Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Citizen participation in governance
Citizen participation in governance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Citizen participation in governance
St. Thomas, among many others, have studied and theorized what makes for a successful government. One aspect of a successful government according to St. Thomas was the involvement citizens in government. Aragon, established in 1031, formed their government around having a perfect balance between the power of the people and the power of the ruler. This system was so efficient, Aragon lasted for 466 years without changing anything. The kings of Aragon were given a very small amount of power despite being in the highest position. His job was to be a leader and protector of the people rather than their ruler. He didn’t even have to ability to choose a successor for the throne! Kings were elected by the people, though a current king could give
a suggestion. To avoid tyranny, a king could not pass a law on his own. In order to pass a law, the king would need the approval form the people during a meeting that took place about once a year. The king’s most powerful position was head judge, in which he persecuted wrong-doers and settled disputes. It almost seems as if the king had no use, but the king had one thing that no one else had. The king’s job was to be aware of all situations concerning the country in ways the people would not be able to, especially in the realm of military. The king would know of any outside threat and present a solution to ensure the safety of the people. The king was also the only one who could enforce the law, preventing the people from being completely self-sustaining. Citizens involved in government affairs were called the cortes. The cortes consisted of representatives from each social class chosen by the people in their respected class. When the annual meeting came, the cortes were equipped with concerns and suggestions to present to the king and the rest of the cortes for consideration. This was the time that laws were passed, since only the cortes had the power to pass laws, as well as elections for kings and other government officials. Among these elected officials were judges. Judges settled small disputes across the kingdom, such as property damage or theft. Along with small cases that are easily resolved, the judges maintained the law in cases with the king as judge. This is to ensure that the king does not made any decisions that contradict what the law has in place. With the people as the electors of the judges, the position of judges is in the best interest of the public. Aragon’s government system was constructed in a way to ensure that the people were safe from even the slightest possibility of tyranny by involving them with every part of government, emulating what St. Thomas said about what makes for a successful government. This stability and balance is what allowed Aragon to exist for so long, leaving it as one of the most successful forms of government to ever be put in practice.
A good government forms the basis of a good nation. The Republic is a Roman concept and the U.S. today is a Democratic Republic. Document 1 and 2 summarize all three branches of the Roman government and have a chart comparing both our types of governments,
New monarchs are considered the first stepping stone to create great nations. These new monarchs display the traits of limiting the nobles' power, increasing economic prosperity, uniting their nation, and stabilizing their army. Nations such as Spain, France, and England, have new monarchs in their history, including Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain, King Louis XI of France, and King Henry VII of England. Overall without the strengthening of these new monarchs, the corruption of their successors would have been detrimental to the process of improving these nations.
Like the Pre-Columbian Civilizations, the Middle Age kingdoms of Europe had similar qualities such as the governmental structures. Spain, Portugal, England, and the rest of Europe used the Feudal System to sort out the social differences. The King and Queen were the head of state, followed by princesses, princes, bishops, and other church officials. Then came the merchants and artisans trailed by the lowly serfs and peasants who work the land for the system.
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
The ancient kings had absolute authority and sovereignty. In those times The king was the head of the state, chief priest, general and judge. The obvious qualifications for this post were birth, wealth and. military power. The king may have been considered semi-divine due to.
During our history there have been many important governments in the world. Out of these governments, the Hammurabi’s and Thucydides are very strong governments. These governments are well known for their strong leadership and firm relationship between the people. On the other hand, the Magna Carta is the evidence of unsuccessful events of king john.
Aragon he had to go to great lengths to allow this to happen. As a
When Louis the XIV began his rule in 1643, his actions immediately began to suggest and absolute dictatorship. Because of the misery he had previously suffered, one of the first things he did was to decrease the power of the nobility. He withdrew himself from the rich upper class, doing everything secretly. The wealth had no connection to Louis, and therefore all power they previously had was gone. He had complete control over the nobles, spying, going through mail, and a secret police force made sure that Louis had absolute power. Louis appointed all of his officials, middle class men who served him without wanting any power. Louis wanted it clear that none of his power would be shared. He wanted "people to know by the rank of the men who served him that he had no intention of sharing power with them." If Louis XIV appointed advisors from the upper classes, they would expect to gain power, and Louis was not willing to give it to them. The way Louis XIV ruled, the sole powerful leader, made him an absolute ruler. He had divine rule, and did not want to give any power to anyone other than himself. These beliefs made him an absolute ruler.
The European monarchs during that time period lacked any kind of selflessness. They want to keep themselves safe and protected. They will act deceitful and will always be eager to avoid danger (Machiavelli). They will be a person’s best friend when they need to, but when they are put in danger, they forget everything about the friendship. The selfish way of ruling makes it a tyranny. People's opinions about how the government should run are uncared for which gives the monarchs a chance to rule in a cruel way, in a tyranny. The monarchs were doing what they felt was right for their kingdom, but they should not have the right to decide what the members of the government do
The new king Gustay Wasas, decided to separate the church more from the government, Therefore they were no longer represented in the council, Also the church had to give all their property to the king. He also changed the government from an elective monarchy to a Hereditary monarchy which means that from then on there was a line of succession. Its advantage was that there were no longer wars about who would be the next king because when the king died the next person in this dynasty was going to be the king. (Ein Mann, Ein Lauf – Gustav
The term ‘absolute” defines the singular power of the monarch to control every aspect of governing without the aid of the aristocracy or parliamentary forms of governance. The example of Louis XIII defines the rise of absolute monarchy in the 17th century, which eliminated agreements, such as the edict of Nantes, which enabled to aristocracy rights and powers in governmental decisions., however, Louis XIII dissolved these laws in order to gain total dominance over governmental affairs through military and financial might. In this example. Louis XIII defines the role of absolute monarch and the individual powers that the king welled over the government in 17th century
Fernando I, known as Fernando The Great, died in 1065, and at his death Fernando divided his lands among his three sons: Sancho, Alfonso, and Garcia, and his two daughters: Elvira and Urraca. He also asked them to promise him they would respect his wishes and abide by the divisions. But Sancho, who received the Kingdom of Castile, being the eldest, thought he should have inh...
A government was required to lead the people and aid in organizing a city. City governments were far more powerful than the council of elders and local chiefs of farming villages. At first, Priest probably had the greatest. In time, warrior kings came to power as chief political leaders. They soon set themselves up as the chief hereditary ruler and passed their power from father to son. Governments soon became more complex as rulers issued laws, collected taxes, and organizes systems of defense. To enforce order, rulers relied on royal officials. Over time, government bureaucracies evolved. Almost always rulers claimed their power came from god or divine right. These rulers then gained religious power as well.
ruled by a king whose power was constrained to the extent that he had to listen to the citizenry. This king could only
A single example of the importance of a strong and competent ruler or government – as well