery, symbolism, metaphors make his poetry elusive, through these elements Frost is able to give nature its dark side. It is these elements that must be analyzed to discover the hidden dark meaning within Roberts Frost’s poems. Lines that seemed simple at first become more complex after the reader analyzes the poem using elements of poetry. For example, in the poem Mending Wall it appears that Robert frost is talking about two man arguing about a wall but at a closer look the reader realizes that the poem is about the things that separate man from man, which can be viewed as destructive. In After Apple Picking, the darkness of nature is present through the man wanting sleep, which is symbolic of death.
Bloom, Harold, ed. Modern Critical Views; Robert Frost First Edition, New York et al, Chelsea House Pub., 1986.
It can easily be argued that Frost believed that little difference existed between humanity’s inner nature and the nature of the world which surrounded him. Time and again Frost personifies nature in human terms and points out the many ways in which what happens in an individual’s life is a reflection of what occurs in the natural world. In fact, it can be said that this poet viewed nature as being separate from humanity only by the virtue by which humanity removes itself from the outside world. In other words, nature never leaves, humans are the ones to leave nature. Many of Frost’s poems clearly demonstrate the ways in which the peace of being fully juxtaposed to nature when a human steps outside their rigid human realm and learns to appreciate their natural surroundings.
First, in the poem “Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening” there is a lot of nature expressed. Frost’s very first sentence already talks about the woods. Whose woods these are we don’t know. Also, in the poem he states that the narrator likes to sit and watch the snow. He is also a nature lover. In the second stanza Frost refers back to the woods. He must also like ice, because he brings ice and cold up a lot in his poems. Once again Frost brings ice up when he mentions flake and cold wind.