Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of sparta downfall
A essay about sparta
Rise and fall of sparta
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sparta was a very strong, self-reliant nation. They had the strongest army, a modern government, yet a simple lifestyle. They barely resembled any other nation of that time, for they did not care for wealth, but rather for their fellow man.
At around 800 BC, a young man named Lycurgus was in line for the throne of Sparta, but due to some complications, he did not become king. However, the Spartan people loved him and wanted him to help their nation. As the king was his nephew, he became in some way the king’s advisor, yet he had a great deal more impact and control over the Spartans than the king himself. He wanted his nation to be a strong nation, and he wanted them to rely on themselves rather than another country. Bit by bit, he shaped Sparta into a nation like no other of
…show more content…
that time.
He made the rich people share with the poor, and after a short while, everyone became roughly equal in wealth. His next step was to take away gold and silver from the people and replace it with iron money, which was jagged and hard. People of other nations found this currency almost worthless, and it wasn’t long before trade ceased in Sparta. At first the people were unhappy, but Lycurgus soon taught them that worldly possessions were of no matter. Lycurgus soon brought changes to the government. He established a senate and added another king. The senate was to keep the government stable. This not only kept a good balance of strong leadership but also gave the citizens what they wanted, since the senate was made up of the elderly wise Spartan folk, whom the people always trusted. In this way, there would be no democracy, nor dictatorship. Lycurgus made sure the Spartan people interacted frequently with each
other and did not keep to themselves, and so he commanded that all people eat at the common mess halls, and that they eat the same food. In this way, the Spartans learned to be content with what they had, and no one was jealous over his neighbour. The Spartan youth gathered regularly to watch, listen and learn from the older warriors. By the time they were old enough to go into battle, the young Spartan men were stronger than any other man on the battlefield, yet, they kept to their orders, were not arrogant, nor did they take unnecessary risks. They protected their own warriors, and they knew how to react to any situation they were in. These young men seemed to have a lifetime of experience in battle, because they had spent so much time with the older warriors. Lycurgus knew that if the Spartan people were dependent on each other, and in turn could count on his fellow man, there would be no stronger nation than them. Thus, marriage was highly favoured and promoted by the government, and bachelors were given no respect. However, for the first year or so after being married, the husband would still live in the barracks with the other soldiers, and his wife would live at home with her parents. By doing this, the soldier learned that his duty came before his personal feelings. Children were considered the property of the government, and not all children were brought up by their own parents. The children were strictly disciplined from a very young age. When they were quite young still, they learned a little bit of reading and writing, just enough to perform their daily duties. When they were about the age of eight, they began their physical training so that they could become a soldier when they had grown up. Above all else, the students were taught to endure pain, to persevere in battle, and most importantly, were taught perfect obedience. With the changes Lycurgus made to Spartan society, Sparta became one of the strongest nations of that time, without having to rely on anyone but themselves. Through Lycurgus, they found out that worldly possessions were not important, but that their fellow man, their families, and their friends were what mattered most.
Despite common belief, Sparta was not simply a horde of strong, vicious and primitive warriors living on the Laconian plain, on the right bank of the Eurotas River. Though this was the general impression there was much more to the civilization then just the agoge training system and soldiers. Helots and Perioikoi were two o f the most vital aspects of the Spartan empire upon which agriculture and the economy relied.
Sparta was known for being strong, but was it really? In case you don’t know, Sparta was a Greek city-state. Sparta only focused on war. Spartans were only taught the basics of other topics. Spartans were trained for 13 years just to fight. Reading and writing were only taught in Sparta for practical reasons. The strengths didn’t outweigh the weaknesses. There were more weaknesses to Sparta than there were strengths. The strengths of Sparta didn’t outweigh the weaknesses for three reasons. The first reason is that the babies were killed just if they looked weak. The second reason is that the Spartans barely new anything about other topics (math, reading, writing, etc). The third and final reason is that the helots outnumbered the Spartans 50 to 1.
In the ancient Greek writing "Lycurgus", the Spartan king introduces various political, social, and economic reforms that were simple enough to guide the ancient Greeks, but still complex enough to govern entire nations. The intuition and intelligence of Lycurgus, and his ability to communicate with his people at a personal level earned him unquestioned loyalty and fervent love from his subjects. His temperance and wisdom were often tested, but the great king never folded in the heat of battle. All of the aforementioned qualities became evident when Lycurgus introduced his economic reforms.
The one thing we know for certain about Spartan society is that we don’t know much about it. Very few documents and artifacts about the Spartans have been discovered, but the ones that have tell us everything we know. Two of these works are Plutarch’s On Sparta and Xenophon’s Spartan Society. One of the main things these two accounts focused on was the Lycurgan reforms. Through their stories and writings Plutarch and Xenophon had both some similarities and differences when talking about the political, economic, militaristic, and social reforms. One of the main differences when comparing these two writings is how Plutarch gives a historical account of Spartan society and tries to keep objectivity
Hellenic culture in the Spartan community was that of a humble elite. True Spartan culture is well captured in Xenophon’s work, Spartan Society, as he wrote of how this elitist society viewed not only themselves, but the other countries around them. This work shines light into the three-part worldview of the ancient, Hellenic Spartans of: humanism, idealism, and rationalism. As Xenophon begins to write over the whole of the Spartan society it can be seen how the Spartans lived out the worldview of this Hellenistic society. This living out of the worldview recorded in Xenophon’s, Spartan Society, illustrates their worldview through the noting of Lycurgus’ accomplishments and the contrast of the “other.”
Firstly, he divided the land into nine thousand equal shares that were divided amongst the state and, the rest was divided up between the Spartiates. The Helots would be assigned to work on a given parcel for agricultural production. The second instrumental economic reform initiated by Lycurgus was the transformation of Spartan currency from gold/silver to iron of little worth. What this did was create an abundance of currency in Sparta, rather than relying on gold and silver, it created a system where accumulating massive wealth was nearly impossible. This reform was met with resistance from Spartan notables, the new currency essentially eliminated large personal wealth. The currency reform effectively eliminated external trade and commerce and created a system where Spartans were dependent on one another. The nature of the economic reforms would have ever-lasting consequences for the nature of the Spartan
The Battle of Leuctra, one of the most influential and significant battles in ancient Greek history, occurred during the summer of 371 BC. This battle not only influenced Greece for many years to come but also eastern European history in the fourth century BC. Prior to Leuctra, the city-state of Sparta was the most dominant and powerful force in the Peloponnese and the rest of Greece. However, as a result of the conflict, the course of history would change forever. Sparta’s defeat at the Battle of Leuctra ended its power in Greece because as a result of the loss, its military, political, and social dominance was shattered forever and was never recovered for the rest of its history leading to its new position as a second-rate power among the Greek city-states.
Firstly, the rejection of luxury and avarice invariably results in a focus on military pursuits. Secondly, the apparent equality belies a vast slave network (common in antiquity, but the unique brutality of the Spartan kind can only bring to mind the Gulag). Lastly, intellectual sterility sets in. Sparta, intellectually, seems to be only good at cracking jibes (Athenian: “I can imitate a sparrow” Spartan: “So what, I have heard the real thing” upon approaching the walls of a city, a Spartan said, "What kind of women live here?"). Their poetry is stale and militaristic; their women are absolutely free; children are encouraged to steal; sex is made to resemble rape; parents mourn when their children return safe from war, and celebrate when they die: this is the weirdest state ever. The book “On Sparta” is a well written book as well is most of Plutarch’s
Like most Greek states of the Archaic and Classical Era, the Spartan city-state was a militaristic one. Sparta, however, took the idea to its extreme. In order to become the best soldiers, Spartan citizens had to dedicate their entire lives to the occupation. In fact to be a soldier – a hoplite – was the full infrastructure of Spartan society. While most Greek city-states looked down on labor, physical work, and even working for profit, they still had to work for a living, produce something. “The Spartans a...
The law of Sparta was written and developed by Lycurgus (Blundell). Lycurgus was a famous law maker of the Spartan culture and he is credited with founding many of Spartan institutions and militant reforms (Blundell). One
Sparta was a city-state based on strict military ruling, at the age of seven a young Spartan would start out training and be trained into killing machines. When a Spartan baby is born, high elite Spartan soldiers would observe the baby to see if it was healthy and strong, if not the baby was ill and weak so it would be taken up a mountain and left there to die. This is just one example that shows how Sparta only wants a strong army and doesn't care about anything else. Strict rules of the government made it so that every Sp...
There were a number of key institutions that had a powerful influence on the state of Sparta. Spartan tradition claims that the reorganisation of the state derived from oracles at the sanction of Delphi. Ancient lawgiver Lycurgus is a mysterious character, whose reforms resulted from a Delphic oracle. However, his timeframe has been the subject to debate between the ancient and modern sources, most notably; Aristotle placed the reforms in 776BC . It is today’s view that this legislation evolved between the 7th and 5th centuries, with Lycurgus seen as the ‘mythical figure’ who is the symbol of these reforms. Before Lycurgus’ reforms appear in history, there is evidence for kingship lists in early Sparta, however earlier dates are estimated .
To look at this epistemologically, there is an understanding that almost every aspect involved in this culture was derived for the good of the polis. This seemed to be a very proud and arrogant people. A city with no walls, and in almost certainty, only natural born were allowed to earn citizenship. To even be called a Spartan meant years of fighting, service and status. Tyrtaeus states this argument best in the last line of his work. “Thus a man should endeavor to reach this high place of courage with all his heart, and, so trying, never be backward in war.” These writings are great resources for Spartan’s war enhanced values and societal customs, but lack in evidence of governmental affairs and religion.
To begin, The weaknesses outweigh the strengths because of the lack of education. The children were taught only the basics of reading and writing and only for practical reasons. The text states that all other forms of education were banned. No one was allowed to go abroad and study other cultures because Sparta was afraid of people hearing of other laws and beliefs. Sparta only valued military strength rather than education and intellectual strength. This was probably one of the biggest reasons that Sparta fell.
In the year approximately 500 B.C., the Greek civilization came upon a time of peace. Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave