Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on eating disorder
Introduction on eating disorder
Introduction on eating disorder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is here that all theorist; Goffman, Foucault and Agamben offer an insight into how an individual can become discriminated through the power of social interaction and the state, suggesting ways in which obese individuals are able to cope after they are stigmatised. Everyday individuals encounter social situations that one does not feel comfortable with and for obese people this can be an activity such as simply walking down the street that ‘normal’ people take for granted. No one can prepare for a performance for these kinds of situations and thus, individuals create their performances; modifying their behaviour and appearance to an extent that none of their actual identity is apparent, it results in a constructed identity. This performed …show more content…
Foucault and Goffman’s theories are centralised on how an individual’s identity is formed through the process of power and expert knowledge and through Goffman’s work, it is also reminded of the social rules that are underpinned in Foucault and Agamben’s theory too. Agamben and Foucault theory of Bio-power and Bio-politics offers many ways thinking about obesity and what control the government holds over these individuals. Even though in some respects this form of control is discriminative, the power the state hold over the population has a responsibility for other individual’s health and insure good welfare. In the article Obesity, stigma, and responsibility in health care: A synthesis of qualitative studies (2011) it states that ‘obesity is a stigmatized condition with multiple forms of prejudice and discrimination in settings of employment, health care, education, interpersonal relationships, and the media’ (Malterud & Ulriksen, 2011). Thus, this interlinks with Goffman’s ideas concerning individuals that do not fit in with societies normative expectations face these types of discrimination and stigmatisation in many settings which raises many questions such as; ‘how does the stigmatized person respond to his situation?’ (Goffman, 1990: 9). Thus, being obese does not necessarily make the individual feel unhappy, however it is the judgment and discrimination that cause the greatest psychological harm. Being a target of weight discrimination can too lead to self-sabotaging behaviours such as the gym or even going to the doctors to sort these issues in order to protect themselves from future stigmatisation. The article emphasises that ‘body weight becomes a moral issue, indicating the strength of a person's self. Goffman described how stigma is expressed from others and as internalized
Their goal was to be cast against public health officials and they wanted to be “represented as the voices denying the health risks of obesity” (Johnston & Taylor, 2008) and for them to recognize “the gender and class implications of fat
The article “Fat and Happy: In Defense of Fat Acceptance” is written by Mary Ray Worley, a member of the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance. She writes of her firsthand experience as a “fat person” in society. Throughout the article, Worley explains what it is like to be obese and describes the way society treats those who have a weight problem. She attacks the idea of dieting, criticizes medical professionals for displaying an obscured view of health risks, and defends the idea of exercising to feel good rather than exercising to lose weight. Unfortunately, her article seems to reflect only own opinions and emotions rather than actual facts and statistics.
Cynara Geisslers’ essay “Fat Acceptance: A Basic Primer,” was published in Geez Magazine in 2010. The focus of the essay is to refute the pressure of society to be thin and promote self-acceptance regardless of size. While this essay touches on many agreeable points, it tends to blow many ideas out of context in an attempt to create a stronger argument. The article takes on a one-sided argument without any appropriate acknowledgement of the opposition, overlooks the risks of ignoring personal health, and has a strong feminist ideology associated towards the essay which tends to make the validity of her argument questionable.
Following his accounts, detailing the the scarily high statistics of obesity in America and its ramifications, Robbins subsequently transitions from establishing his validity to inquire “It’s easy to point our fingers and pass judgment… We can play the blame game ad infinitum, but who does that help?” (69). Robbins auspiciously is able to make himself appear more cogent to the reader by approaching them as if he were on the same level as them. Robbins uses key words like ‘we’ and ‘our’ in order not to come across as reprimanding the audience and soften the blow of his opinions. He does not ignore the reader’s, perhaps, contrasting thoughts with the points he has made; he acknowledges them and addresses them. Robbins is almost agreeing with the detractors, that what he is claiming is controversial, but he then prompts the reader to reflect upon society’s unhealthy cycle of fat shaming, so that he may appear as a sensible man with valid points, which the reader will then trust and concur
This country places great value on achieving the perfect body. Americans strive to achieve thinness, but is that really necessary? In his article written in 1986 entitled “Fat and Happy?,” Hillel Schwartz claims that people who are obese are considered failures in life by fellow Americans. More specifically, he contends that those individuals with a less than perfect physique suffer not only disrespect, but they are also marginalized as a group. Just putting people on a diet to solve a serious weight problem is simply not enough, as they are more than likely to fail. Schwartz wants to convey to his audience that people who are in shape are the ones who make obese people feel horrible about themselves. Schwartz was compelled to write this essay,
Producers of reality television shows often attempt to imitate many common stereotypes, behaviors, and emotions that go hand in hand with everyday life in the real world today. As a matter of fact, the aspect of reality within TV shows often proves as the foremost reason to why individuals decide to dedicate themselves to watching a show on a regular basis. Viewers frequently feel inner connections to particular characters or events that occur throughout a given reality TV show. These connections provide viewers with a sense of purpose watching a show since it may have an impact on how they go about their own lives within the real world. On the other hand, I generally have limited experience watching reality TV shows throughout my recent past, but for this assignment I decided to watch and evaluate a few episodes of the show, My 600-lb Life.
Sobal, Jeffery (2004), ‘Sociological Analysis of the Stigmatisation of Obesity”, in John Germov and Lauren Williams (Editors), A Sociology of Food and Nutrition. The Social Appetite, Oxford, Oxford University Press
This paper will share my reflection on Part One of the documentary entitled Weight of the Nation. I will also include what I took away from the movie while giving my personal insight into the topic of this part of the movie – “Consequences” involving children and obesity in the United States.
The mentality of parents can lead to the downfall of their children 's health. Due to the lack of provision and support that they provide as a result of their mentality, their children who gravely need it remains obese and their condition usually exacerbates. In Jan Hoffman 's article, Parents ' Denial Fuels Childhood Obesity Epidemic, she makes it clear that parents who deny the condition of their children can drastically harm them even if it is unintentional. Since, parents with an ignorant mentality cannot provide their obese child with the help they desperately need to combat their obesity problems. She provides anecdotes of parents as well as the sentiments from individuals that developed obesity as a child and needed an intervention,
In this essay we will critically evaluate Erving Goffman’s work on stigma and social interaction. Before we start evaluating Goffman’s theories let us first understand what both the terms actually mean.
Overweight and obesity problem is becoming more and more serious in Australia. Not only Australians but also the world’s problem obesity is studied as one of the main causes of chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and some cancers and sleep apnoea as well as other serious conditions, which put national economies and individual lives at risk. Obesity is also regarded as epidemic. Obesity is caused by a calorific imbalance between diet intake and consumed calories. Obesity has become the biggest threat to Public Health in Australia shown by Australia Bureau of Statistics (2013). Also, the prevalence of obesity is predicted as the ratio of obesity in adults and children will be doubled by 2025 (Backholer et al.2012). It is believed that this phenomenon is happening due to many social determinants of health, which have a strong negative impact on not only individuals but also society and economy. (Wilkinson and Marmot 2003) The social determinants of health are explained as conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age by WHO (Wilkinson & Marmot 2013). Different circumstances can be formed depending on their finance, power and global resources. These social determinants seem to be responsible for health inequities, which seem to be unfair and avoidable. Social determinants of health including social gradient, high calorie food intake, excessive amounts of stress and poor early life care are the relevant factors to contribute to be or being obesity. It is important to understand that the correlation of social determinants of health and obesity to manage the health problems and enhance public’s health.
Is obesity about poverty and cheap food? Or lack of moral fibre? I will be elaborating an essay on the points written by Zoe Williams (2011) balanced arguments, on whether there is a link between obesity, poverty and or lack of inner strength. I will be presenting for and against arguments relating the issue.
Libal, Autumn. "The Poor Get Fat, The Rich Get Thin?" Social Discrimination & Body Size: Too Big to FIt? 2005. 40-55. Print. 10 Nov. 2013.
Physical beauty is constructed by the society that we live in. We are socialized from a very young age to aspire to become what our culture deems ideal. Living in the United States, as in many other Western cultures, we are expected to be well-educated, maintain middle-class or upper-class status, be employed as well as maintain a physical standard of beauty. Although beauty is relative to each culture, it is obvious that we as Americans, especially women, are expected to be maintain a youthful appearance, wear cosmetics and fashionable clothes, but most importantly: not to be overweight. Our society is socially constructed to expect certain physical features to be the norm, anything outside this is considered deviant. Obesity is defined as outside the norms of our culture's aesthetic norms (Gros). “People who do not match idealized or normative expectations of the body are subjected to stigmatization” (Heckert 32). Obesity is a physical deviance; it is one that is an overwhelming problem in our society as we are always judged daily, by our appearance. Those who do not conform to the standards of beauty, especially when it comes to weight, are stigmatized and suffer at the hands of a society that labels them as deviants.
Townend, L. 2009. The moralizing of obesity: A new name for an old sin?. Critical social policy, 29 (2), pp. 171--190.