Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The hero of the death of Ivan Ilych
The hero of the death of Ivan Ilych
The hero of the death of Ivan Ilych
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the novel, The Death of Ivan Ilych, Leo Tolstoy exploits the miserable life Ivan faces, leading to an inevitable and crucial downfall. Through the course of his childhood, the perspective of his existence gradually transforms as his torturing life prolongs. Tolstoy utilizes Gerasim as he emphasizes the roles of family and morality to convey Ivan’s realization of falsity in all aspects of his life.
Throughout the novel, Ivan’s change in view towards his children and wife, Praskovya Fedorovna, is evident. While balancing the responsibilities of his life, he develops an obscured relationship towards his family and spends his time playing the game of bridge. In addition, he also turns to constant conversations with his co-workers and dinners
…show more content…
with his colleagues. In Ilych’s relationship, he senses deceitfulness when it comes to his wife bearing children. The flaws become visible as Ivan questions the true meaning of marriage and describes it as “not always conducive to pleasure and amenities of life, but on the contrary often infringed upon both comfort and propriety” (15). In the time during the death of his children, Ivan maintains an apathetic perspective, proving the indifference he owns against his family. Tolstoy exposes Ivan’s detachment and distance by him providing financially, but not emotionally for his own blood. Throughout his entire life, Ivan Ilych has never sensed the genuineness of companionship. Shockingly, he seeks relief in Gerasim, the butlers assistant in which “Ivan Ilych obtained comfort” in the process of coping with his illness and pain. (38) Gerasim’s role in aiding Ivan is glorified because he is the only person to recognize and pity him. Although not a part of the family, Gerasim’s compassion is admired not only because it is his job to obey commands, but also, he caters to Ivans needs and acknowledges that death is slowly creeping towards him, “It’s God’s will. We shall all come to it some day” (10). Performing the task of holding Ivans legs overnight to ease the pain shows Gerasim’s concern, as seen, “Don’t you worry, Ivan Ilych. I’ll get sleep enough later on” (40). His evident humbleness and inhibition allows Ivan to create a sincere relationship. The lack of comfort from Ilych’s family is replaced by Gerasim’s genuity. Ivan faces internal conflict when Praskovya attempts to kiss him and states “hated her from the bottom on his soul” (34). Only in Gerasim’s presence does Ivan acknowledge the falsity of his wife and entire family. His contributions emphasizes the contrast between the role of his senseless family and genuity of a stranger. In the company of Gerasim, Ivan Ilych’s beliefs on morality suddenly change.
Gerasim is described as, “a clean, fresh peasant lad, grown stout on town food and always cheerful and bright. At first the sight of him, in his clean Russian peasant costume, engaged on that disgusting task embarrassed Ivan Ilych” (38). Gerasim shocks Ivan in a way that a peasant is unselfishly willing to help. His generosity gives him a sense of ease, knowing that the presence he brings is paradoxical to everyone else in society, including his family. Throughout the novel, Ivan shows ignorance towards the center attentions of life. The importance of success, wealth and materialistic items are no longer treasured as Ivan comes to realization of the true principles in living. Tolstoy explains Gerasim’s self sacrificing persona, “did it all easily, willingly, simply, and with a good nature that touched Ivan Ilych” (40). Opposite of Ivan, Gerasim lives a healthy life by treasuring life for what it gives rather than constantly attempting to succeed in society. Ilych’s greatest flaw is being stuck in the ideal of riches that hinders the mind for cherishing the relations between family and genuine companions. Surprisingly Ivan’s servant understands the significance of relationships amongst others and accepts his social class, stated “Gerasim alone did not lie; everything showed that he alone understood the facts of the case and did not consider it necessary to disguise them, but simply felt sorry for his emaciated and enfeebled master” (41). Tolstoy utilizes Gerasim to build a new perspective within Ivan Ilych, to enjoy life not through unimportant envies or desires but by appreciating the small yet simple
items. In addition, Gerasim’s affiliation with Ivan provides comfort as he slowly makes his journey towards death. Gerasim’s youth, strength and liveliness does not offend Ivan but his presence soothes and makes his suffering less painful. Tolstoy explains his persona as truthful and wise, “We shall all of us die, so why should I grudge a little trouble?” — expressing the fact that he did not think his work burdensome, because he was doing it for a dying man and hoped someone would do the same for him when his time came” (41). He did not believe that a little more effort was bothersome. The self motivated and undetermined servant recognized that assisting ones need is the humane thing to do. His sense of care inspires Ivan to challenge his pass mindset on ethics and kinship. Lastly, Gerasim allows Ivan to gradually reflect on his past life and now sees it from a different perspective. Ivan begins to compare his life before his illness and present situation. He begins to question death and its bigger meaning, “What if my whole life has been wrong, It occurred to him that what had appeared perfectly impossible before, namely that he had not spent his life as he should have done, might after all be true” (54). Ivans spiritual rebirth opens his eyes to the reality which significantly alters his past views on death. Slowly coming to the realization of the errors in his lifetime, he also learns to accept death and illness is apart of life. After all the endless suffering, he finally reaches the point of welcoming death on his doorstep and realizes that death was not so dark after all, but offers light and comfort from all the pain. The shift in Ivan Ilych’s view on family and morality is vivid. Death and continuous suffering is what causes Ivan to suddenly face realization and moral awakenings. Leo Tolstoy emphasizes the steady approach Gerasim gives Ivan towards life, while portraying the conformity and inevitability of death. The renewal in perspective comforts him and allows him to gradually accept death for its glorious truth. Tolstoy’s use of Gerasim as a sense of relief and wisdom brings understanding to Ivan of his fictitious life.
The short story, “Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka and His Aunt”, explicates the life of a man named Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka. We see him briefly in his young years, followed by his life in the army, and his return to the farm where his strong characterized aunt resides. We can see immediately that this man lives in constant cleanliness and dutiful paranoia; these are some of his desires that he wishes to exhibit to others. We can also see his fears, which reside in the confiscation of his masculinity and independence. This short story has many elements that resemble others in the Nikolai Gogol collection.
It is important that everyone lives their lives according to God’s purpose for them. Many people in today’s society fear death. Those who fear death have little to no knowledge about what God has planned for all of his children. On the other hand, some people fear death because they feel as though they have not fully completed their life’s purpose; or lived accordingly. This work brings about many real-life situations. There will always be people who use others to advance their own lives. Then there will be people who want the best for others. Continuing a study of this work will allow readers to make a connection to his or her current society. The Death of Ivan Ilyich is an easy read, that will automatically catch the reader’s
Our aim is to portrait the character of Dmitry Dmitrich Gurov, in the context of the story, extracting those elements that are characteristic of the period in which Chekhov wrote the story. True love is a reason for everything, even deleting the laws of life. People's mistakes and weaknesses are part of life and, without contradictions, the world would not have evolved.... ... middle of paper ...
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
The story of In "The Death of Ivan Ilych", was written by Leo Tolstoy around who examines the life of a man, Ivan Ilyich, who would seem to have lived an exemplary life with moderate wealth, high station, and family. By story's end, however, Ivan's life will be shown to be devoid of passion -- a life of duties, responsibilities, respect, work, and cold objectivity to everything and everyone around Ivan. It is not until Ivan is on his death bed in his final moments that he realizes that materialism had brought to his life only envy, possessiveness, and non-generosity and that the personal relationships we forge are more important than who we are or what we own.
They are surprised by his death, but immediately think of how his death will affect their own lives, but more importantly, their careers. “The first thought that occurred to each of the gentlemen in the office, learning of Ivan Ilyich’s death, was what effect it would have on their own transfers and promotions.” (pg 32) As a reader, you have to wonder how Ivan must have had to live in order for people close to him to feel no sadness towards the loss or even pity for his wife. In fact, these gentlemen are exactly like Ivan. The purpose of their lives was to gain as much power as possible, with no regard for the harm that was caused by their selfish endeavor.... ...
First, Dostoevsky gives the reader the character, Raskolnokov. He is the main character, whom Fyodor uses to show two sides of people their admirable side and their disgusting side. He loves Raskolnokov, which is why Fyodor uses Raskolnokov’s point of view throughout the whole novel. Personally, Fyodor dislikes some of his qualities but understands that all people are plagued with some bad traits, and that Raskolnokv is trying to make emends for some of his wrong doings, i.e. the murder of the pawnbroker and her sister. He knows that what he did was wrong and is willing to suffer for his crime, and he does throughout the whole book with his constant depression. Dostoesky believes in punishment for your crimes, this is why he shows Raskolnokov suffering through most of the novel, to show his great love for penance. Dostoevsky likes the kind giving nature of people; this is why he portrays the main character as a kind, gentle, and giving, person. Often, Raskolnokov thinks only of others benefits such as when he helped Katerina by giving her all his money for Marmelodov, as well as his caring about what happens to his sister with her marriage to Luzhin. Raskolnokov hates Luzhin’s arrogant and pompous attitude, which reflects Dostoevsky’s animosity of the same qualities in people in the real world.
In Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskalnikov undergoes a period of extreme psychological upheaval. By comparing this death and rebirth of Raskalnikov's psyche to the story of the resurrection of Lazarus, Dostoevsky emphasizes not only the gravity of his crimes, but also the importance of acceptance of guilt.
Ivan has a strong disconnect with his family and begins feel like he is always suffering, while beginning to question if his life has been a lie. An example of this for prompt number three is when we are giving the quote "Ivan Ilych's life had been most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible." Leo Tolstoy implies through the quote that even though he lives an ordinary
Ivan Ilych was a member of the Court of Justice who was "neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as the younger, but was a happy mean between them—an intelligent, polished, lively, and agreeable man” (Tolstoy 102). He lived an unexceptionally ordinary life and strived for averageness. As the story progresses, he begins to contemplate his life choices and the reason for his agonizing illness and inevitable death. “Maybe I did not live as I ought to have done, but how could that be, when I did everything properly?” (Tolstoy
Ivan Ilych is living during the industrial revolution, a time of technological advancement, that mainly advances the upper class, which he is apart of. Ivan’s number one priority in life is to be comfortable and to do the correct thing at all times. Every decision he makes, including who he chooses to marry, is with the intent that it does not damage his “easy, agreeable, and always decorous character of his life,” (Tolstoy 213). Ivan is convinced that the best way to have an easy and agreeable life is to be wealthy, marry a woman from his own class, and live in a house full of modern conveniences and luxury. Ironically, it...
In such poor living conditions, those that the slums of Russia has to offer, the characters in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment1 struggle, living day to day. Raskolnikov, the protagonist, experiences multiple layers of suffering (the thought of his murder causes him greater suffering than does his poverty) as does Sonia and Katerina Ivanovna (1). Through these characters as well as Porfiry Petrovitch, Dostoevsky wants the reader to understand that suffering is the cost of happiness and he uses it to ultimately obliterate Raskolnikov’s theory of an ubermensch which allows him to experience infinite love.
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment begins with Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov living in poverty and isolation in St. Petersburg. The reader soon learns that he was, until somewhat recently, a successful student at the local university. His character at that point was not uncommon. However, the environment of the grim and individualistic city eventually encourages Raskolnikov’s undeveloped detachment and sense of superiority to its current state of desperation. This state is worsening when Raskolnikov visits an old pawnbroker to sell a watch. During the visit, the reader slowly realizes that Raskolnikov plans to murder the woman with his superiority as a justification. After the Raskolnikov commits the murder, the novel deeply explores his psychology, yet it also touches on countless other topics including nihilism, the idea of a “superman,” and the value of human life. In this way, the greatness of Crime and Punishment comes not just from its examination of the main topic of the psychology of isolation and murder, but the variety topics which naturally arise in the discussion.
Tolstoy establishes his satire instantly after the death of Ivan through the cruel and selfish reactions of his friends. The death of a friend would normally conjure feelings of grief and compassion, yet for Ivan’s close associates, thoughts of their futures drowned out any thoughts of death. “So on receiving the news of Ivan Ilych's death the first thought of each of the gentlemen in ...
A. The Epic of Russian Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1950. 309-346. Tolstoy, Leo. "