How Does CSI Affect Lack Of Forensic Evidence?

CSI is an enthralling hit TV series, which reels viewers into the sinister minds of the criminals and the warped cases that the investigators solve within the hour. It draws in people from the younger crowd as well as older viewers. The shows, set in different cities, allow you to witness investigators sweep a crime scene, collect the evidence, run tests in the lab, and crack the case. Public expectations may influence jury trials if expecting evidence like on CSI. Most of the impact seems to be on prosecution and forensic scientists, easy for defense lawyers to attack lack of forensic evidence

The CSI effect is a belief that prosecutors and law enforcement have that hit Tv show CSI has influence jurors to rely on what they see on Tv

What crime scene investigators and forensic scientists do depiction of technologies that do not exist, unrealistic expectations for types of evidence that can be collected or what can be determined from evidence, way faster than reality and scientific outcomes that do not prove anything. According to the article “CSI effect has juries wanting more evidence” Jurors who watch CSI on daily basis has raise the expectations of the prosecutor on physical evidence in a trial. Also in the article it states that jurors are relying too heavily on the scientific evidence that they are unwilling to accept that those findings can be compromised by technical errors. Therefore it has effect numerous of court cases where jurors have found criminals not guilty due to the lack of physical evidence. The CSI effect has also had a positive effect on people. Forensic science has become a popular undergraduate major. The CSI effect will effect jurors in the future by increasing their knowledge of forensic science. Juror would have a better understanding that yes physical evidence is very important in case, but not every case is the