Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explaining consequentialism and non consequentialism
Explaining consequentialism and non consequentialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this situation the officer was actually justified to kill the sniper. The theory I based my views on this matter is consequentialism. This case reminds me of a very similar one where Charles Whitman, an engineering student, wounded with a rifle over thirty people at the University of Texas at Austin, killing thirteen others. As well as the case I chose, he was also killed by a police officer. In the first place, the sniper in the story had already killed three people, 2
“three are seriously injured and three are killed.” (Thiroux/Krasmann, 187) he was a menace and he needed to be
However, if the officer is in immediate threat, he has the right to use deadly force to protect themselves from being the victim. “The Court held that the use of deadly force is subject to the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement, and that the Tennessee statute was unconstitutional in so far as it authorized the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances” (Gross,2016). Nonetheless, it also depends on the seriousness of the crime as to how excessive the force may be to control the civilian actively resisting apprehension. Conversely, “what Graham did was to set the tone for how officers should be trained to react in a given situation” (Doerner,2016). Therefore, there are variables set in place to control and monitor the law enforcement standards and training aspects
...“a pathological case” (Petrowski 350) and a “one of a kind” (Petrowski 350), how are the other shootings and massacres of thousands of innocent people to be explained? Lepine was a victim of the negligence of the community which he grew up and of the negligence of the parents who raised him.
middle of paper ... ... After I was disposed of, the corporal then made the majority of the 27 sufferers march with the rest of the troops. Most of the men, including an Australian chaplain, died during succeeding weeks, largely as a result of this calculated brutality.’ (Iggulden, 2009, p.22)
On October 20, 2014 a young male teen was fatally shot in Chicago, Illinois. The shooting occurred in the middle of the road and the suspect that was fatally shot was named Laquan McDonald. McDonald was just 17 years old and was the suspect after initial reports placed him in the scene of a possible car jacking. It was reported that Laquan McDonald had a knife and was also seen slashing tires of a police cruiser. When police had finally had him surrounded in the middle of the road, one officer opened fire and released 16 shots into his body. Another deputy on hand said the use of force was not needed because Laquan was not in any way trying to attack the officers present. The officer who fired the 16 shots into Laquan is named Jason D. Van
Twenty lives were lost, including two of the striker’s wives and eleven children, but only one of these lives belonged to the National Guard. With this in mind, it can be debated whether or not this event should be considered a battle or a massacre. Some have argued that, because of the striker’s retaliation, the event should be considered a battle, but because of previous abuse and the guard’s disregard for who they were firing at it and careless destruction, it should be considered a massacre.
...ssed as police officers, cornered and shot seven members of a top rival gang in the back. Such levels of violence were horrific however it appeared that no-one might touch him till 1931, wherever where was finally convicted for tax evasion instead of the four hundred murders he was presumed have committed.
One of the worst things about war is the severity of carnage that it bestows upon mankind. Men are killed by the millions in the worst ways imaginable. Bodies are blown apart, limbs are cracked and torn and flesh is melted away from the bone. Dying eyes watch as internal organs are spilled of empty cavities, naked torso are hung in trees and men are forced to run on stumps when their feet are blown off. Along with the horrific deaths that accompany war, the injuries often outnumber dead men. As Paul Baumer witnessed in the hospital, the injuries were terrifying and often led to death. His turmoil is expressed in the lines, “Day after day goes by with pain and fear, groans and death gurgles. Even the death room I no use anymore; it is too small.” The men who make it through the war take with them mental and physical scarification from their experiences.
The actual business of physical injury had added the more subtle process of slaughter of morale, a far more difficult, but none the less effective, method of warfare. The Germans have for a long time preached it. They practiced it from the first, 'frightfulness' being merely the German interpretation of the theory of the destruction of morale. Bernhardi lays as much stress upon it as upon perfection of maneuver. The Allies, perhaps keener students of psychology, substituted persuasion for brutality, and developed a system of military propaganda that has never before been equaled.
For example, according to Dara lind “Officer’s aren’t supposed to shoot to kill. They’re supposed to do whatever is necessary to disable the threat”(Lind). Whenever an officer gets caught up in a difficult situation where deadly force is needed for the most part officers do shoot to kill because they feel like there life is in danger themselves. Yes like they said they are supposed to do whatever is necessary so therefore if shooting to kill someone is necessary to them then for police officers it is the right thing to do. But in reality in some occasions deadly force by a cop resulting in someone’s death is not needed and there should be other alternatives to handle difficult problems like that. In addition, “Usually, the point from where the officer believes he has to use deadly force to the point where he uses deadly force -- where he pulls
Visualize a mother of two kids and a wife of a police officer waking up everyday thinking that her husband has a possibility of being killed. With that being said, I firmly believe that police officers should protect themselves with any means necessary. Recently there have been many scenarios of people claiming police brutality and also shootings taking place in regards to police officers and members of the community. Aside from the great pride that comes along with being an officer, I believe that it is the duty of an officer to protect the community around him, but that can only be done if the police officer has the full support of the community around him. The shootings and assaults that have been taking place are all in all the result of the police trying to defend themselves by making quick, rational decisions to be vigilant and better protect the community, as well as taming the increasingly
The video is a CNN news report about a young boy, Tamir Rice, being shot to death by police officers. It shows footage of the boy in a park, pointing his fake gun around at people. Another man at the park called 911 just informing them about the boy and how the gun “is probably fake”. After a few minutes, the dispatcher describes the boy to the police saying “there’s a guy sitting on a swing pointing a gun at people.” She didn’t mention once that the gun was probably fake. When the police arrived, they asked him to raise his hands. Instead, he raised the gun and was promptly shot. Both police officers were left off with a full-paid leave. This horrific video shows how terrible people can be. There were many things that could have made this
Logically would a police officer have shot to kill simply to commit murder in broad daylight with witnesses? Without all of these questions being answered with facts and being quick to judge is not only ridiculous, but it leads to more issues such as rioting and looting. It will also lead to more shootings. More innocent people will continue to be hurt. Either physically or by the loss of their business and cars, etc.
and Oscar Grant, are just a few civilians who lost their life due to excessive force from a police officers. Eric Garner death was video tape by the media and posted all over the web; Eric was in New York City simply standing in front of a corner store, Police officer say he was selling cigarettes but that information isn’t shown in the video. The video shows the officer telling Eric he’s under arrest, Eric asked why and continue to plead his cases stating he was just standing in front of the store and didn’t do anything wrong. Before you know it 5 police officers are trying to take this man down to the ground, one officer in particular had his hand around his neck holding him in a choke hold position. Eric kept repeating he cannot breathe
The answer is no, the duty of a police officer is to serve and protect and killing another person should be the last option unless the officer is in danger which would justify the use of deadly force. Critical thinking can be supported through training. Why is critical thinking important? In today’s world police officers are face with many challenging situations, not only are they outnumbered because of budget cuts but also are face with situations where their actions can cause them death or jail. Recently there have been cases where officers have been recorded acting in very violent ways when faced with difficult situations, for example the case in South Carolina where a police officer was conducting a routine stop but when the individual tried to get away, the officer pulled his weapon and shot him eight times for no apparent reason. Fantz A. & Yan, H. (2015) South Carolina shooting: Officer charged and fired; protesters demand justice. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/08/us/south-carolina-officer-charged-with-murder/index.html. It is unknown why this officer reacted the way he did, some claim racism but can it be something else? Could it be that the lack of critical
Police officers primary responsibility is to protect and serve citizens and communities, not to abuse the laws by hurting innocent people. In most states Stand-Your-Ground laws allows innocent citizens the right to use deadly force to defend and protect themselves. But what if they were protecting themselves from police brutality. Police brutality has been going on for many years; they can cause riots, injuries, and even mistrust for the police.