Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the new manifest destiny
Research of the manifest destiny
Causes and effects of manifest destiny
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Mexican War or Mexican-American War is a war that had occurred from 1846-1848 and the legitimacy of the war depends only on the idea of Manifest Destiny. The war was a conflict that began with a territory dispute between the United Mexican States and the United States of America. Many historians would argue that the conflict was inevitable and that the fight between territories was unavoidable as the United States had already began its path of seizing land by any means necessary including winning conflicts and purchasing land. The Mexican people were not the only people who were attacked and defeated for land, and the list of people also includes the Native Americans at the time that populated much of North America. Although many would …show more content…
argue that there was no legitimacy to the war however Manifest Destiny is what provided legitimacy. The war between the United States and Mexico occurred as a result of Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny as defined by Robert J. Miller a historian states, “Historians have for the most part agreed that there are three basic themes to Manifest Destiny. 1. The special virtues of the American people and their institutions; 2. America’s mission to redeem and remake the world in the image of America, and; 3. A divine destiny under God’s direction to accomplish this wonderful task.” Essentially, Miller is stating what the justifications for the Mexican war were. Manifest Destiny was, at the root, these three different aspects that Americans had largely believed. The Americans were given this right by God that could not be opposed. This is what they believed. The thesis begs the question: How exactly does Manifest Destiny legitimize the war? When viewing the Mexican War, one has the potential to take a number of possible positions either for or against the war. However there were two main positions that one is able to take. Based on the common belief systems at the time of the war, both of the positions were justified and entirely legitimate; however due to the change in belief systems one position is become more legitimate while the other became less legitimate. The positions were: the Mexican position, which would state that the Mexican War was not legitimized because it was just a war intended to steal land and purely was unnecessary, and the American position which would state that the Mexican War was legitimized due to Manifest Destiny and the right given upon Americans to continue heading West and gaining land because God had given that right to them. In modern day, there are many historians who historically investigate the Mexican War, that would argue that the war was not legitimized, and that the war was simply an attack to steal land, and an act that was entirely devoted to political and religious gain.
Even if the United States wanted only to acquire land assuming that the country’s intentions did not lie in starting a war, the thesis still begs the question: How exactly does Manifest Destiny legitimize the war? In order to answer this question one must first define all of the key terms in the question. Manifest Destiny was defined early by Robert J. Miller but what exactly is the definition of “legitimize”? In order to properly answer the thesis question one must define legitimize in the context of the Mexican War. In Merriam Webster, legitimize is defined as, “to make legitimate”. Legitimate is defined as “allowed according to rules or laws,” or “real, accepted, or official,” or “fair or reasonable”. Therefore the entire transitive definition of legitimize is “to be allowed or accepted according to laws, rules, or reasonability.” In other dictionaries, such as the Oxford dictionary and Dictionary.com, the definitions …show more content…
match. It is important to mind that the word legitimize is not the same as justified.
Justified would imply that there is some type of universal reasoning that would state what occurred because of the war was a good outcome. The purpose of the thesis is not to justify the Mexican War but to simply see to what degree did Manifest Destiny legitimize it. Based on the definition of legitimize, all that is needed to legitimize it is either a law or a rule that allows for the war to be accepted. Manifest Destiny is that “rule” that allows for the American people to accept the war thereby making it legitimate. The reasons for legitimizing the Mexican War were quite simple at the time. The only things needed to legitimize the war were Manifest Destiny, opposing Christian values, and weapons. The reason this was only needed was because the majority of the country at the time was Christian and Christian ideas such as determinism could help legitimize the war. The idea that the United States’ destiny to expand westward was already present inside of the mindset of Americans long before the war had started. This mindset helped drive the forces of the American government and people to eventually spark the Mexican
War. The Mexican War was entirely an attack against the Mexican people. It was a war that was fueled by the ideas of Manifest Destiny, and Manifest Destiny was so ingrained in the people that it was unavoidable that the war between Mexico and the United States would occur. A conversation that was had on PBS with David M. Pletcher, a professor at Indiana University, actually discussed the Mexican War and Manifest Destiny. The conversation was a question-and-answer type of discussion and the first question posed was, “What were the driving forces behind the United States' quest for Manifest Destiny during the 19th century?” Pletcher’s entire response both involved a definition for what Manifest Destiny was as well as the reason why it’s a reason to legitimize the War. Part of his response is as follows, “Manifest Destiny was a conviction that God intended North America to be under the control of Americans. It’s a kind of early projection of Anglo-saxon supremacy and there’s a racist element to it.” In this statement, he’s clearly stating that Manifest Destiny is only intended for Americans and this was due to the idea that God himself bestowed the United States with the right to control all of North America. Early in his response Pletcher mentioned that the United States wanted land and by using God and Manifest Destiny as an “excuse”, it allowed for America to convince itself to enter and take the land. As I stated earlier, Manifest Destiny was only a part of the legitimization of the war. Another reason for the war to be legitimate was the opposing Christian values of the people. In the idea of Manifest Destiny, it was God himself who had given the right to Americans in order to expand westward and that same right was entirely
Although many Americans did not take the war seriously, the Mexican-American War of 1846 was responsible for the thousands of both Mexican and American deaths, and permanently left a scar on the the U.S’ relationship with Mexico. In 1846, the U.S declared war on Mexico after shots were fired at American soldiers on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, which the Americans believed was the border between Mexico and the U.S. The war was very controversial, and many Americans vigorously opposed President Polk’s decision to declare war. However after winning the war, the U.S gained most of Mexico’s territory in the West, completing the Manifest Destiny (BGE). Was the U.S. right to go to war with Mexico? The United States were unjustified in going
Later they wanted to annex it but Mexico said that any attempts to annex Texas would be an act of war. The Mexican War started in 1846, when Mexicans attacked a group of United States soldiers, under the command of Zachary Taylor, in a disputed zone on the border of United States and Mexico, killing about a dozen American soldiers. President Polk told the U.S. Congress that the “cup of forbearance has been exhausted” which means the Mexicans hit the last straw and it is time for war. President Polk sent General Zachary Taylor to Nueces River vs. Rio Grande to poke the Mexicans to shoot and they did. The Mexicans have shed “American blood upon American soil.” The United States wanted war with Mexico now they have a reason to declare war ( History.com
The war between Mexico and the United States started in 1846, should the United States go to war with Mexico? The United States was indeed justified in going to war with Mexico, because 16 Americans lost their lives in a battle with Mexico. Second, Mexicans were mad about the revolution, and Mexico treated U.S. diplomats poorly. Many mini-huge and impactful battles took place to unite the country and to fulfill God’s will to take all the land. While trying to execute Manifest Destiny, 16 Americans killed for the right but made a sacrifice to take dominance over Mexico.
One reason the Mexican War was justified was the United States Manifest Destiny beliefs. Evidence supporting this reason is that, according to Document A, John O'Sullivan said it was God’s choice if the United States will grow by taking or buying territory. Also, the annexation of Texas helped grow the United States which gave the
This caused conflict between the two countries. Is it right for the United States to declare war against Mexico? America was justified in going to war with Mexico because they could gain economic benefits, Mexico threatened America first, and citizens and James K. Polk wanted to fulfill their manifest destiny. Another reason that the Mexican War was justified was because Mexico had already threatened the United States by advancing past the boundary of the United States.
Through Manifest Destiny, the U.S. conquered many new territories. Ever since the U.S. became its own country, they always wanted more land. They thought that the Manifest Destiny gave them the right to expand and conquer more land. The United States were offered a deal known as the Louisiana Purchase which doubled their size. Even after they received this land, they were thirsty for more. They wanted to have Texas as their own. After Texas got their independence from Mexico, President Polk annexed it. Polk had his eye set on California next. But before he could get California, he had to deal with border dispute in Texas, leading to the war with Mexico. So, did the United States have a good reason to go to war with Mexico? The answer is simple, the U.S. was not justified into going to war with Mexico. This is proven through the Manifest Destiny, border disputes, and an American viewpoint on the war.
The Mexican-American War - Debate The Mexican-American war began in 1846, but reasons for the war began much earlier when Mexico made the crucial decision to entice settlers to Texas, with the promise of affordable land grants, actions which eventually led to the annexation of Texas by the United States. All they had to do was accept Mexico 's requirements of becoming citizens, speaking Spanish and converting to Catholicism, this to people who were use to a government that people had rights and freedoms, not experienced in Mexico. Mexico wanted them to develop these long uninhibited lands of Texas, in hopes that it would promote development in the area.(Nardo, 1991, p. 16). The selling of land grants started in the 1820s and the Mexican-American James W. Fannin took over the garrison at Goliad manning it with 350 untrained volunteers with guns, who would be considered pirates to Mexico.
Today we live in a world where war never sleeps. War is a term used to explain conflict between two nations, or within a nation. This particular war was between two nations, Mexico and the United States. About a century and a half ago in 1846, on what was thought to be the Mexican-American border, many American and Mexican soldiers lost their lives. The war was an on-going feud, that had and still has many pros and cons. The U.S. was unjustified in going to war with Mexico because many U.S. citizens disagreed and sided with Mexico. Mexico owned and took care of the land first, and the United States deliberately caused this war to occur. As awesome as a
The Mexican–American War, also known as the Mexican War, the U.S.–Mexican War, the Invasion of Mexico, the U.S. Intervention, or the United States War Against Mexico, was an armed conflict between the United States and the Centralist Republic of Mexico from 1846 to 1848 in the wake of the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico considered part of its territory despite the 1836 Texas Riot. Through this time, supply ships from San Blas continued to be unpredictable and the missions—with their native workers—were worried to provide for the population. When the native groups began to resist the bigger demands, they were placed under firmer military control. Also, additional tribes were gathered, mixed, and combined into dense groups in order to serve the payment. Under these conditions, new diseases quickly spread and native cultures were further disrupted.
Rodolfo Acuña and Norman A. Graebner take opposing standpoints on this topic. Acuña takes the standpoint that the Americans took advantage of the Mexican government, which was young and unstable at the time. He argued that the United States waged an unjust war solely for the acquisition of new lands. His excerpt from Occupied America: A History of Chicanos, 3rd Edition provided the basis for his argument. On the other hand, Graebner took the standpoint that President James Polk pushed a policy, enforced by a stronger nation, to force Mexico to sell New Mexico and California and recognize the annexation of Texas to the United States without starting a war. His argument was taken from his article “The Mexican War: A Study in Causation”. Both sides of the American Imperialism argument contain their own strengths. However, after the examination of the articles, Graebner proposes a more convincing
The term “Manifest Destiny” was never actually used until 1845, but the idea was always implied from the Doctrine of Discovery. Without understanding the Doctrine, it is impossible to understand the reasons and fundamentals behind why Manifest Destiny began.This Doctrine was a set of ten steps and rules that European nations followed in order to avoid conflict over land holdings, created in the early 1400s. The first few steps give the discovering country full rights to buy the land from the native peoples. This is important, since it gave the discovering country the power of preemption. Conquered Indian peoples lose sovereign powers and the rights to free trade and diplomatic relations, and the land they occupy is said to be vacant. Religion played a massive role in the regulations of the Doctrine, since “non-Christian people were not deemed to have the same rights to land, sovereignty, and self determination as Christians”(Miller 4). These rules were all meant to favor the ethnocentric, with full understanding of the repercussions on those who lived in the places being conquered.
The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because America came in and broke the laws, there were no borders for Texas, and America stole Mexico's land. Tejanos(Mexicans) invited Americans in to settle in Texas. Americans also known as Anglos Broke most of the few laws Mexico made. There was a war for the independence of Texas. A couple years later, President Polk went to go ask Mexico for some of their land because of their belief called Manifest destiny.
While women in Mexico and the United States were both fighting for their rights, their choices and actions were shaped by the world around them. Between the years of 1846 and 1848, the United States and Mexico had been at war with one another. The United States attacked Mexico because they believed themselves to be entitled to their land. They called this entitlement Manifest Destiny. The United States was ultimately victorious, this was an enormous defeat to the Mexican people and they were forced to give up approximately half of their territory. This defeat came shortly after Mexico had declared its independence.
The Mexican-American war determined the destiny of the United States of America, it determined whether or not it would become a world power and it established the size of the United States of America. Perhaps the war was inevitable due to the idea of Manifest Destiny - Americans thought they had the divine right to extend their territory. The Mexican-American War started mainly because of the annexation of the Republic of Texas (established in 1836 after breaking away from Mexico). The United States and Mexico still had conflicts on what the borders of Texas was, the United States claimed that the Texas border with Mexico was the Rio Grande, but the Mexicans said that it was the Nueces River, so the land in between were disputed and claimed by both the United States and Mexico.
Manifest destiny was the belief that the U.S was supposed to extend its boundaries westward toward the Spanish area and far on. While it may have interfered with the progress of every other nation like Mexico, I believe it was essential towards the other the success and progress of the states. Firstly, many of the current U.S citizens, given the time, were very fond of the idea of having the U.S Be the same size as it was when it had first been declared independence from Britain. According to Andrew Jackson in his speech, he states, “We would not want to see this continent restored to the condition in which our forefathers found it.” From president Jackson’s speech one can infer that he, along with many other Jacksonians and U.S citizens, wanted