How Does Orwell Use Rhetoric Language In Animal Farm

671 Words2 Pages

In his novella Animal Farm, George Orwell analyzes the problem of rhetoric language in government and the way in which language can be manipulated as an instrument of social control. Rhetoric language can be used in a positive way if the speaker has good intentions as well as wanting to give people hope. On the other hand, rhetoric language can be used in a very negative way when the speaker has bad intentions, as well as manipulation and an instrument of social control. Another point is how the language an individual uses can either affect the person listening or blow over their head depending on whether they want it to be true or not. In Animal Farm, Orwell explores how rhetoric language can have a negative or positive impact on society and individuals may feel the need to suppress their emotions when they listen to someone they trust who uses language as an instrument of social control.
Rhetoric language can be rewarding if the speaker using it has sinless intentions in mind. The Prime minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, is a great example of a leader who is able to persuade and inspire using his words. The citizens of Canada are able to trust his good intentions even though …show more content…

Napoleon the farm leader hires Squealer to be his “spokesperson”. Squealer is very good with his words and mainly uses rhetoric language to manipulate and persuade. An example of this is how the pigs literally rewrite history by being able to stretch the truth. When the pigs rewrite the fourth commandment from “No animal shall sleep in a bed”(Orwell 15) to “No animal shall sleep in bed with sheets”(Orwell 45). The animals were so brainwashed by squealer that even though at first they did not want to accept his words, they so badly wanted it to be true to the point where they were lying to themselves. The animals chose to believe Squealers rhetoric language because they had already learned to trust

Open Document