How Did Gandhi Use Civil Disobedience

1131 Words3 Pages

Mohandas Gandhi was a Hindu activist who led India to independence using non-violent resistance. Gandhi used many peaceful methods to lead his nation to freedom, he believed in civil disobedience which is the practice of breaking laws in nonviolent ways for moral or physiological reasons. There can be many positives and negatives to using civil disobedience. Some positives are you will gain sympathy from the people, draw the attention of the government and less people will die than if you had gone to a civil war. There are also negatives including, even though fewer people will die, many will get hurt, and civil disobedience can also get you in jail, which will garner sympathy but will also make it hard for you to fight for freedom. Civil wars …show more content…

One of Gandhi's close friends and personal advisor was Charlie Andrews, a British minister who came to Gandhi in South Africa when Gandhi was fighting for Indian rights there. Vince Walker was a New York Times journalist who followed Gandhi in his successes and failures. The last person I'm going to talk about is Mirabehn, who was the daughter of a British Admiral. She left her home and came to support Gandhi in his efforts to free India. Gandhi's practice of nonviolence involved many steps to accomplish his goal of freeing India. The first step is to investigate and identify the injustice being done to you or others. Next, you attempt to negotiate a compromise with the people committing the injustice. Then you got media coverage to gather people to your cause, in Gandhi’s time this was newspapers, but now we have a lot more social media which would make this easier. Finally, take action and protest the injustice. Gandhi and his followers used nonviolence in many of their protests. Some important protests that made significant change were the Amritsar Massacre and the Salt March. The Amritsar Massacre was a horrifying show of British

Open Document