Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of mass communication in society
Impact of mass communication in society
A eassy about conformity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of mass communication in society
William Shakespeare once said, “We know what we are, but not what we may be.” This quote is extremely relevant and relatable to a plethora of literature seen from today and the past, including my selected texts. I have investigated four texts that signify and exploit the search for identity collectively. These being, the film ‘Into the Wild’ by Sean Penn, novels ‘1984’ by George Orwell and ‘Fahrenheit 451’ by Ray Bradbury, and the memoir ‘Walden’ by Henry David Thoreau. These texts all display a search for identity due to the conformities of society. Not only connected through this, sub connections were also interpreted between them. The conforms of society initiating the protagonists void from civilisation in search of identity is apparent …show more content…
This connection is illustrated through the film, ‘Into the Wild’ by Sean Penn. Chris McCandless aspires to live by transcendentalist ideals, to lead an independent, adventurous life. However, the explicit materialism that exists within middle class suburban America deprives him of this opportunity. Early on in the film McCandless is quick to reveal his transcendentalist morals of simplicity and non conformity as he has a conflicting conversation with his family. “I don't want a new car”, “I don't want anything. All these things things, things, things.” This confirms Chris’ non materialistic trait, and illustrates his struggle to escape the restraints of societies expectations. Followed by, “Why, are you worried what the neighbours might think?” further suggests he is in disagreement with the conformities of society, and evidently isn't worried about other characters opinions of him. His identity and aspired characteristics contradict what his parents and wider community assume, which initiates his immense feeling of dislocation. This sparks Chris’ desire for an independant, pure life of adventure. Incapable of dealing with human connection the protagonist sacrifices a prestigious and profitable career, and abandons all of his possessions, friends, and family as he ventures into the abyss of the Alaskan Wilderness, all in …show more content…
Protagonist, Winston Smith, lives within a futuristic, corrupt and controlling society which has created a collective mindset of ignorance, much alike Montag from Fahrenheit 451. Both novels provide an insightful estimate of the possible future societies, and collectively display corruption, control and manipulation of people and information. Winston, and the rest of the community are watched voyeuristically by ‘The Party’, and their omniscient leader known as Big Brother. “They never become aware that they are oppressed,” as Television screens are located in each room advertising a constant stream of propaganda designed to manipulate the people into thinking The Party is a positive influence on society. In connection with Fahrenheit 451, their dystopian society is also surrounded by ‘parlour walls’ in each of their rooms. ‘Parlour walls’ are tv screens utilised to manipulate the people, distract them from their miserable lives and control the information available to citizens. In addition to manipulation, 1984s screens also monitor the communities behavior which suggests the lack of trust between society and the government, causing a corrupt relationship. Citizens are continuously watched and reminded, “Big Brother is watching you”, to reiterate that the authorities are scrutinizing
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
“I now walk into the wild” (3). It was April 1992 a young man from a rather wealthy family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness. His name was Christopher McCandless. He gave all of his savings to a charity, abandoned his car in the desert, left all his possessions, burned his money and wallet, and invented an alter ego all to shun society. Four months after his adventure, his decomposing body was found in bus 142 by a moose hunter. Into the Wild is a riveting novel about one man’s journey to find himself and live as an individual. Although, Chris McCandless may come as an ill-prepared idiot, his reasons for leaving society are rational. He wanted to leave the conformist society and blossom into his own person, he wanted to create his own story not have his story written for him, and he wanted to be happy not the world’s form of happiness.
The book Into The Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, tells the story of Chris McCandless a young man who abandoned his life in search of something more meaningful than a materialistic society. In 1992 Chris gave his $ 25,000 savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, and burned all of his money to chase his dream. Chris’s legacy was to live in simplicity, to find his purpose, and to chase his dreams. Chris McCandless’s decision to uproot his life and hitchhike to Alaska has encouraged other young adults to chase their dreams. Neal Karlinksy illustrates the love Chris had for nature in the passage, “He was intoxicated by the nature and the idea of a great Alasican adventure-to survive in the bush totally alone.”
Every part of life is regimented and controlled, but the only crime is ‘thought crime’: independent thinking and individualism. Big Brother is the figurehead of the Inner Party, and throughout the book, it is heavily implied that he may not really exist. The people are divided into Inner Party members, who control the government, Outer Party members, who make up the middle class, and Proletarians, or Proles, who make up the uneducated lower class. He utilizes strong but vague descriptions of the world around Winston to hint at the state of the world without directly saying it. He describes a bright cold day, which seems to perfectly depict the world's bleak state in a sort of indirect way (Orwell, 1948).
Chris McCandless, the young man who died during his travel to Alaska, seemed to be more of a foolish adventurer than an inspiring hero. His desire to journey started in April 1992, where he stopped all contact with his family, donated to save starving children, and deserted his beloved Datsun. After Jon Krakauer, an American writer, wrote about him in Outside magazine, Krakauer continued researching him, and thereby published the book, Into the Wild, in 1996. As one start learning of Chris, they’ll know he wasn’t at all materialistic, that he loathed his parents, yearned for freedom, and was resistant towards the government. Chris should have pursued to withdrew from the wild because he left his family heartbroken, had a prideful rejection for essentials, and wasn’t truly getting freedom from the wild.
The novel “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer goes into great detail to describe the main character, Chris McCandless, who died traveling alone into the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless, whom in the novel renamed himself Alex, left his home and family to travel to Alaska in 1992. In Alaska McCandless planned to live an isolated life in the desolate wilderness, but unfortunately he did not survive. This non-fiction novel portrays his life leading up to his departure and it captures the true essence of what it means to be “in the wild”.
Monsters under the bed, drowning, and property damage are topics many people have nightmares about; nightmares about a dystopian future, on the other hand, are less common. Despite this, Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and George Orwell’s 1984 display a nightmarish vision about a dystopian society in the near future. Fahrenheit 451 tells of Guy Montag’s experience in a society where books have become illegal and the population has become addicted to television. Meanwhile, 1984 deals with Winston Smith’s affairs in Oceania, a state controlled by the totalitarian regime known as the Party. This regime is supposedly headed by a man named Big Brother. By examining the dehumanized settings, as well as the themes of individuality and manipulation, it becomes clear that novels successfully warn of a nightmarish future.
Jon Krakauer, the author of the novel, Into the Wild, portrays Chris McCandless, a young man who travels into nature unprepared and foolishly to find his true identity and dignity. Chris McCandless wants to evade and fled the claustrophobic confines of his family. He has a grudge against his family, except his sister, which caused him the desire of vanish. Nature, the wild, is a place where he believes he can find his true self and his proper status in the society. Sean Penn, the director of “Into the Wild”, shows his remarkable journey of Chris McCandless, allowing the audience to experience his unwillingness to give up in searching his dignity. Through the use of Chris McCandless’s characterizations in both Krakauer and Penn’s works, they
A young man, in his twenties, sets off into the wild completely disregarding his family and his past life and takes on a whole new personality. This perfectly explains Chris McCandless and the journey he initially set out on. He was a young man seeking self-acceptance and peace, and he looked for it in all of the different places that he visited. Visiting these places made Chris more and more hungry for a challenge. He planned on leaving the comfort of a home and setting out into the Alaskan wilderness, where he would eventually die.
In Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Christopher McCandless gives up all his material possessions to seek fulfillment in the Alaskan Wilderness. In doing this, Chris is able to escape from his parents and live the life of many transcendentalists that he’s read about. As John Muir once said, “The mountains are calling and I must go.” Like John Muir, Chris has developed such a profound love for nature that he is called into the wild by it. Ultimately, Chris’s life decisions are a fascinating paradox that make him both a transcendentalist hero and a fool.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
Sometimes a character may be pushed over the edge by our materialistic society to discover his/her true roots, which can only be found by going back to nature where monetary status was not important. Chris McCandless leaves all his possessions and begins a trek across the Western United States, which eventually brings him to the place of his demise-Alaska. Jon Krakauer makes you feel like you are with Chris on his journey and uses exerts from various authors such as Thoreau, London, and Tolstoy, as well as flashbacks and narrative pace and even is able to parallel the adventures of Chris to his own life as a young man in his novel Into the Wild. Krakauer educates himself of McCandless’ story by talking to the people that knew Chris the best. These people were not only his family but the people he met on the roads of his travels- they are the ones who became his road family.
Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell, is a superb novel with outstanding themes. One of the most prominent themes found in this novel is psychological manipulation. Citizens in this society are subject to ever present signs declaring “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU” (Orwell 1). Along with psychological manipulation, physical control takes place. The Party not only controls what people in Oceania think, but what they do as well. Technology is another important theme. Without the constant telescreens, microphones, and computers, the Party would be all but powerless. Big Brother is the main figure of the Party. The main symbol that drives these themes is the telescreens. It is representative of the party always watching and controlling everyone at all times.
In 1984, George Orwell presents an overly controlled society that is run by Big Brother. The protagonist, Winston, attempts to “stay human” in the face of a dehumanizing, totalitarian regime. Big Brother possesses so much control over these people that even the most natural thoughts such as love and sex are considered taboo and are punishable. Big Brother has taken this society and turned each individual against one another. Parents distrust their own offspring, husband and wife turn on one another, and some people turn on their own selves entirely. The people of Oceania become brainwashed by Big Brother. Punishment for any uprising rebellions is punishable harshly.