Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
European Union about immigration
European Union about immigration
European Union about immigration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: European Union about immigration
Davontae Glenn
March 14, 2015
French 250
Final Essay
Using the “Magical Minority” in French Cinema
Filmmaker and director Spike Lee, known for his exuberant personality and fearless attitude, has never shied away from shedding light on issues of controversy. Many of Spike’s films including Do the Right Thing, She’s Gotta Have It, and Jungle Fever present the audience with matters of race relation. It came as no surprise when in 2001 Spike Lee introduced the theory of the “magical negro”. Lee claims the “magical negro” is a supporting character in films that is portrayed as coming to the relief of a film's white, usually male, protagonist. This film character functions as a ploy to help the protagonist get out of trouble, usually by assisting
…show more content…
the white character realize his own wrongdoings to surmount them. Although it is assumed the “magical negro” has special talents, their efforts are only directed toward helping the protagonist and not bettering their own situation to overcome racism or class discrimination. The main argument of Spike Lee is that by accepting these restrained supporting character roles, minorities are submissively disparaged and stereotyped in modern day cinema. Through othering or any action by which an individual or group becomes mentally classified in somebody else’s mind as “not one of us”, the “magical negro” can be applied to all minorities and be referred to as the “magical minority”. In regards to French cinema, it’s imperative to dissect the characters and plots of these films to observe the use of the highly scrutinized “magical minority” character. Examining Philippe le Guay’s Women on the Sixth Floor and Philippe Lioret’s Welcome, one could argue that the “magical minority” character exists in both films and plays an integral role in the storyline of the two movies. Set in Paris, France during the 1960’s, Women on the Sixth Floor is a romantic comedy that combines the prudery of an upper class French family with the cheerfulness and enthusiasm of Spanish housework ladies who are employed and live in their apartment building. The film revolves around Jean-Louis Jubert, an unadventurous and timid stockbroker who lives his life going about the same daily routine. His wife, Suzanne, demonstrates a similar lifestyle. The two combined lack the spark that one would see from the average married couple as their emotionless and snobby existence takes form due to the collective morals and values shared by aristocracy in France during the 1960’s. The cinematography, mise-en-scene, and editing by Philippe Le Guay in the first couple of scenes accentuates the dull lifestyle of the Jubert family and is differentiated with the livelihood of the Spanish maids living on the sixth floor of the apartment building. As an historic reference in the film, many of the maids emigrated from Spain to France due to the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War and the economic poverty that had formed under the fascist rule of the dictator Franco. Even though their living conditions aren’t the greatest on the sixth floor, the maids make the most of their situation by enjoying the presence of one another, each woman unique in their own way. The plot of the film begins when the Jubert’s veteran maid, Germaine, decides to quit. Suzanne and Jean-Louis quickly realize they cannot do the daily chores performed by a maid and begin their search for a replacement. Suzanne hires Maria, a relatively young woman who has just moved to France to escape her previous dilemma in Spain. As a maid, Maria becomes everything the Jubert’s were searching for and even begins to form a bond with Jean-Louis. An opportunity for the “magical minority” character to appear begins to develop as the audience is introduced to the personality flaws of the film’s protagonist, Jean-Louis. The lack of enjoyment and passion in all aspects of Jean-Louis’ life becomes a problem that the “magical minority” must help to fix. The lives of the Spanish maids, particularly Maria, begin to have a positive effect on the personality of Jean-Louis. The enthusiasm and excitement that Maria possesses begins to rub off on Jean-Louis while she introduces him to the Spanish culture, taking him to church and teaching him Spanish. Even though Maria is a likeable character, one with which the audience can sympathize with, her character never develops larger than Jean-Louis’ as his quest to become a better person out shines the growth of Maria. The character of Maria only exists, in a supporting role, to serve the needs of Jean-Louis while motivating him to be a better person. The movie barely sheds light on the social difficulties with which Maria and the maids are dealing with, such as living in poverty and the class discrimination they endure. The film also puts to use the “happy slave” trope with Maria and the other Spanish maids. Even though Maria and the maids work as a legal slaves, doing all the cooking, cleaning, and duties around the household, the film makes them seem happy with their current social and economic situation as they teach the white protagonist, Jean Louis, the Spanish culture. Spike Lee would argue that if Maria and the Spanish maids possessed the special power to change the personality and well-being of people, then they would have used it to benefit themselves and better their conditions, instead of improving the lives of those already privileged such as Jean-Louis. As the film comes to an end, it becomes evident that Maria’s “magical minority” character succeeds in transforming the protagonist, Jean-Louis, into a passionate, exciting, and livelier persona that his character lacked at the beginning of the movie. Jean-Louis leaves his wife, quits his job, and no longer identifies with the boring aristocracy lifestyle. Lastly, Mr. Jubert steals the spotlight of the film, culminating his new personality by moving into the sixth floor and confessing his love for Maria. The same theme is illustrated in the critically acclaimed and controversial film Welcome.
Director Philippe Lioret creates a storyline that the audience can sympathize with emotionally to garner exposure in the unfair immigration laws that encourage exclusion of certain groups of people. Welcome sheds light on the controversial immigration policies of European countries and the determination of refugees to cross borders at any means possible to be granted access into the metaphorical “Fortress of Europe”. The film depicts the dangerous and sometimes deadly attempts of migration for many refugees. The movie tells the story of Simon Calmat and Bilal Kayani. Simon Calmat, a French swimming coach at the local pool in Calais, is in the process of divorcing his wife Marion at her request. Bilal Kayani, an Iraqi-Kurdish immigrant, has settled in France with hopes to migrate to the United Kingdom to be reconciled with his girlfriend Mina. After a failed attempt at crossing the English Channel on a truck bound for a ferry, Bilal derives an idea to swim the 30 miles across the English Channel. Signing up for swimming lessons in preparation for this nearly impossible mission, Bilal meets Simon who agrees to give him lessons. Bilal shows relentless determination for crossing into the United Kingdom, when Simon realizes the reason for Bilal’s swimming lessons, he becomes just as invested in Bilal’s preparations for the treacherous waters of the English Channel. The relationship between the two characters becomes a major aspect of the film. Slowly but surely, a change in Simon’s character is presented as he goes from careless towards the policies of immigration to sympathetic and willing to harbor refugees such as Bilal and his friend. As in most of the movies that a “magical minority” character exists, the film’s protagonist starts off faulty is someway. In the case of Welcome, Simon goes about his life with an unsympathetic attitude towards Calais’ ever-increasing population
of refugees and turns a cheek toward the discrimination of immigrants. While in a grocery store with Marion, Simon encounters two immigrants that are refused entry into the market. Marion argues with the store manager over the discrimination and refusal of service towards the immigrants while Simon quietly observes then pleads for Marion to ignore the issue. This incident illustrates that Simon lacks the bravery or courage to stand up or fight for things he believes in, including his soon to be ex-wife who has fallen in love with another man. Upon meeting Bilal and giving him swimming lessons, Simon becomes a new man as he is suddenly concerned with the well being of refugees and the cruel immigration policies put in place to exclude them from Europe. Bilal’s “magical minority” character is responsible for the change in Simon’s character, infusing the traits in which Simon lacked and needed. One could also argue that Bilal was used to serve Simon’s need of repairing his relationship with Marion. As the “magical minority” character, Bilal’s purpose is to better the situation of Simon, the film’s protagonist. It’s hard to ignore the fact that Simon decided to harbor Bilal and his friend only after realizing how passionate Marion was on the issue concerning refugees and immigrants. It can be inferred by the audience that Simon only chose to shelter Bilal in the first place to impress Marion and prove to her that he could be passionate towards the same interests as her. Simon even lies to Marion and tells her that Bilal and his friend had been staying at his home for three of four days when they truthfully had only been there for one night. In the end, Bilal’s journey and determination in attempting to cross the English Channel to reunite with the love of his life is downplayed by the personality progression we see in Simon’s character and his relationship with Marion. It becomes evident Bilal is only a supporting “magical minority” character when the script of the film decides he will not be successful in crossing the English Channel but will instead drown and die. By choosing death as Bilal’s faith, director Philippe Lioret brings even more attention to Simon’s character as his journey heroically continues but Bilal’s tragically ends. Philippe le Guay’s Women on the Sixth Floor and Philippe Lioret’s Welcome would be entirely different movies without the use of the two “magical minority” characters Maria and Bilal. Maria’s character works to transform Jean-Louis from the boring and snobby aristocrat, to the exuberant and lively man with an appreciation for different cultures. Bilal’s character serves to instill the courage and awareness of unjust immigration policies that Simon previously lacked, helping him repair his relationship with Marion. What if Maria used her outgoing personality to explore a more lucrative career in teaching, as opposed to being a maid? What if Bilal used his athletic ability to pursue a soccer career as a means of crossing the United Kingdom border? In alternate situations were the “magical minority” characters decide to use their presumed talents or powers to better their own life, the mere existence of the protagonist in each film is eliminated. Depreciated as supporting characters, neither Maria nor Bilal were able to use their powers to overcome issues of racism or class discrimination, but their roles as facilitators in altering the personality of the protagonist in each film were integral to the storyline of both movies.
Over the past decades, Hollywood movies have brought out the representations of racial inequality through out various themes of racism and stereotypical ways. One frequent type of racial inequality is that there is a culture or race that is belittled, under-privilege and inferior while the other is superior and high in order. In “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, He identifies the term “magical negro” as: “a saintly African American character who acts as a mentor to a questing white hero, who seems to be disconnected from the community that he adores so much, and who often seems to have an uncanny ability to say and do exactly what needs to be said or done in order to keep the story chugging along in the hero’s favor” (408) and in Mitu Sengupta “ Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” the author examines the movie Avatar as a racist film, and focuses on how it resembles the “white messiah” stereotype. The term “white messiah” is known as a white individual who hold superior power, according to David Brooks of the New York Times, “a stereotype that white people are rationalistic and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic, and that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades” (Sengupta 213). Both articles dwell and explain the two terms and how it portrays the themes of racism and stereotypes through two elements, known as author’s purpose and main idea. These elements effectively convey the theme because it prevents our thoughts from being scattered by a broad spectrum of ideas and instead, it tells you exactly what is going to be discussed throughout the article.
Over past decades, Hollywood movies have brought out the representations of racial inequality through out various themes of racism and stereotypical ways. One frequent type of racial inequality is that there is a culture or race that is belittled, under-privilege and inferior while the other is superior and high in order. In “The Offensive Movie Cliché That Won’t Die” by Matt Zoller Seitz, He identifies the term “magical negro” as: “a saintly African American character who acts as a mentor to a questing white hero, who seems to be disconnected from the community that he adores so much, and who often seems to have an uncanny ability to say and do exactly what needs to be said or done in order to keep the story chugging along in the hero’s favor” (408) and in Mitu Sengupta “ Race Relations Light Years from the Earth” the author examines the movie Avatar as a racist film, and focuses on how it resembles the “white messiah” stereotype. The term “white messiah” is known as a white individual who hold superior power, according to David Brooks of the New York Times, “a stereotype that white people are rationalistic and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic, and that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades” (Sengupta 213). Both articles dwell and explain the two terms and how it portrays the themes of racism and stereotypes through two elements, known as author’s purpose and main idea. These elements effectively convey the theme because it prevents our thoughts from being scattered by a broad spectrum of ideas and instead, it tells you exactly what is going to be discussed throughout the article.
Before we get into the movie specifically, we should first talk about representation and how race is represented in the media in general. Representation is defined as the assigning of meaning through language and in culture. (CITE) Representation isn't reality, but rather a mere construction of reality and the meaning behind it. (CITE) Through representation we are able to shape how people are seen by others. Race is an aspect of people which is often represented in the media in different ways. Race itself is not a category of nature, but rather...
This week’s readings of the reviews of Spike Lee’s ‘Do the Right Thing’ and Marilyn Fabe’s “Political Cinema: Spike Lee’s ‘Do the Right Thing’, raised a number of questions regarding not only the moral issues the film addresses but also the intention of the artist. This dialectical opposition, which Pamela Reynolds suggests “challenges the audience to choose” (Reynolds, p.138) between the narrativized hostility shown between that of the hero and villain. More specifically Lee’s portrayal of violence vs passive opposition. This can be perceived through Lee’s technical employment of contradictory quotes from Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcom X at the conclusion of the film, which not only highlights this concern but also deluges further into themes of political opposition. Marylin Fabe discusses this where she states that Spike Lee’s film carries a “disturbing political message” (Fabe, p.191). Arguably, ‘Do the Right Thing’ acmes themes of racism (Black vs White); with underlining motifs of imperialism (colonisers’ vs colonised), psychoanalytic (power vs powerlessness) and even Marxist theory (ownership vs public space/consumption), with Clarence Page stating that Lee provides a “public service… (not trying) to provide all the answers, but raising the questions.” (Reid, P.144). In saying this we explore this concept of the role of the artist, with Georgopulos stating that the role of the artist is to create a consciousness within the audience by revealing a fraught set of truths about the human condition. Thusly, the reactions and responses to the films reveal Lee to be successful in conveying his intentions, which back in its zenith, explored this issue of racism in a way that had rarely been seen, and presented the ways in which t...
Refugees share similar experiences and emotions when they move to a new country. The book Inside Out and Back Again splits these feelings into two categories, “inside out” and “back again”. Refugees from around the world experience these feelings. For instance, it is easy for a refugee to feel “inside out” when learning a new language, or they can feel “back again” when they find a familiar object that reminds them of their past. Many refugees mainly struggle with learning a new language, but to make them feel more comfortable, they can find satisfaction in items from their home land.
The first social issue portrayed through the film is racial inequality. The audience witnesses the inequality in the film when justice is not properly served to the police officer who executed Oscar Grant. As shown through the film, the ind...
Being one of the few black students to attend Tisch School of the Arts, the aspiring filmmaker’s first year at New York University was a particularly difficult one. Lee’s experiences, race, and upbringing have all led him to create controversial films to provide audiences with an insight into racial issues. Spike Lee’s first student production, The Answer, was a short ten minute film which told of a young black screenwriter who rewrote D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation. The film was not well accepted among the faculty at New York University, stating Lee had not yet mastered “film grammar.” Lee went on to believe the faculty took offense to his criticisms towards the respected director’s stereotypical portrayals of black characters (1).
Spike Lee is a filmmaker who has generated numerous controversial films that unapologetically bring delicate social issuest o the media forefront. He honestly portrays life's societal obstacles. He challenges the public to cogitate on the world's glitches and disunion. Spike Lee created a name for himself with films such as Do the Right Thing (1989) and Malcolm X (1992), and with documentaries such as 4 Little Girls (1997) and When the Levees Broke (2006). Lee’s goal was to portray African Americans in a more accurate light.
There was light inside the container. He looked around. Two dozen anxious faces stared at him. It seemed he wasn’t going to make this part of the journey alone.” This text evidence supports the idea because when you are surrounded by refugees who live a life completely different from yours, it might be okay to them to do something that might never ever be done in your country.
Do the Right Thing is a dramatic comedic film that was directed by Spike Lee. The movie was released in 1989. Lee served in three capacities for the film: writer, director and producer of the movie, Ernest Dickenson was the cinematographer and Barry Alexander Brown was the film’s editor. For this film, Lee garnered together some notable actors and actresses, including Ruby Dee and Ossie Davis, Rosie Perez, Samuel L. Jackson, John Tuturro and Martin Lawrence. The setting of the movie is in Bedford-Stuyvesant; which is a neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York. This particular neighborhood is made up of several ethnic groups that include African Americas, Italians, Koreans, and Puerto Ricans. The movie takes place on a particularly hot day during the summer time. The extreme heat causes tensions between the different races in the neighborhood. In this paper, I will attempt to show how mise-en-scène, camera work, editing, and sound are used to convey “explicit” and “implicit” meaning in one scene in Do the Right Thing.
When we typically think of racial tropes in popular culture, we often don’t look towards animated G-rated movies. The film The Princess and the Frog released by Walt Disney Animated Classics in 2009 created by John Musker, Ron Clements and Rob Edwards is a perfect contemporary example of a film that shows images of pre-constructed racial tropes. Though Disney has produced multiple films based on past fairy tales, The Princess and the Frog was the first animated Disney princess film that featured an African American woman in a leading role. Often times regarded as a turning point in Disney’s movie production career, the film’s representation of African Americans proves to be regressive of racist politics surrounding the 21st century. The design
The Arrival is a graphic novel, which was written to be a universal tale of immigrating to a new culture without knowing the language or having any prior connections. Illustrations constitute the entirety of the story, with no text in any real language and taking place in a made up culture, assuring that all readers would experience the character’s feeling of alienation in the same way. While the society the unnamed main character finds himself in is a fantasy, it is structured like a real one, with references to Ellis Island and a semi-modern immigration process. This book is similar to The Metamorphosis, as each of these stories focuses on one person whose situation has changed so drastically that simply taking care of himself and getting comfortable requires acclimation. For one, his body and preferences have changed, and the other, the world around him. Early on, both stories show their characters’ misplacement in their environment and then their adaptation by implying a simple task the character wishes to carry out, but showing how it has become more complicated, due to the disruption which has occurred. This is clearer in The
The White Savior Complex is a damaging subconscious underlay of the Hollywood system, and more broadly all of western society. It is used to further separate the notions of “us” and “other” by creating a firm separation fueled by self-righteousness, and a sense of entitlement. Hollywood attempts to address race relations, but fails because of this trope. Kingsle, from the article “Does My Hero Look White In This?” described that both racism and colonialism are acknowledged, but not without reassuring that not only were white people against the system of racist power dynamics, but also were actively fighting against it in leadership roles (2013). In the remainder of my essay I will be commenting on many modern films and their use on this trope, and why subscribing to this filmmaking strategy is problematic.
As a fan of cinema, I was excited to do this project on what I had remembered as a touching portrait of racism in our modern society. Writer/Director Paul Haggis deliberately depicts his characters in Crash within the context of many typical ethnic stereotypes that exist in our world today -- a "gangbanger" Latino with a shaved head and tattoos, an upper-class white woman who is discomforted by the sight of two young Black kids, and so on -- and causes them to rethink their own prejudices during their "crash moment" when they realize the racism that exists within themselves. This movie does provoke a dialogue on race that, according to author and journalist Jeff Chang, "has been anathema to Hollywood after 9/11. " During the first viewing of this movie, the emotionally charged themes of prejudice and racism are easy to get caught up in. (125) Privilege is inclined to white males through every facet of our everyday lives that inconspicuously creates racism through classism.
Often racial injustice goes unnoticed. Television tries to influence the mind of their viewers that blacks and whites get along by putting them on the screen to act as if interracial relationships has been accepted or existent. “At the movies these days, questions about racial injustice have been amicably resolved (Harper,1995). Demott stresses that the entertainment industry put forth much effort to persuade their audience that African Americans and Caucasians are interacting and forming friendships with one another that is ideal enough for them to die for one another. In the text, Demott states “A moment later he charges the black with being a racist--with not liking whites as much as the white man likes blacks--and the two talk frankly about their racial prejudices. Near the end of the film, the men have grown so close that each volunteer to die for the other” (Harper,1995). Film after film exposes a deeper connection amongst different races. In the text, Demott states “Day after day the nation 's corporate ministries of culture churn out images of racial harmony” (Harper, 1995). Time and time again movies and television shows bring forth characters to prove to the world that racial injustice has passed on and justice is now received. Though on-screen moments are noticed by many people in the world it does not mean that a writer/ director has done their