Orwell took inspiration from the world around him when writing 1984. In 1937, Orwell arrived in Barcelona to fight General Franco’s fascist ways and joined a socialist group, P.O.U.N., but Russia wanted to use their own socialist views to fight against Franco. Russia then went on to denounce P.O.U.N. as a fascist supporting group (“Famous Authors: George Orwell: 1903-1950”). Orwell witnessed first hand how the government is able to distort the truth in order to gain power. Winston also witnessed the party claiming that they had created helicopters and then when Julia got to school the party claimed to create airplanes (Orwell 153).This is crucial because whoever controls the past also controls the future since they have the power to change both. From his experiences in the Spanish Civil War, Orwell gained a sense of the ineffectiveness …show more content…
of a stalemate war in which neither army is able to defeat the other (“Famous Authors: George Orwell: 1903-1950). 1984 is set in a world where three superstates, Oceania, Eastasia, and Eurasia, have all the power.
The three superstates are in a constant war, but one can not or even try to defeat the others. While Winston was reading Goldstein’s book, he discovered the true meaning of war is “waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent the conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact” (Orwell 199). Power over the citizens is maintained through these wars because the party ensures that each member feels as though they are helping the soldiers on the warfront, when in reality, they are producing items for themselves. When World War II broke out, Orwell was unable to enlist and stayed in London to work for the British Broadcasting Corporation, also known as “BBC”(“Famous Authors: George Orwell: 1903-1950”). While working for the networking company, he began to see that facts were once again distorted to fit the government’s point of view like how London had suddenly switched from hating Russia to becoming allies and London’s “Big Brother” and no one seemed to
notice. In 1984, the same event had occurred during Hate Week when a man was giving a speech about how Oceania was at war with Eurasia, but in the middle of speaking, someone came running up and handed the man a piece of paper and without missing a beat, the man continued to speak about the war, but now Oceania was at war with Eastasia and Eurasia was an ally (Orwell 180). The crowd listening to the speech was completely mortified for all the wrong reasons. They had not realized that the party had suddenly switched allies and enemies and claimed that Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, but the citizens genuinely believed that Goldstein’s agents had switched the posters that they had in their hands the entire time to be wrong and then Hate week continued as planned. Orwell took inspiration from himself and his own life to write the novel. George Orwell and the main protagonist, Winston Smith, share several character traits. While writing 1984, Orwell was dying due to tuberculosis and was coping with the fact that he was dying by having Winston oftenly have coughing attacks as well (Sperber). In addition, Winston and Orwell were no strangers to helping the government lie to fit their party’s agenda. Winston was employed at the Ministry of Truth where he struggled most with his orthodoxy because his job was to change articles to coincide with what the party wants to promote at that time. For example, Winston had to create a fake person, Comrade Ogilvy, for Big Brother’s Order for the Day which “celebrates” a model citizen. George Orwell had a similar job of creating propaganda while at the BBC working as a writer, producer, and broadcaster (“Famous Authors: George Orwell: 1903-1950”). Though Winston and Orwell shared several traits, many people struggled with the fact that he wrote 1984 to cope with the tragedies that occured in his life. Several people disagree with Orwell’s idea of what a totalitarian society would entail. According to Packer, Orwell’s major flaw was he believed “a mature totalitarian system would be so deformed its citizenry that they would not be able to overthrow it” (Packer 19). However, Orwell’s own political opinions were present throughout the book and disagreed with Packer because he believed that people would remain oblivious and “until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious” (Orwell 70). Although, most people take the sole purpose of the novel is to warn the future of the threats of a totalitarian government. The novel actually has another purpose as well. 1984 was written for Orwell to be able to cope with the tragic events that took place in his own life. However, according to Huber, “Orwell was wrong in his fundamental logic, wrong in the grand vision, and wrong in his chain of reasoning (Huber). Orwell had relied on his work to be the way to vent about the wrongdoings that the government had done to him. He was not writing as a politician, but as a fearful individual of what the future may hold if capitalism were to die. George Orwell’s 1984 was written as a means for him to be able to speak out against all ills that the government had done to him throughout the years. Like Winston, Orwell learned to question the government and to not follow as blindly as those around him. Orwell truly believed that the free world was going to be destroyed if Hitler’s Germany won the war. By writing this novel, he gave a warning to the world to not be as trusting of the government as he once was.
The book 1984, by George Orwell is based on the theory of “Big Brother” and how he is always watching you. In the book, the Oceania government controls their citizens by saying and ordering them into not doing certain things. Which then forced their citizens to deceive their government by going in to hiding. When Pearl Harbor was attacked in 1941, Japanese-Americans were ordered to do certain things as well. Both of these two events prove that the government can force their citizens to do anything under their power. I think some parts of the government abuse the right of their power and manipulate their citizens into doing unlawful events.
...of the world if fascism were to continue. In Orwell's day, the leading fascists were Hitler and Stalin, and today there are Muammar Qaddafi, Kim Sung-un, and Xi Jiaping, while in 1984 there is Big Brother. All of these governments are very similar to each other, as Orwell had predicted. These points reveal that even though those who live in free nations think that 1984 is dystopian science-fiction, in some places around the world, 1984 is almost a work of realistic fiction.
In 1984, the manipulation of the body is an effective practice that oppresses a population. The Party maintains absolute control over Oceania’s citizens by manipulating their physical state to better repress them. This leads to them being more about their own pain and physical well being, thus distracting them from the suffering that is happening in the world around them, and distracting them from thought of rebellion. The Party uses physical manipulation via overworking them to exhaustion and torture methods.The Party keeps their citizens in a state of exhaustion as they are easier to control, as the narrator explains while Winston works in the Ministry of Truth:
). Did Orwell realise quite what he had done in Nineteen Eighty-Four? His post-publication glosses on its meaning reveal either blankness or bad faith even about its contemporary political implications. He insisted, for example, that his 'recent novel [was] NOT intended as an attack on Socialism or on the British Labour Party (of which I am a supporter)'.(1) He may well not have intended it but that is what it can reasonably be taken to be. Warburg saw this immediately he had read the manuscript, and predicted that Nineteen Eighty-Four '[was] worth a cool million votes to the Conservative Party';(2) the literary editor of the Evening Standard 'sarcastically prescribed it as "required reading" for Labour Party M.P.s',(3) and, in the US, the Washington branch of the John Birch Society 'adopted "1984" as the last four digits of its telephone number'.(4) Moreover, Churchill had made the 'inseparably interwoven' relation between socialism and totalitarianism a plank in his 1945 election campaign(5) (and was not the protagonist of Nineteen Eighty-Four called Winston?). If, ten years earlier, an Orwell had written a futuristic fantasy in which Big Brother had had Hitler's features rather than Stalin's, would not the Left, whatever the writer's proclaimed political sympathies, have welcomed it as showing how capitalism, by its very nature, led to totalitarian fascism?
Orwell wrote 1984 a few years after the end of WWII, trying to combat totalitarianism at a time when many nations were beginning to take it on. Totalitarianism was and is a form of government with a single dictator that doesn’t require, but almost always involves, censorship. Totalitarian dictators use this censorship to control the people, and cover up the dictator’s evil-doings. Many people were afraid that totalitarianism was going to spread all over the world, and tried their hardest to stop it from happening. George Orwell was among the many that were deathly afraid, so he wrote 1984, doing his part to prevent it from spreading. 1984 takes place in Orwell’s far future (but our
Orwell has real concerns about the way in which society worked, particular when considering hierarchies and the way the powerful manipulate information. As can be seen there is a strong hierarchy system in the novel 1984 with references to poor and wealthy classes, the proles being lower class and the inner party members being higher class. Orwell spent time in boarding school, wasn’t wealthy and saw disparity between people who had and hadn’t, there are many references towards headmaster and control “ When he spoke it was in a schoolmasterish kind of way” (3.5.297). Orwell also used Hitler’s actions as a leader and incorporated them into 1984; this is evident through the propaganda of Big Brother, dictatorship and the way the Inner party was able to manipulate society to change their beliefs. “The German Nazis and the communist came very close to us in their methods…” (3.3.276) Orwell’s values and beliefs about communism and democracy have strongly been developed through his trepidation in power and historical references to Hitler.
Every human being has natural rights that can never be taken away. In an attempt to create a world where every person if offered a fair opportunity to live life, the United Nations passed a bill called The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in 1948. The document outlines the all the rights provided to everyone in the world, despite age, gender, religion etc. Civil liberties including, right to life, liberty and security of person; the right not to be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family or home; and right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, are incorporated in the Declaration. Despite the positive moral of the implemented civil rights, there have been numerous instances when essential civil liberties have been taken away from innocent people. By taking away natural rights from other people, the offenders attain the desired power and control. In the book, 1984, George Orwell presents the idea of how the world would become if all natural rights seized to exist. The omnipresent ruler of Oceania, named Big Brother, seizes all the natural rights of the citizens, to gain unconstrained power over everything and everyone. Big Brother’s dominants the lives of the citizens by strongly executing the idea of ‘mind over matter’ or doublethink to control the minds of the people, by the creation of groundbreaking technology to control the actions of the citizens and by controlling and modifying the English spoken and written language to express authority over freedom of thought and speech. The combination of the three methods helps Big Brother to create a never-ending rein on the minds and hearts of the citizens of Oceania.
War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. The party slogan of Ingsoc illustrates the sense of contradiction which characterizes the novel 1984. That the book was taken by many as a condemnation of socialism would have troubled Orwell greatly, had he lived to see the aftermath of his work. 1984 was a warning against totalitarianism and state sponsored brutality driven by excess technology. Socialist idealism in 1984 had turned to a total loss of individual freedom in exchange for false security and obedience to a totalitarian government, a dysutopia. 1984 was more than a simple warning to the socialists of Orwell's time. There are many complex philosophical issues buried deep within Orwell's satire and fiction. It was an essay on personal freedom, identity, language and thought, technology, religion, and the social class system. 1984 is more than a work of fiction. It is a prediction and a warning, clothed in the guise of science fiction, not so much about what could happen as it is about the implications of what has already happened. Rather than simply discoursing his views on the social and political issues of his day, Orwell chose to narrate them into a work of fiction which is timeless in interpretation. This is the reason that 1984 remains a relevant work of social and philosophical commentary more than fifty years after its completion.
Nineteen Eighty-Four was written in the past yet seems to show very interesting parallels to some of today’s societies. Orwell explains many issues prominent throughout the book in which his main characters attempt to overcome. He shows how surveillance can easily corrupt those in control and how those in control become corrupt by the amount of power. Those with power control the society and overpower all those below. The novel shows what could potentially happen to our current society if power ends up leading to corruption.
Success is the main object of desire for many people in the world of today. In George Orwell's 1984, the author provides a speculative view to the future and brilliantly describes what would happen if ultimate success was attainable. George Orwell describes success in three extremes: those who succeed ultimately, those who fail miserably, and those who are neither capable of succeeding nor failing. In 1984, the success of the individual is forbidden, while the success of the Inner Party is ultimate.
Upon my reading of the novel 1984, I was fascinated by George Orwell’s vision of the future. Orwell describes a world so extreme that a question comes to mind, asking what would encourage him to write such a novel. 1984 took place in the future, but it seemed like it was happening in the past. George Orwell was born in 1903 and died in 1950; he has seen the horrific tides of World War ² and Ï. As I got deeper into this novel I began to see similar events of world history built into 1984.
The novel 1984 by George Orwell presents the readers an image of a totalitarian society that explores a world of control, power, and corruption. The main idea of government control presents itself in the novel by protecting and listening to the people of Oceania. However, Orwell suggests giving too much power to the government is a mistake because eventually the decisions they make will not be about the people anymore but rather themselves. In 1984, the power and corruption the party has is overwhelming for the people. There are no ways around the beliefs of the Party, the party attempts to control and eventually destroy any mental or physical resistance against their beliefs. The agenda for the party is to obtain mind control over its people and force them to adore their leader. The methods the Party uses to achieve its goal are: the use of constant propaganda and surveillance, the rewriting of history, and Room 101.
George Orwell is considered to be one of the most creative and expressive political writers of the twentieth century, particularly for his views opposing communism and totalitarian regimes famously expressed in his novel, 1984. Orwell perceived communism as, “A new, dangerous form of totalitarianism, a powerful tool for controlling the masses.” Orwell’s hatred towards communism began with communist leader, Joseph Stalin whom he referred to as, “a bloody-minded master” (Rossi 1). Orwell’s views solidified during his participation in the Spanish Civil War; throughout his experience, Orwell was subject to communist propaganda, which led to his distrust of authority and established hatred of fascist and communist governments (Rossi 2). Orwell’s views, along with his participation ...
The struggle for complete domination and power has been apparent in the past, most notably when Germany and Russia conflicted to maintain control in World War 2. In 1984, written by George Orwell, a totalitarian society seeks unlimited power by constantly monitoring it citizens. This monitoring was used to manipulate the minds and alter the thoughts of the people of Oceania. The population of Oceania is led to support ideas, which they do not truly believe. The lack of privacy and personal belief in citizens induces the idea of “doublethink”, where two contradictory ideas are both accepted. This is utilized by George Orwell to demonstrate political power and dominance. The Party forces the people to believe that “WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,
In modern times, the people in the upper government spy on residents and people of the lower government. So The Party spies on people in 1984 and the government spies on people today, there is a strong connection between today and Orwell’s vision of the future. War is a major example of an event in 1984 that has come true today. For instance, in 1984, it says “Winston could not definitely remember a time when his country had not been at war”(Orwell 25).