Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The interpretation of Renaissance humanism
The interpretation of Renaissance humanism
The relationship between renaissance and humanism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The interpretation of Renaissance humanism
2. Castiglione helped developed Italian courtly society with The Book of Courtier. In this book, he talks about certain ideals that aristocrats should have. This book soon became very popular and is a fundamental guidebook for European aristocrats. Castiglione described his ideal courtier with three basic attributes. First, they should have fundamental personality like impeccable character, grace talents, and noble birth. Second, they should do bodily and military exercises and fill his life with arts (musical instrument, drawing, and painting). Finally, nobles have to make good impressions but also be modest. They should show grace in their accomplishments.
4. Renaissance Humanism was an intellectual movement that involved the study of classical literary works of Greeks and Romans.
…show more content…
Followers of renaissance humanism were called humanists. The literal works consist of grammar, rhetoric, poetry, moral, philosophy, and history. They were al works of past Greeks and Romans. Humanism had a huge affect on education because they believed education created change. Humanist schools started to appear and the focus of the school was on liberal arts, which were ideas of Cicero and Quintilian. Liberal arts were similar to literary works and taught the students in history, moral, philosophy, eloquence, letters, poetry, mathematics, astronomy, and music. The goal was to create citizens who followed the oath of virtue and wisdom. 6. The Iberian Peninsula was separated into different kingdoms before the unification of Spain. Aragon and Castile were the strongest kingdoms, west was the independent monarchy of Portugal, north was kingdom of Navarre, south was the Muslim kingdom of Granada. Spain was united when Isabella of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragon married. Since Castile and Aragon were the strongest kingdoms at the time, the marriage combined their kingdoms, which was a major step towards the unification of Spain. If the marriage did not happen, Spain might have never happened or the smaller independent kingdoms could have combined to create a smaller Spain. 8. The major figures of the Renaissance papacy are Julius II, Sixtus IV, and Alexander VI. Julius II is known for using bloodshed and was very involved in war and politics. He was called the “warrior pope”. Pope Sixtus IV made five of his nephews as cardinals and gave the many church offices. This lead to the increase of personal finance. Alexander VI was known for his debauchery and scandalized the church. He encouraged his son, Cesare, to make a state for himself in central Italy. If I was a scholar at that time, I would have written a book on the corruption of the church and start a movement to remove the popes from the church. Primary Sources 2. The characteristics and advantages Renaissance families looked for were the reputation of their parents, the amount of the dowry, how their personality is like, beauty, and her hobbies. It is very similar to what people look for when they are looking to be in a relationship with someone. But, Renaissance families also focused mostly on the reputation of the family and how willing they are to allow the daughter to marry someone. The marriage would most likely have no emotional connection because they did not have a choice and they don’t get to build up a connection with each other before going to marriage. 4.
Machiavelli’s advice to a prince who wanted to hold power is that they have to instill fear into the people. He believes fear is important because it restrains men, as they fear being punished. Love will never help you hold power because it attaches people to promises. Machiavelli believes that since humans are wicked, they will break these promises whenever their interests is at stake. Men will devote everything to you if you serve their interests, but as soon as you need help, they turn on you. Therefore, creating fear in them is the perfect strategy. I feel like Machiavelli is being sarcastic and did this to get attention. He knew his way of thinking was different and would get the attention of the people.
6. In the Oration on the Dignity of Man by, Mirandola states that God create man as a creature with indeterminate nature and was placed in the middle of the world. The nature of everything else in the world besides humans is limited by the boundaries of laws created by Us. Only men are constrained by no limits. Humans have unlimited potential and you get to chose how to live your life. Humans are neither heaven nor earth, and we have the power to be reborn into a higher
form. 8. Vasari considered Leonardo an artistic genius because he believes he is endowed by heaven with beauty, grace, and talent. Everything he does is inspiring and comes from God. Vasari says Da Vinci has infinite grace and was a genius. Everything he did seemed to be with ease. He possessed great strength and dexterity. Vasari believes this talented gift that Leonardo Da Vinci has is from the grace of God.
Niccolo Machiavelli believes in a strong government. The leader should be strong and feared. I believe he gets this idea from the fear of God; no one is supposed to question God because he is so feared, and in the same sense, no one should question a strong leader. Machiavelli realizes that the leader should be feared, but not hated. A hated leader will probably be killed in a rebellion. One also can not be loved. Any compassion towards your citizens will make them believe you are weak, and they will rebel. He thinks a very strong military is necessary at all times, and that powerful arms should be available and in hand. This idea is similar to that of right wing America and our friends, the National Rifle Association, who believe assault rifles are America’s pastime. The nation should always be prepared for war, and should always be searching for new lands to conquer. T...
According to text 2 one of Machiavelli's quotes came up about being feared more than loved and the response to that was " A leader must build his relationship with the people upon mutual respect, more than any other thing. It is not fear or
and when it (danger) comes nearer to you they turn away? (649). Machiavelli reinforces the Prince?s need to be feared by stating: ?? men are less hesitant about harming someone who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared?? (649).
According to Nicholas Mann, "Humanism is that concern with the legacy of antiquity, and in particular but not exclusively with its literary legacy... it involves above all the rediscovery and study of Greek and Roman texts, the restoration and interpretation of them, and the assimilation of the ideas and values they contain." The Studia Humanitatis (Studies of Humanity) is a Latin term used by Roman writers describing a cycle of studies in the humanities including, grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, and moral philosophy. Francesco Petrarch, an Italian scholar and poet of the fifteenth century, is considered by many to be the father of humanism. Petrarch 's influential texts had circulated widely throughout Florence and made their way into the government. Thus, humanist learning began to shape political ideologies in Florence. By inspiring humanist philosophy, Petrarch helped pave the way for the start of the Renaissance.
Baldesar Castiglione outlines the ideal man in The Book of the Courtier. The text suggests that the cultured person is required to acquire grace and competence through situations, knowledge, love, and skills. These requirements are presented to the reader through the debates of several parties. One declares, "What the courtier especially requires in order to speak and write well, therefore, is knowledge, because the man who lacks knowledge and has nothing in his mind worth hearing has nothing worth writing and speaking." (The Courtier, 76) This supports the emphasis that is placed on intellectual progress alone. Aside from knowledge, Castiglione also stresses the importance of character as he recommends one to be "…modest and reserved, observing always, and especially in public, the reverence and respect which should mark...
Although Machiavelli gives numerous points on what it takes to excel as a prince, he also shows some raw examples of how he feels a prince should act in order to achieve maximum supremacy. First, when he says, "ought to hold of little account a reputation for being mean, for it is one of those vices which will enable him to govern" proves Machiavelli feels mighty adamant about his view that being mean will help a prince achieve success (332). It is absurd to imagine the meanest prince as the most successful. Also, when Machiavelli states, "our experience has been that those princes who have done great things have held good faith of little account, and have known how to circumvent the intellect of men by craft" revealing his attitude to manipulate people into fearing and respecting the prince (335). Also, Machiavelli shows that for a prince to be successful, he must not think about good faith.
During the renaissance, there was a renewed interest in the arts, and the traditional views of society came into question. People began to explore the power of the human mind. A term often used to describe the increasing interest in the powers of the human mind is humanism. Generally, humanism stresses the individual's creative, reasoning, and aesthetic powers. However, during the Renaissance, individual ideas about humanism differed.
Some may take this to mean a completely different thing, such as thinking that Machiavelli believes that the end justifies the means, that a leader should lie to the people, and that a ruler has to rule with force. In actuality, Machiavelli means no such thing. He says that there are times when the common good outweighs the means, and the morality of a ruler’s actions. He also says that you cannot be loved by everyone, so try to be loved and feared at the same time, but of the two, choose to be feared.
Machiavelli in his famous book “The Prince” describes the necessary characteristics for a strong and successful leader. He believes that one of the most important characteristics is to rule in favor of his government and to hold power in his hands. Power is an essential aspect of Machiavelli’s theory, and a leader should do whatever it takes to keep it for the safety of his country because “the ends justifies the means.” To attain and preserve the power, a leader should rather be feared than loved by his people, but it is vital not to be hated. As he states, “anyone compelled to choose will find far greater security in being feared than in being loved.” If a leader is feared, the people are less likely to revolt, and in the end, only a threat of punishment can guarantee obedienc...
“Knowledge is power. Power to do evil...or power to do good. Power itself is not evil. So knowledge itself is not evil” (Veronica Roth). Machiavelli is providing all of his knowledge that is useful for aspiring or current rulers. The information is also helpful to understand how Machiavelli was truly thinking during his time in power. He has experienced many things that have persuaded him to think the way he does. He has a specific mindset when it comes to certain ideals. Machiavelli presents some views that are remarkably different from other individuals when considering human nature including the desires and justice, the decency of the people, and virtues of a prince.
the state. When the ruler is in danger they turn against him. Machiavelli reinforces the prince's need to be feared by stating: “
The time of the Renaissance is one filled with growth of intellect, beauty of nature, the dignity of mankind, and the rising of artists. It is characterized from the move of scholasticism, a devotion specifically for the theological and philosophical teachings of the Church to humanism, a devotion to the humanities of rhetoric, arithmetic, and other subjects. One example of this movement can be seen in Machiavelli’s The Prince in which describes Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideal ruler and how to obtain stability, which was lacking as during the time of his writing this, there was a power shift from the Mediterranean to Northern Europe. How Machiavelli describes his ideal prince and his leadership is one that in which he is
According to Niccolo Machiavelli “if you have to make a choice, to be feared is much safer than to be loved” (225). Machiavelli was the first philosopher of the Renaissance, and wrote The Prince which argued that leaders must do anything necessary to hold on to power. The main reason it is better to be feared is because men are evil, rotten and will only do things that benefit themselves. Men only think of themselves and it is for this reason fear can control them and keep them loyal to a leader. Since loyalty through love can be easily broken because it involves no punishment, loyalty through fear is the better choice because it involves the “dread of punishment, from which [the subjects] can never escape” (Machiavelli 226). Machiavelli goes on to say that the great leader Hannibal took control of his immense army, because the soldiers saw Hannibal as a fearsome and cruel person, thus, making them loyal to him. Machiavelli in addition gives an example of a leader who chose not to be feared and cruel: “Scipio, an outstanding man not only among those of his own time, but in all recorded history; yet his armies revolted in Spain, for no other reason than his excessive leniency in allowing his soldiers more freedom than military discipline permits”(226). Failure to be cruel and fearsome will cause a leader to lose control of his soldiers, and it will cause the leader’s soldiers to revolt. Hannibal was the better leader; even though he was cruel, he was more merciful in reality than Scipio because he did not allow any disorders to happen.
Machiavelli's views have been misinterpreted since his book was first written, people take him in the wrong way, and are offended by what he says. Careless readers take him in a completely wrong way, such as they think that he believes that the end justifies the means, that a leader should lie to the people, and that a ruler has to rule with force. In actuality, Machiavelli means no such thing, he says that there are times when the common good outweighs the means, and the morality of a rulers actions. He also says that you cannot be loved by everyone, so try to be loved and feared at the same time, but of the two, choose to be feared. The Prince is considered to be one of the most important nonfiction literature written in the history of mankind.
While “every sensible prince wishes to be considered, merciful and not cruel”(pg. 35), one should learn to be merciful in moderation. Not doing so can lead to unintended effects where if you are too “good” it can lead to being taken advantage of, or to “uprisings and civil war” because then you will be looked at as a pushover by your citizens and other neighboring countries. Therefore if you were to be cruel, people will fear you enough to, in theory, not go against you and stay united. But I think this concept seems more like a dictatorship, which thrives on citizens fear, and I don’t think it should be instilled in our government considering that most dictatorships end poorly and lead to more uprisings and civil war than with a merciful leader. And this is why the question in this section on whether it is better to be feared or loved also comes up. Machiavelli believes that a prince should find a balance of being both feared and loved and in general just try to escape hatred. If you are loved by your people, rarely will they betray you, but it is also good to be feared by other nations so that you are not looked upon as a target. So in this section of the prince I think the concept of ruling only on fear should not be used, however I do think that a leader should try balance being loved and