How Did The Ottoman Empire Lead To The Fall Of The Ottoman Empire

608 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Rise and Fall of Ottoman Turkey

The political plus military factors of fall, it is often hard to isolate one exact element as the main reason of decline. But as the Ottoman Empire’s system was so reliant on the sultan for stimulating and guide it as well as keep it as one and since collapse was, indeed, accompanied with serious elements of corruption within the organization of the sultanate and the persons holding the sultanate office, one can suppose that this was, certainly, the key to fall. Even during the glorious days of the rule of Suleyman there was decline. Maybe it was a lot to expect that the Ottoman Empire or any empire could maintain a constant series of able sultans such as the sultans who had made the empire. Conversely, because so much reliant on the personality of the sultan, a single weak sultan was enough for opening the doors to a sequence of nonentities and incompetents. The majority members of the feudal Sipahis and the Kapikulu corps married, left the garrisons, became estate owners, artisans, or merchants, abandoned military training jointly, and kept their groups memberships just for the pri...

Show More
Related

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.

    Read More

  • Reasons For The Fall Of The Roman Empire Dbq

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Roman empire was a very large and successful empire, although like many things it had to come to an end. The three primary reasons that had most contributed to Rome's fall is foreign invasions, military weakness , and weak leadership.

    Read More

  • Ottoman vs. Qing

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hooker, Richard. "The Ottomans: The 17th and 18th Centuries." Washington State University - Pullman, Washington. 1996. Web. 06 Apr. 2011. .

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Spanish And Ottoman Empires

    903 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Ottomans and Spanish built flourishing empires based on different philosophies from 1450 to 1800. The Ottoman and Spanish were two powerful empires during that time. During the building of the two empires, the Spanish and the Ottoman both developed similarities in their social, political, and economic structures. The Ottoman took control of Europe, while the Spanish saw it as easy to monitor new lands. The different tactics employed made the both empires flourish. For instance, the Spanish were not tolerant of religion. They conquered other areas with the aim of converting Christians to Islam, if they refused, they would be killed. On the other hand, the Ottoman leaders incorporated leaders of diverse culture

    Read More

  • Tang And Byzantine Empires: A Comparative Analysis

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    We had a choice of a couple of ancient nation states in which to compare but I choose the Tang and Byzantines because I thought their history contained the most interesting elements. I was still unaware though in the main purpose of the essay, the ways in which these empires held political control. Discovering these means was the main task for me during this project. Surprisingly I found that this subject was not only was related to my love of history but also modern politics and the role of government. I found that these two

    Read More

  • Ottoman And Russian Empires Similarities

    485 Words  | 1 Pages

    There were many important empires on the Eurasia continent; The Qing Dynasty, The Ming Dynasty, The Tokugawa Shogunate, The Mughal Empire, The Safavid Empire, The Russian Empire and The Ottoman Empire They all had their similarities and their differences and their influence on the modern day are strong. Two of the of the countries that shared many similarities but also had their differences where the Russian empire and the Ottoman empire.

    Read More

  • The Young Turks Fight Against the Decline of the Ottoman Empire

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    The men at the forefront of the Young Turk’s rebellion were Mehmed Talaat, Ismail Enver and Ahmed Djemal. Eventually, they came to have more of a dictatorial sort of rule on their people, with their own visions of what they wanted for the Turkic people. They all wanted to unite their people and expand ...

    Read More

  • The Political Decay of the Roman Republic

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Political Decay of the Roman Republic The fall of the Western Roman Empire was the first example in history on the collapse of a constitutional system which was caused by the internal decay in political, military, economics, and sociological issues. The government was becoming corrupt with bribery. Commanders of the Roman army turned their own army inward towards their own Constitutional systems, fueled by their own ruthless ambition. This paper will talk about how the violence and internal turmoil in 133 B.C.-27 B.C. was what provoked the economic stagnation in the city of Rome and to the end of the Republic and the many corrupt politicians and generals who only thought of nothing more than personal gains and glory. The senate lost control of the Roman military and the reason they rose against the senate was because the senate were no longer able to help manage the social problems or the military and administrative problems of the empire.

    Read More

  • The Differences and Similarities of the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe

    2130 Words  | 5 Pages

    While taking the class of Early Modern European History there was two states that really stuck out and peaked my interest the most. They were the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe. If you compare and contrast both the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe during the 16th Century through the 18th Century, you will see that there are a number of similarities as well as differences when you look at the expansion of the states. You will also see many of these contrasts as well when you look in terms of each states military and commerce. Although the Ottoman Empire existed before the 16th century and continued to exist past the 18th century and in great decline until the early 20th century, when looking at the state as a whole the time period of 1500’s through the 1700’s is a period of growth and strength. It is perhaps even known as a golden era for the state, when taking in to comparison the Early Modern Europeans where the same time period marks a change in how society thought and how people were treated.

    Read More

  • The Rise Of Ancient Greece And Persia Empires

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    Greece and Persia are two of the four great empires that rose to the top rapidly. Both empires have well organized political systems that greatly influenced the way later governments were structured in the United States and Europe. Greece and Persia empire’s structures weighed greatly on their development and growth, but the diverse topographies of Greece and Persia also made a vast impact. These features affected the cultures and even how the political government changed overtime.

    Read More

  • The Hierarchical Structure Of Empires By Motyl

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    The author, Motyl writes about empires and the concepts of empires using different theorist ideas. He compares concepts, which are central to this book, the theories and theorists that the author uses are both organizational and substantive in explaining empires, decay, collapse and revival. The writer explains about empires, the hierarchical structure of the political system in these empires. The author uses rimless wheels and hub like structures and parabolas to explain about elites and state dominate peripheral elites in empirical society. The author examines the collapse of five different empires; there are the Ottoman, Soviet Union, Habsburg, Wilhelmine and Habsburg. The author explains the end of empires as a certain political structure

    Read More

  • Modernization And Development In Afghanistan

    1761 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will examine the process of modernization and development in Afghanistan during the era of Amanullah Khan (1919-1929) and Turkey during the era of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1918-1938). Each state had used multiple theories of modernization and different approaches in order to modernize the state and be modernized. Modernization and development happened in both countries in chorus; while Afghanistan failed to become modernize under Amanullah khan but Turkey under Ataturk succeded to become modernize and develop. I will use the theories of Ibn-Khaldon, Weber, Smelser and Rostow, Charles Tilley’s war making and state making, to take a comparative analysis of modernization in both states and the aspects which led to modernization of turkey and fall of Amanullah Khan's governmnt.

    Read More

  • Modernization of the Ottoman Empire: Tanzimat Reforms

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Tanzimat Ottoman Reforms Name Institution. Introduction Tanzimat was the period of transformation where reforms were instituted to modernize the Ottoman Empire in the middle seventeen century. Under the rule of Sultan Abd al-Majid, the empire was threatened by advances made by the western powers in gaining control of the regions that were once under the empire. Additionally, the empire was losing popularity where numerous regions were struggling to break away from the empire.

    Read More

  • Decline Of The Ottoman Empire Essay

    464 Words  | 1 Pages

    Explain the reason for the fall of the Ottoman During most of the seventeenth century the Ottoman Empire was territorially stable but during the last years of the century, beginning with the Ottoman rejection in the second siege of Vienna (1683), the Empire suffered a series of military defeats, first at the hands of Austria and later Russia in the Turkish-Russian Wars. With the Treaty of Jassy (1792), the Ottomans, who since 1774 had lost the Crimean Khanate for Russia, they lost their territories north of the Danube and all territories east of the Dniester also Russian hands. In other European territories and in Asia and Africa, there were many more or less autonomous on which the central government had little control rulers.

    Read More

  • The Fall of Malacca Kingdom

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    By understanding the factors that contribute to fall of the Malacca, the country itself have responsibilities to protect the empire. The main factor in the fall of Malacca is that the weaknesses in the administration when the sultan and ministers are not capable enough to govern a country. As the Malacca achieved the height of glory, the sultanate is in a comfort zone and did not prepare for the worst scenario. The lesson learnt from the fall of Malacca is that success that achieved should be managed properly to avoid too comfortable zone, which then resulting in the occurrence of undesirable consequences.

    Read More

More about How Did The Ottoman Empire Lead To The Fall Of The Ottoman Empire

Open Document