The story that was chosen was Mark Twains, “The Damned Human Race”. In Twains story he states powerfully that the human race is simpleminded, flawed, and corrupt and that the human race should be labeled or classified as “lower animals”. While it is understandable the author’s point of view and his statement that the human race is damned he is stating his opinion about the human race and is comparing the civilized structured human race to uncivilized animals.
When Mark Twain originally wrote “The Damned Human Race”, he had to know going into his theory that he would cause uproar with his “finding” and in my opinion is a great example of Social Darwinism. What is Social Darwinism? It was a theory that took place in the late 1900’s that the law
…show more content…
of evolution that Charles Darwin observed in nature applies to society, which is humorous. He stated, “Man takes more than what he needs, while nature takes only to survive, man kills, enslaves, sets himself apart in his own country, fights and is cruel, meanwhile Twain fails to understand that’s the bad traits he listed goes both ways for both man and animal but he is criticizing and critiquing human being for being the aspect of what a human being is. However, in this story’s pathos is very present as well.
Pathos is an appeal to emotion, and is a way of convincing an audience of an argument by creating an emotional response, and in this story is very noticeable. The story makes the reader reevaluate certain logical behavior and the choices we make on a day to day base even in modern time forgetting the original story was written in the early 1900’s. Twain states, “Roosters keep harems, but it is by consent of their concubines; therefore no wrong is done. Men keep harems but it is by brute force, privileged by atrocious laws which the other sexes were allowed no hand in making. In this matter man occupies a far lower place than the rooster”; or “The higher animals engage in individual fights, but never in organized masses. Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War.” Twains example sets the human race to portray the role of being evil and heartless individuals but, this is how Twain uses pathos by using the animals to deplete …show more content…
humanity. Lastly, Logos is when the author uses support such as fact, or statistics for their theory.
In this situation although, Twain stated in the beginning of his story that he used the scientific method and held experiments at the London Zoological Garden, his facts still could be considered inconclusive having not proven any strong facts only opinion that the human race is to be considered damn. Any experiments usually have multiple conclusions from three or more test the could possible range from months to years with the same study but with different result. While taking the test subject into consideration you also have to take in time, weather, situations that may occur for test subjects, different era (if experiments were to be recreated). There is nothing in modern time to reenact his finding from his original experiment but his word, so it could be possible what was experimented in 1905 could be completely different in
2014. I believe that Mark Twain story, “The Damned Human Race” doesn’t have a successful argument. Now, some may say that the readers are looking at this story with a closed mind, but it’s a rare find to come across a story that will diminish the civilized human race and compare them to animals because mainly he just listed bad traits that humanity has and not so much explained why the human race is truly damned. Now, while we viewed and it’s understood that this is his own opinion with own experimental studies; it can be believed the Twain focused too generally on man’s actions and too little on animals’ actions as well. The majority of the human race has improved and since originally written humanity has come a long way.
One example of Gladwell's use of pathos is in his personal story in the epilogue. Mr. Gladwell gives an excerpt from his mother's book about being dark skinned. "Here I was, the wounded representative of the negro race in our struggle to be accounted free and equal with the dominating whites!" she says. This account of the hardship of being "dark" begs the reader to consider his and her prejudices. Another example of Gladwell's use of pathos is his depiction of the feud between two families in the 19th century. This section's purpose is to provide an example of people impacted by their ancestry. In this situation, the culture is one of honor. Gladwell portrays this through dialogue between a mother and a son. The mother tells the son to "die
Some of the most prominent examples of individuals versus society are the ones who go against the norm, but many are a part of the norm trying to mask their differences with masks that belong to citizens of the sea of society. In Mark Twain’s article, Lynching Moral Cowardice, he states, “No mob has any sand in the presence of a man known to be splendidly brave. Besides a lynching mob would like to be scattered, for of a certainty there are never ten men in it who would not prefer to be somewhere else and would be, if they but had the courage to go” (Twain 1). Like Atticus, some of the bystanders, who had minority morals, had pangs of regret watching the life drain from innocent faces. In the early years of the 19th century and back, racism
The structure of the essay leads the reader to make conclusions about the morality of the human species. Twain presents specific examples of human deficiency that certain populations can identify with, then moves to broader topics that anyone can relate to. Twain describes mankind's moral dilemma by saying (quote). Allowing the readier to come to the conclusion that man kind is jaded when it comes to issues on morality Twain has successfully achieved his goal. He does state his opinion but does not force the reader to come to the same idea. The manner that he presents the information allows the reader to come to the conclusion that humans are flawed in comparison to animals in a logical manner even though the overall theme of the essay is a satire
Mark Twain’s purpose in “Corn-Pone Opinions” is to inform the reader that it is human nature to conform to the rest of society. According to Twain,”self-approval is acquired mainly from the approval of other people. The result is conformity.” (Twain 720). While humans provide opinions, many of them are based from the association with others. Twain claims that it is a basic human instinct to receive approval, mostly that of others. In his essay, Furthermore, Twain is attempting to persuade the reader to stop conforming to what society wants. It is through this process that many individuals abandon their own beliefs and principles.
Humanity Exposed in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. & nbsp; People are the picture of contrast, sometimes strong and heroic, and other times weak and lamentable. In the novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain illustrates both the good and the disagreeable portions of human nature. The good side of humanity is shown through his depiction of people's courage. The irrationality of mankind is exposed through the actions of characters in the novel. The unproductive self-serving attitude of many people is also shown in Huck Finn.
In Mark Twain’s essay, “The Damned Human Race,” he uses a sarcastic tone in order to show that humans are the lowest kinds of animals and ar not as socially evolved as they think they are, making his readers want to change. In order to inspire his audience, Twain motivates them by providing specific comparisons between animals and humans. These satiric examples emphasize the deficiencies of the human race and entice them to change for the better.
"Social Darwinism." Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2014. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
Social Darwinism is a late 19th century term used to describe the application of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to social and political conditions. Late 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer tried to capture the essence of social Darwinism with his phrase “survival of the fittest”. This essentially meant that the strong would rise to the top while the weak simply died out. Social Darwinists eschew social responsibility and compassion, instead believing that some people are more fit to survive than others. Many social Darwinists advocated that the government should maintain a laissez-faire, or hands off, approach when it came to regulating economic competition and alleviating social inequalities. Social Darwinism was used to justify the consolidation of the majority of wealth by a minority of Americans. The term allowed people to rationalize capitalism, imperialism, racism, and even eugenics. The wealthy believed in social Darwinism because it allowed them to justify their oppressive business tactics and low wages for their labor force. Politicians believed in it because it allowed them to justify imperialism, or expansion of the nation. Affluent Anglo-Saxons believed in social Darwinism, believing themselves to be the superior race, and used it to justify ...
The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.
In order to comprehend the present state of these two forces, it is necessary to analyze more completely the meanings of Social Darwinism and Social Welfare. Every since Charles Darwin published the Origin of the Species in 1859, social scientists have attempted to explain human behavior as a product of natural selection. In the 19th century, Social Darwinism held that history was about the "survival of the fittest" and "superior" social groups were evolutionary more fit to rule the world. Social Darwinism was at the heart of many pernicious theories of the past century, including scientific racism and eugenics (Goldfield, et al, 1998, p. 721).
Its influence has even extended into realms other than biology and science. An entire method of looking at and interpreting society has come into being partly from the ideas of Darwin. This methodology is known as social darwinism. One can trace the roots of this idea all the way back to the time of Darwin and his contemporaries, and proponents of the theory remain strong even today. Social darwinism has shown its influence in many ways throughout history and is seen to be just as controversial as Darwinian evolution.
Mississippi Twain tells us of a man with a dream. As imperfection has it this
Most people believe that Social Darwinism is a term that can only be applied to people’s race, and for most well known social Darwinism theories this is true. The basis of these theories is always revolved around the term survival of the fittest. Darwin works on what to do with animals and how animal species have adapted to challenges thrown at them by nature.... ... middle of paper ...
Huckleberry Finn - Moral Choices There were many heroes in the literature that has been read. Many have been courageous and showed their character through tough times. Through these tough times, they were forced to make important decisions and this is where you get the real idea of who deserves to be called a hero. The most influential though of all these was Huckleberry Finn. Through the innocence of childhood, he is able to break through the societal pressures that are brought on him and do right.
...-like symbols are fading--“black once but faded now to that fierce muted metallic green of old peacock feathers”--revealing the length and magnitude of the struggle (142). The contrast is apparent by the mention of the peacock feathers, which in their natural state are lively and radiant. There is an inability for the woman to reconcile with the man because “the indomitable woman-blood ignores the man’s world in which the blood kinsman shows the coverage or cowardice, the folly or lust or fear, for which his fellows praise or crucify him” (123). One must follow the male characteristics to the roots of their southern heritage to acknowledge the full tragic beauty of the female.