Sherlock Holmes was unequivocally not guilty for killing Dr. Roylott. The title of this story is “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” and it is drafted by the world renowned Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sherlock Holmes did not physically or personally kill Dr. Roylott. Even though Sherlock Holmes agitated the snake he did not know that it would gravitate towards Dr. Roylott and kill him. Moreover, Sherlock Holmes did not know Dr. Roylott’s position in his room. Sherlock Holmes did not execute Dr. Roylott, the snake did.
In “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” Sherlock Holmes did not harm Dr. Roylott in shape or form. The story never mentioned that Sherlock Holmes touched Dr. Roylott; therefore, Sherlock Holmes did not commit the crime. The text states “He has died within ten seconds of being bitten”. That phrase is describing how quickly Sherlock died from the snake, not a human. Sherlock Holmes was in the room beside Dr. Roylott protecting Helen Stoner; thus, Sherlock Holmes was nowhere near Dr. Roylott to commit the
…show more content…
crime. Although Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson acquired guns while defending Helen Stoner it never says that they used them. Sherlock Holmes did not physically or personally kill Dr. Roylott, and he certainly did not know that after he agitated the snake it would kill Dr. Roylott. Sherlock did not obtain the knowledge of knowing the swamp adder would execute Dr.
Roylott. According to the text, the detective attacked the snake to defend themselves from perishing. Since the door and windows were locked, Sherlock Holmes deflected the swamp adder back into the ventilator. Sherlock Holmes did not intentionally redirect the swamp adder in the ventilator; it was simply the only way for everybody to live. Despite the snake passing through the ventilator, Sherlock Holmes would not have known that the snake would then target Dr. Roylott. After all, the story only remarked that Dr. Roylott could command the swamp adder, not Sherlock Holmes or anyone else. Lastly, the vicious beast could have remained in the ventilator and not go into Dr. Roylott’s room; there is no way the astute investigator could have concluded that. Sherlock Holmes did not know the snake would go and assassinate Dr. Roylott nor the position of Dr. Roylott in his
room. Sherlock Holmes did not perceive Dr. Roylott’s location in the room by which he was in. Sherlock Holmes could not see in the room; so, the observer did not know where he was. In addition, Sherlock Holmes was not able to see through the ventilator. Therefore, when the demonic serpent retreated through the ventilator Sherlock Holmes did not know where it would go. The protagonist and the antagonist were in separate rooms, so they could not visualize where each other were. To conclude, Sherlock Holmes could not communicate with the snake to locate Dr. Roylott and attack, the snake found Dr. Roylott’s position on its own. All of these claims configure that Sherlock Holmes was indeed not guilty for the demise of Dr. Roylott. The illustrious detective, Sherlock Holmes is in no way guilty for the death of the villain Dr. Roylott. Sherlock Holmes did not personally or physically execute Dr. Roylott. Sherlock Holmes did not know the serpent would go towards Dr. Roylott. Furthermore, Sherlock Holmes did not have information on Dr. Roylott’s position in his room. Sherlock Holmes is in no way guilty for the demise of Dr. Roylott. Nevertheless, others would disagree. However, with observing the text with great detail, you will realize that Sherlock Holmes did not cause the death. The filthy crook Dr. Roylott has now perished, and the community surrounding him is now in the clear.
the man had to remove the snake from the farm, but can't understand why he had to kill the
For a while he finished the stories, but with debts and great public support he created another collection of the Holmes stories, due to the fact they were in high demand. Conan Doyle sadly died in Crowborough, Sussex, England, on July 7, 1930. Holmes is an intellectual detective who although spends a lot of the time by his self still depend on a valiant partner to accompany him on his cases, in this case Dr Watson. Dr Watson, in the Sherlock Holmes stories, is portrayed as particularly as an average British person helping his friend in his cases. Because he is portrayed as this it helps us see ourselves in the story along with Holmes therefore, intriguing the reader to usually read more.
Holmes and Watson were to guard Helen from a mysterious whistle she heard in the early morning, every single morning. The whistle she heard was the same whistle that Julia (her sister) had heard when she came upon her fate. The night that they were going to investigate, they stayed in Helen’s room; Julia’s old room. They woke up to the whistle and Holmes smacked the snake in the face. The snake ended up going back into Dr. Roylott’s room and killing him by venom. Helen was saved by Holmes in the situation where she would have been murdered by her own father and let her be married with no interference. Holmes, however, could have done another action that did not include hitting the snake and making it bite Dr. Roylott. Holmes had banged the snake in the head, which caused it to be aggravated and bite the first person it saw. Holmes could not have predicted where Dr. Roylott was sitting in his
On page 39, it describes the moment in which bullies from his school force him to go face to face with a skeleton in a doctor’s office. Such a terrible experience truly could have scarred Holmes, but at the same time his comfortability with an representation of death could have prompted his killer roots. Also, the “accidental” death of Holmes’s childhood friend, at an event that Holmes was present, was another red flag in terms of potentially becoming a psychopath. We learn more of Holmes’s younger upbringing through the text in which it states,"He drifted through childhood as a small, odd, and exceptionally bright boy....in the cruel imaginations of his peers, he became prey" (Larson, 38) Holmes was essentially an outcast, a person who has been rejected by society or a social group. He was the target of many because of his oddness and rather unique characteristics. With no solid upbringing, and a probable fascination with death, Holmes was bound to be the infamous serial killer he became in his future.
Comparing the Portrayals of the Villains from Tell-Tale Heart and The Speckled Band The two villains in “Tell-Tail Heart” and “The Speckled Band” both have similarities and differences in their portrayals of murder, conveyed in the stories. They have disparities between motives and methods of murder, although there is a resemblance in the masterminds of murder. The villain in “The Speckled Band”, Dr. Grimsby Roylott was married to Mrs. Stoner in India who is prosperous with her wealth, but she had died in a train crash and bequeathed the sum of £1000 to Dr. Roylott. This money was enough to fulfil the family’s needs as they moved into an old ancestral house in Stoke Moran.
Holmes was never arrested for the incident with his father-in-law. However, he was later arrested in “July 1894, Holmes was arrested for the first time. It was not for murder but for one of his schemes” (Taylor). Being arrested should have scared Holmes onto the straight and narrow path, it did not. It was in jail that Holmes met one of his accomplices, Marion Hedgepeth (Nash, Bloodletters 448).
Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan. Sherlock Holmes: The Hound of the Baskervilles. New York: Penguin Books Ltd., 2001. Print.
...he met the detective, fell victim to Moriarty’s games. “Moriarty is playing with your mind too. Can’t you see what’s going on!” (Sherlock). During Holmes’ last days before his faked suicide, he pleads with John to see reason through Jim’s manipulations, as does Desdemona with Othello’s accusations. Even Sherlock’s oldest friend Detective Inspector Greg Lestrade was doubting Holmes’ credibility.
The Speckled Band" is about a premeditated murder with the motive of money, whereas "The Cardboard Box" is a spur of the moment murder arising out of jealousy. "Silver Blaze", however, is not a murder, merely an accident, although until the dénouement we are led to believe that it is. The relationship between Holmes and Watson is completely platonic. They live together but only in a professional partnership. This would not have been unusual in Victorian England.
In 1885 He married Louise Hawkins. Sherlock Holmes made his first appearance in a short novel called "A Study in Scarlet" which was printed in 1887. He continues to write thrilling stories until he realised he wanted to be known not just for Sherlock Holmes but wanted to get involved in other projects. Readers were astonished when Doyle finally killed off the famous detective when he was shoved off a cliff. in 1893 by his arch-nemiss Professor Moriaty.
Comment on the way Conan Doyle uses the character of Watson in The Hound of the Baskervilles.
“A Scandal in Bohemia” the first of many Sherlock Holmes short stories. It was written by
He said, if the person judged guilty, he/she was forced to undergo an ordeal called “chopping nut”. The beans were crushed, and then soaked in water until a creamy white fluid resulted. The guilty person was required to drink this fluid and then made to walk around until the poison took effect. If the person died, this was considered proof of his or her guilty. If the person happened to vomit up the poison before it took effect, he or she was then considered to be innocent and set free. Can this ordeal really distinguish between the guilty and the innocent? The answer will be no. According to Walter Sneader, “If the person confident of his innocence might have swallowed the ordeal poison rapidly, and which could have overwhelmed his stomach and causing vomiting; where as guilty person, fearing to face the test, might have held the liquid in his mouth, facilitating buccal absorption of the alkaloid or swallowed it slowly”. It has also been proposed that the chief who administered the poison might have prede...
Sherlock Holmes, one of the most famous fictional characters in literary history is a detective capable of solving the most complex mysteries. The author behind the character, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a very successful British writer. The majority of his literary success is due to his crime-fiction tales such as the Sherlock Holmes series. However, Mr. Doyle and Mr. Holmes himself must not take all the credit because there is another character that plays a major role in the stories success. He goes by the name of Dr. Watson, Holmes’ sidekick. The importance of Dr. Watson is evident in many of Doyle’s stories such as A Scandal in Bohemia and A Study in Scarlett.
Holmes was first charged with insurance fraud, and then the murder of Benjamin Pitezel (H.H. Holmes Biography, 2015). He was never charged with the deaths of any of his victims in Chicago due to the inability to positively identify any victims (H.H. Holmes, 2004). Holmes gave numerous stories to police about what happened in “The Murder Castle”, and admitted to at least 27 murders, but again, the exact number is not known. Holmes acted as his own lawyer in the case of murder and insurance fraud against him, but was convicted and hanged on May 7, 1896 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (H.H. Holmes Biography, 2015).