Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Goldings view on human nature lord of the flies
William goldings view of lord of the flies
Goldings view on human nature lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the best aspects of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies was the portrayal of characters. Golding used the main characters of his novel to reveal the characteristics he believed were vital to human nature. Each character developed as the story went on, and each of the main characters represented one aspect of human nature. For example, Piggy represented intelligence, Ralph represented reason, Jack represented violence and savagery and Simon represented intuitiveness and kindness. In this way, Golding reveals his ideas about the natural instinct of human nature. Although each boy portrays one trait above others, they all prove to possess each trait to some extent. Golding has shown the reader the aspects he believes to be common in human …show more content…
nature through his portrayal of his characters. Jack Merridew represents the violent, angry and sadistic aspects which are unfortunately a part of basic human nature. He returns to the primal instincts to fend for ourselves as opposed to caring for others, and to hunt and kill things for meat.
The first time the reader is introduced to Jack, he appears to be jealous of Ralph due to his role as chief. Straight away, Golding is revealing the envious, violent aspects of Jack the reader will be exposed to later in the novel. Jack seems eager to begin hunting, although at first he struggles to kill a pig. This shows Jack trying to un-learn everything society has taught him. Eventually, he is able to kill one, and returns excited about his achievement. This is when the chant: “Kill the pig! Cut her throat! Spill her blood!” is first used. At this time, Jack was meant to be keeping the fire going, and because he didn't the fire went out and a boat passed by the island without noticing them. Ralph is distraught, however Jack believes the situation turned out well, as he was able to kill something, showing his selfishness and disregard for the wellbeing of the rest of the tribe. He giggles and jumps about as him and his hunters retell the story of the hunt, and tell them how there was so much blood. This is the start of Jack’s descent into savagery. Jack becomes bloodthirsty, and enjoys killing. He becomes obsessed with …show more content…
blood, “rubbed the stuff over his cheeks”, and descends into insanity, along with the other hunters, finding “the pig’s efforts to avoid the advancing spear (…) so funny that the boys cried with laughter.” Soon enough, Jack decides to leave Ralph and start his own tribe, which focuses on hunting and having fun as opposed to getting off the island. He holds a feast to tempt the boys into joining him, and while they dancing, Simon stumbles out of the forest to warn them that there is no beast. Jack, and the others, mistake him for the Beast and begin clawing and beating at him until he is dead. Jack reveals the voice inside the heads of human beings which whispers words of selfishness and violence, the voice that can sometimes be tempting enough to coax people away from how they are taught to act. Ralph is the main protagonist of the novel, and is initially chosen by the others to be chief. He represents the rational, understanding and leadership qualities all people possess, although it takes some time for him to grow into these titles. Ralph’s main focus was to get off the island, which was the most logical and vital desire. From the beginning to the end, the one thing he asked of the boys was to keep the signal fire going. Most of what he does is for the wellbeing of the tribe, and not necessarily for the wellbeing of himself. For example, he, accompanied by Simon, built the last two shelters so that everyone would have a place to sleep, even though almost everyone abandoned him after the building the first one. The boys sought out leadership, as it is basic human instinct to look for a leader in times of trouble. Ralph is the one they select to fill this role. Ralph has a natural gift for leadership, and this was clear to the others. At first, Ralph rejoices in the independence from grown-ups, and childishly mocks Piggy for his cruel nickname. Ralph quickly realises that playing around will get him nowhere, and is forced to rapidly mature in order to keep himself and the others alive, and to ensure there is a chance of getting off the island. He grows frustrated with the childish nature of the others, and at how they refuse to follow his orders. Influenced by Piggy, he yearns for order and a society to mimic that of the outside world. The others disagree with his methods, and soon leave to follow Jack. Although Ralph represents order and rationality, he does not always stay true to his nature. At times, his fear overcomes his natural instinct and causes him to do unspeakable things. On the beach at Jack’s feast, Ralph willingly participates in Jack’s cruel dance and contributes to the death of Simon. After this, Ralph, much like Jack, begins to go insane, due to the realisation of the capability of man. Ralph, along with representing the level-headed & leadership qualities of man, also represents the combination of all elements, both good and bad, in all of us. The boy behind many of Ralph’s rational ideas, Piggy is arguably the most intelligent of the boys. He is usually very logical and talkative, which at first caused him to be the laughing stock of the tribe. At first all the boys, including Ralph, were excited by the prospect of being alone without any grown-ups on an island. Yet Piggy realises the severity of their situation and the importance of grown-ups. This shows his maturity, and shows that he sees things differently compared to others. Throughout the book he attempted to compare and model the group of boys according to how grown-ups would act, often exclaiming “What would the grown-ups think?” Piggy values the rules, and is very sensible. He understands the necessity of rules in a society, and that chaos will break out without them. Piggy often argues the opposite of what the others think, leading him to even out the situation. For example, after the boys carelessness leads to a large fire and the death of the little boy with the mulberry mark on his face, Piggy is angered by how careless the boys have been and at how little they seem to worry about the death of the young one. However, after the death of Simon, Ralph begins to ramble about how Simon was murdered, and how they assisted in that murder. Piggy argues that they “can’t do no good thinking about it,” and reminds Ralph of how it was an accident. He does not necessarily argue the same side in every situation; he argues the side less represented, in order to escalate or de-escalate the situation to where it should be to make the others act rationally. Piggy’s logical and thoughtful nature helps Ralph to be a better leader. Simon spends a lot of time alone in thought.
Aside from Piggy and Ralph, Simon works the hardest out of all the boys, and was the only one who would help Ralph finish the huts. It is revealed that he has a subconscious sense of the fact that the beast is not what they think, which is shown when he hallucinates and the “Lord of the Flies” says to him, “Fancy thinking the beast is something you could hunt and kill!” Obviously, the pig’s head on a stick was not actually telling him these things, which means the ideas came from Simon himself. This realisation displays the importance of contemplation in difficult times. At the beginning, Simon says he thinks the Beast could exist, but that “maybe it’s only us.” He is implying that the boys themselves are the Beast, although he struggles to articulate this. Simon is also very kind and forgiving, which is another element common in every person. He is the only boy to show any kindness to Piggy right from the start, and has no ill-intent towards anyone. Simon is selfless, and holds Ralph especially to a higher importance than himself, saying, “you’ll get back to where you came from.” This implies that Simon himself will not get back, but that it’s better that Ralph does as he is more important. The Beast represents the fear of the boys, as well as the selfishness and savagery the boys begin to value more the longer they stay on the island. Simon is further from this idea of the Beast than any other boy on the island, and this is why
he dies. Simon is seen as weak, but he possesses the strongest aspects of human nature: kindness, selflessness and intuitiveness. Every main character in Lord of the Flies is an extreme example of one aspect of what Golding sees to be the basics of human nature. He has shown the raw aspects he believes humans rely on for survival, and how humans behave when the teachings of society have been stripped away and the burden of responsibility is lifted from their shoulders. Human nature can vary from person-to-person: some can be kind, like Simon; some turn out to be rational with good leadership skills, similar to Ralph; some are intelligent and logical like Piggy and some can be vicious, violent and sadistic like Jack. Golding used his knowledge from his experience in the war to tell the story. He also used Biblical images, such as the Garden of Eden, to aid the reader in developing a better understanding in the situation and to make it easier to notice the changes and contrast involved. He was attempting to portray a story of the loss of innocence of a group of boys, and how thin the line between civilisation and savagery is.
In the novel, Lord of the Flies, William Golding created an island, which represented a microcosm of the world. The characters in the book had unique and different personalities to simulate the real world. Every kid on the island was different. Each character fell under the artisan, rational, idealist, or guardian temperament. The characters' personalities helped determine their temperament. Two specific characters were Jack and Piggy. Piggy exhibits aspects of the artisan temperament, whereas Jack exhibits aspects of the rational temperament.
While they agree that the beast is not a traditional monster, it is Simon’s philosophical understanding that allows him to fully realize the meaning of the beast. At the assembly, Ralph plans to discuss the beast, hoping to bring the fear to an end. Simon suggests that the boys themselves are the beast. Later, when Simon encounters the “Lord of the Flies” in a hallucination, the reader learns the extent of his understanding. The Lord of the Flies mocks Simon by saying, “Fancy you thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?”(128). Simon realizes that there is something within humans that can cause them to act savagely. However, at the assembly, in an effort to understand what Simon meant about the beast, the boys suggest that the beast could be a ghost. Piggy firmly rejects this idea because he approaches the beast in the same way he handles most situations: logically and scientifically. As Piggy states, “Life… is scientific, that’s what it is…. I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear either… unless we get afraid of people” (72). Piggy understands fear can have detrimental effects, but he does not yet understand that fear is within every person, and this is the “beast” that can cause people to act without
As soon as they realise what must be done to survive on the island, jack has the desire to kill a pig for meat. This is the first sign of his savagery. Soon his urge to kill a pig turns into the desire to kill and hunt other living
Characters are used in literature as symbols to represent mankind's different “faces”. Everyone in both fictional and real societies have civil orderly sides, as well as an instinctual hunger for power. Both of these traits together make us human, but imbalance of these traits in some people can alter our being. These traits are necessary for our survival, but too much can create toxic environments. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses symbols to tell the reader more about human traits and provides a platform that shows the interactions between people with different balances of traits; Golding then shows the possible outcome of the conflict these traits create. Three main characters that stand out and represent the civility and hunger for power of humans are Piggy, Jack, and Ralph. Each can be seen as a symbol for different behaviors and traits that humans show, as well as the different mixes of civil and instinctual. The characters symbolize the different traits, instinctual power and calming civil nature, and how the different balances can affect a persons actions, behaviors, and interactions with others.
Lord of the Flies is a novel written by William Golding in 1954 about a group of young British boys who have been stranded alone together on an island with no adults. During the novel the diverse group of boys struggle to create structure within a society that they constructed by themselves. Golding uses many unique literary devices including characterization, imagery, symbolism and many more. The three main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack are each representative of the three main literary devices, ethos, logos, and pathos. Beyond the characterization the novel stands out because of Golding’s dramatic use of objective symbolism, throughout the novel he uses symbols like the conch, fire, and Piggy’s glasses to represent how power has evolved and to show how civilized or uncivilized the boys are acting. It is almost inarguable that the entire novel is one big allegory in itself, the way that Golding portrays the development of savagery among the boys is a clear representation of how society was changing during the time the novel was published. Golding is writing during
In Lord of the Flies, Golding is able to exemplify intelligence, violence, and leadership, through the behaviors, responses, and actions of Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, respectively. Golding provides insight into the delicate touch-and-go basis of human nature, something that to this day has yet to be fully understood.
Simon is perhaps the most important character in the novel for he is the first and only character to come to the realization that the Beast is inside them all, and is not represented by a physical manifestation. Simon is a follower, not a leader. He believes and trusts what Ralph, his leader, says. That’s why he mentions that the beast could be inside all of them once, and immediately discards that because Ralph doesn’t think so. His confrontation with the Lord of the Flies is the only way he can liberate that information to himself. The encounter begins with “Even if he shut his eyes the sow’s head still remained like an after-image.” This represents the beginning of the fixation Simon is having on the head, thinking of it even after he shuts his eyes. Golding then points out that the pig had half shut eyes and were dim with infinite cynicism of adult life. Those details come back a little later. It’s at this point where Simon asks himself a question and answers it aloud. “ ‘I know that.’ Simon discovered that he had spoken aloud”. “He opened his eyes quickly and there was the head grinning amusedly in the strange daylight, ignoring the flies, the spilled guts, even ignoring the indignity of being spiked on a stick.” That sentence shows the continuing evolution of the fixation Simon has in this encounter. The first thing he sees when he opens his eyes is the head, and he ignores every detail around it. This is when Simon comes to the realization that his original conclusion is credible, the one he let be because of Ralph. He looks away, trying to forget the head even exists, but cannot accomplish that task.. He pulls himself back to the head “Might not the beast come for it?”, simply because he believes the Beast is not a physical manifestation, therefore being impossible for it to come. According to Simon, the head seems to agree with him. At this point, he knows the Beast doesn’t exist physically, but he is hesitant none-the-less. The head says “Run away […] go back to the others. It was a joke really—why should you bother? You were wrong, that’s all. A little headache, something you ate, perhaps. Go back, child.” Simon is making excuses for himself through the pig. Here, the fixation on the head is nearly complete.
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding expresses the idea that humans are naturally immoral, and that people are moral only because of the pressures of civilization. He does this by writing about a group of boys, and their story of survival on an island. The civilized society they form quickly deteriorates into a savage tribe, showing that away from civilization and adults, the boys quickly deteriorate into the state man was millions of years ago. This tendency is shown most in Jack, who has an animalistic love of power, and Roger, who loves to kill for pleasure. Even the most civilized boys, Ralph and Piggy, show that they have a savage side too as they watch Simon get murdered without trying to save him. Simon, the only one who seems to have a truly good spirit, is killed, symbolizing how rare truly good people are, and how quickly those personalities become corrupted.
Although there are many interpretations of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, one of the most important is one that involves an examination of Freudian ideas. The main characters personify Sigmund Freud’s theory of the divisions of the human mind; thus, Jack, Ralph, Piggy and Simon are metaphors for the id, ego, and the super-ego of Freudian psychology, respectively. The inclusion of psychological concepts in this literary work distinguish it as a commentary on human nature, beyond labels of “adventure” or “coming of age” novel. Many readers are left in shock upon reading Golding’s masterpiece because of the children’s loss of innocence, but most fail to consider
Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.
William Shakespeare states, in one of his famous plays, Hamlet, that “We know what we are, but not what we maybe,” (4.5. ). The author suggests the idea of the human’s true self, hiding behind one’s mask, which further leads to the question of human identity. The question “Who am I?” becomes one of the most complex topics in literature and philosophy because no one yet finds the answer. This subject inspires different writers such as Phillip K. Dicks, Aldous Huxley, and William Golding to pursue people seek for the unknown. One of the dystopian novels, called Lord of the Flies by William Golding, tells the story of a group of children, on an uninhabited island in the Pacific Ocean during the atomic bomb war. By choosing the character between
Lord of the Flies In the novel Lord of The Flies, William Golding uses character development throughout the novel to illustrate what raw humanity can become. The characters Ralph, Piggy, and Jack all represent different sides of human nature. Jack is the side of humanity that Golding wants the reader to recognize. Golding’s idea of humanity is that people can easily revert to savagery and a state of being that took us thousands of years to evolve out of. In the beginning, Jack wanted to lead the boys and be the chief, but not to the point of killing.
Jack is the strong willed egomaniac, who is secretly insecure and uses face paint and the fear of the beast for power and control. He represents the unbridled savagery, violence, and desire for power that is existent on the island. Early on, when he loses the election to Ralph he becomes furious, and not soon after on page 23 does he suggest the task for his group “Ralph waved again for silence. “Jack’s in charge of the choir. They can be—what do you want them to be?” “Hunters.”” From this moment on Jack becomes obsessed with hunting, and none of the other things such as the fire, the shelters, or the assemblies, seem to matter, but even though his obsession begins early, it isn’t until later when he realizes his full potential. Sure he hunted the pigs and loved the activity, but it wasn’t until he removed himself and his past values that he began killing. On page 63, Jack decides to paint his face thereby removing his true self from the activity and now he is protected by the mask and is able to fully immerse himself in the hunting and become fond of the killing “A rounded patch of sunlight fell on his face and a brightness appeared in the depths of the water. He looked in astonishment, no longer at himself but at an awesome stranger. He split the water and leapt to his feet, laughing excitedly. Beside the pool his sinewy body held up a mask that drew their eyes and appalled
In chapter 7, Ralph contemplates whilst gazing at the ocean and feels as if the water is barrier barricading any hope of escaping the island. Simon restores faith in Ralph by reassuring that he will return,“You’ll get back to where you came from [. . .] you’ll get back all right” (111). Simon is confident that Ralph will escape and civility within him will survive, unlike the other boys due to their loss of sanity. Simon is implying in a different sense meaning that the boys might get back home, but they will not be the same boys like before. Although Simon smiles at the fact that Ralph will get rescued, his selfless diction foreshadows that he himself will not make it off the island. While the other boys dance around a fire, Simon encounters the sow’s head on a stake— the Lord of the Flies— in the forest. Golding personifies the Lord of the Flies as Simon’s hallucination when he talks with the beast that exists within the boys. The head threatens, “You’re not wanted. Understand? We are going to have some fun on this island [. . .] So don't try [to take] it on [. . .] or else [. . .] we shall do you [. . .] Jack and Roger and Maurice and Robert and Bill and Piggy and Ralph” (144). The Lord of the Flies warns Simon that he should not try to escape the darkness within him and join the fun with the others. It foreshadows that Simon loses his life by the hands of Jack, Roger, and the boys