Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of genetic testing
Arguments for and against genetic testing
Arguments for and against genetic testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of genetic testing
Genetic testing negatively affects millions of lives. For example, negative test results may trigger awful emotions. To tell the truth testing may cost too much for the average person. Additionally, these screenings are not full body reviews. However, considering these genetic test affects, these should be prohibited by agencies offering the tests for everyone’s life. The results of a genetic test may trigger some horrible emotions. Although finding out that a gene mutation is absent may cause them to feel a sense of relief. Regardless though finding out that you have a genetic disorder results in a displeasured feeling. Considering this some may feel the urge “playing it safe” (Timmermans, July 19, 2013), not doing what they want, but worrying about what could happen. For example, depression could be shown and might make someone feel like they need to “opt …show more content…
At this moment it is too expensive for the majority of people. Also, negative results will negatively affect emotions in a negative way causing depression. Thereupon, those tests will not tell you everything, so there may be a second mutation that may not be acknowledged, so the person taking the test would never know about that mutation unless paying for another test. All in all these negative inputs put in perspective the horrible effects of genetic screenings. It proves the point more and more that genetic screenings should be prohibited. In every person's life genetic test should be prohibited. Foremost, emotions may be triggered from negative test results, that would say what disease or disorder that person has. Secondly, the cost of these tests is way to high for the average person. Thirdly, these tests also do not give full insight on all of the genetic disorders as well as diseases. Now, action needs to be taken to shut down these horrible agencies that offer genetic
Studies to make the process quicker and cleaner are under development.... ... middle of paper ... ... Insurance providers and other holders of genetic information should be prohibited from releasing genetic information (Hudson, 1998). Guidelines like these need to be formed into a federal law that people can pass in one way or another so that we can be protected from the various forms of discrimination that is possible with this kind of information.
Teutch, S., & Tuckson, R. Department of Health & Human Services, (2008). U.S. system of oversight of genetic testing: A response to the charge of the secretary of health and human services. Retrieved from website: http://osp.od.nih.gov/sites/default/files/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf
The history of harmful eugenic practices, spurring from the Nazi implementations of discrimination towards biologically inferior people has given eugenics a negative stigma (1,Kitcher, 190). Genetic testing, as Kitcher sees it through a minimalistic perspective, should be restrained to aiding future children with extremely low qualities of life (2,Kitcher, 190). He believes that genetic engineering should only be used to avoid disease and illness serving the role of creating a healthier human race. He promotes laissez-faire eugenics, a “hands off” concept that corresponds to three components of eugenic practice, discrimination, coercion and division of traits. It holds the underlying works of genetic testing, accurate information, open access, and freedom of choice. Laissez-faire eugenics promises to enhance reproductive freedom preventing early child death due to genetic disease (3,Kitcher, 198). However there are dangers in Laissez-faire that Kitcher wants to avoid. The first is the historical tendency of population control, eugenics can go from avoiding suffering, to catering to a set of social values that will cause the practice of genetics to become prejudiced, insensitive and superficial. The second is that prenatal testing will become limited to the upper class, leaving the lower class with fewer options, creating biologically driven social barriers. Furthermore the decay of disability support systems due to prenatal testing can lead to an increased pressure to eliminate those unfit for society (4,Kitcher, 214).
It is important that every genetic test must be validated before can be used, must be ap-proved and certified by the regulatory bodies as FDA.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
Prenatal genetic testing has become one of the largest and most influencial advances in clinical genetics today. "Of the over 4000 genetic traits which have been distinguished to date, more than 300 are identifiable via prenatal genetic testing" (Morris, 1993). Every year, thousands of couples are subjecting their lives to the results of prenatal tests. For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror. The psychological effects following a prenatal test can be devastating, leaving the woman with a decision which will affect the rest of her life.
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
Summary of AMA Opinion 2.131 - Disclosure of Familial Risk in Genetic Testing: * Note – where words or phrases are in quotation marks, this means I took the phrase or passage verbatim. The original document can be found at http://goo.gl/IQkisp This opinion has four elements that discuss a physician’s duty in regard to genetic testing and informing others that could possibly be affected by the findings while recognizing the physician’s ethical duty to protect patient privacy (first element).
Genetic testing, also known as screening, is a rapidly advancing new scientific field that can potentially revolutionize not only the world of medicine, but many aspects of our lives. Genetic screening is the sequencing of human DNA in order to discover genetic differences, anomalies, or mutations that may prove pathological. As genetic screening becomes more advanced and easily accessible, it presents society with difficult questions that must be asked about the boundaries of science and to what degree we are allowed to tamper with the human genome. To better understand the potential impact of genetic screening on our society, we must examine the potential benefits in comparison to the possible negative impact it may cause. With this knowledge in hand, we can examine what the future holds for this field of study and the best possible direction to take.
First of all, I want to start by saying that I 'm not discriminating the disabled community, but this is a very large number that could possibly be diminished with the help of genetic testing. (1) I believe that there is nothing wrong with testing the genes of an unborn child to possibly determine if it could develop a genetic disorder in the future. One of the advantages that genetic testing provides is that the parents could now be informed of the situation, and keep track of their unborn child 's health. I 'm sure those parents are pleased with this technology, and the chances to be able to keep track of their baby. This a baby, and is something very precious, and valuable, and I believe that parents want to keep track of anything that may happen with the unborn child. I 'm sure that a large amount of people would agree would agree that they don 't want to suddenly take the hard hit. When the news is presented in the delivery room. This serves more as an advantage than a disadvantage, due to the fact parents. Pull be more prepared, or possibly have the option to abort it. This is a right that the parents should have regardless of the opposing side arguments towards it. Im a hundred percent sure that the opposing side has very strong arguments towards genetics testing, and one of the main ones is "playing God." The opposing side believed that some things in
Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Testing Genetic testing has rapidly become a major controversial topic in society. Genetic testing presents itself with many positive and negative attributions in the field of medicine, and should be thoroughly discussed before one should take a stance on it or when deciding on whether to have this test. The ethical dilemmas that arise from this test are not primarily focused on what the test entails, but are centered on the actions of the person of autonomy after receiving their results. This topic has two equally supported sides; however, an appropriate and just stance cannot be formed until all the facts and support have been reviewed. Genetic testing is a field of testing intended to gather critical information
Genetics Essay How have genetics affected our lives? From your physical appearance, to the pets you play with, we are gonna take a look at how genetics have changed our lives. First we’re going to take a look at how genes create you. Then i am going to talk about how mutations in genes can affect us.
Genetic testing negatively affects MILLIONS of lives. Those test results may trigger awful emotions. Testing may cost too much for the average person. Also, these screenings are not full body reviews. Considering these genetic testing should be prohibited by agencies offering the tests for everyone’s life.
I believe genetic screening should be illegal. However, people should be able to choose the sex their baby. Many families are using genetic screening to balance the number of boys and girls in their families. Families’ should take genetic testing at their own risks because the tests don't always offer consistent results. The government needs to ensure that genetic tests provide useful medical information and that the test results are reliable.
Genetic testing on children is a very controversial discussion with parents. Some parents do not think that it is appropriate to test children because their kids are not the ones making the decisions for them the parent is. Well others like me feel that genetic testing should be done for our children. I think is should be done because if there is cancer or some other kind of hereditary disease or disorder on either side of the family you can try to prevent it from happening before it become severe or even happens. A couple of examples are, one of my friends grandchild went to the hospital and was not feeling very well turns out that he had cancer and it was out of the blue because no one had cancer of that type. Maybe if they had tested